| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA LOS ANGELES |
|
| 150.5 | 68 Final 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - First Round | | | | |
307 | MINNESOTA | +180 | 308 | LOS ANGELES | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (370-149 since 1997.) (71.3%, +88.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (228-158 since 1997.) (59.1%, +72.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (179-114 since 1997.) (61.1%, +71.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (212-73 since 1997.) (74.4%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (59-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (182-60 since 1997.) (75.2%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (211-103 since 1997.) (67.2%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (83-52 since 1997.) (61.5%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (179-137 since 1997.) (56.6%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (48-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +22.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (212-166 since 1997.) (56.1%, +39.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (144-45 since 1997.) (76.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +11.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (33-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.6%, +21 units. Rating = 0*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (68-18 since 1997.) (79.1%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (53-12 since 1997.) (81.5%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (52-19 since 1997.) (73.2%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (47-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +27.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-26 since 1997.) (66.2%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (40-13 since 1997.) (75.5%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (52-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more, off an upset win as a home underdog. (22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (71-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (42-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +16.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (58-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.3%, +23.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (40-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season. (67-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (50-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (88-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (32-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (116-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (214-125 since 1997.) (63.1%, +44.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (89-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.1%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (39-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (28-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +28.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a close road loss of 3 points or less. (41-26 since 1997.) (61.2%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (56-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (54-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off 2 covers where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog. (28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +20.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (70-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (47-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 75 | | 30-67 | 45.3% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 10-13 | 78.2% | 44 | 9 | 15 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | | 30-69 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 11-13 | 80.6% | 39 | 7 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 576 times, while MINNESOTA won 398 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 102-31 against the money line (+77.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 73.3 | MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 114-47 against the money line (+43.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 72.9 | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-21.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 81.1 | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 80.5 | LOS ANGELES is 76-82 against the money line (-49.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 76.1 | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-21.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 82.0 |
|
MINNESOTA is 86-99 against the money line (-42.9 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 75-83 against the money line (-39.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 74.7 | MINNESOTA is 2-8 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 80.7 | MINNESOTA is 47-59 against the money line (-38.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | MINNESOTA is 5-11 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 85.4 | MINNESOTA is 61-76 against the money line (-46.5 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 76.3 | MINNESOTA is 2-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | MINNESOTA is 9-10 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | LOS ANGELES is 20-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 26-4 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 125-49 against the money line (+53.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 72.2 | LOS ANGELES is 19-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | LOS ANGELES is 60-11 against the money line (+28.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 70.4 | LOS ANGELES is 58-11 against the money line (+29.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.8, OPPONENT 77.7 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-14.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-13 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 102-113 against the money line (-50.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-14 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-14.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-10 against the money line (-14.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-9 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-11 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-14 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-14 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-14 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-61 against the money line (-73.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 116-83 against the money line (-69.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-11 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 5-8 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-10 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-8 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-9 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 133-122 against the money line (-50.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-14 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 18-17 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 48-26 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 7-7 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 53-53 against the money line (-31.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 63.8, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-3 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-9 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-9 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 199-174 against the money line (-63.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 21-7 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 86-41 against the money line (+24.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 91-45 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 20-6 against the money line (+18.9 Units) revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 17-5 against the money line (+14.6 Units) revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 12-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 26-5 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 136-66 against the money line (+31.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-15 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-10 against the money line (-17.3 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 154-132 against the money line (-66.2 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-3 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-10 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-6 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 6*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 17-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-46 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-13 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-7 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 51-81 against the money line (-32.