| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
MINNESOTA |
|
|
160
| 76
Final
81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 615 | LOS ANGELES | +650 | | 616 | MINNESOTA | -1050 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(27-1 since 1997.) (96.4%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(27-1 since 1997.) (96.4%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(93-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(23-3 since 1997.) (88.5%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(88-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.7%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(21-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.8%, +18.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(66-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +41.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(76-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(45-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(46-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +36.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(47-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, playing with 2 days rest.
(166-184 since 1997.) (47.4%, +74 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(52-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.3%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(57-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(50-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(50-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(91-91 since 1997.) (50%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(112-82 since 1997.) (57.7%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(85-86 since 1997.) (49.7%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(29-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.9%, +40 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points.
(93-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.9%, +57.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(68-55 since 1997.) (55.3%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(52-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(52-39 since 1997.) (57.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(66-51 since 1997.) (56.4%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(32-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +35.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(21-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +29 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(25-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(34-12 since 1997.) (73.9%, +27.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(57-33 since 1997.) (63.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(21-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival.
(38-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +34.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a road underdog of 6 more.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(111-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.7%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(22-8 since 1997.) (73.3%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(52-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset win as an underdog.
(25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(65-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +51.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(52-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (52%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(49-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.2%, +49.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(72-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(57-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.9%, +53.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival.
(21-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(54-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, in June games.
(32-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(63-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(141-134 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing with 2 days rest.
(45-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(55-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(87-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +59.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(53-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(55-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(92-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(82-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.1%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(61-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.3%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(84-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(126-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.5%, +58.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(124-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(168-164 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 76 | | 28-67 | 41.5% | 7-21 | 35.1% | 14-17 | 78.8% | 41 | 8 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | | 31-67 | 46.5% | 9-24 | 38.7% | 12-16 | 78.8% | 43 | 8 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 692 times, while LOS ANGELES won 277 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 171-161 against the money line (-75.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.1 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 298-243 against the money line (-95.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 77.6 | LOS ANGELES is 5-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 84.1 | LOS ANGELES is 69-103 against the money line (-98.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 79.4 | LOS ANGELES is 79-82 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 99-124 against the money line (-45.0 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 84.4 | LOS ANGELES is 18-41 against the money line (-21.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 88.6 | LOS ANGELES is 11-33 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 91.5 | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 83.1 | LOS ANGELES is 254-228 against the money line (-116.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 82.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-15 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 81.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-28 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 84.3 | MINNESOTA is 7-3 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.5, OPPONENT 76.9 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | MINNESOTA is 12-7 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.5, OPPONENT 81.9 | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | MINNESOTA is 9-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.6 | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 75.8 | MINNESOTA is 11-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | MINNESOTA is 20-14 against the money line (+17.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 86.2 | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 88.5, OPPONENT 75.6 | MINNESOTA is 9-0 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.2, OPPONENT 74.2 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 48-35 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 59-81 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 58-32 against the money line (-37.9 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 194-196 against the money line (-113.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 248-232 against the money line (-98.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 159-189 against the money line (-75.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 126-136 against the money line (-51.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-55 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 295-272 against the money line (-98.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 285-244 against the money line (-109.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-84 against the money line (-39.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 275-276 against the money line (-102.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 195-202 against the money line (-76.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-16 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 3-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 94-87 against the money line (-44.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-17 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 35-47 against the money line (-29.6 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-32 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in home games off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 52-56 against the money line (-43.7 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 36-55 against the money line (-34.5 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 111-144 against the money line (-61.