| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
150.5
| 64
Final
76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Eastern Conference Finals - Best of 3 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 603 | INDIANA | +170 | | 604 | CONNECTICUT | -200 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(498-193 since 1997.) (72.1%, +115.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(221-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(221-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-84 since 1997.) (72.5%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(258-101 since 1997.) (71.9%, +89.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(258-101 since 1997.) (71.9%, +89.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(197-58 since 1997.) (77.3%, +86.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(197-58 since 1997.) (77.3%, +86.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(197-58 since 1997.) (77.3%, +86.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(235-74 since 1997.) (76.1%, +86.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(201-62 since 1997.) (76.4%, +86.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(201-62 since 1997.) (76.4%, +86.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(201-62 since 1997.) (76.4%, +86.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(230-70 since 1997.) (76.7%, +86 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(219-78 since 1997.) (73.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(219-78 since 1997.) (73.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(219-78 since 1997.) (73.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(219-78 since 1997.) (73.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(219-78 since 1997.) (73.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(219-78 since 1997.) (73.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(257-93 since 1997.) (73.4%, +76.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(257-93 since 1997.) (73.4%, +76.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(163-50 since 1997.) (76.5%, +75.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(258-96 since 1997.) (72.9%, +70.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(211-75 since 1997.) (73.8%, +66.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(284-123 since 1997.) (69.8%, +66 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(141-32 since 1997.) (81.5%, +65.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(120-27 since 1997.) (81.6%, +63.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(168-47 since 1997.) (78.1%, +63.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(168-47 since 1997.) (78.1%, +63.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(200-82 since 1997.) (70.9%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(200-82 since 1997.) (70.9%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(200-82 since 1997.) (70.9%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(172-61 since 1997.) (73.8%, +59.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(151-47 since 1997.) (76.3%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(180-70 since 1997.) (72%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(180-70 since 1997.) (72%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(180-70 since 1997.) (72%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(39-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(142-46 since 1997.) (75.5%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(172-62 since 1997.) (73.5%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(97-21 since 1997.) (82.2%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(200-92 since 1997.) (68.5%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(108-37 since 1997.) (74.5%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(137-68 since 1997.) (66.8%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(88-20 since 1997.) (81.5%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(94-29 since 1997.) (76.4%, +46.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(85-28 since 1997.) (75.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(180-142 since 1997.) (55.9%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(87-26 since 1997.) (77%, +44.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(80-23 since 1997.) (77.7%, +42.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(69-17 since 1997.) (80.2%, +41 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(91-35 since 1997.) (72.2%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(42-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(79-22 since 1997.) (78.2%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(85-41 since 1997.) (67.5%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(93-56 since 1997.) (62.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(92-30 since 1997.) (75.4%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(98-50 since 1997.) (66.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(56-13 since 1997.) (81.2%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(52-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(65-22 since 1997.) (74.7%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(54-17 since 1997.) (76.1%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(59-22 since 1997.) (72.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(54-14 since 1997.) (79.4%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(43-11 since 1997.) (79.6%, +30.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(46-14 since 1997.) (76.7%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(45-12 since 1997.) (78.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(51-18 since 1997.) (73.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(42-9 since 1997.) (82.4%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(45-12 since 1997.) (78.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(49-13 since 1997.) (79%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(43-9 since 1997.) (82.7%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(53-12 since 1997.) (81.5%, +26.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +24.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(46-12 since 1997.) (79.3%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(52-26 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(59-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(54-18 since 1997.) (75%, +24.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(35-7 since 1997.) (83.3%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(40-14 since 1997.) (74.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(62-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.5%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%).
(30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(47-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(50-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +23.7 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(180-142 since 1997.) (55.9%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(52-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +24.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| INDIANA | 77 | | 29-69 | 42.0% | 8-20 | 38.3% | 12-15 | 79.9% | 43 | 11 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | | 28-68 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 13-16 | 81.9% | 45 | 12 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 508 times, while CONNECTICUT won 464 times.
