| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
INDIANA |
|
|
146.5
| 76
Final
78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Eastern Conference Finals - Best of 3 - Game 2 - Conn Leads 1-0 | | |  | |
| 607 | CONNECTICUT | +145 | | 608 | INDIANA | -165 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(663-283 since 1997.) (70.1%, +146.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(621-271 since 1997.) (69.6%, +132.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(499-194 since 1997.) (72%, +115.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(289-106 since 1997.) (73.2%, +100 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(119-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(126-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +55.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(308-111 since 1997.) (73.5%, +94.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(108-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(222-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +91.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(222-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +91.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(222-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +91.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(222-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +91.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(222-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +91.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(222-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +91.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(134-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(259-101 since 1997.) (71.9%, +90.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(259-101 since 1997.) (71.9%, +90.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(240-89 since 1997.) (72.9%, +89.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(86-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(198-58 since 1997.) (77.3%, +87.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(198-58 since 1997.) (77.3%, +87.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(198-58 since 1997.) (77.3%, +87.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(236-74 since 1997.) (76.1%, +87.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(202-62 since 1997.) (76.5%, +87.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(202-62 since 1997.) (76.5%, +87.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(202-62 since 1997.) (76.5%, +87.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(231-70 since 1997.) (76.7%, +87 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(244-92 since 1997.) (72.6%, +86.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(94-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.7%, +46 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(225-78 since 1997.) (74.3%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(93-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(217-72 since 1997.) (75.1%, +83.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(262-100 since 1997.) (72.4%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(123-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +56.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(56-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(262-95 since 1997.) (73.4%, +78.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(220-78 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(220-78 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(220-78 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(220-78 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(220-78 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(220-78 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(65-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(258-93 since 1997.) (73.5%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(258-93 since 1997.) (73.5%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(321-127 since 1997.) (71.7%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(103-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.5%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(206-61 since 1997.) (77.2%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(86-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(67-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +30.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss.
(129-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(249-103 since 1997.) (70.7%, +71.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(249-101 since 1997.) (71.1%, +71.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(108-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(100-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games.
(220-71 since 1997.) (75.6%, +70.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(90-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(185-63 since 1997.) (74.6%, +69.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(106-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(173-53 since 1997.) (76.5%, +68.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(96-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(163-45 since 1997.) (78.4%, +67.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(154-46 since 1997.) (77%, +67 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(154-44 since 1997.) (77.8%, +64.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(169-47 since 1997.) (78.2%, +64.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(169-47 since 1997.) (78.2%, +64.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss against a division rival.
(184-69 since 1997.) (72.7%, +63.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(77-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss against a division rival.
(177-66 since 1997.) (72.8%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(48-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +32.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(201-82 since 1997.) (71%, +61.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(201-82 since 1997.) (71%, +61.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(201-82 since 1997.) (71%, +61.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(131-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(79-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(183-65 since 1997.) (73.8%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(189-60 since 1997.) (75.9%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(151-42 since 1997.) (78.2%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(181-70 since 1997.) (72.1%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(181-70 since 1997.) (72.1%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(181-70 since 1997.) (72.1%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(191-76 since 1997.) (71.5%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(48-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(166-51 since 1997.) (76.5%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(43-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.6%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(145-40 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(145-40 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(145-40 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(145-40 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(145-40 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(145-40 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(114-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(142-44 since 1997.) (76.3%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(164-61 since 1997.) (72.9%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(145-117 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.3%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(117-30 since 1997.) (79.6%, +53.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(209-161 since 1997.) (56.5%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(145-42 since 1997.) (77.5%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(103-21 since 1997.) (83.1%, +52.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(226-150 since 1997.) (60.1%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(139-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(62-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.7%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(51-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.5%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(189-159 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.3%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(63-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(128-36 since 1997.) (78%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(58-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(201-93 since 1997.) (68.4%, +49.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(84-18 since 1997.) (82.4%, +48.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(83-17 since 1997.) (83%, +48 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(114-33 since 1997.) (77.6%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss against a division rival.
(129-47 since 1997.) (73.3%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(49-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(104-33 since 1997.) (75.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(53-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +20.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(74-13 since 1997.) (85.1%, +46.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss against a division rival.
