| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS LOS ANGELES |
|
| 170 | 84 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | DALLAS | +450 | 604 | LOS ANGELES | -650 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (136-39 since 1997.) (77.7%, +59.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss, on Tuesday nights. (172-114 since 1997.) (60.1%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (187-63 since 1997.) (74.8%, +50.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (89-23 since 1997.) (79.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (105-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (81-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (122-84 since 1997.) (59.2%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (152-116 since 1997.) (56.7%, +32 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (77-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (66-38 since 1997.) (63.5%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a losing record. (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (40-19 since 1997.) (67.8%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games. (40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +17.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (45-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +20.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (68-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (88-58 since 1997.) (60.3%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (27-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 76 | | 26-67 | 39.4% | 6-21 | 29.6% | 17-22 | 77.7% | 41 | 13 | 14 | LOS ANGELES | 90 | | 33-65 | 51.2% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 17-22 | 76.3% | 42 | 10 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 836 times, while DALLAS won 146 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was DALLAS 90.0, OPPONENT 86.0 | LOS ANGELES is 9-9 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 78.7 | LOS ANGELES is 13-18 against the money line (-22.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.0 | LOS ANGELES is 72-72 against the money line (-38.1 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | LOS ANGELES is 158-144 against the money line (-74.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 92.0 | LOS ANGELES is 15-3 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | LOS ANGELES is 112-63 against the money line (+32.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 71.2 | LOS ANGELES is 20-3 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.3, OPPONENT 76.2 | LOS ANGELES is 15-1 against the money line (+15.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.5, OPPONENT 75.8 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 58-66 against the money line (-54.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 91-98 against the money line (-70.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 97-93 against the money line (-47.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-20 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 61-48 against the money line (-37.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-32 against the money line (-20.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-9 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-21 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 45-33 against the money line (-33.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 105-114 against the money line (-42.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-34 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 21-20 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) on Tuesday over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-30 against the money line (-19.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-112 against the money line (-49.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-24 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-13 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 40-8 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) in June games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-8 | -1.2 | 6-9 | 13-2 | 86.8 | 42.0 | 40.9% | 45.3 | 88.2 | 43.9 | 47.6% | 42.1 | Road Games | 3-3 | +2.7 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 86.0 | 40.2 | 38.7% | 46.3 | 86.2 | 43.8 | 45.5% | 46.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.6 | 3-2 | 5-0 | 97.8 | 44.8 | 45.0% | 49.0 | 92.4 | 43.2 | 45.8% | 39.4 | Division Games | 5-2 | +5.2 | 3-4 | 6-1 | 88.6 | 39.9 | 43.5% | 47.0 | 89.1 | 40.6 | 46.6% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.8 | 42.0 | 29-71 | 40.9% | 8-23 | 33.6% | 21-27 | 78.6% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.7 | 29-68 | 43.4% | 5-17 | 32.7% | 18-22 | 79.2% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.0 | 40.2 | 28-73 | 38.7% | 9-28 | 31.5% | 20-25 | 80.9% | 46 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 88.2 | 43.9 | 31-66 | 47.6% | 4-14 | 31.9% | 21-26 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 24 | 9 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.7 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 18-23 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.2 | 43.8 | 31-68 | 45.5% | 5-14 | 38.6% | 19-24 | 76.9% | 46 | 9 | 19 | 24 | 9 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-1 | +10.2 | 9-5 | 7-7 | 85.6 | 42.1 | 48.8% | 38.3 | 71.9 | 34.4 | 42.0% | 42.4 | Home Games | 6-1 | +2.4 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 84.0 | 42.6 | 49.0% | 36.3 | 72.1 | 34.9 | 42.8% | 41.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 83.6 | 39.8 | 47.7% | 37.0 | 75.4 | 37.0 | 43.9% | 42.2 | Division Games | 6-1 | +4.2 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 82.1 | 40.9 | 48.7% | 35.4 | 68.6 | 32.1 | 41.0% | 41.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.6 | 42.1 | 32-66 | 48.8% | 6-16 | 39.7% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 38 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 41.1 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 18-23 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.0 | 42.6 | 32-65 | 49.0% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 14-19 | 74.2% | 36 | 8 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.9 | 34.4 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 4-15 | 25.1% | 14-19 | 73.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 17-21 | 79.0% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.1 | 34.9 | 27-63 | 42.8% | 3-15 | 21.9% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.4, LOS ANGELES 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
