| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
ATLANTA |
|
|
77
| 41
Final
44 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 651 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 652 | ATLANTA | -5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(85-46 since 1997.) (64.9%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(85-46 since 1997.) (64.9%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(85-46 since 1997.) (64.9%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average FT shooting teams (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(56-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(36-12 since 1997.) (75%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(53-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(86-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(47-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, on Tuesday nights.
(160-102 since 1997.) (61.1%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(91-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(129-74 since 1997.) (63.5%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(73-31 since 1997.) (70.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(49-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(42-15 since 1997.) (73.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(110-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in July games.
(445-312 since 1997.) (58.8%, +101.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in May, June, or July games.
(944-738 since 1997.) (56.1%, +132.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents.
(914-701 since 1997.) (56.6%, +142.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(601-456 since 1997.) (56.9%, +99.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a division game.
(935-726 since 1997.) (56.3%, +136.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(364-254 since 1997.) (58.9%, +84.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(239-158 since 1997.) (60.2%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(98-58 since 1997.) (62.8%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(76-40 since 1997.) (65.5%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(50-22 since 1997.) (69.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(434-295 since 1997.) (59.5%, +109.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(324-208 since 1997.) (60.9%, +95.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a road loss against a division rival, in July games.
(87-44 since 1997.) (66.4%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a road loss against a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a road loss, in July games.
(127-68 since 1997.) (65.1%, +52.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good pressure defensive team - forcing >=17 turnovers/game.
(224-146 since 1997.) (60.5%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good pressure defensive team - forcing >=17 turnovers/game, in July games.
(90-46 since 1997.) (66.2%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good pressure defensive team - forcing >=17 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(154-99 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games.
(130-74 since 1997.) (63.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(216-143 since 1997.) (60.2%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(30-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(125-69 since 1997.) (64.4%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in July games.
(445-312 since 1997.) (58.8%, +101.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in May, June, or July games.
(944-738 since 1997.) (56.1%, +132.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents.
(914-701 since 1997.) (56.6%, +142.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(273-178 since 1997.) (60.5%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a non-conference game.
(597-426 since 1997.) (58.4%, +128.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%).
(93-49 since 1997.) (65.5%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(434-295 since 1997.) (59.5%, +109.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(324-208 since 1997.) (60.9%, +95.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, in July games.
(48-23 since 1997.) (67.6%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 75 | | 38 | | 29-69 | 41.3% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 13-17 | 75.1% | 43 | 12 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 82 | | 41 | | 31-68 | 45.2% | 4-15 | 30.3% | 16-21 | 72.8% | 46 | 12 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 523 times, while ATLANTA covered the first half line 425 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 549 games went over first half total, while 405 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 39.3 | CONNECTICUT is 7-20 against the 1rst half line (-15.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 41.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 106-47 OVER (+54.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 42.1 | CONNECTICUT is 120-62 OVER (+51.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 42.0 | ATLANTA is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.0, OPPONENT 39.5 | ATLANTA is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.2, OPPONENT 40.6 | ATLANTA is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.2, OPPONENT 38.7 | ATLANTA is 26-16 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.3, OPPONENT 38.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 37.4 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 26.2, OPPONENT 37.0 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 33.1 | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 36.5 |
|
| | | | |
|
ATLANTA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 35-54 against the 1rst half line (-24.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 32-16 OVER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.0, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 32-20 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 32-21 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-17 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-9 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.7, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.7, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.7, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 40-57 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-34 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 38-26 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-7 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 2 or less 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 36-24 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-16 | -3.4 | 13-13 | 12-14 | 75.5 | 36.3 | 41.5% | 43.4 | 78.3 | 36.4 | 45.4% | 41.2 | | Road Games | 3-10 | -4.1 | 6-7 | 7-6 | 75.1 | 35.9 | 42.3% | 43.0 | 80.2 | 36.1 | 45.8% | 41.8 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 75.0 | 36.4 | 41.2% | 43.4 | 83.8 | 40.4 | 48.9% | 39.4 | | Division Games | 6-10 | -3 | 8-8 | 7-9 | 73.6 | 35.1 | 40.3% | 43.7 | 76.1 | 35.6 | 44.7% | 41.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.5 | 36.3 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 13-18 | 75.4% | 43 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.1 | 35.9 | 29-70 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 11-16 | 73.0% | 43 | 13 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.3 | 36.4 | 29-64 | 45.4% | 4-12 | 32.8% | 16-20 | 77.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.4 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.2 | 36.1 | 30-65 | 45.8% | 4-13 | 33.7% | 16-21 | 76.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 15-9 | -6.2 | 12-12 | 13-11 | 81.9 | 41.3 | 43.6% | 45.9 | 77.8 | 39.2 | 42.7% | 43.4 | | Home Games | 10-3 | -1.4 | 8-5 | 7-6 | 82.6 | 40.5 | 44.7% | 47.3 | 74.5 | 37.8 | 41.3% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -8.