| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SAN ANTONIO
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
156
| 84
Final
86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | SAN ANTONIO | +180 | | 602 | CONNECTICUT | -220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(269-183 since 1997.) (59.5%, +79.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(207-76 since 1997.) (73.1%, +76.3 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(228-94 since 1997.) (70.8%, +73.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(161-46 since 1997.) (77.8%, +72.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(210-87 since 1997.) (70.7%, +67.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(178-54 since 1997.) (76.7%, +59.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(111-28 since 1997.) (79.9%, +57.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record.
(140-53 since 1997.) (72.5%, +56.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record.
(148-58 since 1997.) (71.8%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(105-23 since 1997.) (82%, +55 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread against opponent after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(70-42 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(55-10 since 1997.) (84.6%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a home loss.
(50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(42-13 since 1997.) (76.4%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(34-12 since 1997.) (73.9%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-26 since 1997.) (65.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(31-4 since 1997.) (88.6%, +21.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after trailing their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a upset loss as a favorite, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(256-111 since 1997.) (69.8%, +80.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(232-235 since 1997.) (49.7%, +80.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(269-183 since 1997.) (59.5%, +79.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(122-105 since 1997.) (53.7%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(152-105 since 1997.) (59.1%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(103-37 since 1997.) (73.6%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(43-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +32.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(118-81 since 1997.) (59.3%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(95-63 since 1997.) (60.1%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season, in July games.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +19.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(29-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SAN ANTONIO | 75 | | 29-72 | 40.2% | 6-19 | 34.8% | 10-13 | 76.8% | 42 | 11 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | | 31-69 | 45.0% | 5-14 | 36.0% | 13-16 | 76.9% | 49 | 12 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 620 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 352 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 11-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.9, OPPONENT 79.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 20-18 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.1, OPPONENT 79.9 | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 82.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in home games when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 77.2 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 27-66 against the money line (-58.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 26-58 against the money line (-39.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 38-60 against the money line (-30.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.8, OPPONENT 75.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 9-19 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.1, OPPONENT 85.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 81-108 against the money line (-52.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 60-26 against the money line (+26.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 29-13 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 43-18 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 76.0 | CONNECTICUT is 33-10 against the money line (+19.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 78.9 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 13-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 83.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 66-74 against the money line (-41.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 95-122 against the money line (-48.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-22 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 127-165 against the money line (-53.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-35 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-7 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 7-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 83.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-17 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 84.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-13 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 161-210 against the money line (-66.2 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 56-76 against the money line (-37.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 75-115 against the money line (-51.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.6, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 56-76 against the money line (-37.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-109 against the money line (-60.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-54 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-8 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 5*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 78-108 against the money line (-45.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 49-69 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-26 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-32 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 58-74 against the money line (-36.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 51-75 against the money line (-37.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-37 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 82-117 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-21 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 76-29 against the money line (+23.7 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-21 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-19 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-9 | +1 | 5-8 | 5-8 | 73.3 | 36.3 | 40.0% | 38.6 | 82.2 | 39.8 | 47.7% | 45.2 | | Road Games | 2-5 | +1.6 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 69.9 | 34.6 | 38.0% | 38.3 | 83.7 | 39.3 | 49.8% | 46.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 74.2 | 35.8 | 40.4% | 35.8 | 86.4 | 44.0 | 49.5% | 46.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.3 | 36.3 | 28-71 | 40.0% | 5-17 | 32.6% | 11-16 | 71.4% | 39 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.4 | 38.3 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.9 | 34.6 | 27-72 | 38.0% | 5-17 | 31.0% | 10-14 | 70.3% | 38 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 39.8 | 31-64 | 47.7% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.1 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.7 | 39.3 | 32-64 | 49.8% | 5-12 | 40.2% | 15-19 | 81.7% | 46 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 17 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 3-9 | -10.4 | 4-8 | 3-8 | 72.5 | 35.2 | 39.8% | 46.2 | 77.1 | 39.5 | 42.1% | 44.6 | | Home Games | 2-5 | -7.7 | 3-4 | 2-4 | 73.4 | 35.7 | 39.6% | 47.9 | 76.0 | 39.7 | 41.8% | 42.