WNBA SANANTONIO Matchup 20150904

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Friday 9/4/2015

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
SAN ANTONIO

+2.5

-2.5

72.5

33
Final
36

CONNECTICUT (13 - 18) at SAN ANTONIO (7 - 23)

Friday, 9/4/2015 8:05 PM

Board		First Half
653	CONNECTICUT	72.5
654	SAN ANTONIO	-1.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

KEY GAME INFORMATION

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 6 situations with a total rating of 15 stars.

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(70-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(56-27 since 1997.) (67.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 6 or more consecutive losses.
(34-10 since 1997.) (77.3%, +23 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 6 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record.
(33-10 since 1997.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(50-21 since 1997.) (70.4%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(32-8 since 1997.) (80%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 12 situations with a total rating of 23 stars.

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more.
(41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(66-35 since 1997.) (65.3%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(125-76 since 1997.) (62.2%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(48-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(56-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(44-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(65-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(69-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 207 situations with a total rating of 460 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in August or September games.
(311-214 since 1997.) (59.2%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - playing with 3 or more days rest.
(211-137 since 1997.) (60.6%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game.
(591-377 since 1997.) (61.1%, +176.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(258-153 since 1997.) (62.8%, +89.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(183-102 since 1997.) (64.2%, +70.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(397-264 since 1997.) (60.1%, +106.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(146-74 since 1997.) (66.4%, +64.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(258-170 since 1997.) (60.3%, +71 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(323-206 since 1997.) (61.1%, +96.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(107-64 since 1997.) (62.6%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(166-112 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(245-164 since 1997.) (59.9%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(115-65 since 1997.) (63.9%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(101-51 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(70-40 since 1997.) (63.6%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(201-129 since 1997.) (60.9%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(101-51 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(101-51 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%).
(96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(323-199 since 1997.) (61.9%, +104.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(245-141 since 1997.) (63.5%, +89.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games.
(337-228 since 1997.) (59.6%, +86.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games, after a division game.
(213-134 since 1997.) (61.4%, +65.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(476-324 since 1997.) (59.5%, +119.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(179-88 since 1997.) (67%, +82.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(109-54 since 1997.) (66.9%, +49.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(291-214 since 1997.) (57.6%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread.
(106-62 since 1997.) (63.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record.
(313-214 since 1997.) (59.4%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(213-137 since 1997.) (60.9%, +62.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(468-258 since 1997.) (64.5%, +184.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(107-58 since 1997.) (64.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(172-109 since 1997.) (61.2%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(195-112 since 1997.) (63.5%, +71.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(455-302 since 1997.) (60.1%, +122.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(45-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a losing record.
(147-95 since 1997.) (60.7%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(426-292 since 1997.) (59.3%, +104.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in August or September games.
(159-102 since 1997.) (60.9%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(138-87 since 1997.) (61.3%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses.
(215-140 since 1997.) (60.6%, +61 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(89-51 since 1997.) (63.6%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(154-99 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(160-105 since 1997.) (60.4%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(140-82 since 1997.) (63.1%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(112-72 since 1997.) (60.9%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(134-75 since 1997.) (64.1%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(175-98 since 1997.) (64.1%, +67.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog.
(45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +23 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(128-67 since 1997.) (65.6%, +54.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(173-92 since 1997.) (65.3%, +71.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(297-162 since 1997.) (64.7%, +118.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(134-69 since 1997.) (66%, +58.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(100-48 since 1997.) (67.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss against a division rival.
(114-61 since 1997.) (65.1%, +46.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss against a division rival.
(84-39 since 1997.) (68.3%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss.
(114-54 since 1997.) (67.9%, +54.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a loss against a division rival.
(74-35 since 1997.) (67.9%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(251-138 since 1997.) (64.5%, +99.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(120-64 since 1997.) (65.2%, +49.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(89-46 since 1997.) (65.9%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a loss against a division rival.
(85-45 since 1997.) (65.4%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss.
(88-48 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points.
(116-67 since 1997.) (63.4%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(328-180 since 1997.) (64.6%, +130 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(158-85 since 1997.) (65%, +64.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(126-67 since 1997.) (65.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(133-70 since 1997.) (65.5%, +56 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog.
(37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(101-47 since 1997.) (68.2%, +49.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog.
(33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(135-66 since 1997.) (67.2%, +62.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(361-199 since 1997.) (64.5%, +142.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(86-44 since 1997.) (66.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(153-87 since 1997.) (63.8%, +57.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(110-63 since 1997.) (63.6%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(142-76 since 1997.) (65.1%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog.
(39-13 since 1997.) (75%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(112-55 since 1997.) (67.1%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog.
(35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(151-73 since 1997.) (67.4%, +70.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(205-110 since 1997.) (65.1%, +84 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(97-52 since 1997.) (65.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a loss against a division rival.
