| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
166.5
| 80
Final
79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Western Conference Finals - Best of 3 - Game 2 - MIN Leads 1-0 | | |  | |
| 605 | MINNESOTA | +135 | | 606 | LOS ANGELES | -155 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(663-282 since 1997.) (70.2%, +148.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(621-270 since 1997.) (69.7%, +133.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(499-193 since 1997.) (72.1%, +116.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(289-105 since 1997.) (73.4%, +101.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(119-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(126-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +57 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(308-110 since 1997.) (73.7%, +95.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(134-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(240-88 since 1997.) (73.2%, +90.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(86-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(244-91 since 1997.) (72.8%, +88.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(94-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(225-77 since 1997.) (74.5%, +86 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(217-71 since 1997.) (75.3%, +85.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(262-99 since 1997.) (72.6%, +85.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(123-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +58.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(262-94 since 1997.) (73.6%, +80.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(65-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +30.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(321-126 since 1997.) (71.8%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(279-112 since 1997.) (71.4%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(86-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(67-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.9%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss.
(129-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.7%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(249-102 since 1997.) (70.9%, +73.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(249-100 since 1997.) (71.3%, +73.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(108-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(100-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(90-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(185-62 since 1997.) (74.9%, +71.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(106-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(96-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(154-45 since 1997.) (77.4%, +68.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss against a division rival.
(184-68 since 1997.) (73%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(77-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(195-70 since 1997.) (73.6%, +64 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss against a division rival.
(177-65 since 1997.) (73.1%, +64 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(131-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(79-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(183-64 since 1997.) (74.1%, +63 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(191-75 since 1997.) (71.8%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(48-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(43-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(114-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(142-43 since 1997.) (76.8%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(164-60 since 1997.) (73.2%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(145-116 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(169-110 since 1997.) (60.6%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(209-160 since 1997.) (56.6%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, on Sunday games.
(211-106 since 1997.) (66.6%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(226-149 since 1997.) (60.3%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(139-94 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(62-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.8%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(51-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(189-158 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(63-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(58-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(201-92 since 1997.) (68.6%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(84-17 since 1997.) (83.2%, +49.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(83-16 since 1997.) (83.8%, +49.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, on Sunday games.
(175-59 since 1997.) (74.8%, +49.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(114-32 since 1997.) (78.1%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss against a division rival.
(129-46 since 1997.) (73.7%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(52-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(49-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (79%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(53-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +22 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss against a division rival.
(126-46 since 1997.) (73.3%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(44-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(62-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(112-42 since 1997.) (72.7%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(62-8 since 1997.) (88.6%, +45 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(118-43 since 1997.) (73.3%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(103-30 since 1997.) (77.4%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(34-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(64-14 since 1997.) (82.1%, +42.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(57-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(99-48 since 1997.) (67.3%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(105-35 since 1997.) (75%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(63-10 since 1997.) (86.3%, +40.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, on Sunday games.
(213-85 since 1997.) (71.5%, +40.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(106-59 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(53-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, on Sunday games.
(105-30 since 1997.) (77.8%, +38.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(58-10 since 1997.) (85.3%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(131-104 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(65-16 since 1997.) (80.2%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(38-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.6%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(70-30 since 1997.) (70%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(95-36 since 1997.) (72.5%, +34.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(98-38 since 1997.) (72.1%, +33.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(44-5 since 1997.) (89.8%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(31-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(46-9 since 1997.) (83.6%, +32.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(73-37 since 1997.) (66.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(60-27 since 1997.) (69%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(29-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(56-13 since 1997.) (81.2%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(45-28 since 1997.) (61.6%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(43-9 since 1997.) (82.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(38-7 since 1997.) (84.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(104-55 since 1997.) (65.4%, +27.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(38-7 since 1997.) (84.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(31-4 since 1997.) (88.6%, +26.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(80-23 since 1997.) (77.7%, +26 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(53-26 since 1997.) (67.1%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(55-18 since 1997.) (75.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(46-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(36-7 since 1997.) (83.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(23-10 since 1997.) (69.7%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(73-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +20.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(37-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(104-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(47-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(39-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(164-50 since 1997.) (76.6%, +76.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(259-96 since 1997.) (73%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(212-75 since 1997.) (73.9%, +67.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(285-123 since 1997.) (69.9%, +67 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(40-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(105-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(173-62 since 1997.) (73.6%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(138-68 since 1997.) (67%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(68-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(86-28 since 1997.) (75.4%, +46.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(61-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(81-23 since 1997.) (77.9%, +43.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(135-81 since 1997.) (62.5%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(92-35 since 1997.) (72.4%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season.
