| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
160
| 60
Final
68 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 611 | SEATTLE | +375 | | 612 | LOS ANGELES | -550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(132-32 since 1997.) (80.5%, +63.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(185-128 since 1997.) (59.1%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(164-58 since 1997.) (73.9%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(155-116 since 1997.) (57.2%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(130-48 since 1997.) (73%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(53-7 since 1997.) (88.3%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(69-47 since 1997.) (59.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(96-41 since 1997.) (70.1%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(62-23 since 1997.) (72.9%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(80-25 since 1997.) (76.2%, +31 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(52-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +27.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(63-33 since 1997.) (65.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 6 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(40-8 since 1997.) (83.3%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(61-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +30.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 5 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(75-43 since 1997.) (63.6%, +24.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(41-18 since 1997.) (69.5%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(53-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(50-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(30-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(29-15 since 1997.) (65.9%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(41-11 since 1997.) (78.8%, +19.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%) after 15+ games.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +16.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in July games.
(25-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +13 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(19-7 since 1997.) (73.1%, +13.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in July games.
(43-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(82-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(54-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in July games.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a non-conference game against opponent after 3 consecutive non-conference games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season.
(78-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +17.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in May, June, or July games.
(55-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after playing 3 consecutive home games.
(39-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(185-128 since 1997.) (59.1%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(155-116 since 1997.) (57.2%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(30-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(32-28 since 1997.) (53.3%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-28 since 1997.) (63.6%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(20-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(21-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(24-18 since 1997.) (57.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(23-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(25-12 since 1997.) (67.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +24.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(35-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(43-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 79 | | 29-61 | 48.6% | 7-19 | 36.2% | 13-15 | 83.7% | 38 | 8 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 85 | | 32-68 | 48.1% | 6-17 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 79.9% | 37 | 10 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 675 times, while SEATTLE won 294 times.
Edge against the money line=SEATTLE |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 15-7 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.4, OPPONENT 80.5 | SEATTLE is 72-50 against the money line (+32.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.1 | SEATTLE is 154-124 against the money line (+32.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.1 | SEATTLE is 9-4 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | SEATTLE is 68-26 against the money line (+56.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 73.3 | SEATTLE is 24-17 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 80.9 | LOS ANGELES is 9-9 against the money line (-20.0 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 82.2 | LOS ANGELES is 65-57 against the money line (-34.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.0 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 86.9 | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-23.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 181-155 against the money line (-85.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
SEATTLE is 2-12 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.4, OPPONENT 77.4 | SEATTLE is 1-5 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 85.3 | SEATTLE is 53-70 against the money line (-31.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 73.6 | SEATTLE is 67-84 against the money line (-33.0 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 70.7 | SEATTLE is 3-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 87.9 | SEATTLE is 1-9 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 91.0 | SEATTLE is 5-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 83.8 | SEATTLE is 5-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 86.2 | LOS ANGELES is 67-16 against the money line (+31.2 Units) in home games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 71.0 | LOS ANGELES is 15-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.6, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 73.5 | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 45-9 against the money line (+24.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | LOS ANGELES is 29-2 against the money line (+24.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.3, OPPONENT 79.5 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 72-48 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 94-69 against the money line (+25.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-9 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-5 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-6 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 99-89 against the money line (+28.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 140-135 against the money line (+22.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 46-44 against the money line (+25.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 114-96 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 83-54 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-9 against the money line (-20.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 66-71 against the money line (-64.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 105-105 against the money line (-78.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 106-98 against the money line (-56.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 154-138 against the money line (-66.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-14 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-18 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 134-120 against the money line (-59.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 40-59 against the money line (-58.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 59-78 against the money line (-64.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-7 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-23 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-7 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in home games versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-18 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 126-102 against the money line (-63.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 185-148 against the money line (-78.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-126 against the money line (-57.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-180 against the money line (-72.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-111 against the money line (-45.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-11 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-76 against the money line (-63.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.9, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-32 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 65.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 3-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 3-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-16 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 118-104 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 63-47 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 84-64 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 130-119 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 17-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 157-146 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 37-20 against the money line (+31.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 18-10 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 139-123 against the money line (-68.6 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 206-167 against the money line (-65.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 91-81 against the money line (-56.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 37-31 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-19 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 63-51 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-20 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 23-40 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-7 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-12 against the money line (-12.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 2-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-15 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-25 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 5-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 34-55 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 9-17 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 73-20 against the money line (+29.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-5 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 9-11 | -9 | 7-13 | 13-7 | 81.9 | 40.7 | 47.8% | 37.3 | 82.1 | 42.0 | 44.0% | 40.3 | | Road Games | 2-5 | -4 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 81.0 | 39.3 | 48.6% | 37.0 | 85.1 | 42.9 | 46.4% | 40.