| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK CONNECTICUT |
|
| 165 | 79 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
321 | NEW YORK | +250 | 322 | CONNECTICUT | -330 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (85-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (91-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +27.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (69-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (99-28 since 1997.) (78%, +36.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (56-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +16.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (55-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (194-113 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +37.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (51-21 since 1997.) (70.8%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread. (26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +16.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (39-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (39-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (39-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (55-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (58-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (44-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (23-4 since 1997.) (85.2%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (41-21 since 1997.) (66.1%, +33 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (57-40 since 1997.) (58.8%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (59-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.5%, +55 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (83-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +60.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK | 77 | | 29-69 | 41.4% | 7-21 | 32.8% | 13-16 | 76.6% | 42 | 12 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | | 33-72 | 46.1% | 8-22 | 35.4% | 15-19 | 75.3% | 47 | 14 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 775 times, while NEW YORK won 207 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 12-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 | NEW YORK is 131-118 against the money line (+24.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 81.7 | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.9 | CONNECTICUT is 60-73 against the money line (-35.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.2 |
|
NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 84.9 | NEW YORK is 1-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 71.8, OPPONENT 82.2 | NEW YORK is 74-100 against the money line (-41.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.2, OPPONENT 72.5 | NEW YORK is 3-13 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 85.6 | NEW YORK is 6-14 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 90.1 | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 78.3 | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 83.5 | CONNECTICUT is 78-35 against the money line (+43.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 96-74 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 79-48 against the money line (+26.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.3, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 38-20 against the money line (+22.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 83.6 | CONNECTICUT is 26-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.4, OPPONENT 81.1 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 131-110 against the money line (+24.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 60-37 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 6*) | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 1-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 8*) | NEW YORK is 3-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-12 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-17 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-28 against the money line (+13.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 122-91 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 173-127 against the money line (+28.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 123-99 against the money line (+25.5 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 44-25 against the money line (+20.6 Units) on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 42-42 against the money line (+22.6 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-17 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 65-37 against the money line (+47.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 88-80 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 134-126 against the money line (+34.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 85.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 15-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 99-80 against the money line (+38.2 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-19 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 188-174 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 100-85 against the money line (+30.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 56-51 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 38-31 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 188-165 against the money line (+37.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 5-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in all games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 5-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 3-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 5-12 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 5-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 11-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 3-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-8 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-19 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-23 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-19 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-20 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after playing 4 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 69-47 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-14 | -16 | 7-12 | 10-9 | 77.4 | 38.3 | 42.1% | 40.6 | 83.9 | 41.0 | 44.3% | 44.3 | Road Games | 2-6 | -5.5 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 75.9 | 37.6 | 40.8% | 41.4 | 84.2 | 41.1 | 43.9% | 43.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.3 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 82.4 | 41.0 | 42.1% | 41.4 | 91.4 | 45.0 | 47.4% | 43.0 | Division Games | 4-5 | -3 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 82.9 | 43.4 | 43.1% | 43.0 | 84.3 | 39.0 | 41.9% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.4 | 38.3 | 29-69 | 42.1% | 7-21 | 32.1% | 13-16 | 76.8% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.9 | 37.6 | 27-67 | 40.8% | 6-21 | 30.1% | 15-18 | 82.1% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.9 | 41.0 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 18-22 | 79.5% | 44 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.2 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 8-21 | 37.5% | 17-20 | 81.6% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | -5.9 | 8-11 | 10-8 | 86.5 | 42.2 | 44.9% | 46.4 | 82.6 | 42.4 | 43.7% | 39.9 | Home Games | 5-1 | -1.5 | 4-2 | 5-1 | 95.0 | 45.8 | 50.4% | 43.7 | 82.5 | 43.5 | 42.4% | 37.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 82.2 | 41.8 | 43.7% | 43.2 | 84.6 | 39.8 | 46.3% | 38.6 | Division Games | 6-4 | -5.4 | 4-6 | 6-3 | 87.8 | 44.0 | 44.9% | 48.3 | 81.0 | 42.6 | 43.3% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.5 | 42.2 | 33-73 | 44.9% | 7-22 | 34.3% | 13-18 | 75.1% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 95.0 | 45.8 | 35-70 | 50.4% | 8-19 | 43.7% | 16-21 | 79.2% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.6 | 42.4 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 7-18 | 35.6% | 18-22 | 81.2% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.1 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 80.6% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.5 | 43.5 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 7-17 | 39.8% | 19-23 | 82.3% | 38 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 70.1, CONNECTICUT 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
