| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
DALLAS |
|
|
86
| 41
Final
38 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | | 604 | DALLAS | -6 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(69-34 since 1997.) (67%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(122-68 since 1997.) (64.2%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(147-82 since 1997.) (64.2%, +56.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(117-63 since 1997.) (65%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(121-77 since 1997.) (61.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(199-129 since 1997.) (60.7%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(72-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(227-135 since 1997.) (62.7%, +78.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(125-68 since 1997.) (64.8%, +50.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(45-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(153-92 since 1997.) (62.4%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(117-60 since 1997.) (66.1%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(92-45 since 1997.) (67.2%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(159-100 since 1997.) (61.4%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(133-75 since 1997.) (63.9%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(104-56 since 1997.) (65%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(101-56 since 1997.) (64.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(175-112 since 1997.) (61%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(125-73 since 1997.) (63.1%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(264-173 since 1997.) (60.4%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(141-83 since 1997.) (62.9%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(49-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(136-80 since 1997.) (63%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(98-56 since 1997.) (63.6%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(206-141 since 1997.) (59.4%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(492-368 since 1997.) (57.2%, +87.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(125-78 since 1997.) (61.6%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in July games.
(78-42 since 1997.) (65%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - off a road win, in May, June, or July games.
(240-165 since 1997.) (59.3%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(404-301 since 1997.) (57.3%, +72.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(257-185 since 1997.) (58.1%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(509-368 since 1997.) (58%, +104.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(382-260 since 1997.) (59.5%, +96 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (DALLAS) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(267-180 since 1997.) (59.7%, +69 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(825-620 since 1997.) (57.1%, +143 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a non-conference game.
(663-512 since 1997.) (56.4%, +99.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(509-368 since 1997.) (58%, +104.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(382-260 since 1997.) (59.5%, +96 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 81 | | 41 | | 31-70 | 44.3% | 5-18 | 29.4% | 13-18 | 71.8% | 43 | 12 | 14 | | DALLAS | 88 | | 44 | | 30-69 | 43.0% | 8-21 | 35.3% | 21-27 | 79.3% | 47 | 14 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 584 times, while DALLAS covered the first half line 373 times.
Edge against first half line=CONNECTICUT | In 1000 simulated games, 550 games went under first half total, while 412 games went over first half total.
Edge against first half total=Under |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 33.3 | CONNECTICUT is 64-42 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 35.6 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 36.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 35-70 against the 1rst half line (-42.0 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 41.4 | CONNECTICUT is 27-46 against the 1rst half line (-23.6 Units) in road games when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.4, OPPONENT 43.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.1, OPPONENT 35.8 |
|
| | | | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 42.4, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.6, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-23 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 28.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 28.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 120-90 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 29.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.9, OPPONENT 46.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.9, OPPONENT 46.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-80 against the 1rst half line (-37.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 56-82 against the 1rst half line (-34.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 75-105 against the 1rst half line (-40.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 42.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 42.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 46.0, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was DALLAS 44.8, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was DALLAS 46.4, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.4, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.5, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 42.7, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.4, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.5, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 44.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 44.4, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 45.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 44.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 44.4, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 45.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 42.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 42.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 45.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 45.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 45.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 43.1, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 45.1, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 29.7, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-13 | -10.2 | 8-7 | 8-8 | 79.9 | 37.8 | 42.3% | 43.6 | 87.3 | 41.9 | 47.8% | 42.7 | | Road Games | 1-7 | -5 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 78.6 | 37.5 | 42.2% | 42.0 | 88.7 | 42.4 | 48.5% | 43.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 78.8 | 38.6 | 43.1% | 40.6 | 86.8 | 43.8 | 50.6% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.9 | 37.8 | 30-72 | 42.3% | 5-19 | 29.3% | 14-19 | 70.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 17-22 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.6 | 37.5 | 30-72 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 12-18 | 67.6% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 24 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.3 | 41.9 | 31-65 | 47.8% | 6-16 | 36.8% | 19-24 | 79.3% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 40.5 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 18-23 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 88.7 | 42.4 | 31-65 | 48.5% | 5-14 | 34.8% | 21-26 | 81.2% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-9 | -1.2 | 8-9 | 14-3 | 86.4 | 42.8 | 41.4% | 44.5 | 87.6 | 43.5 | 47.3% | 41.6 | | Home Games | 4-5 | -3.9 | 2-7 | 9-0 | 87.3 | 43.2 | 42.5% | 44.6 | 89.6 | 44.0 | 49.1% | 39.3 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 90.2 | 48.6 | 45.2% | 42.8 | 87.8 | 42.0 | 46.4% | 37.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.4 | 42.8 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 8-23 | 35.0% | 21-26 | 79.5% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 17-22 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.3 | 43.2 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 22-28 | 77.3% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.6 | 43.5 | 31-66 | 47.3% | 5-14 | 32.1% | 20-25 | 81.1% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 18-22 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.6 | 44.0 | 32-65 | 49.1% | 4-14 | 27.4% | 22-27 | 82.3% | 39 | 9 | 19 | 24 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.1, DALLAS 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-77 | 43-41 | 6.5 | W | 78 | O | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | | 5/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-93 | 37-39 | 3 | W | 75 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | | 5/31/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 90-99 | 46-40 | 7 | W | 81.5 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 48 | 19 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 35 | 4 | | 6/3/2016 | ATLANTA | 77-83 | 39-43 | 4 | T | 82.5 | U | 29-73 | 39.7% | 50 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 47 | 16 | | 6/5/2016 | INDIANA | 77-88 | 35-47 | 3 | L | 81.