| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT ATLANTA |
|
| 156.5 | 80 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | CONNECTICUT | +325 | 652 | ATLANTA | -450 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (240-88 since 1997.) (73.2%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (176-57 since 1997.) (75.5%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record. (103-26 since 1997.) (79.8%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (89-22 since 1997.) (80.2%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss, on Tuesday nights. (151-104 since 1997.) (59.2%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (107-55 since 1997.) (66%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (39-5 since 1997.) (88.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a home loss. (25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a bad team (25% to 40%) after 15 or more games. (44-11 since 1997.) (80%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (44-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +23 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots against opponent after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse. (20-8 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (475-515 since 1997.) (48%, +103.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (273-279 since 1997.) (49.5%, +98.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (146-129 since 1997.) (53.1%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (93-88 since 1997.) (51.4%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games. (95-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.2%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (93-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (80-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (61-55 since 1997.) (52.6%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights. (92-72 since 1997.) (56.1%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (56-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (174-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +77.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (55-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (55-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (55-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (118-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (118-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (118-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 75 | | 29-69 | 41.3% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 13-17 | 75.1% | 43 | 12 | 17 | ATLANTA | 82 | | 31-68 | 45.2% | 4-15 | 30.3% | 16-21 | 72.8% | 46 | 12 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 694 times, while CONNECTICUT won 289 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 63-38 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 71.5 | ATLANTA is 30-28 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 76.8 | ATLANTA is 44-54 against the money line (-27.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 83.4 | ATLANTA is 27-28 against the money line (-26.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 82.5 | ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-33 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.7, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 82.5 | CONNECTICUT is 9-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.1, OPPONENT 78.8 | CONNECTICUT is 4-21 against the money line (-18.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 86.3 | CONNECTICUT is 8-22 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.5, OPPONENT 77.1 | ATLANTA is 35-18 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 | ATLANTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 86.8, OPPONENT 77.9 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus good pressure defensive teams - forcing >=17 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 19-17 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-12 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-22 against the money line (-25.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 27-26 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-16 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-21 against the money line (-22.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 27-26 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-23.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 16-19 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-18 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 24-23 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 18-16 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-17 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 16-19 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 24-35 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-15 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-35 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-38 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 66.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-74 against the money line (-31.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 103-75 against the money line (+22.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 72-49 against the money line (+18.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 76-55 against the money line (+20.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-19 against the money line (+14.3 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 59-34 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-12 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 36-30 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-13 against the money line (-24.8 Units) as a home favorite of -270 to -450 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-13 against the money line (-18.2 Units) in home games on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-11 against the money line (-14.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 24-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-4 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-22.0 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 15-15 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-5 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 0-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-19 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-11 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 13-19 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-19 against the money line (-28.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 5-12 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 8-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 2 or less 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 20-38 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-23 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-27 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-22 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-15 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-19 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-24 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 10-16 | -3.4 | 13-13 | 12-14 | 75.5 | 36.3 | 41.5% | 43.4 | 78.3 | 36.4 | 45.4% | 41.2 | Road Games | 3-10 | -4.1 | 6-7 | 7-6 | 75.1 | 35.9 | 42.3% | 43.0 | 80.2 | 36.1 | 45.8% | 41.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 75.0 | 36.4 | 41.2% | 43.4 | 83.8 | 40.4 | 48.9% | 39.4 | Division Games | 6-10 | -3 | 8-8 | 7-9 | 73.6 | 35.1 | 40.3% | 43.7 | 76.1 | 35.6 | 44.7% | 41.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.5 | 36.3 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 13-18 | 75.4% | 43 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.1 | 35.9 | 29-70 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 11-16 | 73.0% | 43 | 13 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.3 | 36.4 | 29-64 | 45.4% | 4-12 | 32.8% | 16-20 | 77.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.4 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.2 | 36.1 | 30-65 | 45.8% | 4-13 | 33.7% | 16-21 | 76.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-9 | -6.2 | 12-12 | 13-11 | 81.9 | 41.3 | 43.6% | 45.9 | 77.8 | 39.2 | 42.7% | 43.4 | Home Games | 10-3 | -1.4 | 8-5 | 7-6 | 82.6 | 40.5 | 44.7% | 47.3 | 74.5 | 37.8 | 41.3% | 42.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -8.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 81.2 | 39.4 | 40.4% | 43.4 | 84.8 | 45.0 | 45.0% | 48.8 | Division Games | 10-8 | -10.6 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 80.0 | 40.6 | 42.5% | 47.0 | 75.8 | 38.8 | 42.0% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 41.3 | 31-71 | 43.6% | 4-15 | 29.4% | 15-21 | 72.4% | 46 | 12 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 15-20 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.6 | 40.5 | 31-70 | 44.7% | 4-13 | 27.1% | 16-22 | 71.9% | 47 | 12 | 21 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.8 | 39.2 | 29-67 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 37.4% | 15-20 | 75.8% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.5 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 41.3% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 15-20 | 74.8% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.5, ATLANTA 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