(126-47 since 1997.) (72.8%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(44-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(144-95 since 1997.) (60.3%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(112-43 since 1997.) (72.3%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(62-9 since 1997.) (87.3%, +43.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(118-44 since 1997.) (72.8%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(102-37 since 1997.) (73.4%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(85-20 since 1997.) (81%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(103-31 since 1997.) (76.9%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(34-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(52-4 since 1997.) (92.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(64-15 since 1997.) (81%, +40.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(57-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(99-49 since 1997.) (66.9%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(105-36 since 1997.) (74.5%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(63-11 since 1997.) (85.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(33-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(106-60 since 1997.) (63.9%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(53-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(58-11 since 1997.) (84.1%, +37 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(131-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.5%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(65-17 since 1997.) (79.3%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(38-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(70-31 since 1997.) (69.3%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(44-6 since 1997.) (88%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(46-10 since 1997.) (82.1%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(73-38 since 1997.) (65.8%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(56-14 since 1997.) (80%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(59-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(46-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(57-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(104-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(131-34 since 1997.) (79.4%, +78.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(165-50 since 1997.) (76.7%, +77.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(260-96 since 1997.) (73%, +72.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(213-84 since 1997.) (71.7%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(213-75 since 1997.) (74%, +69 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(286-123 since 1997.) (69.9%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(185-72 since 1997.) (72%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(41-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(143-46 since 1997.) (75.7%, +56.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(102-27 since 1997.) (79.1%, +55.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(174-62 since 1997.) (73.7%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(114-47 since 1997.) (70.8%, +52.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(139-68 since 1997.) (67.1%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(109-37 since 1997.) (74.7%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(79-22 since 1997.) (78.2%, +49.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(87-28 since 1997.) (75.7%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(88-26 since 1997.) (77.2%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(82-23 since 1997.) (78.1%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(136-81 since 1997.) (62.7%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(68-15 since 1997.) (81.9%, +42.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(93-35 since 1997.) (72.7%, +42.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(66-17 since 1997.) (79.5%, +42.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(44-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(79-31 since 1997.) (71.8%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(96-41 since 1997.) (70.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(87-41 since 1997.) (68%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(29-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.6%, +25.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(98-46 since 1997.) (68.1%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(104-61 since 1997.) (63%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(170-112 since 1997.) (60.3%, +39.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(100-50 since 1997.) (66.7%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(122-61 since 1997.) (66.7%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(94-56 since 1997.) (62.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(93-30 since 1997.) (75.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(66-25 since 1997.) (72.5%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(73-33 since 1997.) (68.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(88-48 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(67-22 since 1997.) (75.3%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(56-17 since 1997.) (76.7%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(61-22 since 1997.) (73.5%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(46-17 since 1997.) (73%, +33.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(69-45 since 1997.) (60.5%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(103-60 since 1997.) (63.2%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(143-93 since 1997.) (60.6%, +32.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +32.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(56-15 since 1997.) (78.9%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(69-29 since 1997.) (70.4%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(51-18 since 1997.) (73.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(47-12 since 1997.) (79.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(83-40 since 1997.) (67.5%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +14.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(47-14 since 1997.) (77%, +30.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(59-24 since 1997.) (71.1%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(54-27 since 1997.) (66.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(37-10 since 1997.) (78.7%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(55-36 since 1997.) (60.4%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(64-36 since 1997.) (64%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(66-29 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(52-18 since 1997.) (74.3%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(47-27 since 1997.) (63.5%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(53-33 since 1997.) (61.6%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(47-23 since 1997.) (67.1%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(91-54 since 1997.) (62.8%, +25.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(36-19 since 1997.) (65.5%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +24.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(48-18 since 1997.) (72.7%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(37-16 since 1997.) (69.8%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +22.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(27-4 since 1997.) (87.1%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having won 15 or more of their last 20 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(21-5 since 1997.) (80.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(43-20 since 1997.) (68.3%, +15 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 73 | | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-16 | 36.9% | 11-14 | 82.1% | 44 | 12 | 15 | | INDIANA | 79 | | 29-69 | 41.6% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 14-17 | 80.8% | 44 | 13 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 634 times, while CONNECTICUT won 348 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 75.9 | CONNECTICUT is 67-41 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.0 | CONNECTICUT is 12-0 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 70.7 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 73.6 | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.5 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 69.4 | INDIANA is 72-94 against the money line (-65.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | INDIANA is 38-50 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 72.0 | INDIANA is 31-55 against the money line (-38.