| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT DALLAS |
|
| 174 | 86 Final 83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | CONNECTICUT | +375 | 604 | DALLAS | -550 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (249-201 since 1997.) (55.3%, +68.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (174-36 since 1997.) (82.9%, +65.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Saturday games. (63-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (152-49 since 1997.) (75.6%, +60.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (208-77 since 1997.) (73%, +60.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (152-42 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (137-42 since 1997.) (76.5%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (160-72 since 1997.) (69%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (98-27 since 1997.) (78.4%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (92-19 since 1997.) (82.9%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (125-86 since 1997.) (59.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +32.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against a poor free throw shooting team (67-71%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (30-15 since 1997.) (66.7%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (63-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games. (27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +13.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (44-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (94-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (300-294 since 1997.) (50.5%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (63-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (162-145 since 1997.) (52.8%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (49-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (103-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +52.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (81-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (71-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +28 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (86-50 since 1997.) (63.2%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (109-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (47-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (156-120 since 1997.) (56.5%, +33.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +32.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (62-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (54-29 since 1997.) (65.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (26-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (42-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +13.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (63-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +24.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (19-11 since 1997.) (63.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (37-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 2 days rest, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (26-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +35.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (38-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +30 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (68-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +39.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (54-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (30-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (48-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (72-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (38-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games. (31-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 81 | | 31-70 | 44.3% | 5-18 | 29.4% | 13-18 | 71.8% | 43 | 12 | 14 | DALLAS | 88 | | 30-69 | 43.0% | 8-21 | 35.3% | 21-27 | 79.3% | 47 | 14 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, DALLAS won the game straight up 684 times, while CONNECTICUT won 295 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 68-38 against the money line (+23.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 74.2 | CONNECTICUT is 111-95 against the money line (+22.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 73.8 | CONNECTICUT is 53-27 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 21-15 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.9 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 87.8 | CONNECTICUT is 41-66 against the money line (-39.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 1-11 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 90.5 | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 92.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-30 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 88.3 | DALLAS is 5-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.5, OPPONENT 85.3 | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.0, OPPONENT 84.9 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 111-145 against the money line (-50.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 46-33 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-23 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 0-4 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 0-4 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in home games in non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-16 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-26 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-45 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-16 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-19 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-21 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-18 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 91.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 3-13 | -10.2 | 8-7 | 8-8 | 79.9 | 37.8 | 42.3% | 43.6 | 87.3 | 41.9 | 47.8% | 42.7 | Road Games | 1-7 | -5 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 78.6 | 37.5 | 42.2% | 42.0 | 88.7 | 42.4 | 48.5% | 43.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 78.8 | 38.6 | 43.1% | 40.6 | 86.8 | 43.8 | 50.6% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.9 | 37.8 | 30-72 | 42.3% | 5-19 | 29.3% | 14-19 | 70.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 17-22 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.6 | 37.5 | 30-72 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 12-18 | 67.6% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 24 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.3 | 41.9 | 31-65 | 47.8% | 6-16 | 36.8% | 19-24 | 79.3% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 40.5 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 18-23 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 88.7 | 42.4 | 31-65 | 48.5% | 5-14 | 34.8% | 21-26 | 81.2% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-9 | -1.2 | 8-9 | 14-3 | 86.4 | 42.8 | 41.4% | 44.5 | 87.6 | 43.5 | 47.3% | 41.6 | Home Games | 4-5 | -3.9 | 2-7 | 9-0 | 87.3 | 43.2 | 42.5% | 44.6 | 89.6 | 44.0 | 49.1% | 39.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 90.2 | 48.6 | 45.2% | 42.8 | 87.8 | 42.0 | 46.4% | 37.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.4 | 42.8 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 8-23 | 35.0% | 21-26 | 79.5% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 17-22 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.3 | 43.2 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 22-28 | 77.3% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.6 | 43.5 | 31-66 | 47.3% | 5-14 | 32.1% | 20-25 | 81.1% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 18-22 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.6 | 44.0 | 32-65 | 49.1% | 4-14 | 27.4% | 22-27 | 82.3% | 39 | 9 | 19 | 24 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.1, DALLAS 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-77 | L | +450 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | 5/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-93 | L | +180 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | 5/31/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 90-99 | L | +550 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 48 | 19 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 35 | 4 | 6/3/2016 | ATLANTA | 77-83 | L | +250 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 50 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 47 | 16 | 6/5/2016 | INDIANA | 77-88 | L | +200 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 77-76 | W | +135 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | 6/12/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 87-93 | L | +280 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 106-109 | L | +135 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 72-80 | L | +250 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-90 | W | -210 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 32 | 13 | 6/24/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-98 | L | +280 | 32-85 | 37.6% | 46 | 12 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 38 | 15 | 6/26/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-80 | L | | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 11 | 6/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 75-86 | L | +550 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 42 | 13 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 14 | 7/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/27/2016 | ATLANTA | 93-102 | L | -200 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 48 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 44 | 12 | 5/29/2016 | CHICAGO | 87-92 | L | +100 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 6/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-80 | L | +550 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | 6/8/2016 | WASHINGTON | 79-87 | L | -175 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 43 | 10 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 52 | 15 | 6/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 73-97 | L | +325 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 6/14/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 88-91 | L | +280 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | 6/16/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-79 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | 6/18/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 117-111 | W | +280 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 65 | 17 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 55 | 20 | 6/21/2016 | PHOENIX | 100-90 | W | +135 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 39 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 36 | 13 | 6/23/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-90 | W | -600 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 49 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 6/25/2016 | INDIANA | 87-92 | L | -250 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | 6/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-89 | L | +400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 34 | 12 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 6/30/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 83-78 | W | -110 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 13 | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
DALLAS is 31-25 (+9.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
DALLAS is 2-2 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 17-11 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 1-1 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 154.5 | Over | 39 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 44 | 13 | 14 | | TULSA | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 44 | 11 | 10 | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | 74 | 153 | Over | 48 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 39 | 6 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -4 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 43 | 12 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 6-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in July games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 26-37 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 4-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 6-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 9-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 11-23 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 6-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-28 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 0-6 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 71.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 2-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 76.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 26-42 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 44-61 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 77.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 1-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 24-36 against the money line (-29.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 40-55 against the money line (-33.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-17 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-28 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 81.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-34 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 32-56 against the money line (-28.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-20 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-38 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 2-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 83.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-4 against the money line (+7.5 Units) off a road win as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 34-14 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 81.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 30-16 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 21-9 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 23-14 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 84.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 93 times, while the road underdog won straight up 15 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/01/2016 - Rachel Banham "?" Saturday vs. Dallas Wings ( Knee ) | [F] 06/29/2016 - Chiney Ogwumike "?" Saturday vs Dallas Wings ( Knee ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 5:46:16 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|