| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
147
| 73
Final
72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | CONNECTICUT | +135 | | 654 | SAN ANTONIO | -155 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(295-104 since 1997.) (73.9%, +88.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(381-237 since 1997.) (61.7%, +86.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(316-115 since 1997.) (73.3%, +85.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(273-106 since 1997.) (72%, +78.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(260-93 since 1997.) (73.7%, +77.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(280-112 since 1997.) (71.4%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(240-104 since 1997.) (69.8%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(204-75 since 1997.) (73.1%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(263-109 since 1997.) (70.7%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(270-114 since 1997.) (70.3%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(204-79 since 1997.) (72.1%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record.
(161-68 since 1997.) (70.3%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(106-36 since 1997.) (74.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(76-28 since 1997.) (73.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(71-53 since 1997.) (57.3%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(39-20 since 1997.) (66.1%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an embarrassing road loss scoring less than 55 points, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(22-12 since 1997.) (64.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(224-176 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +45.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(209-155 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(243-199 since 1997.) (55%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less.
(79-36 since 1997.) (68.7%, +45 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(76-28 since 1997.) (73.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(131-81 since 1997.) (61.8%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(94-70 since 1997.) (57.3%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(97-53 since 1997.) (64.7%, +28.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(34-10 since 1997.) (77.3%, +25.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Friday nights.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(53-27 since 1997.) (66.2%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an embarrassing road loss scoring less than 55 points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an embarrassing road loss scoring less than 55 points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, on Friday nights.
(35-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, on Friday nights.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +20.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 74 | | 29-67 | 43.4% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 9-12 | 73.2% | 41 | 9 | 13 | | SAN ANTONIO | 73 | | 28-64 | 42.9% | 4-11 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 78.4% | 43 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 491 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 484 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 139-101 against the money line (+27.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 | CONNECTICUT is 109-89 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 73.3 | CONNECTICUT is 66-44 against the money line (+20.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 72.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 55-55 against the money line (-33.3 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 36-84 against the money line (-68.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 77.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 32-59 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 63-91 against the money line (-52.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 1-7 against the money line (-6.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.4, OPPONENT 83.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 24-27 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 10-20 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 94-125 against the money line (-52.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 75.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-20 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 81.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 82-130 against the money line (-59.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 75.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-25 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 40-62 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 13-35 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.8, OPPONENT 76.0 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 31-11 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-97 against the money line (-42.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 77-111 against the money line (-48.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 109-147 against the money line (-57.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 130-154 against the money line (-51.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-148 against the money line (-52.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-35 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-24 against the money line (-30.4 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-59 against the money line (-41.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 115-145 against the money line (-50.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-21 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-28 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when playing with 2 days rest this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) against Western conference opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-20 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-21 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-70 against the money line (-44.1 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 82-59 against the money line (-45.2 Units) as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 115-113 against the money line (-52.8 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-88 against the money line (-48.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 59-101 against the money line (-52.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-93 against the money line (-41.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 69-117 against the money line (-54.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-150 against the money line (-66.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-93 against the money line (-41.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-103 against the money line (-43.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 54-83 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 42-55 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-20 against the money line (-12.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-25 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 55 points or less since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after a combined score of 115 points or less since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-33 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 61-107 against the money line (-41.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 71-111 against the money line (-43.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-41 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-127 against the money line (-48.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-51 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-121 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-150 against the money line (-49.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-19 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-32 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-15 against the money line (-12.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-18 | +4.2 | 15-16 | 18-13 | 75.1 | 36.5 | 42.2% | 40.1 | 76.9 | 38.9 | 44.1% | 42.0 | | Road Games | 6-9 | +6.6 | 6-9 | 9-6 | 72.6 | 33.1 | 39.8% | 40.3 | 77.4 | 35.6 | 42.5% | 45.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 65.2 | 29.4 | 39.5% | 36.2 | 76.2 | 38.4 | 45.6% | 43.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.1 | 36.5 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 12-16 | 73.7% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.6 | 33.1 | 27-68 | 39.8% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-17 | 73.5% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.9 | 38.9 | 28-64 | 44.1% | 5-13 | 34.9% | 16-19 | 82.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.4 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 16-19 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.4 | 35.6 | 27-64 | 42.5% | 5-13 | 35.1% | 19-23 | 82.1% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 7-23 | -13.2 | 15-14 | 13-17 | 68.9 | 34.5 | 39.8% | 40.1 | 77.4 | 38.0 | 46.1% | 42.3 | | Home Games | 7-8 | -0.2 | 7-8 | 6-9 | 70.5 | 35.8 | 40.6% | 42.0 | 76.1 | 38.3 | 45.4% | 41.3 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 57.2 | 28.8 | 31.0% | 41.8 | 76.8 | 39.0 | 47.3% | 45.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 34.5 | 26-64 | 39.8% | 4-12 | 30.2% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.8 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.5 | 35.8 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 4-12 | 32.6% | 15-20 | 75.6% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.4 | 38.0 | 31-67 | 46.1% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 12-16 | 76.