(72-36 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss.
(76-38 since 1997.) (66.7%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival.
(293-186 since 1997.) (61.2%, +88.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(122-65 since 1997.) (65.2%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(98-54 since 1997.) (64.5%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss against a division rival.
(207-119 since 1997.) (63.5%, +76.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(97-55 since 1997.) (63.8%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(69-31 since 1997.) (69%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss.
(278-181 since 1997.) (60.6%, +78.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss, in August or September games.
(111-63 since 1997.) (63.8%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss, with a losing record.
(129-80 since 1997.) (61.7%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(89-47 since 1997.) (65.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(113-67 since 1997.) (62.8%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(174-120 since 1997.) (59.2%, +42 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(347-228 since 1997.) (60.3%, +96.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(74-37 since 1997.) (66.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(151-104 since 1997.) (59.2%, +36.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing a road game.
(443-304 since 1997.) (59.3%, +108.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(182-118 since 1997.) (60.7%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(140-82 since 1997.) (63.1%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(140-82 since 1997.) (63.1%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(112-72 since 1997.) (60.9%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(112-72 since 1997.) (60.9%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(483-339 since 1997.) (58.8%, +110.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(368-245 since 1997.) (60%, +98.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(256-174 since 1997.) (59.5%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(139-88 since 1997.) (61.2%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(822-587 since 1997.) (58.3%, +176.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(210-135 since 1997.) (60.9%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(373-267 since 1997.) (58.3%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(611-449 since 1997.) (57.6%, +117.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(293-204 since 1997.) (59%, +68.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(430-302 since 1997.) (58.7%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(215-147 since 1997.) (59.4%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 30 points or more.
(30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(594-416 since 1997.) (58.8%, +136.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(306-213 since 1997.) (59%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(649-457 since 1997.) (58.7%, +146.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(169-101 since 1997.) (62.6%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(357-250 since 1997.) (58.8%, +82 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 30 points or more.
(27-4 since 1997.) (87.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(188-128 since 1997.) (59.5%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing a road game, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(201-135 since 1997.) (59.8%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in August or September games.
(311-214 since 1997.) (59.2%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game.
(513-359 since 1997.) (58.8%, +118.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(256-172 since 1997.) (59.8%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(168-112 since 1997.) (60%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(338-222 since 1997.) (60.4%, +93.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(129-73 since 1997.) (63.9%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(219-138 since 1997.) (61.3%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(352-251 since 1997.) (58.4%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(159-98 since 1997.) (61.9%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(107-64 since 1997.) (62.6%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(166-112 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(239-164 since 1997.) (59.3%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(107-64 since 1997.) (62.6%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-54 since 1997.) (62.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(91-54 since 1997.) (62.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-54 since 1997.) (62.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(323-199 since 1997.) (61.9%, +104.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(245-141 since 1997.) (63.5%, +89.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(101-54 since 1997.) (65.2%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(69-32 since 1997.) (68.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games.
(337-228 since 1997.) (59.6%, +86.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(497-315 since 1997.) (61.2%, +150.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(224-158 since 1997.) (58.6%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(272-146 since 1997.) (65.1%, +111.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(133-75 since 1997.) (63.9%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(153-82 since 1997.) (65.1%, +62.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(81-41 since 1997.) (66.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(296-205 since 1997.) (59.1%, +70.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(264-176 since 1997.) (60%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(74-40 since 1997.) (64.9%, +30 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(337-243 since 1997.) (58.1%, +69.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(424-301 since 1997.) (58.5%, +92.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(328-227 since 1997.) (59.1%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(454-335 since 1997.) (57.5%, +85.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(420-294 since 1997.) (58.8%, +96.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after playing a road game.
(416-288 since 1997.) (59.1%, +99.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after playing 2 consecutive road games.
(179-124 since 1997.) (59.1%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(201-117 since 1997.) (63.2%, +72.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(75-38 since 1997.) (66.4%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(47-25 since 1997.) (65.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(156-89 since 1997.) (63.7%, +58.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(116-62 since 1997.) (65.2%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(154-99 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(87-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(483-339 since 1997.) (58.8%, +110.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(368-245 since 1997.) (60%, +98.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(107-60 since 1997.) (64.1%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(72-35 since 1997.) (67.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(403-294 since 1997.) (57.8%, +79.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - poor foul drawing team - attempting <=17 free throws/game, in August or September games.
(77-42 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(317-232 since 1997.) (57.7%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(239-170 since 1997.) (58.4%, +52 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(173-114 since 1997.) (60.3%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(227-164 since 1997.) (58.1%, +46.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(181-127 since 1997.) (58.8%, +41.3 units. Rating = 1*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
CONNECTICUT	74		37		29-67	43.4%	6-19	33.3%	9-12	73.2%	41	9	13
SAN ANTONIO	73		37		28-64	42.9%	4-11	34.8%	14-18	78.4%	43	9	14

