| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SAN ANTONIO
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
150.5
| 81
Final
86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | SAN ANTONIO | +175 | | 608 | LOS ANGELES | -210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(235-100 since 1997.) (70.1%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(171-103 since 1997.) (62.4%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record.
(157-65 since 1997.) (70.7%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(100-22 since 1997.) (82%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(140-95 since 1997.) (59.6%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(35-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(71-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(275-286 since 1997.) (49%, +93.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(271-250 since 1997.) (52%, +84.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(171-103 since 1997.) (62.4%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(64-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.3%, +43.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(78-61 since 1997.) (56.1%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(90-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(93-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +48.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(53-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(42-26 since 1997.) (61.8%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(54-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(65-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(56-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(36-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SAN ANTONIO | 71 | | 26-63 | 41.0% | 4-15 | 28.5% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 39 | 7 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 75 | | 30-69 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 9-11 | 83.1% | 45 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 576 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 390 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 23-21 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.0 | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 73.7 | LOS ANGELES is 34-45 against the money line (-24.8 Units) when they attempt 11 or less free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.7, OPPONENT 69.2 | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 81.5 | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 75.9 | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 2-15 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.2, OPPONENT 79.3 | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the money line (-17.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 85.9 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 36-81 against the money line (-65.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 40-52 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 31-55 against the money line (-25.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 62-87 against the money line (-49.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 79.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-16 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 82.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-18 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 79.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 39-68 against the money line (-31.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.9, OPPONENT 77.4 | LOS ANGELES is 88-29 against the money line (+40.2 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 68.3 | LOS ANGELES is 108-59 against the money line (+31.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 70.9 | LOS ANGELES is 93-44 against the money line (+34.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 71.7 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-13 against the money line (-28.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-21 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-16.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-13 against the money line (-18.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-18 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-22 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-17 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-18.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 84-91 against the money line (-39.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 84-104 against the money line (-38.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 86-127 against the money line (-51.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 149-198 against the money line (-61.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-24 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 31-29 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-27 against the money line (-23.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-13 against the money line (-15.0 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-20.7 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-5 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-16 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-21 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 187-249 against the money line (-73.8 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 112-162 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-111 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-143 against the money line (-63.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-39 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 84-127 against the money line (-59.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-66 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 55-81 against the money line (-36.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 45-78 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-40 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 60-87 against the money line (-39.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-22 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 70-92 against the money line (-38.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 48-62 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-41 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 84-107 against the money line (-38.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-91 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-105 against the money line (-42.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-121 against the money line (-48.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 83-115 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) off 3 or more consecutive road losses since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 2-7 | -5.6 | 3-5 | 3-6 | 70.7 | 32.3 | 39.3% | 41.1 | 78.3 | 37.8 | 45.8% | 43.6 | | Road Games | 0-4 | -4 | 2-1 | 1-3 | 69.7 | 29.5 | 38.2% | 37.5 | 80.2 | 38.2 | 47.1% | 44.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 74.6 | 34.8 | 41.2% | 42.2 | 79.2 | 39.2 | 49.7% | 36.2 | | Division Games | 2-5 | -3.6 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 68.6 | 31.7 | 39.4% | 40.3 | 76.9 | 37.7 | 45.7% | 42.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 32.3 | 26-66 | 39.3% | 4-16 | 27.6% | 15-18 | 80.5% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 36.2 | 28-66 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 15-18 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.7 | 29.5 | 25-65 | 38.2% | 5-17 | 30.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 15 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.3 | 37.8 | 32-70 | 45.8% | 4-11 | 34.0% | 11-14 | 75.8% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.3 | 37.5 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 81.1% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.2 | 38.2 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 4-12 | 31.2% | 12-16 | 79.4% | 45 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 0-7 | -7.2 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 65.9 | 34.4 | 40.9% | 40.1 | 76.0 | 31.1 | 44.8% | 39.3 | | Home Games | 0-3 | -3.2 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 58.0 | 34.0 | 40.1% | 38.3 | 67.7 | 25.7 | 44.9% | 36.3 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 69.2 | 35.0 | 42.7% | 40.4 | 77.2 | 31.8 | 44.4% | 38.4 | | Division Games | 0-3 | -3.2 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 55.7 | 31.3 | 37.3% | 39.3 | 71.0 | 27.3 | 48.0% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.9 | 34.4 | 26-63 | 40.9% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 9-11 | 82.5% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 4 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 72.1 | 37.4 | 26-65 | 40.1% | 5-17 | 31.8% | 15-18 | 81.7% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 58.0 | 34.0 | 24-59 | 40.1% | 5-17 | 26.9% | 6-9 | 69.2% | 38 | 6 | 15 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 31.1 | 28-62 | 44.8% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 15-22 | 71.1% | 39 | 6 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.3 | 36.1 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 14-17 | 78.4% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.7 | 25.7 | 26-59 | 44.9% | 4-15 | 28.9% | 11-15 | 71.1% | 36 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 