Edge against the money line=INDIANA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 10-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 71.3 | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+6.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 80.0, OPPONENT 70.7 | INDIANA is 23-9 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 71.4 | INDIANA is 66-33 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 70.0 | CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 75.6 |
|
INDIANA is 72-94 against the money line (-65.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | INDIANA is 4-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 76.6 | INDIANA is 43-70 against the money line (-57.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 68.7, OPPONENT 69.9 | INDIANA is 62-65 against the money line (-32.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.0, OPPONENT 70.9 | INDIANA is 31-54 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.6, OPPONENT 74.1 | INDIANA is 27-55 against the money line (-25.6 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | INDIANA is 69-72 against the money line (-41.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 82.1, OPPONENT 82.3 | INDIANA is 2-10 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 82.1 | CONNECTICUT is 66-41 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.1 | CONNECTICUT is 12-0 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 70.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 10-0 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 73.8 | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | CONNECTICUT is 59-31 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 70.8 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 22-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-9 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 26-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.0, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 33-14 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 28-15 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 38-22 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 15-22 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-39 against the money line (-20.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 56-72 against the money line (-32.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 49-66 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+13.4 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-18 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-30 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 18-8 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 15-8 against the money line (+7.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 82.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-11 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-4 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-15 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 41-94 against the money line (-37.0 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 69.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 69.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 61-65 against the money line (-35.4 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 74-78 against the money line (-42.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 81-87 against the money line (-43.8 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-21 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 68.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 23-55 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 130-132 against the money line (-49.1 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 98-108 against the money line (-44.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 124-123 against the money line (-51.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-4 against the money line (+16.4 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+8.5 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-14 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 24-13 | +4.3 | 21-16 | 17-19 | 78.6 | 38.9 | 42.1% | 40.6 | 72.6 | 35.5 | 42.8% | 41.9 | | Road Games | 10-8 | +2.2 | 10-8 | 7-11 | 75.3 | 34.3 | 40.1% | 41.4 | 73.2 | 35.8 | 42.5% | 42.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 80.2 | 37.8 | 45.2% | 48.2 | 67.6 | 36.6 | 38.2% | 37.6 | | Division Games | 17-8 | +6.6 | 16-9 | 13-11 | 79.6 | 39.6 | 43.4% | 40.1 | 72.6 | 36.4 | 42.4% | 41.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.6 | 38.9 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 8-20 | 39.3% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.5 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 14-19 | 76.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.3 | 34.3 | 26-65 | 40.1% | 7-19 | 36.7% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.6 | 35.5 | 27-64 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 13-17 | 75.4% | 42 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.8 | 38 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 75.6% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.2 | 35.8 | 27-64 | 42.5% | 5-17 | 30.3% | 14-18 | 77.2% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 27-9 | +8.2 | 16-20 | 18-17 | 80.9 | 39.5 | 43.0% | 43.2 | 76.5 | 37.4 | 42.4% | 43.1 | | Home Games | 13-5 | -5.5 | 6-12 | 11-6 | 83.2 | 41.8 | 44.2% | 42.2 | 77.3 | 36.7 | 42.4% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 73.0 | 34.0 | 43.0% | 44.2 | 63.8 | 28.6 | 37.0% | 40.8 | | Division Games | 20-4 | +11.2 | 12-12 | 11-12 | 80.5 | 39.0 | 45.4% | 42.1 | 74.4 | 36.9 | 41.7% | 41.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.9 | 39.5 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 6-16 | 35.3% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.3 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 14-19 | 76.3% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.2 | 41.8 | 31-69 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 34.4% | 17-20 | 83.3% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.5 | 37.4 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 13-18 | 75.5% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.3 | 36.7 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 32.3% | 13-16 | 76.4% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 71.1, CONNECTICUT 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/28/2012 | WASHINGTON | 83-68 | W | -1050 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 34 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 15 | | 8/30/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 76-63 | W | -175 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 8 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 21 | | 9/1/2012 | CHICAGO | 81-64 | W | -400 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 33 | 9 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 39 | 20 | | 9/5/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 64-71 | L | +170 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 16 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 14 | | 9/7/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 82-78 | W | +170 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 45 | 13 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 39 | 10 | | 9/9/2012 | PHOENIX | 89-83 | W | | 32-76 | 42.1% | 35 | 6 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 44 | 22 | | 9/12/2012 | SEATTLE | 72-48 | W | -220 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 38 | 28 | | 9/14/2012 | MINNESOTA | 64-66 | L | -175 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 40 | 13 | | 9/17/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-86 | L | +180 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 36 | 11 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 41 | 14 | | 9/19/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | 67-73 | L | +180 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 36 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 42 | 17 | | 9/21/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-53 | W | -200 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 53 | 16 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 15 | | 9/23/2012 | TULSA | 91-58 | W | -220 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 