| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA MINNESOTA |
|
| 157 | 59 Final 84 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | | | |
651 | ATLANTA | +350 | 652 | MINNESOTA | -500 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (700-305 since 1997.) (69.7%, +129.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (654-289 since 1997.) (69.4%, +119.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (139-36 since 1997.) (79.4%, +84.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (193-45 since 1997.) (81.1%, +79.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (175-55 since 1997.) (76.1%, +79.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (322-122 since 1997.) (72.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (226-89 since 1997.) (71.7%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (121-21 since 1997.) (85.2%, +77.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (284-105 since 1997.) (73%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (152-35 since 1997.) (81.3%, +69.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (274-102 since 1997.) (72.9%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (292-113 since 1997.) (72.1%, +63.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (340-215 since 1997.) (61.3%, +60 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (160-51 since 1997.) (75.8%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (109-30 since 1997.) (78.4%, +56.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (119-23 since 1997.) (83.8%, +55.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (119-51 since 1997.) (70%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, with a winning record on the season. (206-70 since 1997.) (74.6%, +53.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (100-29 since 1997.) (77.5%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (83-24 since 1997.) (77.6%, +51.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (93-20 since 1997.) (82.3%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games. (245-87 since 1997.) (73.8%, +49.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (104-25 since 1997.) (80.6%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (93-21 since 1997.) (81.6%, +49.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (68-8 since 1997.) (89.5%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (115-42 since 1997.) (73.2%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (99-31 since 1997.) (76.2%, +46.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (68-9 since 1997.) (88.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (92-29 since 1997.) (76%, +45.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (72-16 since 1997.) (81.8%, +45.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (83-19 since 1997.) (81.4%, +44.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (91-32 since 1997.) (74%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (67-11 since 1997.) (85.9%, +44.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (92-33 since 1997.) (73.6%, +44.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (64-10 since 1997.) (86.5%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite. (114-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (76%, +28.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (65-18 since 1997.) (78.3%, +39.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season. (64-34 since 1997.) (65.3%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season. (45-6 since 1997.) (88.2%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (45-6 since 1997.) (88.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games. (40-6 since 1997.) (87%, +30.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (33-3 since 1997.) (91.7%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals. (39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 4 or more consecutive wins. (31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals. (42-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive unders, explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season. (24-11 since 1997.) (68.6%, +14.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent off a win against a division rival. (33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival against opponent off a road win. (23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +13.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road win. (24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road win. (26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +12.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road win. (30-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, on Sunday games. (56-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +15.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 4 or more consecutive wins. (31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite. (19-6 since 1997.) (76%, +14.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (73-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 69 | | 27-68 | 39.9% | 3-12 | 22.6% | 12-16 | 74.8% | 40 | 10 | 15 | MINNESOTA | 84 | | 34-69 | 48.9% | 4-10 | 38.5% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 45 | 10 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 862 times, while ATLANTA won 117 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 18-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 74.5 | ATLANTA is 22-12 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 77.0 | ATLANTA is 7-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 72.4 | MINNESOTA is 111-125 against the money line (-55.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 78.6 |
|
ATLANTA is 17-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 75.0 | ATLANTA is 12-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | ATLANTA is 0-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.6, OPPONENT 85.9 | ATLANTA is 12-12 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 76.8 | ATLANTA is 9-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 76.7 | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 84.7 | ATLANTA is 0-8 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 89.3 | ATLANTA is 39-50 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.0 | ATLANTA is 11-29 against the money line (-27.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 11-24 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 68.7, OPPONENT 75.2 | MINNESOTA is 25-1 against the money line (+22.8 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 72.6 | MINNESOTA is 52-37 against the money line (+18.0 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 71.3 | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 72.6 | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 69.7 | MINNESOTA is 18-0 against the money line (+19.5 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 68.6 | MINNESOTA is 24-1 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.9, OPPONENT 71.3 | MINNESOTA is 22-3 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 73.4 | MINNESOTA is 62-12 against the money line (+35.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.5, OPPONENT 75.5 | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.5, OPPONENT 73.0 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 68-87 against the money line (-34.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 4-17 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-22 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-34 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 16-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was ATLANTA 68.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 16-17 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-22 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-29 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-14 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 17-3 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 16-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 22-5 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 17-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 83.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-9 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 49-41 against the money line (-36.6 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 149-168 against the money line (-64.2 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 49-41 against the money line (-36.6 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-36 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 5-19 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 68.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 2-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after 5 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 68.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 25-30 against the money line (-25.3 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-29 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-15.1 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 66.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-10 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 79-25 against the money line (+26.4 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 42-5 against the money line (+25.1 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 42-5 against the money line (+25.1 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 42-5 against the money line (+25.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 38-13 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 70.2, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 22-1 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 26-7 against the money line (+13.4 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 67-20 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 62-19 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 21-18 | -9.9 | 20-18 | 19-20 | 76.0 | 39.5 | 41.8% | 44.4 | 73.9 | 37.6 | 41.5% | 43.7 | Road Games | 6-13 | -12.4 | 7-12 | 8-11 | 71.8 | 38.9 | 40.3% | 45.2 | 76.5 | 39.7 | 43.2% | 43.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 70.0 | 35.0 | 38.3% | 46.6 | 64.0 | 33.2 | 37.6% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.0 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 3-13 | 26.7% | 15-20 | 74.6% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.1 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.8 | 38.9 | 28-70 | 40.3% | 3-13 | 23.3% | 12-17 | 71.7% | 45 | 12 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.9 | 37.6 | 27-66 | 41.5% | 4-13 | 31.6% | 15-20 | 78.0% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.2 | 36.6 | 27-66 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.5 | 39.7 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 16-20 | 77.6% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 30-8 | +9.8 | 25-13 | 14-24 | 81.9 | 41.9 | 47.3% | 43.4 | 72.3 | 36.4 | 40.3% | 39.9 | Home Games | 17-2 | +11 | 14-5 | 7-12 | 86.4 | 44.8 | 49.6% | 42.6 | 70.5 | 35.3 | 39.9% | 39.0 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4 | 4-1 | 0-5 | 74.8 | 39.2 | 46.9% | 42.8 | 62.4 | 31.0 | 38.6% | 38.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 41.9 | 32-68 | 47.3% | 4-10 | 35.9% | 14-18 | 77.7% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.2 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 31.9% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.4 | 44.8 | 34-68 | 49.6% | 4-10 | 39.1% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.3 | 36.4 | 27-66 | 40.3% | 5-17 | 30.3% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.2 | 37.2 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 31.5% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.5 | 35.3 | 27-67 | 39.9% | 6-18 | 31.2% | 11-15 | 77.9% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.8, MINNESOTA 69.1 |
