| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
First Half Results
WASHINGTON |
|
|
80.5
| 45
Final
37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | CHICAGO | -2 | | 604 | WASHINGTON | 80.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(115-70 since 1997.) (62.2%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(247-168 since 1997.) (59.5%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, averaging 45 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, averaging 45 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(38-10 since 1997.) (79.2%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game.
(38-13 since 1997.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(50-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(143-88 since 1997.) (61.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(81-43 since 1997.) (65.3%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(57-24 since 1997.) (70.4%, +30.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(74-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(64-28 since 1997.) (69.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(24-5 since 1997.) (82.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(31-8 since 1997.) (79.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(100-57 since 1997.) (63.7%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(106-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a non-conference game.
(647-489 since 1997.) (57%, +109.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(96-54 since 1997.) (64%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(67-33 since 1997.) (67%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(84-43 since 1997.) (66.1%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, playing with 2 days rest.
(239-154 since 1997.) (60.8%, +69.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(199-131 since 1997.) (60.3%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win.
(323-215 since 1997.) (60%, +86.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(810-602 since 1997.) (57.4%, +147.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(852-629 since 1997.) (57.5%, +160.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(527-388 since 1997.) (57.6%, +100.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(302-211 since 1997.) (58.9%, +69.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(166-100 since 1997.) (62.4%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 77 | | 39 | | 30-71 | 42.8% | 4-11 | 33.7% | 13-16 | 80.3% | 46 | 12 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | | 39 | | 28-66 | 42.6% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 16-20 | 77.7% | 42 | 9 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON covered the first half line 571 times, while CHICAGO covered the first half line 394 times.
Edge against first half line=WASHINGTON | In 1000 simulated games, 627 games went under first half total, while 373 games went over first half total.
Edge against first half total=Under |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 26-56 against the 1rst half line (-35.6 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.9 | WASHINGTON is 87-122 against the 1rst half line (-47.2 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 37.1 | WASHINGTON is 23-42 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) in home games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.6 |
|
CHICAGO is 70-98 against the 1rst half line (-37.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 42.4 | WASHINGTON is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.6, OPPONENT 38.4 | WASHINGTON is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.4, OPPONENT 35.7 |
|
CHICAGO is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 42.6 | CHICAGO is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 41.9 |
|
WASHINGTON is 103-76 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.5 | WASHINGTON is 102-67 UNDER (+28.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.3 | WASHINGTON is 75-49 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 | WASHINGTON is 99-71 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 36.4 | WASHINGTON is 65-42 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.2 | WASHINGTON is 181-138 UNDER (+29.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 35.9 | WASHINGTON is 85-52 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.9 | WASHINGTON is 134-93 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.0 | WASHINGTON is 94-63 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.6 |
|
| | | | |
|
WASHINGTON is 57-82 against the 1rst half line (-33.2 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-25 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 36-21 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-21 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 9 or less 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 156-105 UNDER (+40.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 62-38 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 80-51 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-47 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 173-130 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 133-98 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 51-31 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 199-147 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 278-199 UNDER (+59.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-52 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 158-113 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 156-119 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 51-30 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 53-30 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 83-120 against the 1rst half line (-49.0 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-48 against the 1rst half line (-31.8 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 26-44 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-51 against the 1rst half line (-30.1 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-48 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-44 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-34 against the 1rst half line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 37-58 against the 1rst half line (-26.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-52 against the 1rst half line (-29.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-27 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-64 against the 1rst half line (-28.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-49 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-29 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 16-30 against the 1rst half line (-17.0 Units) in road games in June games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 45-66 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-47 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 54-31 OVER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-17 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in June games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-15 OVER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-18 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-20 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-18 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-15 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-28 OVER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-16 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-14 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-27 OVER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 353-261 UNDER (+65.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 219-167 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 73-49 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a home underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 64-43 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a home underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 183-120 UNDER (+51.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 118-82 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 230-177 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 243-148 UNDER (+80.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 125-93 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 171-128 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 83-59 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 4 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 40-20 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 22 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 101-68 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 127-88 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-39 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 145-110 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 56-33 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 163-120 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 49-30 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-7 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 52-30 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-24 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-92 UNDER (+31.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-16 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 52-30 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 216-155 UNDER (+45.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-96 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 148-110 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-21 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 166-127 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 178-140 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 197-155 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 22-15 | -1.5 | 16-20 | 22-15 | 82.9 | 42.4 | 44.8% | 43.9 | 79.5 | 39.8 | 42.9% | 42.1 | | Road Games | 8-10 | -3.2 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 79.6 | 41.8 | 43.7% | 42.9 | 80.6 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 44.