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 74.2 | 34.0 | 40.6% | 48.6 | 79.4 | 41.6 | 42.2% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.5 | 35.2 | 28-71 | 39.8% | 5-13 | 34.6% | 11-16 | 72.3% | 46 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.4 | 35.7 | 28-70 | 39.6% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 14-19 | 72.2% | 48 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.1 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 42.1% | 4-12 | 36.1% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 45 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.6 | 38.4 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.0 | 39.7 | 29-68 | 41.8% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 43 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 72.6, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | CHICAGO | 81-69 | W | +155 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 43 | 11 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 14 | | 6/9/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 70-72 | L | +250 | 27-86 | 31.4% | 41 | 7 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 62 | 19 | | 6/11/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-87 | L | | 28-73 | 38.4% | 36 | 12 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 48 | 15 | | 6/15/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 48-84 | L | +325 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 37 | 22 | 36-61 | 59.0% | 34 | 15 | | 6/21/2013 | SEATTLE | 86-91 | L | -250 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 32 | 9 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 34 | 10 | | 6/23/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 78-77 | W | +210 | 35-91 | 38.5% | 49 | 11 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 55 | 21 | | 6/25/2013 | PHOENIX | 77-83 | L | +180 | 30-83 | 36.1% | 41 | 7 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 56 | 12 | | 6/30/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 67-93 | L | +550 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 32 | 21 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 45 | 18 | | 7/6/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 66-93 | L | +550 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 15 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/10/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 88-80 | W | +350 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 35 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 35 | 17 | | 7/12/2013 | WASHINGTON | 73-83 | L | -165 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 7 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 51 | 16 | | 7/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | WASHINGTON | 62-66 | L | -270 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 53 | 11 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 42 | 11 | | 6/12/2013 | @ INDIANA | 73-61 | W | +145 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 47 | 17 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 11 | | 6/14/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 68-78 | L | -110 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 11 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 63 | 16 | | 6/16/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-78 | L | -400 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 10 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | | 6/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 77-78 | L | +170 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 56 | 18 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 14 | | 6/29/2013 | PHOENIX | 70-89 | L | +170 | 18-67 | 26.9% | 51 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 48 | 12 | | 7/2/2013 | TULSA | 88-69 | W | -220 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | | 7/6/2013 | @ INDIANA | 66-78 | L | +170 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 34 | 8 | | 7/12/2013 | CHICAGO | 70-83 | L | +145 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 12 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 12 | | 7/14/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 14-11 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 8-4 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 1-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/30/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 84 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 48 | 14 | 8 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 73 | -7 | Under | 40 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 47 | 9 | 16 | 5/25/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 79 | 158.5 | ATS | 35 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -7 | SU Over | 36 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 42 | 7 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Dan is 41-31 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 88-78 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 16-13 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 14-7 against the money line (+9.3 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 6-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 84.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 35-30 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-18 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 70.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 1-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 0-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 1-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 5-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 75.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Dan is 126-140 against the money line (-32.4 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 60-73 against the money line (-25.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-26 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 59-70 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 28-36 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 44-57 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 60-75 against the money line (-29.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-49 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 11-25 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 31-34 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 51-54 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-57 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 20-30 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 59-73 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 6-19 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Dan is 51-44 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 73-77 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 11-15 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 91-90 against the money line (-33.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 99-109 against the money line (-32.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-29 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 83-73 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 49-44 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 58-26 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 74.4, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 169 times, while the road underdog won straight up 65 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/08/2013 - Becky Hammon out for season ( Knee ) | | [F] 05/23/2013 - Sophia Young out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 07/12/2013 - Tan White expected to miss another week ( Finger ) | | [G] 07/13/2013 - Renee Montgomery "?" Sunday vs. SA Silver Stars ( Ankle ) | | [G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Undisclosed ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/7/2024 4:08:44 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|