| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 160 | 80 Final 84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | MINNESOTA | -400 | 652 | CONNECTICUT | +300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (114-81 since 1997.) (58.5%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (93-64 since 1997.) (59.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (19-7 since 1997.) (73.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (19-7 since 1997.) (73.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (19-7 since 1997.) (73.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in non-conference games. (36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road wins. (34-10 since 1997.) (77.3%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (69-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (37-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (103-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in non-conference games. (50-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (157-42 since 1997.) (78.9%, +89.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (265-92 since 1997.) (74.2%, +84.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (139-26 since 1997.) (84.2%, +83.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (311-305 since 1997.) (50.5%, +77.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (235-63 since 1997.) (78.9%, +75.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (320-120 since 1997.) (72.7%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (185-60 since 1997.) (75.5%, +72.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (296-123 since 1997.) (70.6%, +70.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (181-60 since 1997.) (75.1%, +69.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (222-77 since 1997.) (74.2%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (165-39 since 1997.) (80.9%, +68.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (295-126 since 1997.) (70.1%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (277-112 since 1997.) (71.2%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (153-49 since 1997.) (75.7%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (292-275 since 1997.) (51.5%, +57.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (110-22 since 1997.) (83.3%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (122-38 since 1997.) (76.2%, +53.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (203-204 since 1997.) (49.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (115-33 since 1997.) (77.7%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (115-33 since 1997.) (77.7%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (144-73 since 1997.) (66.4%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (155-54 since 1997.) (74.2%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (155-48 since 1997.) (76.4%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (138-98 since 1997.) (58.5%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (180-68 since 1997.) (72.6%, +46.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (157-59 since 1997.) (72.7%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (163-58 since 1997.) (73.8%, +44.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (176-75 since 1997.) (70.1%, +43.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (143-82 since 1997.) (63.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (143-55 since 1997.) (72.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (77-31 since 1997.) (71.3%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (74-15 since 1997.) (83.1%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (43-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (83-37 since 1997.) (69.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (94-37 since 1997.) (71.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (78-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in August or September games. (66-21 since 1997.) (75.9%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (57-31 since 1997.) (64.8%, +33.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (121-61 since 1997.) (66.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 4 or more consecutive wins. (34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (114-73 since 1997.) (61%, +30.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (50-27 since 1997.) (64.9%, +30.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (65-47 since 1997.) (58%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (79-34 since 1997.) (69.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (52-31 since 1997.) (62.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (77-33 since 1997.) (70%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in August or September games. (34-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (89-30 since 1997.) (74.8%, +28.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (75-22 since 1997.) (77.3%, +26.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (34-6 since 1997.) (85%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog. (38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (55-26 since 1997.) (67.9%, +23.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (50-28 since 1997.) (64.1%, +21 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (25-12 since 1997.) (67.6%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (53-32 since 1997.) (62.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (70-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (31-5 since 1997.) (86.1%, +18.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games, on Friday nights. (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (43-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +17.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (30-10 since 1997.) (75%, +16.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite of 7 or more, off a home win against a division rival. (21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (23-6 since 1997.) (79.3%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (40-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (49-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +21.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 87 | | 34-70 | 48.0% | 4-13 | 32.3% | 16-20 | 81.9% | 47 | 12 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | | 29-70 | 41.3% | 5-18 | 27.9% | 13-18 | 72.9% | 40 | 11 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 797 times, while CONNECTICUT won 184 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 19-5 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 69.9 | MINNESOTA is 98-43 against the money line (+41.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 72.7 | MINNESOTA is 186-63 against the money line (+98.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 140-31 against the money line (+102.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 90.1, OPPONENT 79.9 | CONNECTICUT is 29-55 against the money line (-51.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 80.1 | CONNECTICUT is 49-136 against the money line (-122.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 86.7 | CONNECTICUT is 25-97 against the money line (-97.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 90.5 | CONNECTICUT is 12-33 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 79.8 | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 80.0 |
|
MINNESOTA is 63-89 against the money line (-36.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.8 | MINNESOTA is 63-76 against the money line (-41.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | MINNESOTA is 101-101 against the money line (-52.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 118-113 against the money line (-48.1 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.4 | MINNESOTA is 17-11 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 75.9 | CONNECTICUT is 83-63 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-7 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 9-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 73.2 | CONNECTICUT is 14-15 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 113-96 against the money line (+29.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 39-19 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 29-40 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 6-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 68.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-10 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-9 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 27-17 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-17 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 1-3 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 6*) | MINNESOTA is 64-66 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 3-5 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 69-51 against the money line (-41.5 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-12 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-12 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-8 against the money line (+13.