| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON INDIANA |
|
| 140.5 | 73 Final 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 | | | | |
601 | WASHINGTON | +180 | 602 | INDIANA | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (338-139 since 1997.) (70.9%, +89.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (263-100 since 1997.) (72.5%, +87.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (348-145 since 1997.) (70.6%, +87.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (268-105 since 1997.) (71.8%, +82.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (242-86 since 1997.) (73.8%, +81.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (253-101 since 1997.) (71.5%, +78.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (287-109 since 1997.) (72.5%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (259-106 since 1997.) (71%, +75.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (244-88 since 1997.) (73.5%, +75.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (195-69 since 1997.) (73.9%, +74.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (181-57 since 1997.) (76.1%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (194-72 since 1997.) (72.9%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (110-27 since 1997.) (80.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (119-40 since 1997.) (74.8%, +55.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (160-62 since 1997.) (72.1%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (131-47 since 1997.) (73.6%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (121-38 since 1997.) (76.1%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (141-53 since 1997.) (72.7%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (151-62 since 1997.) (70.9%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (89-29 since 1997.) (75.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (94-32 since 1997.) (74.6%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (57-9 since 1997.) (86.4%, +41.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (60-12 since 1997.) (83.3%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (82-23 since 1997.) (78.1%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (84-29 since 1997.) (74.3%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (117-73 since 1997.) (61.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (73-19 since 1997.) (79.3%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (82-23 since 1997.) (78.1%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (115-70 since 1997.) (62.2%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (71-20 since 1997.) (78%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (73-21 since 1997.) (77.7%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (66-30 since 1997.) (68.8%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (70-20 since 1997.) (77.8%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (68-20 since 1997.) (77.3%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (73-24 since 1997.) (75.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (44-8 since 1997.) (84.6%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (62-25 since 1997.) (71.3%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (62-17 since 1997.) (78.5%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (42-6 since 1997.) (87.5%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (99-61 since 1997.) (61.9%, +29.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (64-20 since 1997.) (76.2%, +29 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (36-6 since 1997.) (85.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good offensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (27-4 since 1997.) (87.1%, +22.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (33-19 since 1997.) (63.5%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (73-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more. (28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (246-218 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +42.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (237-190 since 1997.) (55.5%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (43-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (38-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more. (28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (31-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 73 | | 27-62 | 43.6% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 41 | 9 | 15 | INDIANA | 75 | | 28-67 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 77.1% | 44 | 13 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 546 times, while WASHINGTON won 426 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 69.3 | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 70.5 | WASHINGTON is 10-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 70.5 | INDIANA is 15-22 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 74.5 | INDIANA is 0-5 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in home games when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 65.2, OPPONENT 74.8 | INDIANA is 0-7 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.0, OPPONENT 88.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 69-100 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 117-187 against the money line (-70.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 61-99 against the money line (-37.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.9 | INDIANA is 22-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.8 | INDIANA is 72-50 against the money line (+21.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.2, OPPONENT 70.7 | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 73.8 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 13-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 3-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 115-137 against the money line (-51.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-79 against the money line (-40.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-61 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-46 against the money line (-28.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 72-136 against the money line (-64.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 114-188 against the money line (-61.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 85-143 against the money line (-66.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 131-196 against the money line (-67.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 113-190 against the money line (-83.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 176-272 against the money line (-94.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-41 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-99 against the money line (-44.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 59-102 against the money line (-39.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 36-70 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-8 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 25-11 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 20-11 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 31-15 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 39-29 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 42-30 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 25-13 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 31-19 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 12-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-15 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 11-17 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 70.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 72-78 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-31 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 228-351 against the money line (-110.6 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-117 against the money line (-41.7 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 147-225 against the money line (-82.7 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 87-146 against the money line (-64.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 56-99 against the money line (-48.7 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-74 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 102-174 against the money line (-79.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-79 against the money line (-41.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-43 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 87-128 against the money line (-44.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 42-100 against the money line (-56.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 51-105 against the money line (-58.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 73-137 against the money line (-61.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-40 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 59-109 against the money line (-40.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 109-192 against the money line (-74.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 55-103 against the money line (-54.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 22-59 against the money line (-40.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 122-214 against the money line (-71.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 39-30 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 20-12 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season. The average score was INDIANA 72.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-11 against the money line (+10.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 34-21 against the money line (+13.8 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.9, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 91-65 against the money line (+24.8 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-16 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 16-18 | -1.6 | 15-17 | 12-22 | 74.3 | 35.8 | 42.5% | 43.5 | 73.8 | 36.3 | 41.2% | 42.5 | Road Games | 8-9 | +3.1 | 8-9 | 8-9 | 75.4 | 36.8 | 43.8% | 42.5 | 75.9 | 38.0 | 41.6% | 43.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.3 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 71.2 | 32.2 | 38.7% | 44.6 | 72.4 | 33.2 | 43.2% | 43.2 | Division Games | 11-11 | -1.7 | 10-11 | 7-15 | 72.6 | 34.9 | 41.8% | 44.0 | 70.9 | 35.5 | 40.5% | 42.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.3 | 35.8 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-16 | 31.7% | 13-17 | 79.8% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.4 | 36.8 | 29-65 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 34.8% | 13-16 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 36.3 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 4-13 | 31.8% | 13-18 | 73.