Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Tuesday 7/29/2014Line$ LineOU LineScore
SEATTLE
 
TULSA
+5  

-5  
+175

-210

152.5
 		74
Final
80

Go to Top
SEATTLE (9 - 18) at TULSA (9 - 17)
View Previous GameView Next Game
Tuesday, 7/29/2014 8:05 PM
Go to Top
Board Money Line
655SEATTLE+170
656TULSA-200
BETTING TRENDSGo to Top

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)

 (0%)

OVER

 (0%)
(Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™Go to Top
StatFox Super Situations favoring TULSA against the money line
There are 2 situations with a total rating of 4 stars.
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss, on Tuesday nights.
(151-104 since 1997.) (59.2%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(107-55 since 1997.) (66%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring SEATTLE against the money line
There are 17 situations with a total rating of 35 stars.
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(475-515 since 1997.) (48%, +103.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(273-279 since 1997.) (49.5%, +98.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in July games.
(158-177 since 1997.) (47.2%, +66.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(146-129 since 1997.) (53.1%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(87-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +63.1 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(93-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights.
(92-72 since 1997.) (56.1%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(56-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +39 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(86-38 since 1997.) (69.4%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(59-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(77-50 since 1997.) (60.6%, +25.9 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(68-30 since 1997.) (69.4%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(60-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(40-21 since 1997.) (65.6%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +18 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(30-15 since 1997.) (66.7%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season.
(227-196 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 1*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™Go to Top
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
SEATTLE76 28-6345.1%7-1937.1%13-1678.6%39714
TULSA82 30-6844.1%5-1731.4%16-2078.3%441211

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 634 times, while SEATTLE won 336 times.
No Edge.
Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring SEATTLE to win against the money line
SEATTLE is 74-31 against the money line (+39.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 71.6
SEATTLE is 65-38 against the money line (+30.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 70.3
SEATTLE is 19-17 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 76.3
SEATTLE is 12-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 80.9
SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 73.4
SEATTLE is 26-29 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 72.7
TULSA is 10-30 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 80.2, OPPONENT 84.7
TULSA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.9
TULSA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.1, OPPONENT 78.8
TULSA is 5-25 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 75.5, OPPONENT 85.5
TULSA is 4-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.9, OPPONENT 82.5
TULSA is 12-33 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.9
TULSA is 9-22 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 82.9
TULSA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.3 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents this season.
The average score was TULSA 79.9, OPPONENT 86.4
TULSA is 9-26 against the money line (-15.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 84.1, OPPONENT 88.1

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring TULSA to win against the money line
SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 75.9
SEATTLE is 36-69 against the money line (-42.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.8, OPPONENT 71.4
SEATTLE is 14-45 against the money line (-37.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 79.7
SEATTLE is 1-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 83.9
SEATTLE is 29-60 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 74.9
SEATTLE is 44-78 against the money line (-49.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.8, OPPONENT 72.9
TULSA is 22-20 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 87.3, OPPONENT 85.5