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 569 times, while SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 431 times.
Edge against first half line=CONNECTICUT

In 1000 simulated games, 579 games went over first half total, while 421 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 34.5

CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 34.4

CONNECTICUT is 61-40 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 35.3

CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 34.3

SAN ANTONIO is 47-69 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 37.3

SAN ANTONIO is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.3, OPPONENT 41.0

SAN ANTONIO is 17-33 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) in home games when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.6

SAN ANTONIO is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 39.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total

CONNECTICUT is 15-7 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 38.6

CONNECTICUT is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.6, OPPONENT 40.8

CONNECTICUT is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 40.3

SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.5

SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.9

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

CONNECTICUT is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 35.5

CONNECTICUT is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 35.6

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.2, OPPONENT 34.1

CONNECTICUT is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 35.3

SAN ANTONIO is 56-31 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 36.2

SAN ANTONIO is 100-71 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.9

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
CONNECTICUT
SAN ANTONIO	0

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 34-58 against the 1rst half line (-29.8 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 18-33 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 32-53 against the 1rst half line (-26.3 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 2 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 19-6 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 32 trends with a total rating of 42 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 22-7 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 22-6 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.5, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.7, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.5, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.8, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 143-111 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 87-56 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 121-75 UNDER (+38.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 139-100 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 204-162 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 32 trends with a total rating of 26 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the 1rst half line (+6.4 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 23-10 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 72-102 against the 1rst half line (-40.2 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 56-86 against the 1rst half line (-38.6 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 30-50 against the 1rst half line (-25.0 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 29-51 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 103-141 against the 1rst half line (-52.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 29-51 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.2, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 15-30 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 23-43 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 49-73 against the 1rst half line (-31.3 Units) in home games after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 18-36 against the 1rst half line (-21.6 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 5-16 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 1 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 29-47 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 2 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 20-11 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 50 trends with a total rating of 50 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 29.4, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 21-5 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 19-5 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 18-6 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 58-42 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 103-57 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 103-57 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 124-94 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 65-44 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 61-37 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 34-19 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 30.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 28-16 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 86-59 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 148-112 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 98-68 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 69-44 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 40-23 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 121-90 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 145-108 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 83-58 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 52-29 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 66-44 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	13-18	+4.2	15-16	18-13	75.1	36.5	42.2%	40.1	76.9	38.9	44.1%	42.0
Road Games	6-9	+6.6	6-9	9-6	72.6	33.1	39.8%	40.3	77.4	35.6	42.5%	45.7
Last 5 Games	1-4	-0.8	2-3	1-4	65.2	29.4	39.5%	36.2	76.2	38.4	45.6%	43.8

CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	75.1	36.5	28-67	42.2%	6-19	34.1%	12-16	73.7%	40	9	16	20	8	13	3
vs opponents surrendering	75.7	38.2	28-65	42.4%	5-15	32.7%	15-19	79.7%	41	9	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	72.6	33.1	27-68	39.8%	6-19	31.6%	13-17	73.5%	40	10	15	22	9	13	3
Stats Against (All Games)	76.9	38.9	28-64	44.1%	5-13	34.9%	16-19	82.9%	42	9	16	16	7	15	4
vs opponents averaging	76.4	38.6	28-66	42.6%	5-15	33.0%	16-19	80.1%	42	9	16	19	7	13	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	77.4	35.6	27-64	42.5%	5-13	35.1%	19-23	82.1%	46	10	17	17	6	14	4

SAN ANTONIO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	7-23	-13.2	15-14	13-17	68.9	34.5	39.8%	40.1	77.4	38.0	46.1%	42.3
Home Games	7-8	-0.2	7-8	6-9	70.5	35.8	40.6%	42.0	76.1	38.3	45.4%	41.3
Last 5 Games	0-5	-5	1-4	2-3	57.2	28.8	31.0%	41.8	76.8	39.0	47.3%	45.8

SAN ANTONIO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	68.9	34.5	26-64	39.8%	4-12	30.2%	14-18	77.9%	40	8	15	15	7	13	3
vs opponents surrendering	74.8	37.7	28-65	42.1%	5-15	32.6%	15-19	79.7%	41	9	16	19	7	12	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	70.5	35.8	26-64	40.6%	4-12	32.6%	15-20	75.6%	42	8	17	15	7	14	3
Stats Against (All Games)	77.4	38.0	31-67	46.1%	4-12	32.2%	12-16	76.3%	42	9	18	18	8	13	5
vs opponents averaging	75.4	37.9	28-65	43.0%	5-15	32.6%	15-18	80.7%	41	8	17	19	7	13	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	76.1	38.3	31-67	45.4%	4-11	36.1%	11-15	73.1%	41	8	19	19	8	12	6

Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.1, SAN ANTONIO 70.7

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/28/2015	INDIANA	73-75	34-42	-0.5	L	75	O	28-65	43.1%	37	18	33-81	40.7%	52	13
7/31/2015	SEATTLE	67-66	38-40	-3.5	L	73	O	24-63	38.1%	47	16	24-61	39.3%	40	15
8/2/2015	@ INDIANA	70-83	41-32	3	W	74.5	U	25-55	45.5%	33	12	25-59	42.4%	43	13
8/4/2015	SAN ANTONIO	82-51	37-30	-2	W	74	U	36-75	48.0%	50	17	23-55	41.8%	29	21
8/7/2015	WASHINGTON	86-72	46-38	1	W	71	O	35-65	53.8%	40	9	25-60	41.7%	34	11
8/9/2015	@ WASHINGTON	73-84	22-34	3.5	L	71.5	U	22-64	34.4%	38	8	25-51	49.0%	40	11
8/12/2015	TULSA	80-74	41-48	-2	L	75	O	31-73	42.5%	43	10	28-65	43.1%	39	13
8/14/2015	NEW YORK	78-90	40-47	2.5	L	72	O	29-57	50.9%	36	17	37-73	50.7%	33	7
8/16/2015	@ ATLANTA	77-90	42-39	2	W	78.5	O	27-68	39.7%	33	14	27-59	45.8%	47	12
8/21/2015	@ TULSA	76-84	39-30	3	W	76	U	30-68	44.1%	44	14	29-68	42.6%	44	10
8/23/2015	ATLANTA	92-102	47-63	1.5	L	78.5	O	34-70	48.6%	35	12	40-67	59.7%	34	15
8/25/2015	@ ATLANTA	57-71	18-33	4	L	79	U	19-63	30.2%	40	12	26-66	39.4%	49	9
8/27/2015	PHOENIX	80-81	48-41	4	W	73	O	31-69	44.9%	33	8	28-56	50.0%	42	16
8/29/2015	NEW YORK	66-80	33-43	3.5	L	73	O	27-58	46.6%	29	18	33-59	55.9%	35	15
8/30/2015	@ CHICAGO	72-68	33-34	5	W	77	U	26-61	42.6%	46	15	27-72	37.5%	47	9
9/1/2015	@ INDIANA	51-81	15-41	6	L	74.5	U	21-63	33.3%	33	16	31-65	47.7%	46	15
9/4/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO
9/9/2015	@ NEW YORK
9/13/2015	CHICAGO