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-8 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 66-78 against the money line (-39.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 51-72 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-56 against the money line (-35.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 73-80 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 40-51 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 110-156 against the money line (-84.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 56-78 against the money line (-42.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 18-16 | -16.2 | 13-21 | 12-22 | 78.9 | 41.1 | 45.1% | 42.7 | 78.3 | 38.4 | 44.5% | 38.0 | Road Games | 9-8 | -4 | 8-9 | 3-14 | 77.9 | 39.9 | 45.4% | 42.6 | 77.4 | 37.8 | 44.4% | 37.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -4.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 83.2 | 41.4 | 48.6% | 38.2 | 84.8 | 39.4 | 49.1% | 36.4 | Division Games | 9-7 | -5.4 | 7-9 | 4-12 | 79.2 | 40.9 | 45.2% | 43.2 | 77.9 | 36.4 | 43.8% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.9 | 41.1 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 5-16 | 34.6% | 13-16 | 77.9% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83 | 41.9 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.9 | 39.9 | 31-67 | 45.4% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 12-15 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.3 | 38.4 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 34.6% | 12-15 | 79.1% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 83 | 41.7 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.4 | 37.8 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 12-16 | 78.8% | 37 | 6 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-15 | -18.5 | 15-18 | 14-19 | 78.9 | 40.2 | 45.3% | 36.8 | 77.0 | 38.6 | 45.0% | 41.6 | Home Games | 11-6 | -15.5 | 7-10 | 3-13 | 76.4 | 40.8 | 46.2% | 37.6 | 71.8 | 36.9 | 42.5% | 41.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 75.6 | 37.2 | 39.4% | 41.2 | 77.8 | 42.6 | 46.9% | 42.0 | Division Games | 9-7 | -3.9 | 7-9 | 7-8 | 78.3 | 40.4 | 44.9% | 35.2 | 80.1 | 40.4 | 47.0% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.9 | 40.2 | 30-67 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 13-15 | 81.0% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.9 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.4 | 40.8 | 30-64 | 46.2% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 12-16 | 78.2% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 38.6 | 29-64 | 45.0% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 14-17 | 79.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 83 | 41.8 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.8 | 36.9 | 27-64 | 42.5% | 4-17 | 25.6% | 13-17 | 75.9% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.6, LOS ANGELES 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
7/13/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-85 | L | -400 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 41 | 9 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 44 | 12 | 7/15/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-83 | L | -155 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 7/18/2018 | INDIANA | 89-65 | W | | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 9 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 31 | 11 | 7/21/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 80-75 | W | +135 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 14 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 35 | 11 | 7/24/2018 | NEW YORK | 85-82 | W | -950 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 52 | 7 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 14 | 8/2/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-79 | L | +120 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 14 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 37 | 9 | 8/3/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 75-85 | L | +180 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 43 | 18 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 10 | 8/5/2018 | ATLANTA | 66-86 | L | -220 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 39 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 47 | 13 | 8/7/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 85-64 | W | -175 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 43 | 20 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 20 | 8/9/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 89-73 | W | +100 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 46 | 10 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 36 | 11 | 8/12/2018 | SEATTLE | 72-81 | L | +135 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 9 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 47 | 14 | 8/14/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-91 | L | -450 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 44 | 16 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 34 | 14 | 8/17/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 79-96 | L | +180 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 31 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 38 | 10 | 8/19/2018 | WASHINGTON | 88-83 | W | +105 | 35-61 | 57.4% | 34 | 15 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 27 | 10 | 8/21/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/12/2018 | DALLAS | 77-92 | L | -250 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | 7/15/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 99-78 | W | -210 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 39 | 7 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 50 | 13 | 7/20/2018 | INDIANA | 76-78 | L | -1050 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 42 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 43 | 8 | 7/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-76 | W | -155 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 38 | 9 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 13 | 7/24/2018 | ATLANTA | 71-81 | L | -140 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 12 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 47 | 11 | 8/2/2018 | MINNESOTA | 79-57 | W | -140 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 37 | 9 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 14 | 8/5/2018 | PHOENIX | 78-75 | W | -300 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 45 | 7 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 33 | 4 | 8/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 82-81 | W | -450 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 37 | 10 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | 8/9/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 73-79 | L | -120 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 12 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 41 | 19 | 8/12/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | L | -155 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 41 | 15 | 8/14/2018 | NEW YORK | 74-66 | W | -1050 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 46 | 5 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 48 | 18 | 8/17/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-69 | L | +155 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 45 | 10 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 42 | 8 | 8/19/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 86-89 | L | +175 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 44 | 11 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 38 | 16 | 8/21/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 54-38 (+16.4 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 11-9 (+6.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 32-13 (+10.