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 197-201 against the money line (-83.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-47 against the money line (-35.4 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 191-233 against the money line (-70.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 103-140 against the money line (-58.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 51-75 against the money line (-45.9 Units) in road games in June games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 142-169 against the money line (-54.5 Units) in road games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 103-133 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 82-114 against the money line (-45.1 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-22 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-19 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-35 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-42 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-25 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-17 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 101-79 against the money line (-43.6 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 145-172 against the money line (-56.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-28 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-35 against the money line (-43.4 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-38 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-26 against the money line (-31.5 Units) in road games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-17 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 6*) | MINNESOTA is 92-49 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 111-62 against the money line (+31.1 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-10 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-11 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-9 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 22-16 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 19-10 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 16-14 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 191-110 against the money line (+47.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 156-90 against the money line (+37.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 78-30 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 131-68 against the money line (+35.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 104-53 against the money line (+30.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 95-42 against the money line (+33.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-12 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 77-33 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 88-37 against the money line (+30.5 Units) after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 118-67 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-15 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 71-42 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-13 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 15-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-8 | +0.7 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 78.0 | 36.6 | 41.9% | 45.1 | 84.0 | 42.5 | 43.5% | 41.2 | | Road Games | 1-4 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 78.0 | 33.0 | 43.5% | 42.8 | 87.2 | 42.0 | 42.7% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +2.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 77.2 | 34.2 | 39.9% | 45.0 | 86.4 | 44.0 | 44.4% | 41.6 | | Division Games | 2-5 | +0.9 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 78.7 | 35.1 | 41.4% | 44.9 | 86.4 | 44.4 | 43.8% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.0 | 36.6 | 27-65 | 41.9% | 7-23 | 32.5% | 16-21 | 75.6% | 45 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 40.8 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.0 | 33.0 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 8-20 | 37.6% | 17-23 | 72.4% | 43 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 17 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.0 | 42.5 | 31-70 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 35.9% | 15-18 | 79.9% | 41 | 9 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.2 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 8-23 | 33.4% | 14-18 | 80.3% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.2 | 42.0 | 31-72 | 42.7% | 10-26 | 39.7% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 44 | 10 | 21 | 21 | 10 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-3 | +9.2 | 10-2 | 6-6 | 86.7 | 43.5 | 46.2% | 41.2 | 76.0 | 39.2 | 39.7% | 44.8 | | Home Games | 5-1 | +5.1 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 86.2 | 42.0 | 44.8% | 41.8 | 75.2 | 38.3 | 39.8% | 44.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.1 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 87.2 | 42.8 | 46.6% | 38.6 | 73.8 | 38.2 | 38.1% | 47.2 | | Division Games | 7-2 | +6.6 | 7-2 | 4-5 | 86.9 | 43.6 | 45.5% | 41.1 | 75.9 | 38.4 | 38.7% | 47.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.7 | 43.5 | 32-69 | 46.2% | 11-26 | 41.8% | 12-16 | 78.1% | 41 | 7 | 25 | 18 | 10 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.4 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 8-24 | 34.1% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.2 | 42.0 | 31-69 | 44.8% | 11-26 | 43.7% | 13-15 | 83.5% | 42 | 9 | 25 | 17 | 10 | 16 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 39.2 | 28-70 | 39.7% | 6-22 | 28.0% | 14-17 | 81.3% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.4 | 29-70 | 42.3% | 8-23 | 32.2% | 16-19 | 80.5% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.2 | 38.3 | 28-70 | 39.8% | 6-23 | 28.5% | 13-16 | 79.6% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 15 | 10 | 18 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.3, MINNESOTA 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | ATLANTA | 81-92 | L | +145 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 51 | 11 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | | 5/18/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 82-89 | L | | 34-66 | 51.5% | 43 | 17 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 39 | 12 | | 5/21/2024 | WASHINGTON | 70-68 | W | -140 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | | 5/24/2024 | INDIANA | 73-78 | L | +100 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 42 | 18 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 39 | 10 | | 5/26/2024 | DALLAS | 83-84 | L | -165 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | | 5/28/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-82 | W | +180 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 45 | 19 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 14 | | 5/30/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 73-83 | L | +170 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 45 | 18 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 46 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 68-87 | L | +155 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 18 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/5/2024 | MINNESOTA | 62-86 | L | +220 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 51 | 16 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 14 | | 6/7/2024 | DALLAS | 81-72 | W | +155 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 42 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 96-92 | W | +400 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 48 | 15 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 30 | 6 | | 6/11/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 79-95 | L | +500 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 54 | 9 | | 6/14/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/16/2024 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/18/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/20/2024 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2024 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 83-70 | W | +250 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 45 | 17 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 50 | 17 | | 5/17/2024 | SEATTLE | 102-93 | W | -105 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 52 | 27 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 48 | 24 | | 5/23/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-83 | L | +200 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | | 5/25/2024 | NEW YORK | 84-67 | W | +210 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 42 | 16 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 37 | 16 | | 5/26/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 92-79 | W | +155 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 10 | | 5/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 66-80 | L | +155 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 14 | | 5/31/2024 | PHOENIX | 95-71 | W | -270 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 40 | 6 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 16 | | 6/2/2024 | DALLAS | 87-76 | W | -270 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 47 | 25 | | 6/5/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 86-62 | W | -300 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 14 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 51 | 16 | | 6/7/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-81 | L | -200 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 44 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 47 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | SEATTLE | 83-64 | W | -115 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 46 | 16 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 45 | 13 | | 6/11/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 100-86 | W | +210 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 30 | 9 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 46 | 13 | | 6/14/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/17/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 60-49 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 7-1 (+8.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 24-29 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 2-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
07/20/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 70 | 164 | | 29 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 44 | 7 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 73 | -3 | SU Under | 46 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 39 | 6 | 13 | 06/20/2023 | MINNESOTA | 67 | 157.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 44 | 6 | 10 | | | LOS ANGELES | 61 | -5.5 | Under | 33 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 44 | 4 | 17 | 06/16/2023 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 160 | SU ATS | 34 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 17-25 | 68.0% | 36 | 4 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -5.5 | Under | 43 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 37 | 5 | 12 | 06/11/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | -1.5 | Over | 43 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 9-28 | 32.1% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 30 | 2 | 10 | | | MINNESOTA | 91 | 160 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 24-25 | 96.0% | 45 | 8 | 12 | 06/05/2024 | MINNESOTA | 86 | -7 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 42 | 5 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 62 | 154.5 | Under | 26 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 4-28 | 14.3% | 18-18 | 100.0% | 51 | 17 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 31-24 against the money line (+14.6 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 81.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-2 against the money line (+20.7 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 86.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 7*) | Miller is 138-93 against the money line (+26.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 83.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 42-35 against the money line (-22.5 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 17-16 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in home games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 2-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-20 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-18 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-14 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 5-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 3-13 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 89-40 against the money line (+34.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 318-187 against the money line (+23.7 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 148-47 against the money line (+24.2 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 164-70 against the money line (+24.4 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 164-70 against the money line (+24.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 136-62 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 175-99 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 194-102 against the money line (+53.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 124-67 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 86-41 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-40 against the money line (+49.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 97-36 against the money line (+42.0 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 30-10 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 21-6 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 160-81 against the money line (+45.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 130-71 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 121-69 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 37-9 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in home games off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 61-21 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 64-39 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-23 against the money line (+10.2 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 177-112 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 127-68 against the money line (+37.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 122-53 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 234-123 against the money line (+40.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 197-107 against the money line (+31.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 170-89 against the money line (+43.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 144-72 against the money line (+41.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 143-88 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 242-132 against the money line (+43.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 190-93 against the money line (+45.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 149-74 against the money line (+32.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 122-56 against the money line (+36.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 99-44 against the money line (+33.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 92-36 against the money line (+34.9 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 190-99 against the money line (+44.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 117-53 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 77-29 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 80-21 against the money line (+40.9 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 105-49 against the money line (+30.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 194-105 against the money line (+47.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 115-61 against the money line (+29.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 61-24 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 84-67 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 171-99 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 209-109 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 144-68 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 85-50 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 20-11 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 13-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 153-58 against the money line (+20.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 193-118 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 213-134 against the money line (+19.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 247-154 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 254-154 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 85-27 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 120-78 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 254-146 against the money line (+28.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 189-91 against the money line (+37.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 236-151 against the money line (+2.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 194-128 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 36 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 10/22/2024 8:37:48 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|