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 4-13 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.9 | 38.0 | 29-70 | 41.6% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 13-18 | 73.0% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 16-18 | -1 | 21-13 | 16-18 | 74.1 | 37.4 | 41.8% | 40.2 | 75.1 | 35.6 | 44.3% | 40.9 | Home Games | 7-10 | -6.6 | 9-8 | 6-11 | 74.7 | 38.0 | 41.9% | 40.1 | 75.5 | 35.8 | 44.0% | 41.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 71.8 | 40.4 | 42.2% | 40.6 | 70.6 | 31.4 | 46.5% | 37.6 | Division Games | 12-10 | +4.7 | 12-10 | 10-12 | 73.0 | 36.3 | 41.4% | 40.9 | 73.9 | 35.2 | 43.6% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.1 | 37.4 | 27-64 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 34.6% | 16-21 | 75.5% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.3 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 14-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.7 | 38.0 | 27-64 | 41.9% | 6-15 | 37.9% | 15-21 | 73.7% | 40 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 35.6 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 4-12 | 30.5% | 17-22 | 78.3% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77 | 38 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 32.3% | 14-19 | 77.7% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 35.8 | 28-63 | 44.0% | 4-12 | 34.9% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.4, INDIANA 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
7/12/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-74 | W | +145 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | 7/15/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 78-90 | L | +400 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | 7/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-75 | W | +250 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | 7/23/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-75 | W | -175 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 11 | 7/25/2014 | TULSA | 82-77 | W | -210 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 52 | 14 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 52 | 11 | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | 77-67 | W | +135 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 7/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 76-80 | L | +135 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 48 | 13 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 54 | 13 | 8/3/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 65-76 | L | +170 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | 8/5/2014 | NEW YORK | 79-46 | W | -165 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 43 | 14 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 40 | 16 | 8/8/2014 | @ INDIANA | 74-61 | W | +175 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 81-89 | L | -155 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 48 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 63 | 20 | 8/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 69-72 | L | +135 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | 8/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-67 | W | -220 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 46 | 16 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 36 | 12 | 8/16/2014 | NEW YORK | 61-73 | L | -250 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 16 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 31 | 8 | 8/21/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/12/2014 | ATLANTA | 74-93 | L | +100 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | 7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 78-86 | L | +120 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 82-64 | W | -210 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | 7/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 57-60 | L | -165 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 75-68 | W | +100 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-77 | L | +170 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | 7/31/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 76-67 | W | -140 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 38 | 14 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 27 | 18 | 8/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 69-79 | L | +450 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 47 | 9 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 5 | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | 64-66 | L | +170 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 36 | 9 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 52 | 10 | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 61-74 | L | -210 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 90-76 | W | -110 | 35-61 | 57.4% | 33 | 11 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 27 | 14 | 8/14/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-63 | W | -250 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 45 | 14 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 17 | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | 71-67 | W | -165 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | 8/17/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 61-73 | L | +170 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 38 | 10 | 8/21/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 39-19 (+13.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 7-5 (-0.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 20-9 (-0.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-3 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74 | 143 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 44 | 8 | 10 | | INDIANA | 61 | -5 | Under | 29 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 38 | 13 | 10 | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 80 | 144 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 38 | 7 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | -4 | Over | 29 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 6/6/2014 | INDIANA | 64 | 141.5 | SU ATS | 26 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 38 | 10 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 61 | -4.5 | Under | 35 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 51 | 15 | 17 | 5/23/2014 | WASHINGTON | 79 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 9 | 12 | | INDIANA | 63 | -4 | Under | 30 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 39 | 9 | 8 | 9/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 142.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 46 | 14 | 15 | | INDIANA | 67 | -6 | Under | 37 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 41 | 12 | 9 | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | 65 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 44 | 11 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 52 | -4.5 | Under | 16 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 4 | 15 | 7/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 70 | 147 | | 31 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 8 | 21 | | INDIANA | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 32 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 22-23 | 95.7% | 41 | 16 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 60 | 143 | Under | 31 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 39 | 8 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 6 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 12-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 29-19 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 42-27 against the money line (+15.5 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 44-35 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 19-15 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 61-33 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 98-77 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 11-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 72.2, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 60-38 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 49-30 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 73.5, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 72-51 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 73.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Lin is 108-71 against the money line (+21.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 99-73 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after a division game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 94-63 against the money line (+20.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 18-11 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 64-49 against the money line (+14.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 49-32 against the money line (+20.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 41-25 against the money line (+14.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 46-24 against the money line (+16.0 Units) off a road loss as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 61-36 against the money line (+26.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 56-30 against the money line (+26.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 78-50 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 72-54 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 68-45 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 47-25 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 66-36 against the money line (+19.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 53-33 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 78-45 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 126-97 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 51-18 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 89-65 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 124-93 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 37-22 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 49-31 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 18-11 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 28-17 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 203 times, while the road underdog won straight up 78 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/21/2014 - Kara Lawson is upgraded to probable Thursday vs. Indiana Fever ( Ankle ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 9:20:09 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|