| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
First Half Results
TULSA |
|
|
75
| 36
Final
35 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | SEATTLE | 75.5 | | 656 | TULSA | -2.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread against opponent after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(78-37 since 1997.) (67.8%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread against opponent after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(85-46 since 1997.) (64.9%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Tuesday nights.
(77-45 since 1997.) (63.1%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(77-40 since 1997.) (65.8%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(38-12 since 1997.) (76%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss, playing with 2 days rest.
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(95-50 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, on Tuesday nights.
(160-102 since 1997.) (61.1%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(202-121 since 1997.) (62.5%, +68.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(109-59 since 1997.) (64.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(33-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(121-71 since 1997.) (63%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(445-312 since 1997.) (58.8%, +101.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(944-738 since 1997.) (56.1%, +132.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(914-701 since 1997.) (56.6%, +142.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(445-312 since 1997.) (58.8%, +101.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(944-738 since 1997.) (56.1%, +132.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(914-701 since 1997.) (56.6%, +142.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(595-434 since 1997.) (57.8%, +117.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(132-72 since 1997.) (64.7%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(99-51 since 1997.) (66%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(280-200 since 1997.) (58.3%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, on Tuesday nights.
(56-23 since 1997.) (70.9%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(499-371 since 1997.) (57.4%, +90.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(178-110 since 1997.) (61.8%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(123-74 since 1997.) (62.4%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(108-68 since 1997.) (61.4%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(160-103 since 1997.) (60.8%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record.
(45-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(732-561 since 1997.) (56.6%, +114.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(30-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (TULSA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record.
(37-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 76 | | 38 | | 28-63 | 45.1% | 7-19 | 37.1% | 13-16 | 78.6% | 39 | 7 | 14 | | TULSA | 82 | | 41 | | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 16-20 | 78.3% | 44 | 12 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 518 times, while SEATTLE covered the first half line 482 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 631 games went over first half total, while 369 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 43.2 | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 43.7 | TULSA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 46.2 | TULSA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 45.1 | TULSA is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 47.3 | TULSA is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 44.0 | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.1, OPPONENT 44.7 | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 43.2 |
|
SEATTLE is 47-91 against the 1rst half line (-53.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 41.3 | SEATTLE is 44-77 against the 1rst half line (-40.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 35.5 |
|
SEATTLE is 103-63 OVER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 38.3 | TULSA is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 43.2 | TULSA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 42.2 | TULSA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 44.4 | TULSA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 44.0 | TULSA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.1, OPPONENT 44.7 | TULSA is 32-16 OVER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 42.7 |
|
SEATTLE is 132-80 UNDER (+44.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.0, OPPONENT 34.6 | SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.8, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 35.6 | SEATTLE is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.3 | SEATTLE is 85-37 UNDER (+44.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 34.3 | SEATTLE is 102-57 UNDER (+39.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 33.1 | SEATTLE is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.9, OPPONENT 34.8 | SEATTLE is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 33.9 | TULSA is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 33.2, OPPONENT 37.2 |
|
| | | | |
|
SEATTLE is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 30-16 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 36.6, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.5, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 33.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 42-21 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 48-25 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 33-17 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 87-61 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 47-24 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 120-86 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 164-124 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 127-87 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 161-120 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 241-164 UNDER (+60.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 66-45 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 52-32 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 153-101 UNDER (+41.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 148-112 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 68-43 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 95-56 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 68-41 against the 1rst half line (+22.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 35-14 against the 1rst half line (+19.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-17 against the 1rst half line (-9.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-17 against the 1rst half line (-9.7 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 6-14 against the 1rst half line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-16 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.5, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.2, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.0, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 36-24 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 151-102 UNDER (+38.8 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 122-80 UNDER (+34.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 160-100 UNDER (+50.