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 5-4 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/2/2018 | MINNESOTA | 57 | 155.5 | Under | 29 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 40 | 7 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 37 | 6 | 9 | 7/5/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 153.5 | Over | 35 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 30 | 8 | 9 | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 39 | 5 | 14 | 6/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | 69 | 158.5 | Under | 38 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 38 | 5 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -6 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 31 | 4 | 11 | 5/20/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 31 | 5 | 6 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -7.5 | Under | 38 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 47 | 6 | 24 | 10/4/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 154 | Over | 35 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 29 | 7 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 85 | -5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 50 | 14 | 17 | 10/1/2017 | MINNESOTA | 80 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 19-30 | 63.3% | 62 | 16 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 31 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 29 | 7 | 14 | 9/29/2017 | MINNESOTA | 64 | 154 | Under | 26 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 31 | 4 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 75 | -3 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 48 | 8 | 15 | 9/26/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 158 | ATS | 26 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 5 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 70 | -7 | SU Under | 45 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 44 | 7 | 12 | 9/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | 157 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 41 | 8 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 41 | 7 | 15 | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 67 | 155 | Under | 32 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 37 | 3 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | -3 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 35 | 6 | 8 | 8/11/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 70 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 38 | 6 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 64 | -5.5 | Under | 36 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 7/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 166.5 | Under | 36 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 32 | 9 | 17 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 46 | 15 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 46-13 against the money line (+22.9 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 135-60 against the money line (+35.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 41-14 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 45-19 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 96-30 against the money line (+32.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 73-19 against the money line (+34.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 40-8 against the money line (+23.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 77-19 against the money line (+36.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 35-11 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 20-4 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 12-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after 4 straight games allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 21-12 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 104-40 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 71-37 against the money line (+15.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-32 against the money line (+11.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 34-16 against the money line (+14.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 8-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 56-23 against the money line (+25.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 61-12 against the money line (+30.8 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 98-31 against the money line (+28.1 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-23 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 37-16 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 54-20 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 38-12 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 115-45 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 98-35 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 167-73 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 130-48 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-34 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 132-54 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 43-8 against the money line (+28.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 125-50 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-8 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 73-27 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 117-47 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 157-66 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 34-15 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 91-59 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-15 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 26-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-10 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 29-19 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) off a road loss as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-10 against the money line (-15.1 Units) off a close road loss of 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 70.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-13 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Agler is 12-20 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 10-16 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 28-26 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 40-31 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 31-25 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 22-22 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 34-25 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 48-33 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-27 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-24 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 33-26 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 47-36 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-14 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 27-17 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 46-29 against the money line (-31.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 61-36 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 55-34 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 45-28 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 53-38 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 28-17 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 68-60 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 48-34 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Reeve is 44-33 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 6-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 28-24 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 13-16 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 12-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 8-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 53-43 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 21-25 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 39-39 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 118-73 against the money line (-31.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 1-4 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 2-5 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 46-42 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-35 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 70-25 against the money line (+24.3 Units) in home games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 58-17 against the money line (+24.0 Units) in home games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-16 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 31-14 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.9, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive road losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-1 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Agler is 84-41 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 124-51 against the money line (+29.6 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 11-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 66.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 93-38 against the money line (+30.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 127 times, while the road underdog won straight up 59 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 08/20/2018 - Rebekkah Brunson is "?" Tuesday vs LA Sparks ( Concussion ) | [G] 08/13/2018 - Danielle Robinson is out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | |
[F] 08/20/2018 - Nneka Ogwumike is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Min Lynx ( Illness ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 12:03:43 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|