| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT LOS ANGELES |
|
| 160.5 | 73 Final 59 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - 2nd Round - IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | | | |
607 | CONNECTICUT | +170 | 608 | LOS ANGELES | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in August or September games. (139-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games. (99-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (45-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games. (110-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (156-49 since 1997.) (76.1%, +67.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games. (146-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games. (172-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (98-25 since 1997.) (79.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (109-27 since 1997.) (80.1%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (119-71 since 1997.) (62.6%, +49.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games. (138-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in August or September games. (60-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (66-10 since 1997.) (86.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (84-19 since 1997.) (81.6%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win against a division rival, in August or September games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +18.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games. (29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games. (67-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (59-18 since 1997.) (76.6%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (20-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (58-31 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (73-45 since 1997.) (61.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (43-23 since 1997.) (65.2%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (48-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in August or September games. (69-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (47-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game, in August or September games. (41-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (39-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +27.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (43-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (163-124 since 1997.) (56.8%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (131-94 since 1997.) (58.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals. (75-53 since 1997.) (58.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (30-11 since 1997.) (73.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record. (20-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +33 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (25-14 since 1997.) (64.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival. (75-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (18-7 since 1997.) (72%, +23.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (28-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival. (96-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (47-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (56-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 28-66 | 43.2% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 41 | 10 | 17 | LOS ANGELES | 83 | | 32-67 | 47.4% | 8-20 | 37.6% | 12-16 | 78.0% | 41 | 8 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 636 times, while CONNECTICUT won 338 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 38-21 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 78.7 | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 83-48 against the money line (+32.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.0 | CONNECTICUT is 62-40 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 31-10 against the money line (+23.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 79.7 | LOS ANGELES is 38-33 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 78.7 | LOS ANGELES is 7-6 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.9 | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.1 | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-19.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.5 | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 10-21 against the money line (-25.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 85.2 | LOS ANGELES is 34-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 44-68 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 17-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 86.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 88.6 | CONNECTICUT is 5-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 93.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-15 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 86.0 | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 82.9 | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 77.5 | LOS ANGELES is 98-56 against the money line (+22.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 79.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 76.7 | LOS ANGELES is 41-13 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.1, OPPONENT 79.1 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-11 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-18 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 129-104 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-21 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-28 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-23 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 212-172 against the money line (-78.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-129 against the money line (-57.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-25 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 257-212 against the money line (-79.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 172-143 against the money line (-66.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-23 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-25 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 45-33 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-23 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-29 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-24 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 237-215 against the money line (-82.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-23 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-28 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-19 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-23 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 113-93 against the money line (+21.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-18 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 66-55 against the money line (-52.5 Units) on Thursday since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-25 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 109-94 against the money line (-60.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 74-60 against the money line (-37.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-5 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in home games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-28 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-26 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-25 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-14 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-20 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games off a road win over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-46 against the money line (-24.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-0 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 11-12 | -0.4 | 11-12 | 10-12 | 81.0 | 39.5 | 42.7% | 44.2 | 80.0 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 39.8 | Road Games | 11-12 | -0.4 | 11-12 | 10-12 | 81.0 | 39.5 | 42.7% | 44.2 | 80.0 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 89.0 | 39.0 | 43.8% | 47.0 | 82.0 | 39.2 | 42.5% | 39.6 | Division Games | 11-12 | -0.4 | 11-12 | 10-12 | 81.0 | 39.5 | 42.7% | 44.2 | 80.0 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.0 | 39.5 | 30-70 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 16-20 | 76.5% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 41.9 | 31-69 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 15-18 | 80.6% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.0 | 39.5 | 30-70 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 16-20 | 76.5% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.0 | 38.2 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 81.9% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 83.4 | 41.8 | 31-68 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 81.2% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.0 | 38.2 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 81.9% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-7 | -0.1 | 12-10 | 11-11 | 84.9 | 42.4 | 48.1% | 37.9 | 80.3 | 38.8 | 44.9% | 40.1 | Home Games | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -4.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.6 | 43.6 | 47.2% | 37.6 | 80.8 | 41.2 | 46.9% | 37.8 | Division Games | 15-7 | -0.1 | 12-10 | 11-11 | 84.9 | 42.4 | 48.1% | 37.9 | 80.3 | 38.8 | 44.9% | 40.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.9 | 42.4 | 32-67 | 48.1% | 7-18 | 39.8% | 13-17 | 79.2% | 38 | 6 | 20 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 41.8 | 31-68 | 44.6% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.3 | 38.8 | 29-65 | 44.9% | 8-22 | 37.3% | 13-17 | 78.2% | 40 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 17 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 82.9 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 80.9% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71, LOS ANGELES 70.3 |
