| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
TULSA |
|
|
158.5
| 86
Final
75 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | MINNESOTA | -500 | | 654 | TULSA | +350 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(312-187 since 1997.) (62.5%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(92-64 since 1997.) (59%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(50-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(69-44 since 1997.) (61.1%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more.
(56-30 since 1997.) (65.1%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games.
(32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, vs. division opponents.
(24-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(20-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +18.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(230-235 since 1997.) (49.5%, +78.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(160-46 since 1997.) (77.7%, +71.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(183-44 since 1997.) (80.6%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(207-81 since 1997.) (71.9%, +71.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(216-87 since 1997.) (71.3%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(217-72 since 1997.) (75.1%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(200-84 since 1997.) (70.4%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(132-107 since 1997.) (55.2%, +61.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(127-38 since 1997.) (77%, +57.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in May, June, or July games.
(113-35 since 1997.) (76.4%, +56.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(113-38 since 1997.) (74.8%, +56 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(120-105 since 1997.) (53.3%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(114-40 since 1997.) (74%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(116-33 since 1997.) (77.9%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(155-93 since 1997.) (62.5%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(128-48 since 1997.) (72.7%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(95-22 since 1997.) (81.2%, +49.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(48-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +37 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(111-36 since 1997.) (75.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win.
(90-19 since 1997.) (82.6%, +47.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(108-43 since 1997.) (71.5%, +46.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(114-47 since 1997.) (70.8%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +45.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record, in July games.
(76-16 since 1997.) (82.6%, +45 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win.
(105-43 since 1997.) (70.9%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(68-14 since 1997.) (82.9%, +44.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record.
(87-20 since 1997.) (81.3%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(102-37 since 1997.) (73.4%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(61-8 since 1997.) (88.4%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(67-18 since 1997.) (78.8%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(52-6 since 1997.) (89.7%, +39.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(94-61 since 1997.) (60.6%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(28-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.3%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(60-11 since 1997.) (84.5%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(65-14 since 1997.) (82.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(62-12 since 1997.) (83.8%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(80-44 since 1997.) (64.5%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(57-10 since 1997.) (85.1%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(32-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.5%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(55-9 since 1997.) (85.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in July games.
(60-16 since 1997.) (78.9%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(69-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record.
(49-8 since 1997.) (86%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record.
(49-9 since 1997.) (84.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, in July games.
(49-9 since 1997.) (84.5%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(54-14 since 1997.) (79.4%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record.
(39-4 since 1997.) (90.7%, +32 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, in July games.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +24.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(39-4 since 1997.) (90.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record.
(40-6 since 1997.) (87%, +30.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(53-15 since 1997.) (77.9%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(49-12 since 1997.) (80.3%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season, on Saturday games.
(35-5 since 1997.) (87.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season, in July games.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season, on Saturday games.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record, in July games.
(43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 90 points or more.
(34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(36-19 since 1997.) (65.5%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(43-10 since 1997.) (81.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good defensive team - shooting pct defense of <=40% on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(41-21 since 1997.) (66.1%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 83 | | 32-69 | 46.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 48 | 12 | 14 | | TULSA | 76 | | 26-68 | 38.9% | 8-22 | 36.8% | 15-20 | 77.2% | 41 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 670 times, while TULSA won 307 times.
Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 71.2 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 70.9 | MINNESOTA is 17-2 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 22-4 against the money line (+16.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 75.2 | MINNESOTA is 51-10 against the money line (+26.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.8, OPPONENT 76.1 | MINNESOTA is 20-3 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.6, OPPONENT 76.9 | TULSA is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 77.2, OPPONENT 87.5 | TULSA is 2-18 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 72.6, OPPONENT 87.2 | TULSA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 73.2, OPPONENT 81.5 | TULSA is 4-39 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.5, OPPONENT 89.0 | TULSA is 2-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 78.3, OPPONENT 91.7 | TULSA is 7-39 against the money line (-25.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 87.4 | TULSA is 2-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.9, OPPONENT 84.1 | TULSA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 74.1, OPPONENT 84.0 |
|
MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | MINNESOTA is 72-85 against the money line (-39.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.3 | MINNESOTA is 5-6 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | MINNESOTA is 10-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.2 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-5 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 18-18 against the money line (-29.6 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 93-99 against the money line (-61.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-11 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus pathetic teams - shooting <=40% with a defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.1, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus pathetic teams - shooting <=40% with a defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 50-84 against the money line (-42.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 80-118 against the money line (-52.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 82-106 against the money line (-39.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 122-149 against the money line (-53.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 70.8, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 115-145 against the money line (-53.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-43 against the money line (-25.2 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 93-100 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 30-29 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 51-45 against the money line (-39.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-15 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 70.4, OPPONENT 66.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 26-22 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 61-84 against the money line (-37.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 93-122 against the money line (-42.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 7-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 81.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 40-13 against the money line (+18.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-2 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 7-34 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 74.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 77.9, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 74.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 2-16 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 73.