6/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-69 | W | -120 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 55 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 12 | 6/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-69 | L | +135 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 65-67 | L | +135 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 7/1/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-74 | L | -165 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | 7/3/2014 | TULSA | 83-96 | L | -175 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 7/5/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | W | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 7/8/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 71-83 | L | +325 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 7/10/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-72 | L | +180 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | 7/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 64-90 | L | +155 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 39 | 11 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 43 | 12 | 7/15/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 86-63 | W | +145 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 9 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 32 | 8 | 7/17/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 85-101 | L | +500 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 15 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 37 | 8 | 7/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-89 | L | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 11 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 7/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 65-76 | L | +200 | 24-73 | 32.9% | 42 | 10 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 49 | 12 | 7/29/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/20/2014 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | W | -450 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | 6/22/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 78-85 | L | -200 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | 6/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-79 | W | -155 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | 6/29/2014 | @ INDIANA | 76-68 | W | -155 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | 7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 70-77 | L | -330 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86-73 | W | -400 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | 7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83-71 | W | -450 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 7/12/2014 | @ INDIANA | 93-74 | W | -120 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | W | -300 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | L | -220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 108-112 | L | +175 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 75-79 | L | -450 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-77 | L | -155 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 15-12 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 6-5 (+3.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
ATLANTA is 11-2 (+8.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 4-1 (+2.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 71 | 160.5 | Under | 31 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 41 | 13 | 20 | | ATLANTA | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 52 | 11 | 20 | 6/1/2014 | ATLANTA | 76 | -4.5 | Over | 34 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 18-27 | 66.7% | 45 | 15 | 18 | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 49 | 10 | 21 | 9/11/2013 | ATLANTA | 77 | -6.5 | Over | 37 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 48 | 14 | 25 | | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 150 | SU ATS | 36 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 57 | 151 | Under | 24 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 47 | 12 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 88 | -9 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 7 | 17 | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 86 | -3.5 | Over | 45 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 48 | 12 | 10 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | 151 | SU ATS | 54 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 7 | 13 | 7/24/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 152.5 | ATS | 20 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 1-13 | 7.7% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 48 | 11 | 14 | | ATLANTA | 74 | -9.5 | SU Under | 40 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 53 | 16 | 13 | 6/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 78 | -4.5 | SU Over | 45 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 8 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 149.5 | ATS | 37 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 56 | 16 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 78-66 against the money line (+18.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 0-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 28-22 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 79.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 15-16 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 80.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Anne is 20-38 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-23 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 14-27 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 9-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 1-8 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Anne is 10-22 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 8-15 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 2-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 69.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-19 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 13-24 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 6-22 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 1-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 66.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Anne is 4-21 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-14 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 214-110 against the money line (+35.2 Units) in all games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 180-58 against the money line (+40.7 Units) as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 146-66 against the money line (+45.3 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 101-50 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 96-38 against the money line (+40.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 24-11 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.4, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 28-7 against the money line (+22.8 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 81.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 46-24 against the money line (+18.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 165-67 against the money line (+41.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 65-23 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 24-6 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor passing teams, averaging <=14 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 71.7, OPPONENT 66.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 113-63 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 26-6 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 122 times, while the road underdog won straight up 27 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 19 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 07/29/2014 - Kelsey Griffin is downgraded to doubtful Tuesday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Ankle ) | [G] 07/27/2014 - Allison Hightower likely out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 06/25/2014 - Danielle McCray out 6-8 weeks ( Thumb ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:24:51 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|