(128-114 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.9%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(65-17 since 1997.) (79.3%, +41.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(43-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(78-31 since 1997.) (71.6%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(86-41 since 1997.) (67.7%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(28-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.3%, +24.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(97-46 since 1997.) (67.8%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(103-61 since 1997.) (62.8%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(169-112 since 1997.) (60.1%, +37.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(121-61 since 1997.) (66.5%, +36.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(91-60 since 1997.) (60.3%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(70-33 since 1997.) (68%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(72-33 since 1997.) (68.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(66-22 since 1997.) (75%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(59-32 since 1997.) (64.8%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(55-17 since 1997.) (76.4%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(138-107 since 1997.) (56.3%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(60-22 since 1997.) (73.2%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(45-17 since 1997.) (72.6%, +32.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(68-45 since 1997.) (60.2%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(65-39 since 1997.) (62.5%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(142-93 since 1997.) (60.4%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(44-11 since 1997.) (80%, +31.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(68-29 since 1997.) (70.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(46-12 since 1997.) (79.3%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(82-40 since 1997.) (67.2%, +29.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(65-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(58-24 since 1997.) (70.7%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(63-33 since 1997.) (65.6%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(53-27 since 1997.) (66.2%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(51-24 since 1997.) (68%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +28 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(54-36 since 1997.) (60%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(63-36 since 1997.) (63.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(77-51 since 1997.) (60.2%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(41-18 since 1997.) (69.5%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(123-91 since 1997.) (57.5%, +26.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(47-22 since 1997.) (68.1%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(46-23 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(41-19 since 1997.) (68.3%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(41-14 since 1997.) (74.5%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(59-32 since 1997.) (64.8%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(35-19 since 1997.) (64.8%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(37-16 since 1997.) (69.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(50-26 since 1997.) (65.8%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(41-18 since 1997.) (69.5%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(33-12 since 1997.) (73.3%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 15 or more of their last 20 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(32-15 since 1997.) (68.1%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(31-12 since 1997.) (72.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(25-6 since 1997.) (80.6%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(53-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(53-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(53-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win by 10 points or more, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +19 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +18.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(63-27 since 1997.) (70%, +17.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(56-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(40-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(40-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(40-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(77-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 84 | | 32-72 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 36.2% | 13-16 | 78.2% | 43 | 12 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 86 | | 32-69 | 47.0% | 6-16 | 36.5% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 549 times, while MINNESOTA won 420 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 73.8 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 74.5 | MINNESOTA is 20-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 78.3 | MINNESOTA is 42-8 against the money line (+26.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 88.2, OPPONENT 76.6 | MINNESOTA is 31-4 against the money line (+22.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 91.8, OPPONENT 78.5 | MINNESOTA is 29-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 73.4 | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 83.8 | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 89.3 | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 91.1 |
|
MINNESOTA is 90-118 against the money line (-58.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.5 | MINNESOTA is 28-61 against the money line (-41.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | MINNESOTA is 1-6 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 90.7 | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 88.6, OPPONENT 88.3 | MINNESOTA is 116-147 against the money line (-52.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.4, OPPONENT 73.0 | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.0, OPPONENT 73.4 | LOS ANGELES is 91-42 against the money line (+31.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 73.4 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 70.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 70.6 | LOS ANGELES is 19-4 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.3, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.3, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 19-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 77.9 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 27-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 22-12 against the money line (+9.6 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 26-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 25-8 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 88.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-7 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 47-55 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-19 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-25 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-26 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 48-81 against the money line (-38.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 1-4 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 3-6 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 113-142 against the money line (-49.