| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
First Half Results
INDIANA |
|
|
69.5
| 36
Final
30 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 601 | WASHINGTON | 69 | | 602 | INDIANA | -3 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (INDIANA) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(38-12 since 1997.) (76%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
 - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(54-27 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(47-19 since 1997.) (71.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss against a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(44-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(35-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(305-193 since 1997.) (61.2%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season.
(44-18 since 1997.) (71%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(161-95 since 1997.) (62.9%, +56.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(224-120 since 1997.) (65.1%, +92 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(89-38 since 1997.) (70.1%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(211-138 since 1997.) (60.5%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, with a losing record.
(65-32 since 1997.) (67%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(139-81 since 1997.) (63.2%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(194-121 since 1997.) (61.6%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(137-81 since 1997.) (62.8%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(132-79 since 1997.) (62.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss against a division rival.
(97-51 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss.
(125-67 since 1997.) (65.1%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a division game.
(423-251 since 1997.) (62.8%, +146.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(193-117 since 1997.) (62.3%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(139-82 since 1997.) (62.9%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(286-177 since 1997.) (61.8%, +91.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(204-118 since 1997.) (63.4%, +74.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(86-42 since 1997.) (67.2%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(206-123 since 1997.) (62.6%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +17.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(87-48 since 1997.) (64.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(289-139 since 1997.) (67.5%, +136.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(208-103 since 1997.) (66.9%, +94.7 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(222-123 since 1997.) (64.3%, +86.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(126-64 since 1997.) (66.3%, +55.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(96-55 since 1997.) (63.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(90-49 since 1997.) (64.7%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a loss against a division rival.
(203-121 since 1997.) (62.7%, +69.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a road loss against a division rival.
(144-77 since 1997.) (65.2%, +59.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a road loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(95-53 since 1997.) (64.2%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a road loss.
(187-101 since 1997.) (64.9%, +75.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a road loss, with a losing record.
(100-52 since 1997.) (65.8%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(97-48 since 1997.) (66.9%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(63-24 since 1997.) (72.4%, +36.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a loss by 10 points or more.
(141-72 since 1997.) (66.2%, +61.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(297-201 since 1997.) (59.6%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(104-57 since 1997.) (64.6%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(221-121 since 1997.) (64.6%, +87.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, on Thursday nights.
(38-11 since 1997.) (77.6%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(118-61 since 1997.) (65.9%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(36-13 since 1997.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season.
(96-34 since 1997.) (73.8%, +58.6 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(41-11 since 1997.) (78.8%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after playing a road game.
(305-168 since 1997.) (64.5%, +120.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after playing a road game, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(64-25 since 1997.) (71.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(117-65 since 1997.) (64.3%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(56-26 since 1997.) (68.3%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(294-175 since 1997.) (62.7%, +101.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(81-37 since 1997.) (68.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a losing record.
(138-74 since 1997.) (65.1%, +56.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(298-171 since 1997.) (63.5%, +109.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(76-32 since 1997.) (70.4%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record.
(157-89 since 1997.) (63.8%, +59.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - on Thursday nights.
(91-49 since 1997.) (65%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents.
(398-253 since 1997.) (61.1%, +119.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(274-169 since 1997.) (61.9%, +88.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(194-120 since 1997.) (61.8%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(141-77 since 1997.) (64.7%, +56.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a division game.
(355-214 since 1997.) (62.4%, +119.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(182-110 since 1997.) (62.3%, +61 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(245-153 since 1997.) (61.6%, +76.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(179-102 since 1997.) (63.7%, +66.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(133-81 since 1997.) (62.1%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(77-35 since 1997.) (68.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%).
(76-23 since 1997.) (76.8%, +50.7 units. Rating = 5*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(52-12 since 1997.) (81.2%, +38.8 units. Rating = 5*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(41-9 since 1997.) (82%, +31.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(27-2 since 1997.) (93.1%, +24.8 units. Rating = 5*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(32-7 since 1997.) (82.1%, +24.3 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(60-19 since 1997.) (75.9%, +39.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(41-9 since 1997.) (82%, +31.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(41-9 since 1997.) (82%, +31.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(289-139 since 1997.) (67.5%, +136.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(208-103 since 1997.) (66.9%, +94.7 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(292-186 since 1997.) (61.1%, +87.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(151-94 since 1997.) (61.6%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(203-126 since 1997.) (61.7%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record.
(240-143 since 1997.) (62.7%, +82.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a upset loss as a favorite.