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 83.0 | 44.6 | 46.4% | 41.2 | 83.6 | 44.0 | 44.7% | 42.2 | | Division Games | 15-10 | -2.8 | 9-15 | 13-12 | 81.9 | 42.2 | 44.8% | 43.8 | 78.7 | 39.8 | 42.3% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.9 | 42.4 | 32-71 | 44.8% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 82.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.6 | 41.8 | 30-70 | 43.7% | 4-12 | 31.2% | 15-18 | 81.0% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 19-18 | -0.7 | 19-18 | 15-22 | 73.8 | 38.5 | 42.0% | 40.3 | 72.2 | 36.6 | 40.8% | 42.6 | | Home Games | 11-7 | -0.6 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 74.4 | 37.9 | 41.6% | 41.1 | 71.4 | 35.2 | 40.7% | 41.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 42.0% | 41.4 | 75.2 | 36.6 | 40.8% | 44.0 | | Division Games | 11-14 | -6.8 | 12-13 | 11-14 | 72.6 | 37.5 | 41.3% | 41.5 | 72.7 | 36.6 | 40.5% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.8 | 38.5 | 27-64 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.5 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.4 | 37.9 | 26-63 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.2 | 36.6 | 27-66 | 40.8% | 4-13 | 31.7% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.4 | 35.2 | 27-67 | 40.7% | 4-14 | 32.5% | 12-15 | 81.5% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.7, WASHINGTON 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-70 | 45-25 | -6 | W | 81.5 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 55 | 16 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 43 | 17 | | 5/18/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80-97 | 40-46 | 2 | L | 81 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | | 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | 41-37 | -2.5 | W | 84.5 | U | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | 35-53 | 1.5 | L | 82 | O | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | 42-33 | -4 | W | 76 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | 56-47 | -1 | W | 85 | O | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | NEW YORK | 76-87 | 45-45 | 1.5 | W | 69 | O | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 40 | 7 | | 5/18/2016 | DALLAS | 77-87 | 35-42 | -1.5 | L | 75 | O | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 15 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 12 | | 5/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 67-97 | 31-43 | 4 | L | 78 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | | 5/21/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 84-76 | 32-37 | 3 | L | 76.5 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | | 5/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 84-82 | 40-33 | 2.5 | W | 75 | U | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | | 5/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 77-93 | 45-42 | 4.5 | W | 80 | O | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 6 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 41 | 9 | | 6/1/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 23-17 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 20 of 40 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 11-9 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997 | | 10 of 20 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2015 | CHICAGO | 66 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -2.5 | Under | 33 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 8/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85 | 154 | ATS | 43 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 34 | 4 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 87 | -5.5 | SU Over | 45 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 49 | 15 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 158 | ATS | 39 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 41 | 10 | 5 | | | CHICAGO | 71 | -5.5 | SU Under | 34 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 50 | 9 | 6 | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 57 | 157.5 | Under | 32 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 44 | 9 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 54 | 15 | 8 | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 71 | 154 | Over | 34 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 31 | 4 | 9 | | | WASHINGTON | 86 | -1 | SU ATS | 43 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 40 | 9 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 23-12 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-26 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 46-70 against the 1rst half line (-31.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 37.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 33-52 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 37.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 84-103 against the 1rst half line (-29.3 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-29 against the 1rst half line (-15.9 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-69 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-47 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) off a road win as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-59 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-63 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 23-41 against the 1rst half line (-22.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 41-55 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 26-45 against the 1rst half line (-23.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-32 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-58 against the 1rst half line (-19.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-58 against the 1rst half line (-31.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 34-52 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-52 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 21-36 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-53 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 64-81 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 66-49 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-25 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 38-25 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 38-21 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 39.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-2 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 53-40 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 48-33 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-30 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-26 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 105-83 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-39 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-39 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-24 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in June games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 59-46 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 37-25 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 38-26 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 70-52 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 34-22 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-42 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 53-40 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 17-4 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-44 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 46-26 OVER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-22 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-13 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-24 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 25-9 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 59-38 OVER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 46-26 OVER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-18 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 59-46 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 37-24 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-31 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-13 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 54-35 OVER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 60-46 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 36-22 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 50-37 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-36 OVER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 36-22 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 52-38 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 30-15 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 80-66 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-50 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Thibault is 34-22 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 34-21 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 37.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 47-28 UNDER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 37-26 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 34-20 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-14 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 37.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-17 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 36.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 110-72 UNDER (+30.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 36.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 46-25 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 35.4, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 25 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 20 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 5 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 4 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 06/01/2016 - Natasha Cloud is upgraded to probable Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Intestinal ) | | [G] 06/01/2016 - Tierra Ruffin-Pratt injured last game, "?" Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Ankle ) | | [F] 05/26/2016 - LaToya Sanders expected to miss Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/6/2024 8:39:08 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|