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 60-81 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 59-81 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 86-117 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-0 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-0 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 53-16 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-9 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 20-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-5 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 27-8 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 18-3 against the money line (+12.6 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in road games off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 24-7 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 24-5 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 42-11 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-12 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-9 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in road games after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-7 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 44-12 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-7 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 6*) | MINNESOTA is 28-7 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 6*) | MINNESOTA is 31-8 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 41-12 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 32-10 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-12.8 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-28 against the money line (-20.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-13 against the money line (-21.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-19.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-14.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-17.7 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-19 against the money line (-16.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-23 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-21 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 1-4 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games on Sunday games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 3-6 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after a division game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 88-104 against the money line (-41.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 109-133 against the money line (-67.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 76-98 against the money line (-42.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 2-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 27-45 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-45 against the money line (-30.7 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 84-105 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-79 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 268-104 against the money line (+39.5 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 153-97 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-3 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 151-89 against the money line (+38.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 47-16 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-8 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-2 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 30-8 | -1.4 | 20-18 | 23-15 | 85.4 | 43.2 | 46.9% | 46.1 | 76.2 | 38.9 | 40.9% | 39.8 | | Road Games | 11-7 | -8.9 | 10-8 | 9-9 | 81.8 | 42.7 | 46.6% | 44.3 | 76.8 | 39.7 | 41.1% | 39.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 81.6 | 40.2 | 43.1% | 44.2 | 80.8 | 37.8 | 43.6% | 41.0 | | Division Games | 20-6 | -1.8 | 13-13 | 16-10 | 86.2 | 43.9 | 46.6% | 46.4 | 76.9 | 39.1 | 41.6% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 43.2 | 32-68 | 46.9% | 6-16 | 39.7% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.2 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 35.6% | 14-19 | 76.7% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.8 | 42.7 | 31-66 | 46.6% | 7-17 | 38.6% | 14-18 | 76.3% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.9 | 28-68 | 40.9% | 7-20 | 33.0% | 14-19 | 74.8% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77 | 38 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 14-19 | 76.1% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.8 | 39.7 | 28-67 | 41.1% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 77.1% | 39 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 26-11 | +4.9 | 21-14 | 23-14 | 84.5 | 41.7 | 46.3% | 44.0 | 79.3 | 38.6 | 42.0% | 42.4 | | Home Games | 17-1 | +12.4 | 12-4 | 10-8 | 86.9 | 43.6 | 47.5% | 43.4 | 74.0 | 36.4 | 39.8% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 3-1 | 5-0 | 92.8 | 44.0 | 52.4% | 40.2 | 85.2 | 41.6 | 43.5% | 41.2 | | Division Games | 17-8 | +0.2 | 13-10 | 17-8 | 85.6 | 41.5 | 46.7% | 43.4 | 81.6 | 39.2 | 43.1% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 41.7 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 6-16 | 36.3% | 16-21 | 79.1% | 44 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 38.9 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 35.9% | 14-19 | 76.8% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.9 | 43.6 | 32-67 | 47.5% | 6-15 | 37.5% | 18-22 | 79.5% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.3 | 38.6 | 30-71 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 14-18 | 73.9% | 42 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.5 | 38.3 | 28-67 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 14-19 | 75.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.0 | 36.4 | 28-69 | 39.8% | 6-20 | 29.4% | 13-17 | 74.5% | 42 | 11 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.1, LOS ANGELES 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/28/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 96-84 | W | -330 | 40-92 | 43.5% | 64 | 12 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 8 | | 8/31/2012 | TULSA | 92-83 | W | | 34-77 | 44.2% | 48 | 9 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 34 | 9 | | 9/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 88-77 | W | -450 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 39 | 14 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 19 | | 9/7/2012 | ATLANTA | 97-93 | W | -500 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 59 | 19 | 37-93 | 39.8% | 51 | 13 | | 9/9/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-62 | W | -105 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 14 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 36 | 9 | | 9/11/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 70-83 | L | -270 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 30 | 17 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 42 | 13 | | 9/14/2012 | @ INDIANA | 66-64 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 40 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 7 | | 9/17/2012 | INDIANA | 86-79 | W | -220 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 41 | 14 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 36 | 11 | | 9/20/2012 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-92 | L | +105 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 17 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 40 | 15 | | 9/21/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 89-66 | W | | 33-76 | 43.4% | 53 | 13 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 42 | 19 | | 9/23/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-99 | L | -165 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 37 | 7 | | 9/28/2012 | SEATTLE | 78-70 | W | -600 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 12 | | 9/30/2012 | @ SEATTLE | 79-86 | L | -220 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 55 | 15 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 55 | 16 | | 10/2/2012 | SEATTLE | 73-72 | W | -600 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 8 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 37 | 8 | | 10/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 94-77 | W | -220 | 40-82 | 48.8% | 44 | 8 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 