6/2/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-81 | W | -220 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 59 | 20 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 38 | 9 | 6/5/2018 | PHOENIX | 74-80 | L | -140 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 47 | 17 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 29 | 11 | 6/7/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 86-88 | L | +180 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 6/10/2018 | INDIANA | 78-75 | W | -550 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 30 | 15 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 49 | 15 | 6/13/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 63-78 | L | -550 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 32 | 13 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 49 | 11 | 6/16/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-85 | L | +220 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 26 | 17 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 17 | 6/19/2018 | ATLANTA | 79-72 | W | -250 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 48 | 12 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 55 | 17 | 6/22/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-88 | L | -115 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 43 | 16 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 47 | 17 | 6/24/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 54-80 | L | +375 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 43 | 9 | 6/26/2018 | PHOENIX | 69-83 | L | +145 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 42 | 15 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 13 | 6/28/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-80 | L | +325 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 15 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 10 | 6/29/2018 | CHICAGO | 99-103 | L | -165 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 38 | 11 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 34 | 13 | 7/1/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 97-94 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 13 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 48 | 15 | 7/3/2018 | SEATTLE | 62-77 | L | +170 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 42 | 12 | 7/5/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-86 | L | +300 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 43 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 10 | 7/8/2018 | DALLAS | 87-97 | L | +145 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 53 | 9 | 7/11/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/1/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 110-72 | W | -500 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 56 | 16 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | 6/3/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-64 | W | -270 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 6/5/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-82 | L | -270 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 54 | 16 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 45 | 13 | 6/7/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | W | -220 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 89-75 | W | -250 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 91-95 | L | -450 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | L | +105 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | L | +180 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | L | -220 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-92 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | 101-89 | W | -650 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 37 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 31 | 15 | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | W | +350 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 41-40 (-9.2 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 5-3 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 16-24 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 2-1 (+2.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/7/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -5.5 | SU Over | 41 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 52 | 16 | 9 | | NEW YORK | 86 | 165.5 | ATS | 54 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 48 | 6 | 11 | 8/18/2017 | NEW YORK | 82 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-29 | 65.5% | 59 | 10 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -6.5 | Under | 41 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 18-28 | 64.3% | 48 | 6 | 8 | 7/19/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -2 | Over | 41 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 27 | 7 | 4 | | NEW YORK | 96 | 166.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 25-26 | 96.2% | 56 | 12 | 14 | 6/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 163 | SU ATS | 46 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 12-24 | 50.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 38 | 9 | 8 | | NEW YORK | 89 | -4.5 | Over | 32 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 39 | 2 | 14 | 6/14/2017 | NEW YORK | 76 | 162 | Over | 32 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 11 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -2 | SU ATS | 45 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 41 | 7 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 18-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Smith is 5-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Smith is 5-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Smith is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 5-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 3-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Smith is 3-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 5-12 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 5-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 4-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 3-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 3-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 2-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 6*) | Smith is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 3-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 4-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 1-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 7*) | Smith is 3-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-8 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-8 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-27 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-23 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-19 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-29 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 24-20 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-12 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-3 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 23-17 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-28 against the money line (+13.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-26 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-5 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 20-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-19 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-17 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 61 times, while the road underdog won straight up 29 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 07/10/2018 - Alyssa Thomas is doubtful Wednesday vs NY Liberty ( Shoulder ) | [G] 07/09/2018 - Courtney Williams is "?" Wednesday vs NY Liberty ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 8:44:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|