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 6-24 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 230-260 against the money line (-81.0 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 138-87 against the money line (-59.2 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-9 against the money line (-18.9 Units) as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-12 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-12 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 59-93 against the money line (-66.4 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 152-182 against the money line (-82.5 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 44-48 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 2-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-23 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in road games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 67.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 2-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 40-46 against the money line (-27.5 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-11 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-9 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 96-131 against the money line (-74.7 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 52-60 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-10 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-3 | -2.5 | 8-5 | 4-9 | 82.6 | 42.4 | 44.8% | 47.9 | 74.8 | 38.5 | 39.9% | 41.2 | | Road Games | 3-3 | -7.5 | 2-4 | 1-5 | 72.8 | 36.0 | 40.9% | 48.3 | 78.8 | 42.5 | 42.0% | 41.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 81.6 | 43.2 | 44.9% | 47.8 | 70.6 | 37.6 | 38.5% | 42.0 | | Division Games | 7-2 | +3 | 5-4 | 2-7 | 82.3 | 41.0 | 44.5% | 47.6 | 75.4 | 38.9 | 40.3% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.6 | 42.4 | 31-70 | 44.8% | 3-11 | 31.7% | 17-21 | 77.9% | 48 | 12 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.4 | 39.5 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 15-20 | 78.1% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 36.0 | 29-71 | 40.9% | 3-11 | 23.9% | 12-17 | 71.6% | 48 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 38.5 | 28-69 | 39.9% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 76.3% | 41 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.8 | 40 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.8 | 42.5 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 6-16 | 36.5% | 17-22 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 3-12 | -5.2 | 8-7 | 9-6 | 77.5 | 37.3 | 38.7% | 40.6 | 84.4 | 41.3 | 47.7% | 45.7 | | Home Games | 2-4 | -2.7 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 86.7 | 40.7 | 42.2% | 41.7 | 87.3 | 42.2 | 47.1% | 45.8 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 71.2 | 35.2 | 36.1% | 40.2 | 86.8 | 45.0 | 49.5% | 45.4 | | Division Games | 2-5 | +0.5 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 80.3 | 37.3 | 42.3% | 39.1 | 82.4 | 40.4 | 47.6% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.5 | 37.3 | 27-69 | 38.7% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 41 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 38.1 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.7 | 40.7 | 30-72 | 42.2% | 9-22 | 42.1% | 17-21 | 78.1% | 42 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.4 | 41.3 | 32-67 | 47.7% | 5-15 | 35.9% | 15-20 | 76.2% | 46 | 11 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 39.5 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-20 | 78.9% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 87.3 | 42.2 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 7-17 | 39.2% | 16-21 | 76.0% | 46 | 11 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.8, TULSA 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/6/2013 | PHOENIX | 99-79 | W | -600 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 47 | 6 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 43 | 11 | | 6/8/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -850 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 55 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 14 | | 6/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 87-72 | W | | 28-63 | 44.4% | 48 | 15 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 36 | 12 | | 6/14/2013 | @ TULSA | 83-74 | W | -600 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | | 6/19/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 80-69 | W | -165 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 54 | 10 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 32 | 8 | | 6/21/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-87 | L | +145 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 39 | 16 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 55 | 14 | | 6/23/2013 | TULSA | 88-79 | W | | 32-60 | 53.3% | 41 | 13 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 11 | | 6/28/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 88-64 | W | -270 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 52 | 14 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 31 | 14 | | 7/2/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 66-96 | L | +135 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 43 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 8 | | 7/7/2013 | PHOENIX | 91-59 | W | -270 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 51 | 8 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 46 | 21 | | 7/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 94-72 | W | -220 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 47 | 10 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 46 | 18 | | 7/11/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-62 | W | -175 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 8 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 39 | 15 | | 7/13/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-58 | W | +250 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 10 | | 6/8/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-76 | L | | 27-67 | 40.3% | 35 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 20 | | 6/14/2013 | MINNESOTA | 74-83 | L | +400 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | | 6/16/2013 | PHOENIX | 103-108 | L | +200 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 42 | 10 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | | 6/20/2013 | CHICAGO | 83-74 | W | +200 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 9 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 51 | 15 | | 6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 92-70 | W | -200 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 14 | | 6/23/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-88 | L | | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 11 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 41 | 13 | | 6/28/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-80 | L | +135 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/30/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 61-84 | L | +145 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | | 7/2/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-88 | L | +180 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 78-94 | L | +280 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | | 7/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 18-11 (+7.7 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 5-0 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 8-8 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 4-0 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/23/2013 | TULSA | 79 | 161.5 | ATS | 40 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 9-28 | 32.1% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 37 | 6 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -15 | SU Over | 49 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 41 | 8 | 13 | 6/14/2013 | MINNESOTA | 83 | -10.5 | SU Under | 39 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 53 | 15 | 13 | | | TULSA | 74 | 162 | ATS | 35 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 37 | 13 | 5 | 8/31/2012 | TULSA | 83 | 164 | ATS | 56 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 34 | 6 | 9 | | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -18 | SU Over | 48 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 48 | 18 | 9 | 8/19/2012 | TULSA | 59 | 170 | Under | 39 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 37 | 10 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -17 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 48 | 7 | 19 | 7/12/2012 | TULSA | 74 | 168 | ATS | 38 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 44 | 12 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 89 | -17.5 | SU Under | 55 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 54 | 11 | 19 | 7/10/2012 | MINNESOTA | 107 | -12.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 41-59 | 69.5% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 32 | 5 | 16 | | | TULSA | 86 | 164 | Over | 46 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 26 | 8 | 17 | 6/9/2012 | MINNESOTA | 93 | -13.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 34-60 | 56.7% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 35 | 7 | 16 | | | TULSA | 73 | 153 | Over | 42 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 34 | 9 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 26-12 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 17-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 32-10 against the money line (+15.3 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 28-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 22-11 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 16-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 9-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 18-10 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 2-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 79.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 1-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 74.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Gary is 7-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 81.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/26/2024 8:07:30 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|