14 | | 10/7/2012 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/30/2012 | @ TULSA | 85-99 | L | -500 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 41 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 41 | 12 | | 9/2/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 74-85 | L | -300 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 33 | 19 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | | 9/4/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-88 | L | +325 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 19 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 39 | 14 | | 9/7/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-68 | W | -450 | 39-63 | 61.9% | 40 | 18 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 33 | 14 | | 9/9/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 71-73 | L | -220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 55 | 19 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 44 | 14 | | 9/13/2012 | CHICAGO | 86-77 | W | -550 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 14 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 33 | 10 | | 9/14/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 93-82 | W | -270 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 16 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 19 | | 9/18/2012 | PHOENIX | 101-76 | W | | 39-76 | 51.3% | 44 | 10 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 19 | | 9/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | 92-76 | W | -125 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 40 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 17 | | 9/27/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-86 | W | -300 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 11 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 37 | 11 | | 9/29/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 101-94 | W | +145 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 41 | 17 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 38 | 11 | | 10/4/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-94 | L | +180 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 14 | 40-82 | 48.8% | 44 | 8 | | 10/7/2012 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 37-18 (+14.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 7-7 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 22-5 (+11.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-1 (+5.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
10/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 168 | Over | 31 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 36 | 4 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 40-82 | 48.8% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 44 | 13 | 8 | 9/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | 76 | 167.5 | Over | 36 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 6-27 | 22.2% | 24-29 | 82.8% | 44 | 12 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | -2 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 9/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 170.5 | Under | 37 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 39 | 13 | 14 | 7/5/2012 | MINNESOTA | 90 | -6.5 | Over | 43 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 55 | 16 | 13 | | | LOS ANGELES | 96 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 28-34 | 82.4% | 47 | 13 | 14 | 5/24/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 84 | 154 | ATS | 47 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 34 | 8 | 19 | | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -9 | SU Over | 44 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 39 | 13 | 18 | 8/20/2011 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 157 | Under | 34 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 30 | 5 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 87 | -9 | SU ATS | 46 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 50 | 20 | 9 | 8/7/2011 | MINNESOTA | 84 | -7 | SU Over | 45 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 32 | 12 | 12 | | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 157.5 | ATS | 37 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 35 | 8 | 18 | 7/26/2011 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 160 | Under | 30 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 40 | 11 | 25 | | | MINNESOTA | 85 | -9 | SU ATS | 43 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 35 | 12 | 14 | 6/5/2011 | LOS ANGELES | 69 | 154.5 | Over | 40 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 37 | 5 | 17 | | | MINNESOTA | 86 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 51 | 15 | 12 | 6/3/2011 | MINNESOTA | 74 | 156.5 | Under | 43 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 38 | 11 | 10 | | | LOS ANGELES | 82 | -3 | SU ATS | 37 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 45 | 14 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 66-37 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 19-18 against the money line (+12.9 Units) as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 25-19 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 21-3 against the money line (+20.1 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 7*) | Reeve is 32-15 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 27-8 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 13-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-6 against the money line (+14.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 18-3 against the money line (+12.6 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 18-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 28-10 against the money line (+15.6 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 11-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 50-26 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-17 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 18-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 21-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-19 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-11 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-19 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-14 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 34-18 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 11-3 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 46-19 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-13 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-17 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 16-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-12 against the money line (+9.6 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 24-13 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 28-15 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Reeve is 2-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 14-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 14-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 9-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 8-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 8-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 10-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 8-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 9-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 14-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 17-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 12-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 9-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 10-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 118 times, while the road underdog won straight up 80 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 15 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 06/13/2012 - Sharnee' Zoll out indefinitely ( ACL ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/19/2024 4:53:11 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|