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 99-67 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 87-61 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games on Tuesday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.4, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 203-138 UNDER (+51.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 38-23 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 159-107 UNDER (+41.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 154-112 UNDER (+30.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 136-98 UNDER (+28.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 71-47 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 32-19 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 142-109 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 73-46 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 33-17 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 25-8 UNDER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 9-18 | -6.1 | 9-17 | 14-12 | 70.6 | 34.0 | 43.1% | 36.1 | 75.9 | 36.8 | 45.8% | 39.3 | | Road Games | 4-11 | -4.2 | 6-8 | 7-8 | 69.3 | 33.3 | 43.1% | 34.9 | 74.9 | 34.9 | 45.4% | 38.7 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.4 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 68.6 | 34.6 | 40.4% | 35.8 | 82.6 | 39.6 | 49.1% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 5-12 | -3.7 | 6-11 | 7-9 | 69.5 | 32.5 | 43.4% | 35.9 | 75.4 | 37.8 | 46.2% | 37.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 34.0 | 26-60 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 13-16 | 79.3% | 36 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.3 | 33.3 | 25-59 | 43.1% | 6-17 | 34.4% | 12-15 | 81.7% | 35 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.9 | 36.8 | 29-64 | 45.8% | 4-12 | 32.6% | 13-17 | 81.2% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.5 | 39.6 | 30-67 | 44.9% | 5-13 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.9 | 34.9 | 29-63 | 45.4% | 3-12 | 29.2% | 14-17 | 83.0% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-17 | -6.8 | 15-10 | 18-8 | 82.6 | 39.0 | 43.3% | 43.2 | 84.2 | 42.8 | 46.9% | 40.2 | | Home Games | 6-7 | -1.2 | 7-6 | 7-6 | 81.8 | 40.3 | 42.0% | 43.2 | 80.3 | 42.5 | 46.5% | 39.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 85.2 | 36.2 | 43.0% | 44.0 | 85.8 | 42.4 | 46.5% | 40.6 | | Division Games | 4-12 | -6.8 | 10-6 | 13-3 | 82.0 | 39.9 | 43.7% | 42.1 | 85.1 | 42.2 | 48.6% | 37.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.6 | 39.0 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 31.7% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 43 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.8 | 40.3 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 5-17 | 29.5% | 19-24 | 80.6% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.2 | 42.8 | 31-65 | 46.9% | 5-12 | 37.4% | 18-23 | 81.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.1 | 38.8 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 5-14 | 34.7% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.3 | 42.5 | 30-63 | 46.5% | 4-11 | 37.1% | 17-21 | 80.6% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 71.7, TULSA 71 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/19/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-87 | 27-35 | -1.5 | L | 73 | U | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | | 6/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 89-86 | 45-41 | -2 | W | 69.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | | 6/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-65 | 26-32 | 3.5 | L | 73 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | | 6/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | 33-26 | 3.5 | W | 73 | U | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | | 6/29/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 69-74 | 32-42 | 5 | L | 72.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | | 7/3/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 56-70 | 22-40 | 1 | L | 73 | U | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | | 7/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 80-73 | 45-45 | -1.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 29 | 5 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 10 | | 7/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 58-78 | 20-37 | 6 | L | 75 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | | 7/11/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 88-67 | 47-35 | 2.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 11 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 11 | | 7/13/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 60-77 | 28-34 | 4.5 | L | 73 | U | 23-68 | 33.8% | 32 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 16 | | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 63-86 | 30-39 | -2 | L | 70 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 32 | 8 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 9 | | 7/22/2014 | PHOENIX | 71-89 | 36-47 | 3.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 20 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 27 | 10 | | 7/24/2014 | NEW YORK | 80-84 | 45-41 | -2 | W | 70.5 | O | 32-78 | 41.0% | 38 | 7 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 53 | 16 | | 7/26/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 69-77 | 34-37 | 2.5 | L | 73 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 39 | 13 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 10 | | 7/29/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/19/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | 36-46 | 3.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | | 6/20/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 80-91 | 38-45 | 6.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 5 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 35 | 8 | | 6/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 105-99 | 38-48 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 42 | 14 | | 6/25/2014 | @ INDIANA | 107-102 | 36-51 | 2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | | 6/28/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 89-92 | 32-47 | -0.5 | L | 79 | P | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 77-80 | 37-31 | 2.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | | 7/1/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 74-90 | 35-46 | 1.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | | 7/3/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-83 | 43-40 | 2 | W | 79 | O | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | | 7/5/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 76-78 | 35-37 | -2 | L | 81.5 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | | 7/8/2014 | INDIANA | 76-78 | 34-41 | -0.5 | L | 76 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | | 7/10/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-91 | 49-55 | 1.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | | 7/12/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74-91 | 42-55 | -2 | L | 76.5 | O | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | | 7/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-93 | 39-40 | 5 | W | 82.5 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | | 7/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 95-90 | 38-45 | -0.