| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE CONNECTICUT |
|
| 177.5 | 78 Final 65 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
315 | SEATTLE | +135 | 316 | CONNECTICUT | -155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (166-124 since 1997.) (57.2%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (107-35 since 1997.) (75.4%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (151-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (119-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (86-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (31-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.2%, +26.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (42-14 since 1997.) (75%, +31.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (39-8 since 1997.) (83%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (49-26 since 1997.) (65.3%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (37-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +29.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (175-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +30.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (31-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +26.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (28-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (31-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +30.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (199-120 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +23.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (34-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +26.2 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (221-156 since 1997.) (58.6%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (172-112 since 1997.) (60.6%, +66.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (140-99 since 1997.) (58.6%, +64.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival. (204-144 since 1997.) (58.6%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (202-155 since 1997.) (56.6%, +47.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (80-42 since 1997.) (65.6%, +42.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (110-73 since 1997.) (60.1%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (82-44 since 1997.) (65.1%, +39.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (69-40 since 1997.) (63.3%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (96-57 since 1997.) (62.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (102-65 since 1997.) (61.1%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (97-58 since 1997.) (62.6%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (100-63 since 1997.) (61.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (80-46 since 1997.) (63.5%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (102-65 since 1997.) (61.1%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season. (92-57 since 1997.) (61.7%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (83-49 since 1997.) (62.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (80-46 since 1997.) (63.5%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more. (44-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (74-42 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (77-47 since 1997.) (62.1%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (65-35 since 1997.) (65%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (64-36 since 1997.) (64%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (54-35 since 1997.) (60.7%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (24-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (45-21 since 1997.) (68.2%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (40-18 since 1997.) (69%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (52-29 since 1997.) (64.2%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (48-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (52-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (55-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (42-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (61-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest. (36-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE | 87 | | 32-68 | 47.0% | 8-24 | 36.0% | 15-18 | 82.3% | 43 | 10 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 33-74 | 44.4% | 8-22 | 35.3% | 12-16 | 74.3% | 44 | 13 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 538 times, while CONNECTICUT won 436 times. Edge against the money line=SEATTLE |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 85-50 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 73.5 | SEATTLE is 75-53 against the money line (+32.2 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.4 | SEATTLE is 14-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.7, OPPONENT 82.9 | SEATTLE is 10-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | SEATTLE is 17-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 77.4 | SEATTLE is 15-6 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | SEATTLE is 15-3 against the money line (+14.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.8, OPPONENT 82.5 | SEATTLE is 13-1 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 95.0, OPPONENT 82.7 | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.4, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.1 | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.7 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 84.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 87.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 85.0 | CONNECTICUT is 59-83 against the money line (-36.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 61-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 90.3 | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 86.6 | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 84.1 |
|
SEATTLE is 7-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 81.1 | SEATTLE is 15-22 against the money line (-23.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.1, OPPONENT 88.5 | SEATTLE is 11-19 against the money line (-23.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 88.1, OPPONENT 90.6 | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 40-21 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 40-11 against the money line (+32.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was SEATTLE 86.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 114-100 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 83-55 against the money line (+27.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 104-77 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 150-120 against the money line (+29.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 86.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 45-34 against the money line (+19.7 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 126-106 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 94-62 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-0 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-7.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 23-24 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-15 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 5-12 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-18 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-9 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 23-23 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-21 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 22-24 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-19 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-10 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-19 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-29 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 against the money line (+17.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 124-92 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 175-128 against the money line (+26.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-25 against the money line (+20.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 73-61 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 14-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 128-110 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 127-109 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 145-130 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 13-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 86.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was SEATTLE 90.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was SEATTLE 93.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 166-145 against the money line (+40.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-7.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-15.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-50 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-9 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 3-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 17-22 against the money line (-21.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 4-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-42 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in road games off a road win since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-10 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 51-85 against the money line (-33.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-19 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-21 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-14 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 12-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 49-107 against the money line (-46.5 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 69.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-26 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-4 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-11 against the money line (+14.9 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-20 against the money line (+17.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-16 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-20 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 61-53 against the money line (+18.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+9.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-40 against the money line (+20.7 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-6 | +5.9 | 13-9 | 12-9 | 87.7 | 43.7 | 47.1% | 42.1 | 80.1 | 38.8 | 43.2% | 40.1 | Road Games | 7-2 | +7.8 | 7-2 | 6-2 | 91.0 | 45.1 | 49.9% | 39.7 | 80.4 | 37.6 | 43.8% | 38.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 91.8 | 46.2 | 47.9% | 44.6 | 84.2 | 39.4 | 43.4% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.7 | 43.7 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 8-24 | 35.2% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 91.0 | 45.1 | 33-66 | 49.9% | 9-24 | 36.9% | 16-18 | 86.7% | 40 | 7 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.1 | 38.8 | 30-70 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 14-17 | 79.6% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 37.6 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 38 | 8 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-11 | -11.4 | 9-14 | 11-11 | 86.0 | 42.3 | 44.9% | 46.3 | 82.0 | 41.6 | 44.1% | 39.6 | Home Games | 6-3 | -8.3 | 4-5 | 6-3 | 91.1 | 44.7 | 48.8% | 43.8 | 83.0 | 42.1 | 44.0% | 38.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -7.4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 84.6 | 42.2 | 45.2% | 45.4 | 82.0 | 38.4 | 46.8% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.0 | 42.3 | 33-73 | 44.9% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 13-17 | 73.9% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 91.1 | 44.7 | 35-71 | 48.8% | 7-18 | 40.5% | 14-19 | 74.7% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.0 | 41.6 | 29-66 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 17-21 | 80.7% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 80.4% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.0 | 42.1 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 7-17 | 38.9% | 18-22 | 81.6% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 71, CONNECTICUT 71 |