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 77-76 | 28-38 | 1.5 | L | 80 | U | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 87-93 | 41-46 | 4.5 | L | 83 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 106-109 | 42-44 | 1.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 72-80 | 36-41 | 4 | L | 80 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-90 | 45-45 | -2.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 32 | 13 | | 6/24/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-98 | 37-56 | 4.5 | L | 82 | O | 32-85 | 37.6% | 46 | 12 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 38 | 15 | | 6/26/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-80 | 38-36 | 9 | W | 81.5 | U | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 11 | | 6/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 75-86 | 37-41 | 7 | W | 86.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 42 | 13 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 14 | | 7/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/27/2016 | ATLANTA | 93-102 | 49-48 | -2.5 | L | 81 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 48 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 44 | 12 | | 5/29/2016 | CHICAGO | 87-92 | 47-56 | 1 | L | 85 | O | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | | 6/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-80 | 29-36 | 7 | T | 81 | U | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | | 6/8/2016 | WASHINGTON | 79-87 | 37-40 | -2 | L | 80 | U | 26-74 | 35.1% | 43 | 10 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 52 | 15 | | 6/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 73-97 | 32-50 | 5 | L | 81 | O | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | | 6/14/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 88-91 | 50-56 | 4.5 | L | 80 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | | 6/16/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-79 | 36-38 | -3 | L | 82.5 | U | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | | 6/18/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 117-111 | 42-48 | 4.5 | L | 86.5 | O | 33-86 | 38.4% | 65 | 17 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 55 | 20 | | 6/21/2016 | PHOENIX | 100-90 | 48-44 | 1.5 | W | 86 | O | 38-72 | 52.8% | 39 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 36 | 13 | | 6/23/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-90 | 50-34 | -6 | W | 81.5 | O | 32-78 | 41.0% | 49 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | | 6/25/2016 | INDIANA | 87-92 | 48-52 | -3 | L | 84.5 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | | 6/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-89 | 53-34 | 6 | W | 84 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 34 | 12 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | | 6/30/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 83-78 | 44-46 | 0 | L | 85.5 | O | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 13 | | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| DALLAS is 28-27 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 29 of 57 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 16-11 versus the first half line when playing against DALLAS since 1997 | | 15 of 27 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against DALLAS over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 154.5 | Over | 39 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 44 | 13 | 14 | | | TULSA | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 44 | 11 | 10 | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | 74 | 153 | Over | 48 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 39 | 6 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -4 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 43 | 12 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 41.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 19-32 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.0, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-26 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.2, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.9, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 41.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.4, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.0, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.1, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.2, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-30 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.9, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-27 against the 1rst half line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.7, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.1, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.0, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.1, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.2, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.3, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.5, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.2, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.2, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.6, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.3, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.8, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.3, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in home games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 42.2, OPPONENT 49.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.4, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 24-37 against the 1rst half line (-16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 36.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.9, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.2, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 23-35 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.1, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.7, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.1, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 51-35 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 40-23 OVER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 41.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 35-17 OVER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.0, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 28-12 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.2, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.3, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 20-7 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 41.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 38.9, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.0, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 34-19 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.7, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-15 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.1, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 38-26 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 32-17 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.9, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.7, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.8, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 35-24 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 40.5, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-13 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 62-41 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 38.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 39.1, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Williams is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 37.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 55 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 51 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 2 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/01/2016 - Rachel Banham "?" Saturday vs. Dallas Wings ( Knee ) | | [F] 06/29/2016 - Chiney Ogwumike "?" Saturday vs Dallas Wings ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 12:45:22 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|