| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK
MINNESOTA |
|
|
165
| 75
Final
76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 609 | NEW YORK | +550 | | 610 | MINNESOTA | -850 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(216-69 since 1997.) (75.8%, +92.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(374-160 since 1997.) (70%, +90.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(191-43 since 1997.) (81.6%, +86.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(164-49 since 1997.) (77%, +84.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(144-30 since 1997.) (82.8%, +78 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(158-44 since 1997.) (78.2%, +65.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(145-29 since 1997.) (83.3%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(190-65 since 1997.) (74.5%, +64.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(189-67 since 1997.) (73.8%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(102-31 since 1997.) (76.7%, +54.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(93-30 since 1997.) (75.6%, +53.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(91-18 since 1997.) (83.5%, +52 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(109-28 since 1997.) (79.6%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(137-65 since 1997.) (67.8%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(84-12 since 1997.) (87.5%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(84-14 since 1997.) (85.7%, +48.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(75-13 since 1997.) (85.2%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(88-22 since 1997.) (80%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(104-43 since 1997.) (70.7%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(49-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(32-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (97%, +30.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(32-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (97%, +30.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(49-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(26-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.3%, +24.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(26-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.3%, +24.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games.
(44-6 since 1997.) (88%, +34.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%).
(62-18 since 1997.) (77.5%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(36-5 since 1997.) (87.8%, +30 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-3 since 1997.) (91.7%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a win by 10 points or more.
(24-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a win by 10 points or more.
(24-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(44-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.8%, +35.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins by 10 points or more against division rivals, in July games.
(28-3 since 1997.) (90.3%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(37-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(44-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.6%, +32.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(31-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.6%, +22 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(31-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.8%, +20 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(32-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(40-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(32-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(51-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more.
(20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(23-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (92%, +20.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(49-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.5%, +22.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(43-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(52-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +20.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(29-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.6%, +21.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(29-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.3%, +19.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(82-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in non-conference games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(57-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(54-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in July games.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season.
(78-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +17.7 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(118-79 since 1997.) (59.9%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(63-28 since 1997.) (69.2%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in July games.
(43-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in May, June, or July games.
(55-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| NEW YORK | 75 | | 28-69 | 41.3% | 5-17 | 30.7% | 13-17 | 77.4% | 42 | 11 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 86 | | 31-70 | 45.0% | 6-16 | 37.3% | 18-21 | 82.2% | 46 | 11 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 781 times, while NEW YORK won 206 times.
Edge against the money line=NEW YORK |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 40-23 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 77.7 | NEW YORK is 14-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 | NEW YORK is 9-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 77.1 | NEW YORK is 19-11 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 79.6 | NEW YORK is 84-67 against the money line (+22.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.3, OPPONENT 71.8 | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.1, OPPONENT 84.3 | NEW YORK is 92-49 against the money line (+50.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 71.3 | NEW YORK is 29-17 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 75.5 | MINNESOTA is 108-103 against the money line (-50.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.4 |
|
NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 86.4 | NEW YORK is 69-95 against the money line (-42.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.6, OPPONENT 72.1 | NEW YORK is 4-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.2, OPPONENT 87.1 | NEW YORK is 7-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.6, OPPONENT 91.1 | MINNESOTA is 20-4 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.3 | MINNESOTA is 98-48 against the money line (+36.9 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 72.6 | MINNESOTA is 207-66 against the money line (+109.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.1, OPPONENT 78.6 | MINNESOTA is 155-33 against the money line (+110.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.4, OPPONENT 80.1 | MINNESOTA is 36-9 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 71.7 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 22-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-13 against the money line (+9.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-5 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 33-18 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 21-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 118-102 against the money line (+22.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 44-25 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-15 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-13 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 116-109 against the money line (-48.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-5 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 88.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-10 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-4 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in home games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-16 against the money line (-14.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 43-18 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 26-18 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-18 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 120-95 against the money line (+26.2 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 28-17 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-13 against the money line (+9.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-13 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 6*) | NEW YORK is 30-16 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 30-15 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 10-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 5 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 128-119 against the money line (+34.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 16-9 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-11 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 40-23 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 30-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 10-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 28-19 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 84-97 against the money line (-55.9 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 216-197 against the money line (-70.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 25-14 against the money line (-25.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 202-195 against the money line (-68.3 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 25-14 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-8 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 5-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-15 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 0-4 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 30-43 against the money line (-33.5 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 26-39 against the money line (-24.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.6, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 19-22 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.7, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 79-38 against the money line (+29.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games off a win by 20 points or more over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 126-79 against the money line (+24.3 Units) off a home win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 123-60 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 82-35 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 75-33 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 121-51 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 101-34 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in home games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-9 | -1.6 | 9-10 | 9-9 | 79.5 | 39.7 | 42.0% | 48.4 | 79.0 | 39.9 | 40.3% | 41.0 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -2.4 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 75.2 | 37.6 | 39.9% | 48.2 | 80.2 | 42.2 | 40.3% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.4 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 79.4 | 40.8 | 40.1% | 53.2 | 72.8 | 39.2 | 40.0% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.7 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 5-17 | 32.3% | 16-21 | 77.6% | 48 | 10 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.2 | 37.6 | 28-70 | 39.9% | 5-17 | 30.4% | 14-19 | 75.2% | 48 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.0 | 39.9 | 27-68 | 40.3% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 18-22 | 80.1% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.8 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.2 | 42.2 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 20-24 | 84.7% | 42 | 7 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-2 | +6 | 10-8 | 9-8 | 87.6 | 46.3 | 47.4% | 43.2 | 76.6 | 37.7 | 42.9% | 38.6 | | Home Games | 8-1 | -2 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 85.8 | 43.3 | 46.7% | 43.2 | 74.9 | 37.4 | 42.3% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 86.6 | 45.2 | 48.0% | 41.2 | 77.6 | 39.2 | 44.0% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.6 | 46.3 | 32-68 | 47.4% | 7-17 | 37.7% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.8 | 43.3 | 32-68 | 46.7% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 21 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 37.7 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 14-17 | 79.2% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.9 | 37.4 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 11-15 | 75.