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 81.2 | 39.4 | 40.4% | 43.4 | 84.8 | 45.0 | 45.0% | 48.8 | | Division Games | 10-8 | -10.6 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 80.0 | 40.6 | 42.5% | 47.0 | 75.8 | 38.8 | 42.0% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 41.3 | 31-71 | 43.6% | 4-15 | 29.4% | 15-21 | 72.4% | 46 | 12 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 15-20 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.6 | 40.5 | 31-70 | 44.7% | 4-13 | 27.1% | 16-22 | 71.9% | 47 | 12 | 21 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.8 | 39.2 | 29-67 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 37.4% | 15-20 | 75.8% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.5 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 41.3% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 15-20 | 74.8% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.5, ATLANTA 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-69 | 39-45 | -1 | L | 80 | O | 28-73 | 38.4% | 55 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 12 | | 6/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-69 | 33-31 | 1.5 | W | 73.5 | U | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | | 6/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 65-67 | 31-34 | 1.5 | L | 74 | U | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | | 7/1/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-74 | 30-27 | -2 | W | 75.5 | U | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | | 7/3/2014 | TULSA | 83-96 | 40-43 | -2 | L | 79 | O | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | | 7/5/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | 37-35 | 2 | W | 81.5 | U | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | | 7/8/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 71-83 | 31-39 | 5 | L | 79 | U | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | | 7/10/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-72 | 30-21 | 3 | W | 73.5 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | | 7/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 64-90 | 38-44 | 2 | L | 76 | O | 26-76 | 34.2% | 39 | 11 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 43 | 12 | | 7/15/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 86-63 | 39-30 | 2 | W | 70 | U | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 9 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 32 | 8 | | 7/17/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 85-101 | 39-51 | 6.5 | L | 79.5 | O | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 15 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 37 | 8 | | 7/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-89 | 38-38 | 2 | W | 73 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 11 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | | 7/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 65-76 | 28-39 | 3 | L | 80 | U | 24-73 | 32.9% | 42 | 10 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 49 | 12 | | 7/29/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/20/2014 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | 49-35 | -5 | W | 76.5 | O | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | | 6/22/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 78-85 | 40-38 | -2.5 | L | 75 | O | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | | 6/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-79 | 45-42 | -1.5 | W | 80.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | | 6/29/2014 | @ INDIANA | 76-68 | 40-37 | -1.5 | W | 77 | P | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | | 7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 70-77 | 34-40 | -4 | L | 75.5 | U | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86-73 | 40-40 | -5 | L | 76 | O | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83-71 | 39-31 | -5 | W | 79 | U | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | | 7/12/2014 | @ INDIANA | 93-74 | 55-34 | -1 | W | 75.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | 42-46 | -3.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | 40-45 | -3 | L | 76 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 108-112 | 48-52 | 2.5 | L | 81 | O | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 75-79 | 29-43 | -5 | L | 79 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-77 | 38-39 | -1.5 | L | 77.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 14-12 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997 | | 15 of 27 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 6-5 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 10 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| ATLANTA is 8-5 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 6 of 12 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 71 | 160.5 | Under | 31 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 41 | 13 | 20 | | | ATLANTA | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 52 | 11 | 20 | 6/1/2014 | ATLANTA | 76 | -4.5 | Over | 34 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 18-27 | 66.7% | 45 | 15 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 49 | 10 | 21 | 9/11/2013 | ATLANTA | 77 | -6.5 | Over | 37 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 48 | 14 | 25 | | | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 150 | SU ATS | 36 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 57 | 151 | Under | 24 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 47 | 12 | 21 | | | ATLANTA | 88 | -9 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 7 | 17 | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 86 | -3.5 | Over | 45 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 48 | 12 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | 151 | SU ATS | 54 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 7 | 13 | 7/24/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 152.5 | ATS | 20 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 1-13 | 7.7% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 48 | 11 | 14 | | | ATLANTA | 74 | -9.5 | SU Under | 40 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 53 | 16 | 13 | 6/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 78 | -4.5 | SU Over | 45 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 8 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 149.5 | ATS | 37 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 56 | 16 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 39.2, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 34-18 against the 1rst half line (+14.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 15-4 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 37.5, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 28-11 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) in road games off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 37.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 51-32 against the 1rst half line (+15.8 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 112-75 against the 1rst half line (+29.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 109-81 against the 1rst half line (+19.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 117-79 against the 1rst half line (+30.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 59-38 against the 1rst half line (+17.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 36-16 against the 1rst half line (+18.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.5, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 38.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 32.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.7, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Anne is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Michael is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 38.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Anne is 36-24 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 72-46 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 153-109 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 42-24 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Tuesday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.3, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 57-35 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.0, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 110-82 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 73-48 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 21-7 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 29-17 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 24-9 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.7, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.7, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 24-9 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 53-33 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.9, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 88-60 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 55-36 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 73 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 72 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 14 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 8 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 11 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 6 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times. | | Since 1997, 7 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 07/29/2014 - Kelsey Griffin is downgraded to doubtful Tuesday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Ankle ) | | [G] 07/27/2014 - Allison Hightower likely out for season ( Knee ) | | [G] 06/25/2014 - Danielle McCray out 6-8 weeks ( Thumb ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 2:12:38 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|