(105-59 since 1997.) (64%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(96-49 since 1997.) (66.2%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(209-98 since 1997.) (68.1%, +101.2 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(191-88 since 1997.) (68.5%, +94.2 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(32-10 since 1997.) (76.2%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game.
(176-103 since 1997.) (63.1%, +62.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, on Thursday nights.
(33-10 since 1997.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(137-72 since 1997.) (65.6%, +57.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing a home game.
(291-187 since 1997.) (60.9%, +85.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(111-62 since 1997.) (64.2%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(284-195 since 1997.) (59.3%, +69.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a losing record.
(138-85 since 1997.) (61.9%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(76-39 since 1997.) (66.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(294-198 since 1997.) (59.8%, +76.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record.
(159-100 since 1997.) (61.4%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games.
(148-92 since 1997.) (61.7%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - with a losing record.
(247-139 since 1997.) (64%, +94.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(307-189 since 1997.) (61.9%, +99.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(154-81 since 1997.) (65.5%, +64.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(106-60 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(90-49 since 1997.) (64.7%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(112-60 since 1997.) (65.1%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(154-93 since 1997.) (62.3%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(83-37 since 1997.) (69.2%, +42.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - on Thursday nights.
(91-49 since 1997.) (65%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - playing with 3 or more days rest.
(137-82 since 1997.) (62.6%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents.
(398-253 since 1997.) (61.1%, +119.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 60.5 and 65.5 points (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(282-171 since 1997.) (62.3%, +93.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 73 | | 37 | | 27-62 | 43.6% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 41 | 9 | 15 | | INDIANA | 75 | | 38 | Over | 28-67 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 77.1% | 44 | 13 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON covered the first half line 551 times, while INDIANA covered the first half line 405 times.
Edge against first half line=WASHINGTON | In 1000 simulated games, 697 games went over first half total, while 267 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 34.5 | WASHINGTON is 35-21 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 37.1 | WASHINGTON is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 34.8 |
|
INDIANA is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was INDIANA 40.1, OPPONENT 36.0 | INDIANA is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 42.0, OPPONENT 35.4 | INDIANA is 29-14 against the 1rst half line (+13.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.7, OPPONENT 37.7 |
|
WASHINGTON is 21-8 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 40.4 | INDIANA is 38-24 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.2, OPPONENT 36.1 | INDIANA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.3, OPPONENT 35.2 | INDIANA is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.0, OPPONENT 38.1 |
|
WASHINGTON is 142-87 UNDER (+46.3 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.0 | INDIANA is 96-63 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.3, OPPONENT 33.3 | INDIANA is 163-122 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 |
|
| | | | |
|
WASHINGTON is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-35 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-15 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-32 against the 1rst half line (+14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 41-26 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-17 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 52-79 against the 1rst half line (-34.9 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 61-40 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 33-13 against the 1rst half line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 57-38 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 85-50 against the 1rst half line (+30.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 34-19 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 93-64 against the 1rst half line (+22.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.6, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 171-134 against the 1rst half line (+23.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 241-194 against the 1rst half line (+27.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.6, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 47-29 against the 1rst half line (+15.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 58-36 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 172-125 UNDER (+34.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-89 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-78 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 17-9 UNDER (+7.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 180-123 UNDER (+44.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 264-179 UNDER (+67.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 81-50 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 96-68 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 137-93 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.3, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 89-64 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 122-90 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 180-133 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.5, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 248-187 UNDER (+42.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 61-43 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-29 against the 1rst half line (+14.1 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-3 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 29-12 against the 1rst half line (+15.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) off a home loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games off a home loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-23 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 28.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 67-48 against the 1rst half line (+14.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 135-101 against the 1rst half line (+23.9 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 92-64 against the 1rst half line (+21.6 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 197-156 against the 1rst half line (+25.4 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 46-28 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 34-20 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.2, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 52-31 against the 1rst half line (+17.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 44-27 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 95-58 against the 1rst half line (+31.2 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 131-99 against the 1rst half line (+22.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 146-112 against the 1rst half line (+22.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.0, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 26-11 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 21-8 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 211-155 UNDER (+40.5 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 14-7 UNDER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 136-92 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 88-63 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 71-39 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-10 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 133-79 UNDER (+46.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 19-5 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game outrebounding opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 111-79 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 97-65 UNDER (+25.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 167-128 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 187-143 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 311-235 UNDER (+52.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 52-22 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.5, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest this season.
