| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE CONNECTICUT |
|
| 167.5 | 89 Final 96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
659 | SEATTLE | +210 | 660 | CONNECTICUT | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (112-32 since 1997.) (77.8%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (97-65 since 1997.) (59.9%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (103-62 since 1997.) (62.4%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (75-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (127-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (51-18 since 1997.) (73.9%, +24.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (48-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +27.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, on Thursday nights. (41-18 since 1997.) (69.5%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (66-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (40-20 since 1997.) (66.7%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a blowout loss by 15 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (39-9 since 1997.) (81.2%, +20.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (41-14 since 1997.) (74.5%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (56-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game. (28-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +19.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (26-12 since 1997.) (68.4%, +11.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (84-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (77-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +9.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (66-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (40-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.1%, +23.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (83-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (329-236 since 1997.) (58.2%, +68.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (73-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (154-111 since 1997.) (58.1%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights. (106-68 since 1997.) (60.9%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (85-59 since 1997.) (59%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (47-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (85-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher. (36-12 since 1997.) (75%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (83-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (46-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (49-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE | 83 | | 29-63 | 46.8% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 17-20 | 86.8% | 41 | 8 | 16 | CONNECTICUT | 87 | | 34-75 | 45.7% | 7-18 | 40.8% | 12-17 | 71.5% | 43 | 13 | 10 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 609 times, while SEATTLE won 363 times. Edge against the money line=SEATTLE |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 71-50 against the money line (+31.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | SEATTLE is 7-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | SEATTLE is 121-96 against the money line (+23.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 | SEATTLE is 21-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 80.6 | SEATTLE is 17-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 82.0 | CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 82.1 | CONNECTICUT is 4-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 55-147 against the money line (-124.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 86.6 | CONNECTICUT is 28-103 against the money line (-99.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 90.5 |
|
SEATTLE is 2-12 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 67.4, OPPONENT 77.4 | SEATTLE is 6-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 80.5 | SEATTLE is 5-17 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 82.5 | SEATTLE is 53-69 against the money line (-28.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 73.4 | SEATTLE is 2-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 88.2 | SEATTLE is 0-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 92.2 | CONNECTICUT is 32-37 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 81.2 | CONNECTICUT is 73-33 against the money line (+42.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 81.1 | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 82-64 against the money line (+20.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.0 | CONNECTICUT is 18-13 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 85.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 95.7, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.1 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 154-102 against the money line (+26.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 156-145 against the money line (+23.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 132-105 against the money line (+26.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 0-5 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 94.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 9-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-5 against the money line (-9.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-5 against the money line (-9.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 0-5 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-3 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (+17.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-18 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 115-102 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 73-56 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 81-60 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 112-98 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 127-117 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 4-2 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 78.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 146-156 against the money line (+28.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.6, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 155-136 against the money line (+39.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 154-144 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 66-63 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-9 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 70-66 against the money line (+28.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a game where they committed 10+ more turnovers than opponents since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-45 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in June games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 20-36 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-6 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 13-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-30 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in road games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 63.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 42-75 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 2-5 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 86-60 against the money line (+21.0 Units) in June games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-36 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-18 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-16 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-39 against the money line (+17.6 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-12 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-9 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-13 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 118-117 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 64-43 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-7 | -7.1 | 5-8 | 10-3 | 81.4 | 40.1 | 46.7% | 37.5 | 82.2 | 42.2 | 44.3% | 39.5 | Road Games | 1-4 | -4.5 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 77.8 | 38.0 | 46.5% | 36.4 | 86.2 | 42.8 | 46.6% | 39.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.6 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 79.8 | 37.8 | 43.5% | 39.8 | 85.4 | 43.4 | 43.0% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.4 | 40.1 | 29-61 | 46.7% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 17-20 | 85.3% | 37 | 6 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 17-21 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.8 | 38.0 | 28-61 | 46.5% | 7-20 | 32.7% | 15-17 | 85.1% | 36 | 6 | 20 | 18 | 4 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 42.2 | 31-69 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 14-17 | 83.4% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.2 | 29-67 | 43.7% | 5-17 | 32.2% | 17-21 | 81.