| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
149
| 73
Final
77 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | INDIANA | +180 | | 602 | LOS ANGELES | -220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(188-67 since 1997.) (73.7%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(171-58 since 1997.) (74.7%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(223-182 since 1997.) (55.1%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(198-93 since 1997.) (68%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(137-44 since 1997.) (75.7%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(124-37 since 1997.) (77%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(144-62 since 1997.) (69.9%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(86-65 since 1997.) (57%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +13.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(96-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +29.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(39-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season.
(226-196 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +44.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(475-514 since 1997.) (48%, +104.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(273-278 since 1997.) (49.5%, +99.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(146-128 since 1997.) (53.3%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(93-87 since 1997.) (51.7%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(109-65 since 1997.) (62.6%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(107-62 since 1997.) (63.3%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(59-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +38.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(91-53 since 1997.) (63.2%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(60-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(39-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(34-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(20-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(20-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(26-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(45-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| INDIANA | 73 | | 27-64 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 34.7% | 14-19 | 75.5% | 40 | 10 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | | 30-64 | 46.0% | 2-8 | 31.0% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 42 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 652 times, while INDIANA won 304 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 72-49 against the money line (+22.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 70.6 | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 72.2 | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | LOS ANGELES is 0-5 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 84.2 | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 75.7 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 82.8 | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 63-65 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 8-7 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 76.1 | LOS ANGELES is 12-11 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 78.5 | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 88.3 |
|
INDIANA is 10-18 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 77.8 | INDIANA is 18-26 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 72.7 | INDIANA is 20-44 against the money line (-51.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 80.0 | INDIANA is 0-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 88.4 | INDIANA is 78-88 against the money line (-46.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.3 | LOS ANGELES is 58-12 against the money line (+29.9 Units) in home games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 70.3 | LOS ANGELES is 108-57 against the money line (+33.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 70.8 | LOS ANGELES is 71-29 against the money line (+26.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 198-56 against the money line (+116.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 216-128 against the money line (+31.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 36-24 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 38-25 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 23-15 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 35-25 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 23-18 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-17 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 11-23 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who make 3 or less 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 7-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) as a road underdog this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 26-24 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 7-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 64.5 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 35-26 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games revenging a home loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 6-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 29-33 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 7-1 against the money line (+10.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 29-18 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 25-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-9 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 73-35 against the money line (+34.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.2, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 11-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-12.9 Units) as a home favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-5 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in home games in July games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-11 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-15 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-18.3 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-9.7 Units) off a win against a division rival this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-8.9 Units) off a road win this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 9-37 against the money line (-27.9 Units) in road games off a road win since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 67.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 139-141 against the money line (-56.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-16 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-13 | +1.1 | 14-11 | 13-12 | 75.2 | 36.9 | 41.9% | 40.5 | 76.5 | 36.1 | 43.6% | 41.7 | | Road Games | 7-5 | +6.6 | 8-4 | 7-5 | 73.5 | 36.7 | 40.8% | 41.1 | 74.8 | 35.1 | 42.5% | 42.5 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 73.2 | 37.2 | 43.1% | 41.4 | 74.2 | 37.8 | 41.0% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.2 | 36.9 | 27-64 | 41.9% | 5-14 | 35.2% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.3 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 15-20 | 77.5% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.5 | 36.7 | 26-64 | 40.8% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 17-23 | 76.0% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 23 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.5 | 36.1 | 27-62 | 43.6% | 4-13 | 30.2% | 18-23 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.2 | 38.8 | 29-68 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.8 | 35.1 | 26-61 | 42.5% | 3-13 | 22.6% | 20-25 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-14 | -15.2 | 11-14 | 11-13 | 78.1 | 40.4 | 45.2% | 40.0 | 77.9 | 39.2 | 45.0% | 40.0 | | Home Games | 3-9 | -15.8 | 3-9 | 5-7 | 75.5 | 38.7 | 44.5% | 39.1 | 78.6 | 39.9 | 46.8% | 39.5 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 75.0 | 36.0 | 42.9% | 36.8 | 77.0 | 41.8 | 45.9% | 40.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.1 | 40.4 | 31-68 | 45.2% | 3-8 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 40 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 44.1% | 5-14 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 78.