The average score was INDIANA 31.5, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 149-99 UNDER (+40.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 55-36 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.8, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 125-82 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 129-96 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 91-58 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 83-57 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 37-21 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a road loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.8, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 139-92 UNDER (+37.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 120-77 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 152-108 UNDER (+33.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 139-107 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 16-18 | -1.6 | 15-17 | 12-22 | 74.3 | 35.8 | 42.5% | 43.5 | 73.8 | 36.3 | 41.2% | 42.5 | | Road Games | 8-9 | +3.1 | 8-9 | 8-9 | 75.4 | 36.8 | 43.8% | 42.5 | 75.9 | 38.0 | 41.6% | 43.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.3 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 71.2 | 32.2 | 38.7% | 44.6 | 72.4 | 33.2 | 43.2% | 43.2 | | Division Games | 11-11 | -1.7 | 10-11 | 7-15 | 72.6 | 34.9 | 41.8% | 44.0 | 70.9 | 35.5 | 40.5% | 42.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.3 | 35.8 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-16 | 31.7% | 13-17 | 79.8% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.4 | 36.8 | 29-65 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 34.8% | 13-16 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 36.3 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 4-13 | 31.8% | 13-18 | 73.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 4-13 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.9 | 38.0 | 29-70 | 41.6% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 13-18 | 73.0% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-18 | -1 | 21-13 | 16-18 | 74.1 | 37.4 | 41.8% | 40.2 | 75.1 | 35.6 | 44.3% | 40.9 | | Home Games | 7-10 | -6.6 | 9-8 | 6-11 | 74.7 | 38.0 | 41.9% | 40.1 | 75.5 | 35.8 | 44.0% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 71.8 | 40.4 | 42.2% | 40.6 | 70.6 | 31.4 | 46.5% | 37.6 | | Division Games | 12-10 | +4.7 | 12-10 | 10-12 | 73.0 | 36.3 | 41.4% | 40.9 | 73.9 | 35.2 | 43.6% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.1 | 37.4 | 27-64 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 34.6% | 16-21 | 75.5% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.3 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 14-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.7 | 38.0 | 27-64 | 41.9% | 6-15 | 37.9% | 15-21 | 73.7% | 40 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 35.6 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 4-12 | 30.5% | 17-22 | 78.3% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 77 | 38 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 32.3% | 14-19 | 77.7% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 35.8 | 28-63 | 44.0% | 4-12 | 34.9% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.4, INDIANA 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/12/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-74 | 55-42 | 2 | W | 76.5 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | | 7/15/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 78-90 | 33-48 | 6 | L | 77.5 | O | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-75 | 34-34 | 4 | W | 76 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | | 7/23/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-75 | 38-38 | -2 | L | 73 | O | 32-64 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 11 | | 7/25/2014 | TULSA | 82-77 | 49-37 | -2.5 | W | 80 | O | 25-64 | 39.1% | 52 | 14 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 52 | 11 | | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | 77-67 | 39-38 | 1.5 | W | 77.5 | U | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | | 7/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 76-80 | 28-43 | 1.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 32-73 | 43.8% | 48 | 13 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 54 | 13 | | 8/3/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 65-76 | 31-43 | 2.5 | L | 75 | U | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | | 8/5/2014 | NEW YORK | 79-46 | 37-22 | -2 | W | 72.5 | U | 30-58 | 51.7% | 43 | 14 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 40 | 16 | | 8/8/2014 | @ INDIANA | 74-61 | 37-29 | 2.5 | W | 70.5 | U | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | | 8/10/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 81-89 | 32-31 | -1.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 27-74 | 36.5% | 48 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 63 | 20 | | 8/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 69-72 | 29-31 | 1.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | | 8/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-67 | 34-30 | -3 | W | 71.5 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 46 | 16 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 36 | 12 | | 8/16/2014 | NEW YORK | 61-73 | 29-45 | -3 | L | 71 | O | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 16 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 31 | 8 | | 8/21/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/12/2014 | ATLANTA | 74-93 | 34-55 | 1 | L | 75.5 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | | 7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 78-86 | 46-36 | 1.5 | W | 74 | O | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 82-64 | 45-31 | -2.5 | W | 74.5 | O | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | | 7/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 57-60 | 20-29 | -2 | L | 74 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | | 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 75-68 | 41-38 | 1 | W | 73.5 | O | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-77 | 31-35 | 2.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | | 7/31/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 76-67 | 28-31 | -1.5 | L | 70.5 | U | 27-58 | 46.6% | 38 | 14 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 27 | 18 | | 8/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 69-79 | 42-47 | 6.5 | W | 75.5 | O | 23-66 | 34.8% | 47 | 9 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 5 | | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | 64-66 | 44-38 | 2.5 | W | 75 | O | 24-65 | 36.9% | 36 | 9 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 52 | 10 | | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 61-74 | 29-37 | -2.5 | L | 70.5 | U | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | | 8/10/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 90-76 | 51-32 | 0 | W | 70 | O | 35-61 | 57.4% | 33 | 11 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 27 | 14 | | 8/14/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-63 | 46-21 | -3 | W | 70 | U | 28-65 | 43.1% | 45 | 14 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 17 | | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | 71-67 | 44-31 | -2 | W | 72 | O | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | | 8/17/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 61-73 | 32-36 | 2.5 | L | 70.5 | U | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 38 | 10 | | 8/21/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| INDIANA is 33-23 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997 | | 36 of 56 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 9-3 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | | 8 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 16-12 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA since 1997 | | 18 of 28 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-0 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74 | 143 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 44 | 8 | 10 | | | INDIANA | 61 | -5 | Under | 29 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 38 | 13 | 10 | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 80 | 144 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 38 | 7 | 17 | | | WASHINGTON | 77 | -4 | Over | 29 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 6/6/2014 | INDIANA | 64 | 141.5 | SU ATS | 26 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 38 | 10 | 11 | | | WASHINGTON | 61 | -4.5 | Under | 35 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 51 | 15 | 17 | 5/23/2014 | WASHINGTON | 79 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 9 | 12 | | | INDIANA | 63 | -4 | Under | 30 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 39 | 9 | 8 | 9/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 142.