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.2 | 42.8 | 32-70 | 46.6% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 16-19 | 81.2% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-7 | +0.2 | 9-4 | 7-6 | 85.4 | 40.7 | 44.1% | 45.5 | 82.3 | 39.3 | 44.5% | 40.6 | Home Games | 2-3 | -2.1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 84.2 | 39.2 | 42.1% | 45.2 | 79.4 | 40.4 | 43.2% | 42.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.1 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 89.8 | 42.8 | 48.0% | 42.2 | 88.2 | 41.0 | 49.5% | 37.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 40.7 | 32-73 | 44.1% | 7-17 | 43.3% | 14-19 | 74.7% | 46 | 11 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.7 | 39.8 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.2 | 39.2 | 30-71 | 42.1% | 7-17 | 38.8% | 18-22 | 79.3% | 45 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.3 | 39.3 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 19-24 | 79.8% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 5-17 | 32.5% | 17-21 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.4 | 40.4 | 28-65 | 43.2% | 4-16 | 25.9% | 19-24 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.9, CONNECTICUT 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
5/21/2017 | WASHINGTON | 81-71 | W | -125 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 11 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 41 | 10 | 5/26/2017 | NEW YORK | 87-81 | W | -220 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 45 | 10 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 50 | 8 | 5/28/2017 | INDIANA | 94-70 | W | -270 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 31 | 16 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 26 | 17 | 6/3/2017 | MINNESOTA | 77-100 | L | +135 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 27 | 14 | 41-69 | 59.4% | 39 | 14 | 6/6/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-76 | W | -360 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 37 | 10 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 41 | 9 | 6/9/2017 | @ INDIANA | 80-83 | L | -250 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 30 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 8 | 6/11/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 86-94 | L | +135 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 42 | 14 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 7 | 6/13/2017 | ATLANTA | 86-91 | L | -450 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 45 | 17 | 6/18/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 75-57 | W | -600 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 43 | 14 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 47 | 18 | 6/23/2017 | PHOENIX | 82-85 | L | -210 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 12 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 11 | 6/27/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 70-100 | L | +175 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 39 | 23 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 35 | 10 | 6/29/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | 79-81 | L | +210 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 39 | 18 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 29 | 9 | 5/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-80 | L | +550 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 43 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 42 | 20 | 5/26/2017 | MINNESOTA | 68-82 | L | +200 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 34 | 12 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 15 | 5/28/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 97-79 | W | +120 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 69 | 7 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 11 | 5/31/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 76-78 | L | +250 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 10 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 9 | 6/3/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-77 | W | -210 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 47 | 10 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 43 | 13 | 6/10/2017 | ATLANTA | 104-71 | W | -165 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 45 | 8 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 39 | 20 | 6/14/2017 | NEW YORK | 96-76 | W | -125 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 41 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 41 | 11 | 6/17/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 98-93 | W | +350 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 46 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 30 | 13 | 6/23/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 94-89 | W | +170 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 39 | 14 | 6/25/2017 | @ DALLAS | 82-96 | L | -210 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 35 | 18 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 79-87 | L | +120 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 51 | 14 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 6/29/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2017 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 19-16 (-5.1 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-2 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 13-4 (-0.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/24/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 165.5 | Over | 37 | 32-85 | 37.6% | 5-26 | 19.2% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 46 | 15 | 12 | | SEATTLE | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 56 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 38 | 2 | 15 | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 76 | -3 | Under | 38 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 40 | 5 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 162 | SU ATS | 28 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 46 | 12 | 12 | 5/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 152.5 | Over | 37 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 31 | 11 | 13 | | SEATTLE | 93 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 44 | 12 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Boucek is 7-4 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 48-43 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Boucek 77.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 11-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 16-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 16-16 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Boucek is 9-20 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in June games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 20-36 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 15-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 15-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 8-14 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 13-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 5-17 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 11-25 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 6-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Boucek 74.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 17-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 18-35 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-18 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 8-5 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-12 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-13 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-14 against the money line (+17.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 6-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-4 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-18 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-18 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 29 times, while the road underdog won straight up 14 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 06/27/2017 - Morgan Tuck "?" Thursday vs Seattle Storm ( Knee ) | [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/11/2024 10:55:43 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|