| | |
|
|
8/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -270 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 8/31/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 68-85 | L | +220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 46 | 8 | 9/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 92-82 | W | +135 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 9/4/2013 | INDIANA | 89-80 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 9/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 70-57 | W | -200 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 41 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 45 | 18 | 9/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 71-79 | L | -200 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 40 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 52 | 28 | 9/11/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -270 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 25 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | 9/13/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-87 | L | +220 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 7 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 43 | 12 | 9/15/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 68-97 | L | -200 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 14 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 6 | 9/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 56-71 | L | -300 | 20-75 | 26.7% | 41 | 9 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 58 | 13 | 9/21/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-45 | W | +120 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 60 | 13 | 14-56 | 25.0% | 42 | 11 | 9/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 80-72 | W | -250 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 51 | 16 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 34 | 18 | 9/26/2013 | INDIANA | 84-79 | W | -155 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 29 | 11 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 16 | 9/29/2013 | @ INDIANA | 67-53 | W | +180 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 52 | 11 | 18-64 | 28.1% | 45 | 15 | 10/6/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/8/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/10/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/27/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 73-47 | W | -400 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 54 | 15 | 18-72 | 25.0% | 50 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | SEATTLE | 97-74 | W | -750 | 41-71 | 57.7% | 36 | 7 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 14 | 9/4/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 83-74 | W | -330 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 44 | 9 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 40 | 13 | 9/7/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 75-60 | W | -360 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 11 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 11 | 9/10/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 73-60 | W | -400 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 41 | 15 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 32 | 16 | 9/12/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-85 | L | +120 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 47 | 13 | 9/14/2013 | CHICAGO | 79-66 | W | -330 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 48 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 33 | 5 | 9/20/2013 | SEATTLE | 80-64 | W | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 40 | 10 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 33 | 13 | 9/22/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 58-55 | W | -400 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 40 | 17 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 37 | 14 | 9/26/2013 | PHOENIX | 85-62 | W | -330 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 41 | 14 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 41 | 18 | 9/29/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 72-65 | W | -165 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 45 | 6 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 47 | 12 | 10/6/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/8/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/10/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
MINNESOTA is 11-4 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 8-1 (+7.7 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 6-2 (-2.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 5-0 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75 | -2.5 | Over | 41 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 43 | 15 | 19 | | ATLANTA | 88 | 158 | SU ATS | 52 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 40 | 9 | 13 | 7/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 72 | 158 | Over | 39 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 46 | 16 | 18 | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 47 | 7 | 10 | 9/7/2012 | ATLANTA | 93 | 166 | ATS | 52 | 37-93 | 39.8% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 51 | 18 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 97 | -9.5 | SU Over | 31 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 26-34 | 76.5% | 59 | 17 | 19 | 8/25/2012 | MINNESOTA | 84 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 56 | 10 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 74 | 162 | Under | 42 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 10-31 | 32.3% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 41 | 8 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 17-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 7-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 70.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 71.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 1-11 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in road games in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 72.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Fred is 2-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 3-10 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 72.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 71.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 70.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 13-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 68.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 8-12 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 11-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-12 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 10-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-12 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-10 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 92-46 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 49-15 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 49-15 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 43-18 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-10 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 38-13 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 21-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 38-16 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 44-19 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 23-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 41-14 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 22-8 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 37-11 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 7-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 15-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 31-20 against the money line (+11.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-10 against the money line (+17.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 24-3 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 27-7 against the money line (+15.4 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 70-27 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 45-15 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-10 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 67-26 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 50-18 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 37-12 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 28-7 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 50-25 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 64-36 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 44-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 54-27 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 58-25 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 75-36 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 52-23 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 64-34 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 107 times, while the road underdog won straight up 23 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/7/2024 11:50:30 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|