5/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-77 | W | -950 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 53 | 13 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 5/27/2016 | ATLANTA | 93-102 | L | -200 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 48 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 44 | 12 | 5/29/2016 | CHICAGO | 87-92 | L | +100 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 6/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-80 | L | +550 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | 6/8/2016 | WASHINGTON | 79-87 | L | -175 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 43 | 10 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 52 | 15 | 6/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 73-97 | L | +325 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 6/14/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 88-91 | L | +280 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | 6/16/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-79 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | 6/18/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 117-111 | W | +280 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 65 | 17 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 55 | 20 | 6/21/2016 | PHOENIX | 100-90 | W | +135 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 39 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 36 | 13 | 6/23/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-90 | W | -600 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 49 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 6/25/2016 | INDIANA | 87-92 | L | -250 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | 6/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/20/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-67 | W | -330 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | W | -120 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 93-80 | W | -155 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-72 | W | -650 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 68-61 | W | | 23-53 | 43.4% | 39 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 13 | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-61 | W | -550 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 36 | 8 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 8 | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | 100-77 | W | -330 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | 6/11/2016 | @ DALLAS | 97-73 | W | -450 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 98-85 | W | -360 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 6/17/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-71 | W | -550 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 15 | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-72 | L | -155 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | 6/24/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-76 | W | +180 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 38 | 18 | 6/26/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 80-73 | W | | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | 6/28/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
DALLAS is 21-29 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 6-4 (-0.6 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 16-5 (-0.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -9 | SU ATS | 50 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 35 | 9 | 19 | | DALLAS | 73 | 164 | Over | 32 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 34 | 6 | 21 | 9/6/2015 | TULSA | 73 | 151.5 | Over | 37 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 36 | 11 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 37-61 | 60.7% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 32 | 7 | 9 | 8/28/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 66 | -1 | Under | 27 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 31 | 6 | 13 | | TULSA | 76 | 154 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 47 | 15 | 13 | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | 57 | 152.5 | Under | 26 | 17-65 | 26.2% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 37 | 11 | 10 | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 2-6 | 33.3% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 47 | 9 | 14 | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 67 | 158 | Under | 31 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 42 | 11 | 13 | | TULSA | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 26-28 | 92.9% | 41 | 11 | 5 | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 95 | 149 | ATS | 42 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 40 | 13 | 10 | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | -5.5 | SU Over | 42 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 24-30 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 18-12 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-11 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 45-48 against the money line (-30.7 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-29 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 69.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Williams is 4-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 72.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 0-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 74.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 2-13 against the money line (-15.0 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 1-17 against the money line (-16.4 Units) off a home loss as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 77.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 6-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-22 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-15 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-27 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 8-24 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 7-24 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 5-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-30 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Williams is 12-28 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-32 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 44-60 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-38 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 74.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-45 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 73.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-17 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 73.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 31-55 against the money line (-28.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-37 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 100-51 against the money line (+24.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 39-12 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 81.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 81-60 against the money line (+28.2 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 124-91 against the money line (+44.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 75-54 against the money line (+29.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.2, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 22-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 35-17 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 51-26 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-10 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-8 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 63-35 against the money line (+22.8 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 58-31 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 84-50 against the money line (+32.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 63-27 against the money line (+19.3 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 96-77 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 145-119 against the money line (+37.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 147-107 against the money line (+30.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 63-36 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 96-50 against the money line (+46.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 57-32 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.6, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 82-42 against the money line (+29.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 43-22 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 95-80 against the money line (+31.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 34 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:10:37 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|