SAN ANTONIO - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/29/2015	ATLANTA	102-85	47-42	-2	W	74.5	O	35-65	53.8%	45	17	29-66	43.9%	37	13
7/31/2015	WASHINGTON	53-88	27-49	1	L	73.5	O	22-63	34.9%	30	12	36-63	57.1%	47	14
8/2/2015	LOS ANGELES	78-80	49-38	2.5	W	75	O	28-64	43.7%	33	7	35-65	53.8%	39	10
8/4/2015	@ CONNECTICUT	51-82	30-37	2	L	74	U	23-55	41.8%	29	21	36-75	48.0%	50	17
8/5/2015	@ WASHINGTON	63-66	38-27	6	W	73	U	26-67	38.8%	35	9	21-56	37.5%	46	12
8/8/2015	SEATTLE	88-81	43-34	-2.5	W	73	O	32-63	50.8%	35	16	35-66	53.0%	32	15
8/11/2015	@ MINNESOTA	76-83	46-35	8	W	73.5	O	30-76	39.5%	44	12	34-66	51.5%	40	14
8/16/2015	@ SEATTLE	63-72	35-34	1.5	W	75	U	22-59	37.3%	33	15	27-61	44.3%	46	16
8/19/2015	NEW YORK	45-73	18-39	3.5	L	72.5	U	17-63	27.0%	41	19	30-63	47.6%	50	15
8/21/2015	MINNESOTA	61-78	38-37	4.5	W	74	O	24-71	33.8%	39	10	32-65	49.2%	43	13
8/23/2015	LOS ANGELES	59-90	27-43	2.5	L	72.5	U	19-71	26.8%	45	10	37-68	54.4%	50	10
8/28/2015	@ SEATTLE	69-83	34-42	2	L	73.5	O	25-65	38.5%	33	11	29-62	46.8%	45	18
8/30/2015	@ LOS ANGELES	52-60	27-34	6.5	L	73.5	U	22-75	29.3%	51	11	22-59	37.3%	41	14
9/4/2015	CONNECTICUT
9/5/2015	PHOENIX
9/8/2015	@ TULSA
9/13/2015	@ SEATTLE

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

SAN ANTONIO is 15-15 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997

19 of 29 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

CONNECTICUT is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons

5 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at SAN ANTONIO since 1997

CONNECTICUT is 8-7 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997

8 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons.

CONNECTICUT is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons

2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
8/4/2015	SAN ANTONIO	51	150.5	Under	30	23-55	41.8%	2-10	20.0%	3-7	42.9%	29	1	21
	CONNECTICUT	82	-3.5	SU ATS	37	36-75	48.0%	6-20	30.0%	4-8	50.0%	50	12	17
8/1/2014	CONNECTICUT	89	156	SU ATS	43	35-65	53.8%	5-12	41.7%	14-20	70.0%	44	9	13
	SAN ANTONIO	79	-5	Over	30	32-78	41.0%	7-23	30.4%	8-9	88.9%	39	12	11
7/1/2014	SAN ANTONIO	74	153.5	SU ATS	27	27-61	44.3%	4-15	26.7%	16-17	94.1%	33	6	15
	CONNECTICUT	71	-3.5	Under	30	31-73	42.5%	5-17	29.4%	4-7	57.1%	47	10	19

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 53 trends with a total rating of 38 stars.