| | |
|
|
6/10/2018 | ATLANTA | 64-67 | L | -330 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 57 | 17 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 43 | 14 | 6/12/2018 | CHICAGO | 96-85 | W | -600 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 40 | 13 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 39 | 9 | 6/15/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 103-92 | W | -125 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 6/19/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-89 | L | -600 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 8 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 54 | 9 | 6/22/2018 | INDIANA | 72-63 | W | -750 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 42 | 19 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 41 | 15 | 6/24/2018 | @ DALLAS | 97-76 | W | +105 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 46 | 15 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 32 | 13 | 6/26/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-91 | L | +250 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 33 | 11 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 48 | 11 | 6/28/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 81-72 | W | -155 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 12 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 12 | 7/1/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 84-70 | W | -220 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 7/3/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 77-62 | W | -200 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 42 | 12 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 12 | 7/6/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 95-86 | W | -200 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 49 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 41 | 11 | 7/8/2018 | WASHINGTON | 97-91 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 8 | 7/10/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 75-77 | L | -140 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 21 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 39 | 12 | 7/14/2018 | DALLAS | 91-84 | W | -200 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 50 | 14 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 15 | 7/18/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 101-83 | W | -400 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 38 | 13 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 16 | 7/20/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 91-95 | L | -450 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | L | +105 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | L | +180 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | L | -220 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-92 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | 101-89 | W | -650 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 37 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 31 | 15 | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | W | +350 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | L | -330 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 22-18 (-4.1 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-4 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 15-4 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-0 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/1/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 175 | Under | 35 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 6-24 | 25.0% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 49 | 14 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 41 | 8 | 10 | 6/15/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92 | 176.5 | Over | 45 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 39 | 8 | 10 | | SEATTLE | 103 | -2 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 12-27 | 44.4% | 27-34 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 8 | 8/8/2017 | SEATTLE | 71 | 170 | Under | 42 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 8-28 | 28.6% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 45 | 8 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 50 | 7 | 10 | 7/12/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -3 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 44 | 9 | 12 | | SEATTLE | 79 | 168 | Under | 48 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 33 | 3 | 15 | 6/29/2017 | SEATTLE | 89 | 167.5 | Over | 38 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 32 | 6 | 9 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 39-69 | 56.5% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 44 | 7 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Hughes is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 91.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 12-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 9-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.2, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 9-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 89.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 9-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 89.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 13-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 12-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 86.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 93.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 37-29 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 75.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 9-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 41-36 against the money line (+23.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 7-0 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 91.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-18 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 1-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 9-17 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 6-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-18 against the money line (-15.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 1-5 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Hughes is 48-69 against the money line (-38.8 Units) on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 100-138 against the money line (-56.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 127-159 against the money line (-68.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 115-138 against the money line (-45.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 13-15 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 71.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 79-89 against the money line (-38.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 52-53 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 125-134 against the money line (-50.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 8-17 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 78.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 65-105 against the money line (-43.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 71.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 98-124 against the money line (-48.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 71.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 33-63 against the money line (-31.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 74.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 90-120 against the money line (-51.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 69.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 16-48 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 71.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 91-117 against the money line (-41.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 75.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 19-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 32-49 against the money line (-31.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 74.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 11-26 against the money line (-16.4 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 31-69 against the money line (-39.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 128-166 against the money line (-58.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 75.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-20 against the money line (+17.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-16 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-20 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-8 against the money line (+9.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 8-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 13-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-18 against the money line (+8.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 38-29 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-8 against the money line (+17.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 21-17 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 197 times, while the road underdog won straight up 144 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 11 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/27/2024 11:16:42 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|