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.5, OPPONENT 74.2 | INDIANA is 69-72 against the money line (-41.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 82.1, OPPONENT 82.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 84.4 | INDIANA is 15-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 71.3 | INDIANA is 10-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 71.7 | INDIANA is 23-9 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 71.4 | INDIANA is 66-33 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 70.0 | INDIANA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 80.3, OPPONENT 72.4 | INDIANA is 46-18 against the money line (+20.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 73.0 | INDIANA is 17-3 against the money line (+15.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 86.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | INDIANA is 100-69 against the money line (+22.6 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.5, OPPONENT 68.2 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 101-79 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-0 against the money line (+8.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-18 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-30 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 15-23 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 64.5, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 56-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 49-67 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 4-9 against the money line (-8.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-12 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+5.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-10 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-12 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 33-15 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 28-16 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 38-23 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-4 against the money line (+12.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-12 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 74-79 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-14.3 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-15 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 65.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 36-9 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 22-6 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 80.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-6 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 21-12 against the money line (+9.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 80.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 78-53 against the money line (+26.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.6, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 53-33 against the money line (+16.8 Units) off a road loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 82-58 against the money line (+22.2 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.9, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 9-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 24-11 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 118-99 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 28-9 | +9.2 | 17-20 | 18-18 | 80.8 | 39.2 | 43.1% | 43.1 | 76.1 | 37.2 | 42.3% | 42.9 | | Road Games | 14-4 | +13.6 | 10-8 | 7-11 | 78.7 | 37.2 | 41.9% | 44.3 | 75.6 | 38.2 | 42.5% | 42.5 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 76.2 | 34.4 | 45.3% | 44.2 | 65.0 | 29.6 | 36.1% | 39.6 | | Division Games | 21-4 | +12.2 | 13-12 | 11-13 | 80.4 | 38.7 | 45.3% | 42.0 | 74.0 | 36.6 | 41.6% | 40.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 39.2 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 6-16 | 35.7% | 16-19 | 82.7% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.1 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 14-19 | 76.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.7 | 37.2 | 29-68 | 41.9% | 6-17 | 36.1% | 15-18 | 81.4% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 37.2 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 13-18 | 75.6% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.6 | 38.2 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 11-15 | 73.6% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 24-14 | +3.3 | 21-17 | 17-20 | 78.2 | 38.7 | 42.0% | 40.5 | 72.7 | 35.4 | 42.8% | 41.8 | | Home Games | 14-5 | +2.1 | 11-8 | 10-8 | 81.7 | 43.3 | 44.0% | 39.8 | 72.1 | 35.3 | 43.0% | 41.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 79.8 | 38.2 | 45.8% | 44.8 | 72.2 | 37.4 | 40.0% | 37.8 | | Division Games | 17-9 | +5.6 | 16-10 | 13-12 | 79.0 | 39.3 | 43.2% | 40.0 | 72.7 | 36.2 | 42.4% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.2 | 38.7 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 8-19 | 39.3% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 14-19 | 76.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.7 | 43.3 | 29-65 | 44.0% | 8-20 | 41.6% | 16-19 | 81.7% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.7 | 35.4 | 27-64 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 13-17 | 76.1% | 42 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 38 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 75.8% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.1 | 35.3 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 35.3% | 11-16 | 73.6% | 41 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.3, INDIANA 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/30/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-73 | W | +220 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 48 | 8 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 47 | 16 | | 9/2/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 80-87 | L | +120 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 38 | 13 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | | 9/4/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-70 | W | -360 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 47 | 19 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 36 | 14 | | 9/7/2012 | PHOENIX | 82-91 | L | | 25-63 | 39.7% | 32 | 13 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 54 | 16 | | 9/9/2012 | CHICAGO | 82-77 | W | -360 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 45 | 16 | | 9/12/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 100-78 | W | -220 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 38 | 14 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 53 | 16 | | 9/14/2012 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-93 | L | +210 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 19 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 16 | | 9/16/2012 | @ SEATTLE | 60-58 | W | -360 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 42 | 23 | | 9/19/2012 | INDIANA | 73-67 | W | -220 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 42 | 17 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 36 | 10 | | 9/23/2012 | ATLANTA | 92-72 | W | -210 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 43 | 19 | | 9/27/2012 | NEW YORK | 65-60 | W | -500 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 47 | 13 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 52 | 12 | | 9/29/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 75-62 | W | -175 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 51 | 13 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 31 | 10 | | 10/5/2012 | INDIANA | 76-64 | W | -175 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 12 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 36 | 8 | | 10/8/2012 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/30/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 76-63 | W | -175 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 8 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 21 | | 9/1/2012 | CHICAGO | 81-64 | W | -400 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 33 | 9 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 39 | 20 | | 9/5/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 64-71 | L | +170 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 16 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 14 | | 9/7/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 82-78 | W | +170 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 45 | 13 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 39 | 10 | | 9/9/2012 | PHOENIX | 89-83 | W | | 32-76 | 42.1% | 35 | 6 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 44 | 22 | | 9/12/2012 | SEATTLE | 72-48 | W | -220 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 38 | 28 | | 9/14/2012 | MINNESOTA | 64-66 | L | -175 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 40 | 13 | | 9/17/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-86 | L | +180 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 36 | 11 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 41 | 14 | | 9/19/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | 67-73 | L | +180 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 36 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 42 | 17 | | 9/21/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-53 | W | -200 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 53 | 16 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 15 | | 9/23/2012 | TULSA | 91-58 | W | -220 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 45 | 16 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 32 | 18 | | 9/28/2012 | ATLANTA | 66-75 | L | -175 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 19 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 43 | 13 | | 9/30/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 103-88 | W | +200 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 48 | 17 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 18 | | 10/2/2012 | ATLANTA | 75-64 | W | -175 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 56 | 19 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 35 | 9 | | 10/5/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-76 | L | +155 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 36 | 8 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 12 | | 10/8/2012 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 33-21 (+7.8 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 8-6 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 14-13 (+6.9 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-4 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
10/5/2012 | INDIANA | 64 | 150.5 | Under | 30 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 36 | 10 | 8 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -4 | SU ATS | 30 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 19-20 | 95.0% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 9/19/2012 | INDIANA | 67 | 154 | Under | 27 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 36 | 16 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 73 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 6/21/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 61 | 159.5 | Under | 30 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 95 | -6 | SU ATS | 57 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 39 | 5 | 11 | 6/19/2012 | INDIANA | 85 | 162 | ATS | 39 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -4.5 | SU Over | 45 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 45 | 9 | 15 | 6/8/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 45 | 12 | 15 | | | INDIANA | 81 | -5 | Over | 47 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 36 | 10 | 17 | 9/2/2011 | INDIANA | 55 | 151.5 | Under | 33 | 22-73 | 30.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 45 | 15 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -3 | SU ATS | 48 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 46 | 8 | 14 | 7/28/2011 | INDIANA | 69 | 151 | SU ATS | 34 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 56 | 11 | 16 | | | CONNECTICUT | 58 | -5 | Under | 25 | 22-72 | 30.6% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 46 | 10 | 15 | 7/17/2011 | INDIANA | 71 | 151 | | 32 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 47 | 9 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -5 | SU Under | 42 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 40 | 6 | 12 | 7/13/2011 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 151.5 | Over | 30 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 40 | 11 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 90 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 34 | 6 | 9 | 6/25/2011 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 154 | Under | 32 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 38 | 3 | 15 | | | INDIANA | 75 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 42 | 10 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 218-148 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 92-94 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 139-95 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 33-27 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 123-81 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 117-72 against the money line (+19.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 108-71 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in the 2nd game of a playoff series as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.8, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 76-51 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 55-34 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 25-19 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 31-24 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 114-78 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 58-57 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 17-8 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 47-41 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 50-45 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 48-44 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 55-51 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 44-25 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 18-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.3, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 20-12 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 101-79 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 96-63 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 135-96 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-26 against the money line (+12.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 60-48 against the money line (+12.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 68-44 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 117-81 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 93-51 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 127-73 against the money line (+24.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 120-77 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 169-112 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-10 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 51-46 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 38-18 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 53-30 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 14-21 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 20-29 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Dunn is 17-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 83.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 81-48 against the money line (+17.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 67-42 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 6-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in the 2nd game of a playoff series as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 83.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 5-0 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when trailing 1-0 in a playoff series as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 87.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dunn is 5-0 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when trailing in a playoff series as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 87.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dunn is 9-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when facing elimination in a playoff series as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 33-23 against the money line (+11.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 34-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) off a road loss as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 40-16 against the money line (+26.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Dunn is 39-15 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Dunn is 59-31 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 47-28 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 39-23 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dunn 77.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 57-35 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 175 times, while the road underdog won straight up 109 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 24 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times.
Edge against the money line=INDIANA |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/25/2024 1:07:51 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|