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-20 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-17 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 59-19 against the money line (+31.8 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 42-12 against the money line (+25.5 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 51-20 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-5 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 103-54 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 85-30 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 55-15 against the money line (+30.2 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 39-12 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 16-11 against the money line (-23.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 191-189 against the money line (-62.8 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-11 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 62-80 against the money line (-36.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 106-110 against the money line (-44.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-8 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 21-62 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 143-147 against the money line (-56.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+17.3 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-15 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-25 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-21 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-17 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-14 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-14 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 7*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 21-4 | -5.9 | 14-11 | 13-12 | 85.8 | 43.9 | 47.0% | 43.9 | 75.8 | 38.0 | 40.8% | 39.8 | Road Games | 10-2 | -2.2 | 7-5 | 6-6 | 85.9 | 43.5 | 46.5% | 44.1 | 78.2 | 40.8 | 42.4% | 39.4 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 85.8 | 42.4 | 46.3% | 45.6 | 72.2 | 35.4 | 40.8% | 38.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 43.9 | 32-69 | 47.0% | 4-13 | 31.8% | 17-20 | 81.5% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 5-16 | 34.1% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.9 | 43.5 | 33-70 | 46.5% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 16-20 | 82.5% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.8 | 38.0 | 27-67 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 31.3% | 16-19 | 80.7% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 34.4% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.2 | 40.8 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 31.4% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 39 | 7 | 15 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-16 | +1.8 | 15-8 | 12-12 | 81.6 | 38.9 | 43.1% | 43.2 | 85.3 | 40.4 | 46.0% | 42.9 | Home Games | 3-8 | -2.2 | 5-5 | 6-5 | 81.6 | 38.5 | 42.8% | 44.1 | 85.5 | 41.0 | 45.6% | 44.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.8 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 87.4 | 44.8 | 44.4% | 43.8 | 82.4 | 37.2 | 44.5% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.6 | 38.9 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 29.6% | 14-20 | 73.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 17-21 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.6 | 38.5 | 31-73 | 42.8% | 5-19 | 26.5% | 14-20 | 72.6% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.3 | 40.4 | 31-66 | 46.0% | 5-15 | 35.5% | 19-23 | 81.7% | 43 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 6-16 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 85.5 | 41.0 | 31-67 | 45.6% | 6-17 | 36.1% | 18-23 | 79.3% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.9, CONNECTICUT 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
7/17/2016 | @ DALLAS | 98-97 | W | -450 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 54 | 17 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 41 | 13 | 7/20/2016 | ATLANTA | 83-65 | W | -1050 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 39 | 12 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 38 | 17 | 7/22/2016 | SEATTLE | 79-72 | W | -750 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 11 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 14 | 8/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/17/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 76-83 | L | +280 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 40 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 46 | 16 | 7/20/2016 | @ DALLAS | 89-78 | W | +220 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 46 | 12 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 9 | 7/22/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 94-89 | W | +175 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 7 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 37 | 15 | 8/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 16-16 (+6.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+5.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-7 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 1-2 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | 89 | -11.5 | Over | 33 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 54 | 15 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 163.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 45 | 13 | 14 | 7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 147 | SU ATS | 35 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 42 | 13 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 77 | -8 | Over | 32 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 50 | 18 | 16 | 7/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 85 | -6.5 | SU Over | 42 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 34 | 7 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 146 | ATS | 40 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 11-23 | 47.8% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 40 | 7 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 166-76 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 63-30 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-48 against the money line (+14.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 71-20 against the money line (+30.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 53-12 against the money line (+33.2 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 40-8 against the money line (+27.5 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 14-4 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 51-20 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 24-5 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 25-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-16 against the money line (+20.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 52-14 against the money line (+25.1 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 74-24 against the money line (+26.4 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 82-33 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 68-25 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 119-52 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 54-17 against the money line (+23.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 41-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 42-7 against the money line (+25.7 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 135-51 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 96-31 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 85-25 against the money line (+29.5 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 84-31 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 87-35 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-48 against the money line (+27.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 89-34 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 65-22 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-11 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 38-9 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 75-26 against the money line (+18.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 48-14 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 92-40 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 120-57 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 37-15 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 5-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 4-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 4-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 21 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 07/09/2016 - Rachel Banham out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:01:18 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|