| | |
|
|
8/8/2020 | *CHICAGO | 93-100 | L | +135 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 27 | 19 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 35 | 21 | 8/10/2020 | *ATLANTA | 93-82 | W | -210 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 45 | 8 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 44 | 19 | 8/12/2020 | *DALLAS | 70-66 | W | -200 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 13 | 8/14/2020 | *CHICAGO | 77-74 | W | +200 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 53 | 8 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 40 | 15 | 8/16/2020 | *SEATTLE | 72-95 | L | +375 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 49 | 11 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 36 | 11 | 8/18/2020 | *INDIANA | 84-62 | W | -210 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 45 | 11 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 15 | 8/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 78-99 | L | +220 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 30 | 16 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 43 | 15 | 8/22/2020 | *NEW YORK | 82-65 | W | -850 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 42 | 9 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 39 | 18 | 8/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 76-80 | L | +175 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 23 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | 8/30/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 76-63 | W | -200 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 44 | 13 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 39 | 16 | 9/1/2020 | *NEW YORK | 70-65 | W | -750 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 48 | 12 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 44 | 18 | 9/3/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 78-93 | L | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 47 | 21 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 29 | 10 | 9/5/2020 | *INDIANA | 96-77 | W | -270 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 37 | 6 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 34 | 19 | 9/7/2020 | *PHOENIX | 85-70 | W | +135 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 9 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 41 | 16 | 9/9/2020 | *PHOENIX | 95-100 | L | +120 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 62 | 16 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 47 | 11 | 9/11/2020 | *ATLANTA | 75-82 | L | -115 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 51 | 8 | 9/15/2020 | @ CHICAGO | 94-81 | W | +105 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 49 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 25 | 12 | 9/17/2020 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/9/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 97-81 | W | -300 | 38-58 | 65.5% | 39 | 20 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 26 | 12 | 8/11/2020 | *NEW YORK | 93-78 | W | -1050 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 35 | 16 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 26 | 8/13/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 81-64 | W | -300 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 39 | 12 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 37 | 21 | 8/15/2020 | *INDIANA | 90-76 | W | -360 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 29 | 13 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 39 | 22 | 8/19/2020 | *PHOENIX | 83-74 | W | -220 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 9 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 41 | 17 | 8/21/2020 | *ATLANTA | 93-85 | W | | 30-67 | 44.8% | 44 | 21 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 41 | 29 | 8/23/2020 | *DALLAS | 84-81 | W | -270 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 37 | 12 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 14 | 8/28/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 80-76 | W | -210 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 23 | 8/30/2020 | *ATLANTA | 84-79 | W | | 36-72 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 49 | 15 | 8/31/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 78-96 | L | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 10 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 39 | 7 | 9/2/2020 | *DALLAS | 91-83 | W | -270 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 43 | 13 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 44 | 11 | 9/4/2020 | *SEATTLE | 89-90 | L | +210 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 32 | 13 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | 9/6/2020 | *CHICAGO | 86-80 | W | -210 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 40 | 15 | 9/8/2020 | *NEW YORK | 96-70 | W | | 37-68 | 54.4% | 39 | 11 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 31 | 17 | 9/10/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 72-80 | L | -360 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 13 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 10 | 9/12/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 70-84 | L | +155 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 47 | 15 | 9/17/2020 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 26-21 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-4 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 14-8 (-1.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/28/2020 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | -5 | SU Under | 32 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 32 | 5 | 17 | N | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 160 | ATS | 39 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 7-7 | 100.0% | 35 | 8 | 23 | 7/30/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 167 | ATS | 36 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 56 | 13 | 14 | N | LOS ANGELES | 81 | -6 | SU Under | 41 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 43 | 5 | 15 | 9/22/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 160.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 54 | 8 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 56 | -6 | Under | 32 | 23-75 | 30.7% | 2-21 | 9.5% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 45 | 6 | 10 | 9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 163 | Under | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 31 | 4 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 94 | -1 | SU ATS | 41 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 10-30 | 33.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 57 | 16 | 12 | 9/17/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 75 | 162.5 | Under | 40 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 42 | 7 | 17 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -1 | SU ATS | 37 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 49 | 8 | 9 | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 157.5 | Under | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 43 | 10 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -5 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 35 | 3 | 14 | 6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 25 | 7 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -8 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 14 | 17 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -3 | Under | 31 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 18 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 164 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 9 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 52-36 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 35-24 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 35-26 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 73-52 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 55-35 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 55-31 against the money line (+20.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 78-50 against the money line (+18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 39-23 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 47-30 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-10 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 39-21 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-35 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 52-35 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 76-57 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 41-27 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 56-44 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 45-45 against the money line (-25.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-10 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games off a road win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-14 against the money line (-11.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 13-0 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 294 times, while the road underdog won straight up 151 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 20 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 09/12/2020 - Bria Holmes is out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal ) | |
[G] 09/16/2020 - Sydney Wiese is "?" Thursday vs Connecticut Sun ( Ankle ) | [G] 09/16/2020 - Tierra Ruffin-Pratt is "?" Thursday vs Connecticut Sun ( Shoulder ) | [C] 07/23/2020 - Maria Vadeeva is out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 06/26/2020 - Kristi Toliver is out for season ( Personal ) | [F] 06/26/2020 - Chiney Ogwumike is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:01:39 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|