View Expanded Details
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SEATTLE to win against the money line
There are 28 trends with a total rating of 26 stars.
SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 11-6 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 84-58 against the money line (+23.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 13-10 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 11-14 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 81-68 against the money line (+22.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 17-19 against the money line (+15.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 23-27 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 79-40 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 94-73 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 11-13 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 67-38 against the money line (+25.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 24-20 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 86-77 against the money line (+20.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 5-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 17-20 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*)
TULSA is 10-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 5-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 3-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 74.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*)
TULSA is 6-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 3-10 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 74.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 3-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 7-14 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*)
TULSA is 7-18 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 78.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 4-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 7-17 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 74.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SEATTLE to win against the money line
There are 27 trends with a total rating of 30 stars.
SEATTLE is 17-27 against the money line (+16.0 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 9-11 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 147-120 against the money line (+24.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 14-14 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 9-8 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.1, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 69-48 against the money line (+26.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 18-13 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 5-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 11-9 against the money line (+14.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.5, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 91-70 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 10-13 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 13-9 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 4-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 3*)
SEATTLE is 18-15 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 58-53 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 10-5 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.1, OPPONENT 66.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 18-17 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 9-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 27-22 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.4, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 19-37 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*)
TULSA is 5-19 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games in July games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 76.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 23-71 against the money line (-40.6 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 77.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 80.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 2-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 3-10 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 82.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 5-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 82.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring TULSA to win against the money line
There are 5 trends with a total rating of 5 stars.
SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*)
SEATTLE is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 66.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 12-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*)
TULSA is 13-11 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
ADVANCED TEAM STATSGo to Top
SEATTLE - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games9-18-6.19-1714-1270.634.043.1%36.175.936.845.8%39.3
Road Games4-11-4.26-87-869.333.343.1%34.974.934.945.4%38.7
Last 5 Games0-5-6.40-53-268.634.640.4%35.882.639.649.1%43.4
Division Games5-12-3.76-117-969.532.543.4%35.975.437.846.2%37.6
SEATTLE Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)70.634.026-6043.1%6-1834.5%13-1679.3%36717176132
vs opponents surrendering7838.829-6743.8%5-1533.3%14-1878.5%41917198134
Team Stats (Road Games)69.333.325-5943.1%6-1734.4%12-1581.7%35617187141
Stats Against (All Games)75.936.829-6445.8%4-1232.6%13-1781.2%39817168124
vs opponents averaging79.539.630-6744.9%5-1334.0%15-1979.5%41918188134
Stats Against (Road Games)74.934.929-6345.4%3-1229.2%14-1783.0%39918168124
TULSA - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games9-17-6.815-1018-882.639.043.3%43.284.242.846.9%40.2
Home Games6-7-1.27-67-681.840.342.0%43.280.342.546.5%39.1
Last 5 Games2-3-13-13-285.236.243.0%44.085.842.446.5%40.6
Division Games4-12-6.810-613-382.039.943.7%42.185.142.248.6%37.6
TULSA Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)82.639.030-6943.3%6-1731.7%17-2277.2%431216207123
vs opponents surrendering77.438.129-6643.9%5-1532.6%14-1878.5%41917188134
Team Stats (Home Games)81.840.329-6842.0%5-1729.5%19-2480.6%431116207113
Stats Against (All Games)84.242.831-6546.9%5-1237.4%18-2381.0%40917207125
vs opponents averaging78.138.829-6544.7%5-1434.7%15-1979.9%40917188134
Stats Against (Home Games)80.342.530-6346.5%4-1137.1%17-2180.6%39917216124
Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 71.7,  TULSA 71
View Expanded Details
SCHEDULE AND RESULTSGo to Top
SEATTLE - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
6/19/2014SAN ANTONIO82-87L-15529-6544.6%471230-7341.1%456
6/22/2014WASHINGTON89-86W-16531-7243.1%45836-6952.2%3511
6/24/2014@ LOS ANGELES57-65L+22021-5836.2%311527-6243.5%4411
6/27/2014MINNESOTA81-71W+21028-5947.5%401327-6839.7%406
6/29/2014@ MINNESOTA69-74L+32527-6144.3%291528-6443.7%4818
7/3/2014LOS ANGELES56-70L+10523-5839.7%351831-6150.8%3614
7/5/2014CHICAGO80-73W-14028-5550.9%29527-6342.9%4610
7/9/2014@ PHOENIX58-78L+37525-5942.4%432032-6847.1%306
7/11/2014@ SAN ANTONIO88-67W+17536-6555.4%361123-5442.6%2511
7/13/2014@ MINNESOTA60-77L+28023-6833.8%321231-6547.7%5116
7/15/2014CONNECTICUT63-86L-16527-6640.9%32835-6653.0%499
7/22/2014PHOENIX71-89L+21028-5848.3%382035-6553.8%2710
7/24/2014NEW YORK80-84L-17532-7841.0%38730-7142.3%5316
7/26/2014LOS ANGELES69-77L+17525-6439.1%391329-5949.2%3710
7/29/2014@ TULSA           
7/31/2014INDIANA           
8/3/2014SAN ANTONIO           
8/7/2014ATLANTA           
8/10/2014TULSA           

TULSA - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
6/19/2014@ LOS ANGELES77-87L+21030-6943.5%451434-6651.5%4414
6/20/2014@ PHOENIX80-91L+50031-7939.2%54534-6651.5%358
6/22/2014@ CHICAGO105-99W+12037-7450.0%431739-7750.6%4214
6/25/2014@ INDIANA107-102W+17039-7850.0%461434-7445.9%4512
6/28/2014LOS ANGELES89-92L-11531-7441.9%471636-7647.4%4611
6/29/2014PHOENIX77-80L+17024-7731.2%501225-5149.0%3313
7/1/2014@ NEW YORK74-90L+12028-7040.0%34936-6852.9%5214
7/3/2014@ CONNECTICUT96-83W+15535-7347.9%521231-7143.7%3812
7/5/2014CONNECTICUT76-78L-16527-6740.3%421130-6844.1%4314
7/8/2014INDIANA76-78L-11525-5942.4%411528-6344.4%3611
7/10/2014MINNESOTA85-91L+13531-7243.1%361033-6055.0%4012
7/12/2014WASHINGTON74-91L-16528-7139.4%421034-7048.6%4813
7/16/2014@ MINNESOTA82-93L+30027-6640.9%441634-7048.6%398
7/17/2014SAN ANTONIO95-90W-11530-6050.0%431033-6451.6%2912
7/22/2014@ SAN ANTONIO93-95L+14537-7152.1%31838-7054.3%419
7/25/2014@ WASHINGTON77-82L+17530-8435.7%521125-6439.1%5214
7/27/2014CHICAGO79-69W-12524-6338.1%501228-7238.9%4212
7/29/2014SEATTLE           
7/31/2014ATLANTA           
8/2/2014MINNESOTA           
8/5/2014@ LOS ANGELES           
8/8/2014SAN ANTONIO           
8/10/2014@ SEATTLE           
View Expanded Details
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORYGo to Top
All games in this series since 1997
TULSA is 15-19 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
SEATTLE is 7-4 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons

All games played at TULSA since 1997
TULSA is 8-11 (-2.6 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997
Games played at TULSA over the last 3 seasons.
SEATTLE is 3-2 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
6/15/2014SEATTLE79145.5 ATS3929-5552.7%7-1546.7%14-1877.8%29511
 TULSA85-6.5SU Over4131-6647.0%6-1735.3%17-2181.0%40148
6/1/2014TULSA60149 ATS3624-5742.1%4-1822.2%8-1080.0%40715
 SEATTLE62-3.5SU Under3725-6041.7%4-1428.6%8-1266.7%34911
9/14/2013TULSA73142.5 Over2824-6536.9%6-2524.0%19-19100.0%31915
 SEATTLE85-5.5SU ATS4429-5750.9%7-2035.0%20-2290.9%40915
9/12/2013SEATTLE76145SU ATS3627-6243.5%8-2138.1%14-1593.3%38711
 TULSA67-5.5 Under3225-6439.1%8-2433.3%9-1090.0%38911
7/17/2013TULSA86143.5SU ATS4531-5457.4%8-1361.5%16-2080.0%36417
 SEATTLE59-5.5 Over2620-5735.1%6-2227.3%13-1776.5%32919
6/22/2013SEATTLE70147 Over3025-6240.3%5-1926.3%15-1978.9%381214
 TULSA92-4.5SU ATS4131-6250.0%10-2343.5%20-2774.1%41109
6/7/2013TULSA67148.5SU ATS3423-5442.6%4-1428.6%17-2085.0%42713
 SEATTLE58-7.5 Under2924-6238.7%0-170.0%10-1471.4%34810
View Expanded Details
COACHING TRENDSGo to Top
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring SEATTLE to win against the money line
There are 64 trends with a total rating of 126 stars.
Brian is 140-104 against the money line (+45.0 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 23-13 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 34-24 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 84-62 against the money line (+36.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 36-23 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 92-64 against the money line (+38.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 86-67 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 92-66 against the money line (+34.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 83-56 against the money line (+38.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 67-43 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 77-57 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 33-17 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 29-16 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 4*)
Brian is 54-47 against the money line (+13.3 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 39-34 against the money line (+9.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 3-0 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games off 2 or more consecutive home losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 63.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 53-34 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 23-15 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 55-41 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 60-53 against the money line (+29.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 65-51 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 30-24 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 14-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 7-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 65.9 - (Rating = 4*)
Brian is 66-50 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 27-24 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 18-6 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 66.8 - (Rating = 5*)
Brian is 57-44 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 25-15 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 4*)
Brian is 10-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 66.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 73-39 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 52-24 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 69-36 against the money line (+32.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 54-30 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 80-44 against the money line (+38.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 77-58 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 114-85 against the money line (+39.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 51-36 against the money line (+29.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 73-53 against the money line (+38.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 70-54 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 106-81 against the money line (+35.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 52-19 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 33-25 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 47-35 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 65-59 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 77-59 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 112-82 against the money line (+36.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 54-30 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 78-42 against the money line (+35.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 71-53 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 100-75 against the money line (+35.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 52-44 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 75-61 against the money line (+28.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 30-23 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 42-33 against the money line (+29.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*)
Fred is 14-25 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 79.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 3-10 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 82.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Fred is 5-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 82.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Fred is 2-7 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Fred is 9-21 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 74.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 4*)
Fred is 16-26 against the money line (-22.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Fred is 6-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Fred is 14-24 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*)
Fred is 23-33 against the money line (-28.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 79.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring TULSA to win against the money line
There are 6 trends with a total rating of 7 stars.
Brian is 11-23 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 14-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Fred is 24-10 against the money line (+18.2 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*)
Fred is 13-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 82.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Fred is 17-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 82.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 31-18 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX LINE TRACKER™Go to Top
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-175 (Road=+155), Closing Money Line: Home=-200 (Road=+170)
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 205 times, while the road underdog won straight up 123 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIESGo to Top
SEATTLE
[F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Achilles )
TULSA
No significant injuries.

Last Updated: 5/1/2024 9:34:16 PM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.