| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA WASHINGTON |
|
| 164.5 | 106 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
323 | ATLANTA | +325 | 324 | WASHINGTON | -450 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (66-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (100-56 since 1997.) (64.1%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (55-12 since 1997.) (82.1%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (168-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (43-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (80-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (194-113 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +37.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (31-8 since 1997.) (79.5%, +24.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (48-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (65-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (67%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (40-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games. (41-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (60-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games. (29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (80-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (46-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (24-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 73 | | 27-67 | 40.1% | 5-17 | 28.2% | 14-19 | 74.5% | 42 | 12 | 14 | WASHINGTON | 84 | | 30-69 | 43.5% | 8-22 | 34.9% | 16-19 | 85.4% | 47 | 13 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 785 times, while ATLANTA won 201 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 65-45 against the money line (+21.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 80.0 | ATLANTA is 13-10 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.6 | WASHINGTON is 85-128 against the money line (-57.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 33-42 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 78.0 | WASHINGTON is 77-119 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.2 | WASHINGTON is 52-65 against the money line (-35.8 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 81.5 | WASHINGTON is 54-97 against the money line (-58.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 95-103 against the money line (-40.8 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 13-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.3, OPPONENT 84.6 | WASHINGTON is 132-207 against the money line (-65.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.5 |
|
ATLANTA is 146-169 against the money line (-75.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 46-72 against the money line (-49.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.2 | ATLANTA is 61-67 against the money line (-36.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.7 | ATLANTA is 91-108 against the money line (-45.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 87.1 | ATLANTA is 14-34 against the money line (-21.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 90.4 | ATLANTA is 71-85 against the money line (-35.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 118-141 against the money line (-53.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 84.4, OPPONENT 85.2 | ATLANTA is 34-57 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 | WASHINGTON is 10-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.2, OPPONENT 81.7 | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.7, OPPONENT 81.4 | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.9, OPPONENT 81.8 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 7-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-26 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-24 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 220-323 against the money line (-102.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-43 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 83-141 against the money line (-54.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-24 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 24-48 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 26-45 against the money line (-28.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 40-67 against the money line (-34.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 140-168 against the money line (-67.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-17 against the money line (-19.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-32 against the money line (-27.5 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-29 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-24 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-69 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-30 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 49-74 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 21-65 against the money line (-30.8 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 25-62 against the money line (-29.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 86.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 170-184 against the money line (-72.7 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 81-126 against the money line (-53.7 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 79-130 against the money line (-51.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-79 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 34-50 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-30 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 83-139 against the money line (-49.1 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 37-63 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 120-193 against the money line (-66.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 133-214 against the money line (-68.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-61 against the money line (-38.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 55-60 against the money line (-29.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-12 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 113-178 against the money line (-60.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 133-208 against the money line (-83.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-104 against the money line (-39.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-64 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 182-204 against the money line (-70.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 114-121 against the money line (-54.3 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-24 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 47-60 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-7 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-7 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) on Wednesday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 89.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-13 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 86.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 9-9 | +3.5 | 9-9 | 8-10 | 75.7 | 36.5 | 39.4% | 45.3 | 79.3 | 37.6 | 42.0% | 46.7 | Road Games | 4-6 | -1.2 | 5-5 | 7-3 | 75.4 | 37.1 | 40.9% | 44.0 | 81.9 | 36.3 | 43.3% | 45.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.3 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 80.6 | 40.4 | 43.4% | 42.8 | 85.2 | 37.6 | 46.6% | 42.2 | Division Games | 5-3 | +3.2 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 76.6 | 38.1 | 40.6% | 47.4 | 78.5 | 34.5 | 40.6% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.7 | 36.5 | 27-69 | 39.4% | 5-17 | 28.2% | 16-22 | 74.5% | 45 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 16-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.4 | 37.1 | 28-69 | 40.9% | 5-17 | 28.0% | 14-19 | 75.7% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.3 | 37.6 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 77.1% | 47 | 9 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.9 | 36.3 | 30-70 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 78.5% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-7 | +7.2 | 10-8 | 10-9 | 84.5 | 42.6 | 44.8% | 38.3 | 81.5 | 40.8 | 45.3% | 41.4 | Home Games | 7-4 | +2.1 | 4-7 | 5-6 | 81.5 | 38.9 | 43.4% | 37.8 | 78.5 | 40.5 | 44.5% | 43.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.4 | 2-2 | 1-4 | 82.8 | 39.4 | 41.8% | 39.0 | 79.8 | 39.6 | 45.0% | 39.2 | Division Games | 8-1 | +9.2 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 85.9 | 47.6 | 44.7% | 38.7 | 77.7 | 39.7 | 43.0% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 42.6 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 8-23 | 35.3% | 16-19 | 84.7% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 16-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.5 | 38.9 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 8-25 | 32.5% | 14-16 | 86.9% | 38 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 40.8 | 30-66 | 45.3% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 80.8% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.5 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.7% | 15-18 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.5 | 40.5 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 34.4% | 14-19 | 77.1% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.7, WASHINGTON 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