1 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 73.3, LOS ANGELES 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 71-76 | L | +175 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 43 | 15 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 42 | 11 | | 6/11/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 69-72 | L | +200 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 39 | 17 | 28-76 | 36.8% | 55 | 15 | | 6/14/2015 | TULSA | 62-73 | L | -175 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 41 | 10 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 64 | 12 | | 6/16/2015 | @ TULSA | 61-88 | L | +200 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 36 | 11 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 50 | 12 | | 6/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 59-74 | L | +250 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 37 | 15 | | 6/20/2015 | CHICAGO | 87-95 | L | +175 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 49 | 14 | 42-76 | 55.3% | 41 | 12 | | 6/25/2015 | PHOENIX | 76-71 | W | +120 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | | 6/27/2015 | SEATTLE | 73-71 | W | -220 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | | 6/30/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-85 | L | +400 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | | 7/2/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/6/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-86 | L | +155 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 40 | 8 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 45 | 6 | | 6/14/2015 | SEATTLE | 54-60 | L | -125 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 39 | 12 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 38 | 12 | | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 52-67 | L | +500 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 31 | 8 | | 6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 68-76 | L | +155 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | | 6/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-84 | L | +450 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | | 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | L | +220 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | +145 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 43-31 (-6.6 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 4-4 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 26-11 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 3-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/10/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -2.5 | Over | 31 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 9 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 82 | 155 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 49 | 10 | 8 | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | 159 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 30 | 6 | 10 | | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -6.5 | Under | 38 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 47 | 8 | 22 | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -2.5 | Over | 44 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 0-3 | 0.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 35 | 8 | 19 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 101 | 155 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 24-24 | 100.0% | 29 | 5 | 11 | 5/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 62 | 154.5 | Under | 38 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 33 | 6 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 38 | 6 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Dan is 48-40 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 105-102 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 25-24 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 22-25 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 30-25 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 25-18 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-25 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in home games in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 70.8, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Dan is 152-179 against the money line (-40.0 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 93-112 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 56-76 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-100 against the money line (-39.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-31 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Dan is 71-88 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-48 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 46-59 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 41-56 against the money line (-29.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 22-31 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 24-32 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 78-97 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 49-67 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 63-72 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 44-49 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 32-33 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 77-82 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 58-73 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 72-84 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 70-82 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 23-30 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-21 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 69-70 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 110-117 against the money line (-36.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 69-97 against the money line (-46.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 121-142 against the money line (-40.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 44-58 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 105-103 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 33-29 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 30-54 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 86-45 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.5, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-18 against the money line (+13.1 Units) on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.5, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 35-16 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.4, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-56 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-24 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.4, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 106-83 against the money line (+32.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 87-63 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-7 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.8, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-12 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.3, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 65-46 against the money line (+28.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.8, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 29-19 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.8, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 28-13 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.6, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 30-8 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 79.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-30 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.6, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 48-36 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 71.0, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 17-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.3, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-7 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.4, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-4 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in home games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 78.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 76-47 against the money line (+28.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 124-105 against the money line (+29.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 32-27 against the money line (+16.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 66-28 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 129-98 against the money line (+30.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 87-45 against the money line (+43.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 145 times, while the road underdog won straight up 88 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 06/30/2015 - Alex Montgomery "?" Thursday vs. LA Sparks ( Knee ) | | [C] 06/30/2015 - Jayne Appel "?" Thursday vs. LA Sparks ( Mouth ) | | [G] 06/30/2015 - Jia Perkins "?" Thursday vs. LA Sparks ( Calf ) | |
| [G] 07/01/2015 - Andrea Hoover "?" Thursday vs. SA Stars ( Foot ) | | [F] 06/29/2015 - Farhiya Abdi "?" Thursday vs. SA Stars ( Knee ) | | [G] 06/22/2015 - Erin Phillips out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 06/16/2015 - Alana Beard out indefinitely ( Foot ) | | [F] 06/04/2015 - Candace Parker out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:21:07 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|