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.5 | 38.7 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 3-9 | 31.7% | 14-17 | 80.1% | 39 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 39.2 | 29-65 | 45.0% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 81.2% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.1 | 38.5 | 29-65 | 44.4% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.6 | 39.9 | 30-64 | 46.8% | 5-14 | 34.9% | 14-18 | 75.9% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 69.4, LOS ANGELES 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/20/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | +145 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 52 | 14 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 36 | 14 | | 6/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-83 | L | +350 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 16 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 34 | 19 | | 6/25/2014 | TULSA | 102-107 | L | -200 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | | 6/27/2014 | PHOENIX | 76-81 | L | +180 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 46 | 17 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 30 | 7 | | 6/29/2014 | ATLANTA | 68-76 | L | +135 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | | 7/1/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | W | +250 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | | 7/2/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | +155 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 38 | 17 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 37 | 14 | | 7/5/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 70-71 | L | -175 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 14 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | | 7/8/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | W | -105 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | | 7/10/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 72-68 | W | -220 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | | 7/12/2014 | ATLANTA | 74-93 | L | +100 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | | 7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 78-86 | L | +120 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 82-64 | W | -210 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | | 7/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 57-60 | L | -165 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | | 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 75-68 | W | +100 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/19/2014 | TULSA | 87-77 | W | -270 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 69-72 | L | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | | 6/24/2014 | SEATTLE | 65-57 | W | -300 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | | 6/28/2014 | @ TULSA | 92-89 | W | -105 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -270 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 11 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 45 | 21 | | 7/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 70-56 | W | -125 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | | 7/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 89-94 | L | +105 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-83 | L | +155 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | | 7/11/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 68-54 | W | -175 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 37 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 41 | 16 | | 7/13/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 90-64 | W | -175 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 43 | 12 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 39 | 11 | | 7/15/2014 | @ INDIANA | 86-78 | W | -140 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | | 7/17/2014 | WASHINGTON | 75-79 | L | -330 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | | 7/23/2014 | NEW YORK | 64-66 | L | -330 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 40 | 10 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 49 | 18 | | 7/24/2014 | PHOENIX | 73-93 | L | +175 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 44 | 12 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 8 | | 7/26/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 77-69 | W | -210 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 10 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 39 | 13 | | 7/28/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 18-8 (+10.5 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-0 (+5.9 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 11-2 (+9.0 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 24-28 | 85.7% | 37 | 11 | 12 | | | INDIANA | 78 | 150 | Over | 46 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 34 | 10 | 15 | 8/16/2013 | INDIANA | 72 | 144.5 | Over | 37 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 30 | 9 | 12 | | | LOS ANGELES | 94 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 36-57 | 63.2% | 2-6 | 33.3% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 34 | 5 | 12 | 8/8/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 74 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-55 | 54.5% | 1-3 | 33.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 37 | 4 | 16 | | | INDIANA | 64 | -2.5 | Under | 30 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 17-25 | 68.0% | 42 | 12 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 148-114 against the money line (+2.8 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 16-8 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games in July games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 70.5, OPPONENT 66.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 90-59 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 40-26 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 21-18 against the money line (+11.0 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 63-46 against the money line (+16.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 46-32 against the money line (+20.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 20-15 against the money line (+9.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 48-29 against the money line (+22.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 19-11 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 60-33 against the money line (+29.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 55-28 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 77-47 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 37-15 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 11-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 87-65 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 123-92 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 25-23 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 66-51 against the money line (+7.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 78-56 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 85-60 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 120-88 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 33-20 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 42-31 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 117-88 against the money line (+5.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 51-44 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Lin is 43-45 against the money line (-18.5 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 43-45 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 5-20 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus teams who make 3 or less 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lin 67.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 38-56 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lin 71.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 233 times, while the road underdog won straight up 86 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 3:41:55 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|