Anne is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 33-18 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.7, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 161-120 against the 1rst half line (+29.0 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 111-79 against the 1rst half line (+24.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.0, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.4, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 91-55 against the 1rst half line (+30.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 60-33 against the 1rst half line (+23.7 Units) off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 41-23 against the 1rst half line (+15.7 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 37.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 40.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 86-51 against the 1rst half line (+29.9 Units) off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.7, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 42-21 against the 1rst half line (+18.9 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 37.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 33-16 against the 1rst half line (+15.4 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 58-35 against the 1rst half line (+19.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 38.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) after scoring 55 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 37-12 against the 1rst half line (+23.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.6, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 132-86 against the 1rst half line (+37.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 34-22 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 104-62 against the 1rst half line (+35.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 123-84 against the 1rst half line (+30.6 Units) after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 133-86 against the 1rst half line (+38.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 61-82 against the 1rst half line (-29.2 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 45-67 against the 1rst half line (-28.7 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 79-97 against the 1rst half line (-27.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 29-45 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 69-87 against the 1rst half line (-26.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 56-70 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 45-59 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 27-43 against the 1rst half line (-20.3 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 87-102 against the 1rst half line (-25.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 56-70 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 41-59 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 31-44 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 28-43 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 56-69 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 31-45 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 16-32 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 75-91 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 28-44 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 34-50 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 17-30 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 27-44 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 32-44 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 1 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.

Dan is 100-86 against the 1rst half line (+5.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 130 trends with a total rating of 171 stars.

Anne is 246-191 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 33-14 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 32-14 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 1.5 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 19-4 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 4*)

Anne is 34-15 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 31-14 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 36-15 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.7, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 160-118 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 112-78 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.0, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 77-53 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 22-7 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 32-21 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 19-5 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 30.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 18-6 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 18-6 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.7, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 29-11 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 19-5 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 39-18 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.9, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus pathetic teams - shooting <=40% with a defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.4, OPPONENT 30.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 29-8 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 4*)

Anne is 28-16 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 22-7 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 28-16 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 22-6 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 37-21 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 31-8 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 5*)

Anne is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.5, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.7, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 16-2 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 5*)

Anne is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 30.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 31-18 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 24-6 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 4*)

Anne is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 28-13 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 16-2 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 5*)

Anne is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Dan is 197-151 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 78-65 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 107-79 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 50-38 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 80-46 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 187-139 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 51-39 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 58-39 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 103-85 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 87-74 UNDER (+5.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 80-46 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 32.6, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 94-75 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 109-76 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 48-32 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 55-42 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 34-19 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 40-24 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 41-24 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 116-75 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 88-54 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 59-35 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 47-27 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 32.5, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 74-54 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 94-62 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 49-31 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total off 3 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.2, OPPONENT 31.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 65-42 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 66-37 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 125 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 31.5, OPPONENT 30.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 110-86 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 73-50 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 52-30 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 37-21 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 82-54 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 100-68 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 43-28 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 97-70 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 107-80 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 59-41 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 36-19 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 53-38 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 38-25 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 81-59 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 101-88 UNDER (+4.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 69-46 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 81-53 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 90-60 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 92-79 UNDER (+5.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 132-115 UNDER (+5.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 69-52 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 107-72 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 168-117 UNDER (+39.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 155-129 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 30-18 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 54-29 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 84-71 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 122-104 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 84-58 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = -1.5, Closing First Half Line = -1.5

Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 158 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 157 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 17 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 15 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 73, Closing First Half Total = 72.5

Since 1997, 35 games went under the first half total, while 28 games went over the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 12 games went under the first half total, while 8 games went over the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = -1.5, Closing First Half Total = 72.5

Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 14 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 13 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 6 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 5 times.

Since 1997, 18 games went over the first half total, while 9 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 6 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

CONNECTICUT

[G] 08/24/2015 - Alex Bentley out indefinitely ( Ankle )

[F] 08/15/2015 - Alyssa Thomas out indefinitely ( Shoulder )

[C] 08/13/2015 - Elizabeth Williams out indefinitely ( Knee )

[G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension )

[F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip )

[F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee )

SAN ANTONIO

[G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee )

Last Updated: 4/28/2024 12:54:14 PM EST.