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 80.6 | 41.8 | 48.2% | 36.6 | 81.8 | 41.0 | 42.4% | 41.4 | | Division Games | 4-3 | +1.2 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 79.6 | 40.4 | 49.0% | 36.6 | 76.3 | 41.1 | 42.5% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.7 | 29-62 | 47.8% | 7-19 | 36.1% | 16-19 | 83.9% | 37 | 6 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 40.7 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.0 | 39.3 | 30-63 | 48.6% | 7-20 | 36.9% | 13-16 | 79.5% | 37 | 6 | 21 | 18 | 4 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.1 | 42.0 | 31-70 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 14-18 | 81.2% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.1 | 42.9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 76.3% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 10 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 14-6 | -8.4 | 11-9 | 7-13 | 84.0 | 43.5 | 48.1% | 38.0 | 78.0 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 39.0 | | Home Games | 9-1 | -1.5 | 6-4 | 2-8 | 84.6 | 44.8 | 47.4% | 39.3 | 73.8 | 37.8 | 43.1% | 37.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -10.7 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 78.6 | 41.6 | 46.1% | 37.6 | 78.0 | 39.4 | 46.2% | 38.4 | | Division Games | 5-3 | -2.2 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 83.7 | 43.6 | 48.2% | 36.0 | 80.1 | 37.2 | 45.2% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.0 | 43.5 | 31-64 | 48.1% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 16-20 | 81.3% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.3 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.6 | 44.8 | 31-65 | 47.4% | 6-17 | 37.1% | 17-20 | 82.0% | 39 | 6 | 19 | 15 | 9 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 38.2 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 17-21 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.8 | 37.8 | 27-64 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 30.7% | 13-16 | 81.9% | 38 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.9, LOS ANGELES 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/18/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 75-57 | W | -600 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 43 | 14 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 47 | 18 | | 6/23/2017 | PHOENIX | 82-85 | L | -210 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 12 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 11 | | 6/27/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 70-100 | L | +175 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 39 | 23 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 35 | 10 | | 6/29/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 89-96 | L | +210 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 32 | 9 | 39-69 | 56.5% | 44 | 9 | | 7/1/2017 | @ DALLAS | 89-69 | W | +155 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 45 | 17 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 41 | 13 | | 7/6/2017 | NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | -175 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 40 | 14 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 11 | | 7/8/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 81-69 | W | +180 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 36 | 18 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 36 | 11 | | 7/12/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 79-83 | L | +135 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 33 | 15 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 12 | | 7/15/2017 | ATLANTA | 90-84 | W | -270 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 37 | 13 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 40 | 12 | | 7/18/2017 | CHICAGO | 83-94 | L | -250 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 36 | 9 | | 7/25/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/15/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 80-75 | W | | 27-56 | 48.2% | 34 | 13 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 13 | | 6/18/2017 | PHOENIX | 90-59 | W | -330 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 47 | 13 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 42 | 19 | | 6/24/2017 | @ INDIANA | 84-73 | W | -250 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 37 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 12 | | 6/27/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 87-79 | W | -140 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 51 | 14 | | 6/30/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 85-76 | W | -330 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 41 | 18 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 37 | 14 | | 7/2/2017 | WASHINGTON | 76-69 | W | -250 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 48 | 9 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 39 | 11 | | 7/6/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-88 | L | +210 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 32 | 17 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 46 | 15 | | 7/8/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 69-81 | L | -220 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 36 | 18 | | 7/13/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 87-77 | W | -300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | | 7/17/2017 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | | 34-64 | 53.1% | 41 | 12 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 27 | 16 | | 7/20/2017 | CHICAGO | 80-82 | L | -850 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 38-40 (+19.9 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 7-2 (+14.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 12-24 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 2-2 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -5.5 | Under | 39 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 4-23 | 17.4% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 36 | 9 | 11 | | | SEATTLE | 81 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 36 | 4 | 18 | 5/13/2017 | SEATTLE | 68 | 152.5 | Under | 37 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 34 | 3 | 23 | | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 33 | 5 | 11 | 9/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | -2.5 | Under | 27 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 27 | 2 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 78 | 160.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 18-18 | 100.0% | 47 | 8 | 16 | 8/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9 | Under | 28 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 41 | 5 | 17 | | | SEATTLE | 79 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 40 | 6 | 12 | 5/15/2016 | SEATTLE | 66 | 152.5 | Over | 26 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 39 | 5 | 24 | | | LOS ANGELES | 96 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 26 | 5 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Boucek is 51-45 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 77.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 12-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 17-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 25-25 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 11-9 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 28-38 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 15-19 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 7-12 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 5 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-12 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-12 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 33-24 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-19 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 26-22 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-20 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 24-15 against the money line (-20.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-9 against the money line (-20.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-14 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 21-18 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-14 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-23 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-18 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-23 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-11 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 48-53 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Boucek is 23-40 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 10-16 against the money line (-11.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 15-25 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 7-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 5-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 9-15 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 9-17 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 5-19 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 70.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 16-27 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 9-17 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 10-18 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 20-28 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 21-39 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 118-55 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 57-16 against the money line (+27.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 82.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 58-44 against the money line (+16.5 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.2, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 18-1 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 145-101 against the money line (+33.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 31-16 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.3, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 10-3 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 21-5 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 45-12 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 81.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 15-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-3 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 86-31 against the money line (+25.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 18-4 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 83.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 72-37 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 33-15 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 41-10 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 98-57 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 50-14 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 79.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 122-62 against the money line (+36.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 97-46 against the money line (+29.1 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 76-32 against the money line (+29.9 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 79.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 49 times, while the road underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/18/2024 10:26:19 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|