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 71.9, MINNESOTA 70.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/16/2017 | @ DALLAS | 102-93 | W | -115 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 50 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 41 | 11 | | 6/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 89-94 | L | -200 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 39 | 14 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | | 6/29/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 54-67 | L | +250 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 52 | 19 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 6 | | 7/2/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 72-81 | L | -200 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 47 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 46 | 10 | | 7/6/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 79-70 | W | +155 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 11 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 40 | 14 | | 7/9/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 69-81 | L | +175 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 46 | 17 | | 7/14/2017 | CHICAGO | 68-78 | L | -300 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 58 | 10 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 39 | 7 | | 7/16/2017 | WASHINGTON | 85-55 | W | -270 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 96-80 | W | +105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | | 7/25/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/17/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 93-98 | L | -500 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 30 | 13 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 46 | 17 | | 6/23/2017 | WASHINGTON | 93-76 | W | -550 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 49 | 12 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 34 | 17 | | 6/25/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 87-78 | W | | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 15 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 8 | | 6/30/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 91-83 | W | -300 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 49 | 13 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 41 | 7 | | 7/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 88-77 | W | -270 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 46 | 15 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 32 | 17 | | 7/8/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 76-100 | L | | 25-62 | 40.3% | 31 | 20 | 43-72 | 59.7% | 42 | 19 | | 7/14/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 88-71 | W | -270 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 39 | 13 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 40 | 14 | | 7/16/2017 | PHOENIX | 81-66 | W | | 26-62 | 41.9% | 38 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 42 | 15 | | 7/19/2017 | DALLAS | 100-74 | W | | 38-67 | 56.7% | 52 | 17 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 36 | 13 | | 7/25/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 18-15 (+5.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-3 (+5.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 11-5 (+17.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 2-1 (+6.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/18/2017 | MINNESOTA | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 50 | 6 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 71 | 161 | | 40 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 43 | 8 | 11 | 7/15/2016 | NEW YORK | 70 | 157.5 | Over | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 42 | 10 | 13 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 40 | 10 | 6 | 6/29/2016 | NEW YORK | 95 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 50 | 12 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -13 | Over | 43 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 5/31/2016 | MINNESOTA | 79 | -6 | SU ATS | 46 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 41 | 3 | 13 | | | NEW YORK | 69 | 153.5 | Under | 31 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 41 | 6 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Lambeer is 83-78 against the money line (+4.3 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 36-41 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 35-40 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 25-19 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in July games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 59-49 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 35-30 against the money line (+9.9 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 35-30 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 17-7 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Lambeer is 36-25 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 16-10 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 11-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 7-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 5 straight games with 45 or more rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 11-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 3 straight games with 50 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 80.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 49-43 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 33-26 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 103-66 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 12-5 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games after scoring 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 18-13 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 59-53 against the money line (+22.4 Units) in road games after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 39-28 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 114-95 against the money line (+26.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 71-57 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 10-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 58-45 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 8-6 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 43-37 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 20-21 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 30-35 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 51-46 against the money line (+10.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 33-25 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 47-40 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 21-20 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 30-33 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 21-18 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 69.6, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 52-31 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 41-36 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 29-31 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 10-9 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 51-47 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 79-55 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 50-46 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 3-6 against the money line (-13.4 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 4-7 against the money line (-15.3 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Lambeer is 18-27 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 28-43 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 15-17 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 0-4 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 4-7 against the money line (-10.5 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 11-15 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 26-43 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 4-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 189-82 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 70-13 against the money line (+24.3 Units) as a home favorite of -270 to -850 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 101-27 against the money line (+23.6 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 101-27 against the money line (+23.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 37-11 against the money line (+20.9 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 44-10 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 120-54 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 65-12 against the money line (+40.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 90-32 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 76-31 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 61-23 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-16 against the money line (+25.7 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 53-14 against the money line (+23.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 49-10 against the money line (+21.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 84-26 against the money line (+32.0 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 79-26 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 139-57 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 102-39 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 87-31 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 141-58 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 111-40 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 73-23 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-18 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 111-43 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 43-8 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 48-11 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 62-15 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 106-39 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 156-57 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 131-45 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 114-35 against the money line (+34.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 101-29 against the money line (+33.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 96-33 against the money line (+31.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 99-37 against the money line (+31.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 104-45 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 136-54 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 103-38 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 75-26 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 20-4 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 28-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 106-45 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 139-63 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 87-28 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 37 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/19/2017 - Brittany Boyd out for season ( Achilles ) | | [G] 05/13/2017 - Shoni Schimmel out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 05/13/2017 - Tanisha Wright out for season ( Personal ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/2/2024 5:45:29 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|