| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS CONNECTICUT |
|
| 162 | 66 Final 70 |
|
|
| | |
|
IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | | | |
661 | DALLAS | +170 | 662 | CONNECTICUT | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games. (27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (88-57 since 1997.) (60.7%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (76-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 82 | | 30-68 | 43.6% | 7-22 | 30.8% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 44 | 11 | 13 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | | 33-74 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 10-14 | 75.5% | 45 | 13 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 507 times, while DALLAS won 465 times. Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 26-18 against the money line (+19.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-25.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-15 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 69-89 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 52-85 against the money line (-46.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 | CONNECTICUT is 34-52 against the money line (-35.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 88.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-13 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 87.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 85.6 | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 88.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-19 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 85.7 |
|
DALLAS is 20-37 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 81.9 | DALLAS is 13-33 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 85.9 | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 74.7, OPPONENT 87.9 | DALLAS is 13-31 against the money line (-27.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 88.8 | DALLAS is 9-25 against the money line (-26.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 91.4 | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 70.4, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 112-79 against the money line (+26.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 92-53 against the money line (+28.1 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 26-7 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 19-4 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 81.4 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 32-53 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-37 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 44-72 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 41-68 against the money line (-32.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-14 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 40-56 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 42-73 against the money line (-33.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-29 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 126-101 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 5-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 76.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-21 against the money line (-19.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-12.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-33 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-15 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-18 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 92.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 28-46 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 76.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 26-55 against the money line (-26.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-29 against the money line (-21.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 76.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 10-22 against the money line (-13.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 18-33 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 14-27 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-23 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-19 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 47-70 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-25 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-20 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-17 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 3-14 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 15-22 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-16 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-24 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-24 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-27 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 14-22 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-27 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-18 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-15 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 16-25 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-19 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-14 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 12-19 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 25-47 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-30 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-20 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 3-5 | -4 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 80.6 | 40.9 | 41.0% | 42.6 | 84.5 | 44.1 | 45.5% | 45.4 | Road Games | 3-5 | -4 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 80.6 | 40.9 | 41.0% | 42.6 | 84.5 | 44.1 | 45.5% | 45.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 76.2 | 37.8 | 39.8% | 42.6 | 83.6 | 42.8 | 46.5% | 44.2 | Division Games | 3-5 | -4 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 80.6 | 40.9 | 41.0% | 42.6 | 84.5 | 44.1 | 45.5% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.6 | 40.9 | 30-73 | 41.0% | 8-27 | 30.4% | 12-17 | 75.2% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 86.2 | 43.9 | 32-70 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.6 | 40.9 | 30-73 | 41.0% | 8-27 | 30.4% | 12-17 | 75.2% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 44.1 | 31-69 | 45.5% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 82.7% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 5 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 83.5 | 42.2 | 30-67 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.5 | 44.1 | 31-69 | 45.5% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 82.7% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 5 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 2-6 | -4.6 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 81.7 | 44.0 | 43.8% | 43.7 | 83.4 | 39.9 | 45.3% | 41.9 | Road Games | 2-6 | -4.6 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 81.7 | 44.0 | 43.8% | 43.7 | 83.4 | 39.9 | 45.3% | 41.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 84.0 | 45.4 | 47.0% | 40.2 | 83.0 | 40.4 | 45.5% | 41.2 | Division Games | 2-6 | -4.6 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 81.7 | 44.0 | 43.8% | 43.7 | 83.4 | 39.9 | 45.3% | 41.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.7 | 44.0 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-20 | 31.8% | 16-23 | 70.3% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 14-18 | 78.2% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.7 | 44.0 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-20 | 31.8% | 16-23 | 70.3% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.4 | 39.9 | 30-67 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 42 | 7 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.3 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.6% | 8-21 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.4 | 39.9 | 30-67 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 42 | 7 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 68.5, CONNECTICUT 73.4 |
| | |
|
|
7/26/2020 | *ATLANTA | 95-105 | L | -300 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 39 | 13 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 43 | 16 | 7/29/2020 | *NEW YORK | 93-80 | W | -220 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 38 | 10 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 49 | 18 | 7/31/2020 | *INDIANA | 76-73 | W | -165 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 51 | 9 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 50 | 15 | 8/2/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 70-79 | L | +250 | 28-76 | 36.8% | 38 | 10 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 52 | 18 | 8/4/2020 | *CHICAGO | 79-82 | L | +210 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 40 | 10 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | 8/6/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 68-91 | L | +145 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 39 | 17 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 44 | 14 | 8/8/2020 | *ATLANTA | 85-75 | W | -115 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 50 | 13 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 34 | 12 | 8/10/2020 | *PHOENIX | 79-91 | L | +155 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 8 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 45 | 11 | 8/12/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2020 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/21/2020 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/26/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 69-77 | L | -140 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 50 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 45 | 14 | 7/28/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 89-94 | L | +155 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 7/30/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 76-81 | L | +200 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 56 | 14 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 43 | 15 | 8/1/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 69-78 | L | -125 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 38 | 16 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 53 | 17 | 8/4/2020 | *SEATTLE | 74-87 | L | +400 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 14 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 35 | 9 | 8/6/2020 | *DALLAS | 91-68 | W | -165 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 44 | 14 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 39 | 17 | 8/8/2020 | *CHICAGO | 93-100 | L | +135 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 27 | 19 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 35 | 21 | 8/10/2020 | *ATLANTA | 93-82 | W | -210 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 45 | 8 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 44 | 19 | 8/12/2020 | *DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 36-33 (-8.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 6-1 (+2.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
8/6/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 44 | 6 | 14 | N | DALLAS | 68 | 159 | | 31 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 8-29 | 27.6% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 39 | 10 | 17 | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | 72 | 156.5 | Over | 26 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 23 | 3 | 9 | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 48 | 11 | 16 | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 68 | 148.5 | Under | 34 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 37 | 8 | 9 | | CONNECTICUT | 78 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 6/26/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | -9 | Under | 34 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 36 | 5 | 11 | | DALLAS | 74 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 42 | 10 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 51-50 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 76.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 36-39 against the money line (-29.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-14 against the money line (-17.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 6-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 2-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 68-81 against the money line (-46.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 31-48 against the money line (-39.7 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 69.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 37-59 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-32 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 50-67 against the money line (-37.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 20-24 against the money line (-30.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 19-42 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 9-28 against the money line (-27.2 Units) in road games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 22-26 against the money line (-25.9 Units) vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 69.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-46 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-7 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 31-22 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-41 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 07/29/2020 - Briann January is out indefinitely ( COVID-19 ) | [F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 9/20/2024 9:57:47 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|