45 | 16 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 32 | 18 | | 9/28/2012 | ATLANTA | 66-75 | L | -175 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 19 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 43 | 13 | | 9/30/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 103-88 | W | +200 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 48 | 17 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 18 | | 10/2/2012 | ATLANTA | 75-64 | W | -175 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 56 | 19 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 35 | 9 | | 10/5/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/26/2012 | CHICAGO | 70-82 | L | -500 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 33 | 17 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 46 | 14 | | 8/28/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 83-72 | W | -220 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 44 | 15 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | | 8/30/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-73 | W | +220 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 48 | 8 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 47 | 16 | | 9/2/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 80-87 | L | +120 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 38 | 13 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | | 9/4/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-70 | W | -360 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 47 | 19 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 36 | 14 | | 9/7/2012 | PHOENIX | 82-91 | L | | 25-63 | 39.7% | 32 | 13 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 54 | 16 | | 9/9/2012 | CHICAGO | 82-77 | W | -360 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 45 | 16 | | 9/12/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 100-78 | W | -220 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 38 | 14 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 53 | 16 | | 9/14/2012 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-93 | L | +210 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 19 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 16 | | 9/16/2012 | @ SEATTLE | 60-58 | W | -360 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 42 | 23 | | 9/19/2012 | INDIANA | 73-67 | W | -220 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 42 | 17 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 36 | 10 | | 9/23/2012 | ATLANTA | 92-72 | W | -210 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 43 | 19 | | 9/27/2012 | NEW YORK | 65-60 | W | -500 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 47 | 13 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 52 | 12 | | 9/29/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 75-62 | W | -175 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 51 | 13 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 31 | 10 | | 10/5/2012 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 32-21 (+6.8 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 7-6 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 18-8 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-2 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/19/2012 | INDIANA | 67 | 154 | Under | 27 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 36 | 16 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 73 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 6/21/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 61 | 159.5 | Under | 30 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 95 | -6 | SU ATS | 57 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 39 | 5 | 11 | 6/19/2012 | INDIANA | 85 | 162 | ATS | 39 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -4.5 | SU Over | 45 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 45 | 9 | 15 | 6/8/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 45 | 12 | 15 | | | INDIANA | 81 | -5 | Over | 47 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 36 | 10 | 17 | 9/2/2011 | INDIANA | 55 | 151.5 | Under | 33 | 22-73 | 30.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 45 | 15 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -3 | SU ATS | 48 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 46 | 8 | 14 | 7/28/2011 | INDIANA | 69 | 151 | SU ATS | 34 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 56 | 11 | 16 | | | CONNECTICUT | 58 | -5 | Under | 25 | 22-72 | 30.6% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 46 | 10 | 15 | 7/17/2011 | INDIANA | 71 | 151 | | 32 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 47 | 9 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -5 | SU Under | 42 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 40 | 6 | 12 | 7/13/2011 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 151.5 | Over | 30 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 40 | 11 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 90 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 34 | 6 | 9 | 6/25/2011 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 154 | Under | 32 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 38 | 3 | 15 | | | INDIANA | 75 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 42 | 10 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Dunn is 81-47 against the money line (+18.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 67-41 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 33-19 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 36-19 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 56-35 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dunn 75.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 40-23 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 57-34 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 90-88 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Dunn is 13-38 against the money line (-20.0 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dunn is 15-19 against the money line (-13.2 Units) on Friday as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 6-15 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 69-60 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dunn is 15-33 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dunn 69.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dunn is 20-28 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 217-148 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 162-64 against the money line (+17.7 Units) as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 74-28 against the money line (+23.7 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 48-27 against the money line (+17.4 Units) on Friday as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 138-95 against the money line (+10.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 122-81 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 75-51 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 54-34 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 113-78 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 101-72 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 100-79 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 95-63 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 134-96 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 39-26 against the money line (+11.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 59-48 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 67-44 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 116-81 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 92-51 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 126-73 against the money line (+23.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 119-77 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 168-112 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 50-46 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-18 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 52-30 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 176 times, while the road underdog won straight up 77 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 19 times, while the road underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 4:48:43 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|