6/3/2018 | PHOENIX | 71-78 | L | -120 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 51 | 13 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 15 | 6/5/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 82-77 | W | +210 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 45 | 13 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 54 | 16 | 6/8/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 87-83 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 46 | 11 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 49 | 12 | 6/10/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 67-64 | W | +250 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 43 | 14 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 57 | 17 | 6/12/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 64-72 | L | +300 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 39 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 6/14/2018 | INDIANA | 72-67 | W | -400 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 48 | 8 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 50 | 13 | 6/16/2018 | @ INDIANA | 64-96 | L | -165 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 40 | 18 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 49 | 11 | 6/19/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 72-79 | L | +200 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 55 | 17 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 48 | 12 | 6/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 75-70 | W | +180 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 6/27/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 80-93 | L | +105 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 43 | 16 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 14 | 6/29/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-85 | L | +550 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 37 | 14 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 38 | 18 | 7/1/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-83 | W | -155 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 14 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 35 | 14 | 7/6/2018 | SEATTLE | 86-95 | L | +170 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 41 | 11 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 49 | 13 | 7/8/2018 | PHOENIX | 76-70 | W | +170 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 53 | 15 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 16 | 7/11/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/1/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 73-85 | L | -300 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 13 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 48 | 14 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-88 | L | +210 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 6/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 80-88 | L | +155 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 27 | 11 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 17 | 6/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-91 | W | +325 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86-97 | L | +155 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-60 | W | -500 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-77 | W | -220 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92-80 | W | -165 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | 80-77 | W | -450 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 10 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 15 | 6/30/2018 | PHOENIX | 74-84 | L | -165 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 7 | 7/5/2018 | NEW YORK | 86-67 | W | -400 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 10 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 43 | 15 | 7/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-74 | W | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 13 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 7/8/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 91-97 | L | +200 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 8 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 7/11/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2018 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
WASHINGTON is 19-25 (-2.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 5-1 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
ATLANTA is 11-11 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/30/2017 | WASHINGTON | 77 | -2 | SU ATS | 44 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 58 | 12 | 12 | | ATLANTA | 70 | 167.5 | Under | 29 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 1-12 | 8.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 38 | 9 | 6 | 7/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 96 | 157.5 | Over | 56 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 43 | 9 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 100 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 14-39 | 35.9% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 53 | 16 | 12 | 6/4/2017 | ATLANTA | 72 | 161.5 | | 32 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 1-15 | 6.7% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 45 | 12 | 3 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -6 | SU Under | 41 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 26-31 | 83.9% | 58 | 7 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Collen is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 22-31 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-20 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 3-12 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 36-43 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-27 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 28-44 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 39-58 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-22 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 21-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-58 against the money line (-26.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-31 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Thibault is 66-61 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 62-54 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-13 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after a non-conference game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 60-41 against the money line (+29.4 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 15-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 54-50 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-10 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 69-31 against the money line (+28.4 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 53-50 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 29-28 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 128-110 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 39-36 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 33-11 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 44 times, while the road underdog won straight up 13 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[C] 05/19/2018 - Emma Meesseman is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 6:32:50 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|