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 43 | 10 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 29 | 12 | | 7/22/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 93-95 | 34-37 | 2 | L | 80.5 | U | 37-71 | 52.1% | 31 | 8 | 38-70 | 54.3% | 41 | 9 | | 7/25/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-82 | 37-49 | 2.5 | L | 80 | O | 30-84 | 35.7% | 52 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 52 | 14 | | 7/27/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-69 | 33-41 | -1 | L | 80.5 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 12 | | 7/29/2014 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| TULSA is 19-19 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | | 19 of 36 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 6-5 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 10 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 11-8 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 12 of 19 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/15/2014 | SEATTLE | 79 | 145.5 | ATS | 39 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 29 | 5 | 11 | | | TULSA | 85 | -6.5 | SU Over | 41 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 14 | 8 | 6/1/2014 | TULSA | 60 | 149 | ATS | 36 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 40 | 7 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 62 | -3.5 | SU Under | 37 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 9/14/2013 | TULSA | 73 | 142.5 | Over | 28 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 19-19 | 100.0% | 31 | 9 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 9/12/2013 | SEATTLE | 76 | 145 | SU ATS | 36 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 38 | 7 | 11 | | | TULSA | 67 | -5.5 | Under | 32 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 38 | 9 | 11 | 7/17/2013 | TULSA | 86 | 143.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 36 | 4 | 17 | | | SEATTLE | 59 | -5.5 | Over | 26 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 32 | 9 | 19 | 6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 70 | 147 | Over | 30 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 12 | 14 | | | TULSA | 92 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 41 | 10 | 9 | 6/7/2013 | TULSA | 67 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 42 | 7 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 58 | -7.5 | Under | 29 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 0-17 | 0.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 34 | 8 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 77-60 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) off a home loss as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 51-36 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 54-38 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-19 against the 1rst half line (+14.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 32-20 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 19-6 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 60-40 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 27-14 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 47-28 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 64-40 against the 1rst half line (+20.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 71-50 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 108-91 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 50-37 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 74-52 against the 1rst half line (+16.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 103-85 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 105-90 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 32-21 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 45-30 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in July games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-16 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in home games off a home win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 41.5, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 13-2 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) in home games off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 41.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 40.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fred is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 146-100 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 70-46 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-36 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 40-19 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-8 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 77-47 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 65-43 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 67-34 UNDER (+29.6 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 88-57 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 33-20 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total on Tuesday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 90-69 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 85-67 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 93-66 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 79-62 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 24-8 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 67-48 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 115-77 UNDER (+30.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 54-31 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.3, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-43 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 28-10 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 37-21 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 41-17 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive home losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 60-29 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 61-35 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 67-44 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-24 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-44 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 33-18 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 63-36 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 72-44 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 26-10 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-46 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 48-36 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 70-53 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 78-59 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 117-83 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 70-54 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 70-56 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 111-77 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 47-27 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 49-34 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 72-51 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 77-61 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 115-81 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 70-53 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 70-54 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 103-71 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 78-55 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-35 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 167 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 156 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 19 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 23 games went over the first half total, while 10 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over | | Over the last 3 seasons, 14 games went over the first half total, while 6 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Since 1997, 7 games went over the first half total, while 4 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Achilles ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 8:39:19 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|