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 46 | 14 | 15 | | | INDIANA | 67 | -6 | Under | 37 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 41 | 12 | 9 | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | 65 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 44 | 11 | 12 | | | WASHINGTON | 52 | -4.5 | Under | 16 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 4 | 15 | 7/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 70 | 147 | | 31 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 8 | 21 | | | INDIANA | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 32 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 22-23 | 95.7% | 41 | 16 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 60 | 143 | Under | 31 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 39 | 8 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 6 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 38-20 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 30-16 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 23-10 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 29-13 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) off a home loss as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games off a home loss by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 26-12 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Lin is 147-120 against the 1rst half line (+15.0 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 90-72 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 71-50 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 44-26 against the 1rst half line (+15.4 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 34-23 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 78-56 against the 1rst half line (+16.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 26-15 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) on Thursday as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 97-76 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 96-74 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) after a division game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 67-54 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 93-64 against the 1rst half line (+22.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in home games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.3, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 67-45 against the 1rst half line (+17.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 52-29 against the 1rst half line (+20.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 42-22 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 41-26 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) off a road loss as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 28-16 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 54-42 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 41-29 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 76-46 against the 1rst half line (+25.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 69-41 against the 1rst half line (+23.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 46-24 against the 1rst half line (+19.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 63-37 against the 1rst half line (+22.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 56-29 against the 1rst half line (+24.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 80-42 against the 1rst half line (+33.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 88-70 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 124-96 against the 1rst half line (+18.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 52-34 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 72-50 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 57-44 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 81-60 against the 1rst half line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 87-65 against the 1rst half line (+15.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 121-93 against the 1rst half line (+18.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 36-23 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 48-32 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 82-68 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 87-71 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 117-94 against the 1rst half line (+13.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 78-60 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 112-79 against the 1rst half line (+25.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 26-10 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.0, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.0, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 57-37 OVER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 48-36 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 47-35 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 42-23 OVER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 29-17 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 64-49 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 36-25 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 45-29 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 42.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 84-65 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 46-33 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 60-47 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 76-63 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 42-28 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 33-13 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 28-17 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 78-55 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in the 1rst game of a playoff series in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 34.1, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in the first round of the playoffs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.3, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 149-115 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 35-24 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 33-22 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 41-29 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 46-32 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 36.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 85-59 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lin 35.0, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 142 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 135 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 16 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 11 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 12 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 7 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 27 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 13 times.
Edge against the first half line=INDIANA | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 23 games went under the first half total, while 18 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/21/2014 - Kara Lawson is upgraded to probable Thursday vs. Indiana Fever ( Ankle ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/8/2024 5:48:48 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|