| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 150 | 77 Final 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | ATLANTA | -270 | 602 | CONNECTICUT | +210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (102-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +46.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (317-218 since 1997.) (59.3%, +68.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (333-211 since 1997.) (61.2%, +58.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss. (92-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (137-125 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +37 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (77-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite. (44-21 since 1997.) (67.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss. (60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (38-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (80-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (49-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (37-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (40-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (233-66 since 1997.) (77.9%, +79.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (391-165 since 1997.) (70.3%, +77.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (269-125 since 1997.) (68.3%, +70.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (218-77 since 1997.) (73.9%, +67.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (150-58 since 1997.) (72.1%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (127-40 since 1997.) (76%, +37.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG). (71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (159-94 since 1997.) (62.8%, +27.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (86-22 since 1997.) (79.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games. (45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (104-48 since 1997.) (68.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG). (34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games. (24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +15 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 74 | | 29-69 | 42.7% | 3-13 | 24.6% | 12-17 | 73.6% | 46 | 11 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | | 27-68 | 40.2% | 4-13 | 28.3% | 13-18 | 75.1% | 44 | 11 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 554 times, while CONNECTICUT won 419 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 17-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 5-19 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.7, OPPONENT 75.9 | CONNECTICUT is 5-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.6, OPPONENT 76.0 |
|
ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 77.9 | ATLANTA is 11-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 77.3 | ATLANTA is 10-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 17-18 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 78.6 | ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-17.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 98-69 against the money line (+31.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 72.4 | CONNECTICUT is 62-37 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 71.3 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-26 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-22 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-5 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-13 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-14 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) off a road loss this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-16 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.5 Units) in road games after a non-conference game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was ATLANTA 68.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) off a home loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 95-65 against the money line (+21.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-21 against the money line (+14.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 70-50 against the money line (+17.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+13.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+9.1 Units) off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-14 | -6.2 | 15-15 | 14-17 | 77.0 | 40.3 | 42.4% | 43.9 | 74.2 | 37.5 | 41.6% | 43.8 | Road Games | 4-10 | -9.6 | 4-10 | 5-9 | 71.9 | 39.3 | 40.6% | 43.5 | 78.1 | 40.3 | 44.7% | 43.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 78.0 | 42.0 | 42.2% | 42.8 | 76.6 | 37.4 | 41.6% | 45.6 | Division Games | 12-8 | -2.8 | 10-10 | 9-11 | 76.4 | 39.2 | 42.7% | 44.1 | 72.1 | 35.8 | 40.1% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 40.3 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 3-13 | 25.8% | 15-20 | 74.6% | 44 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.6 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.9 | 39.3 | 29-70 | 40.6% | 3-13 | 20.1% | 12-17 | 72.2% | 43 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.2 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 41.6% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.9 | 36.9 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.1 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 44.7% | 4-11 | 35.3% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-23 | -17 | 13-18 | 10-20 | 70.9 | 33.3 | 39.8% | 42.6 | 76.6 | 38.5 | 43.6% | 44.9 | Home Games | 6-9 | -6.8 | 7-8 | 5-9 | 74.1 | 35.5 | 41.2% | 42.7 | 76.8 | 40.0 | 43.5% | 43.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 69.6 | 31.8 | 40.2% | 37.6 | 76.8 | 38.0 | 45.6% | 43.4 | Division Games | 6-13 | -6.8 | 9-10 | 5-13 | 70.8 | 32.8 | 40.6% | 43.3 | 75.3 | 37.7 | 42.4% | 44.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.9 | 33.3 | 28-69 | 39.8% | 4-14 | 30.3% | 12-15 | 74.6% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.1 | 35.5 | 29-69 | 41.2% | 4-13 | 33.2% | 13-16 | 76.7% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 4-12 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 45 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.8 | 40.0 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 4-11 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 81.3% | 44 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.9, CONNECTICUT 70.5 |
| | |
|
|
8/3/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 76-82 | L | +170 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 50 | 16 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 21 | 8/10/2013 | @ INDIANA | 66-80 | L | +120 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 29 | 14 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 8/11/2013 | NEW YORK | 82-88 | L | -360 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 8 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 50 | 16 | 8/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 86-88 | L | -165 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 10 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 88-57 | W | -450 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 17 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 47 | 21 | 8/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 76-58 | W | -300 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 50 | 17 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 17 | 8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 88-75 | W | +120 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 43 | 19 | 8/23/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-74 | L | -140 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 42 | 9 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 56-67 | L | -175 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 47 | 22 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 53 | 20 | 8/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -270 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 8/31/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 68-85 | L | +220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 46 | 8 | 9/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 92-82 | W | +135 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 9/4/2013 | INDIANA | 89-80 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 9/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 70-57 | W | -200 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 41 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 45 | 18 | 9/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 71-79 | L | -200 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 40 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 52 | 28 | 9/11/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/3/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 88-66 | W | +170 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 14 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 16 | 8/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 72-74 | L | +145 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 13 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 8/9/2013 | CHICAGO | 61-77 | L | +170 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 47 | 9 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 53 | 12 | 8/11/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-74 | L | +170 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 41 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 45 | 14 | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 88-86 | W | +145 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 10 | 8/16/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 57-88 | L | +325 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 47 | 21 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 17 | 8/18/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 78-89 | L | +300 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 34 | 18 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 46 | 16 | 8/22/2013 | MINNESOTA | 77-91 | L | +350 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 39 | 15 | 38-66 | 57.6% | 27 | 9 | 8/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 66-74 | L | -140 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 6 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 45 | 13 | 8/27/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 78-91 | L | | 29-69 | 42.0% | 38 | 18 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 42 | 13 | 8/29/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | +250 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 34 | 12 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 39 | 18 | 8/31/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 68-76 | L | +600 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 40 | 9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 54 | 17 | 9/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | 77-70 | W | +180 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 18 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 18 | 9/7/2013 | @ INDIANA | 60-69 | L | +500 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 42 | 17 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 40 | 15 | 9/11/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 14-10 (+5.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 8-6 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 8-4 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 5-2 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 57 | 151 | Under | 24 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 47 | 12 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 88 | -9 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 7 | 17 | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 86 | -3.5 | Over | 45 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 48 | 12 | 10 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | 151 | SU ATS | 54 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 7 | 13 | 7/24/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 152.5 | ATS | 20 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 1-13 | 7.7% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 48 | 11 | 14 | | ATLANTA | 74 | -9.5 | SU Under | 40 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 53 | 16 | 13 | 6/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 78 | -4.5 | SU Over | 45 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 8 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 149.5 | ATS | 37 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 56 | 16 | 18 | 9/23/2012 | ATLANTA | 72 | 158.5 | Over | 24 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -5 | SU ATS | 36 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 42 | 5 | 15 | 9/2/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 158 | Over | 39 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 38 | 7 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 87 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 50 | 14 | 12 | 6/17/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | 166.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 42 | 7 | 24 | | ATLANTA | 73 | -1 | Under | 39 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 26 | 4 | 12 | 6/10/2012 | ATLANTA | 73 | 165 | | 38 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 45 | 18 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 41 | 5 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 8-22 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 33-44 against the money line (-24.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 1-5 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-14 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Anne is 5-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 3-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 3-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 5-16 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 6-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Fred is 5-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 3-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-12 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 54-25 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.8, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 27-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 80.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 31 times, while the home underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[C] 09/06/2013 - Tina Charles out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 08/26/2013 - Kara Lawson out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 08/21/2013 - Kelly Faris out for season ( Foot ) | [F] 08/21/2013 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Achilles ) | [F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/13/2024 5:04:28 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|