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-18 | 80.7% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.1 | 38.3 | 31-67 | 45.4% | 4-11 | 36.1% | 11-15 | 73.1% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.1, SAN ANTONIO 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 73-75 | L | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | 67-66 | W | -300 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 47 | 16 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 15 | | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 70-83 | L | +200 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-51 | W | -165 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | +105 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 40 | 9 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-84 | L | +220 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 11 | | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | 80-74 | W | -175 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 10 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 13 | | 8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | 78-90 | L | +175 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 17 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 33 | 7 | | 8/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 77-90 | L | +145 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | | 8/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-84 | L | +180 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | | 8/23/2015 | ATLANTA | 92-102 | L | +120 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | | 8/25/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 57-71 | L | +250 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | | 8/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 80-81 | L | +250 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 33 | 8 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 42 | 16 | | 8/29/2015 | NEW YORK | 66-80 | L | +220 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 18 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 15 | | 8/30/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 72-68 | W | +325 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 46 | 15 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 47 | 9 | | 9/1/2015 | @ INDIANA | 51-81 | L | +375 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 33 | 16 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 46 | 15 | | 9/4/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/29/2015 | ATLANTA | 102-85 | W | -165 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | 53-88 | L | +100 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 78-80 | L | +175 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | | 8/4/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 51-82 | L | +145 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | | 8/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-66 | L | +400 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 9 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 46 | 12 | | 8/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 88-81 | W | -200 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 35 | 16 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 32 | 15 | | 8/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-83 | L | | 30-76 | 39.5% | 44 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 40 | 14 | | 8/16/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 63-72 | L | +120 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 33 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 46 | 16 | | 8/19/2015 | NEW YORK | 45-73 | L | +210 | 17-63 | 27.0% | 41 | 19 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 50 | 15 | | 8/21/2015 | MINNESOTA | 61-78 | L | +280 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 39 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 43 | 13 | | 8/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 59-90 | L | +175 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 45 | 10 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 50 | 10 | | 8/28/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-83 | L | +155 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 33 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 45 | 18 | | 8/30/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 52-60 | L | +500 | 22-75 | 29.3% | 51 | 11 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 41 | 14 | | 9/4/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 17-13 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-2 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 7-8 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 1-1 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 51 | 150.5 | Under | 30 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 29 | 1 | 21 | | | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 50 | 12 | 17 | 8/1/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 156 | SU ATS | 43 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 44 | 9 | 13 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 79 | -5 | Over | 30 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 39 | 12 | 11 | 7/1/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 74 | 153.5 | SU ATS | 27 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 33 | 6 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 71 | -3.5 | Under | 30 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 47 | 10 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 55-39 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 73.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 157-193 against the money line (-47.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 86-55 against the money line (-32.4 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 66-44 against the money line (-33.7 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 92-84 against the money line (-36.4 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-38 against the money line (-31.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 82-74 against the money line (-35.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-83 against the money line (-49.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 30-47 against the money line (-23.7 Units) on Friday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 60-67 against the money line (-20.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 94-122 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 57-82 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 77-108 against the money line (-40.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 60-67 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 55-74 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-57 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 6-23 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 36-42 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-79 against the money line (-29.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 37-38 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 50-53 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 45-78 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 36-40 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 19-28 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 76-90 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 34-37 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 74-88 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 80-106 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 12-34 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 5-14 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-62 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 73.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 72-67 against the money line (-20.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 61-79 against the money line (-33.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 87-102 against the money line (-36.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 73-77 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 79-89 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 114-129 against the money line (-43.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-71 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 80-97 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 84-110 against the money line (-37.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 126-156 against the money line (-48.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 18-17 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 110-113 against the money line (-34.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-84 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 101-118 against the money line (-36.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 20-45 against the money line (-26.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 34-66 against the money line (-31.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Anne is 9-33 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Anne is 12-32 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 16-36 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 6-15 against the money line (-12.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 17-37 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 10-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 67.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 22-38 against the money line (-21.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 70.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 22-8 against the money line (+11.5 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 185 times, while the road underdog won straight up 133 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times, while the road underdog won straight up 15 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/24/2015 - Alex Bentley out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | | [F] 08/15/2015 - Alyssa Thomas out indefinitely ( Shoulder ) | | [C] 08/13/2015 - Elizabeth Williams out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 5:52:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|