| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
CHICAGO |
|
|
154
| 83
Final
75 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | CONNECTICUT | -330 | | 608 | CHICAGO | +250 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(254-146 since 1997.) (63.5%, +66.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(160-89 since 1997.) (64.3%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival.
(104-26 since 1997.) (80%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-29 since 1997.) (69.5%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(70-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(40-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +28.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home win by 10 points or more.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival.
(36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(116-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(111-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.3%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(139-134 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(47-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(81-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +45.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(123-100 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.2%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(121-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 31-69 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 13-17 | 75.6% | 44 | 10 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 78 | | 30-69 | 43.1% | 6-20 | 32.9% | 12-16 | 76.4% | 43 | 10 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 594 times, while CHICAGO won 380 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 70.6 | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 76.8 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 70.9 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 76.2 | CONNECTICUT is 35-9 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 76.6 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 76.6 | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 78.8 | CONNECTICUT is 17-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 74.7 | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 80.6 | CHICAGO is 45-84 against the money line (-47.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.2 | CHICAGO is 6-18 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 83.5 | CHICAGO is 70-112 against the money line (-47.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 14-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 88.3 | CHICAGO is 128-174 against the money line (-56.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 80.5 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 46-64 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-17 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 86.9 | CHICAGO is 21-20 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | CHICAGO is 17-13 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 29-21 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 82.4 | CHICAGO is 108-78 against the money line (+43.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 99-88 against the money line (+27.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 17-15 against the money line (+14.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 85.8 | CHICAGO is 18-6 against the money line (+24.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.1, OPPONENT 84.9 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 109-64 against the money line (+33.7 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-28 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-14 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 129-114 against the money line (+25.4 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 84-81 against the money line (-53.8 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 92-94 against the money line (-52.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 132-122 against the money line (-53.0 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 128-120 against the money line (-55.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 111-113 against the money line (-46.6 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 75-89 against the money line (-38.9 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 66-66 against the money line (-36.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 16-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-66 against the money line (-32.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 153-142 against the money line (+34.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 70-65 against the money line (+41.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 75-98 against the money line (+39.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games in June games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-11 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after 2 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-12 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-12 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-10 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-7 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) as a home underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 159-154 against the money line (-66.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 156-150 against the money line (-65.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 118-115 against the money line (-51.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-12 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 92-93 against the money line (-42.9 Units) in home games after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-25 against the money line (-27.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 82-82 against the money line (-50.5 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 52-63 against the money line (-33.8 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 44-53 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-54 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 94-89 against the money line (-45.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 72-71 against the money line (-44.2 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 81-93 against the money line (-60.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 59-58 against the money line (-34.4 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-16 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-11.8 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-17 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-23 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-23 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-8 against the money line (+12.9 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-16 against the money line (+13.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-10 against the money line (+10.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-11 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-18 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-1 | +9 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 80.5 | 40.7 | 43.9% | 44.1 | 70.7 | 36.1 | 41.9% | 38.8 | | Road Games | 3-0 | +3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 81.0 | 40.7 | 43.8% | 48.0 | 72.0 | 40.3 | 40.0% | 37.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 76.6 | 41.0 | 44.8% | 45.4 | 67.0 | 33.6 | 40.3% | 37.2 | | Division Games | 7-1 | +6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 82.4 | 41.6 | 44.5% | 44.6 | 72.1 | 37.9 | 42.1% | 36.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.5 | 40.7 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 30.3% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.5 | 30-69 | 43.6% | 8-23 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.0 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-18 | 29.6% | 16-21 | 76.6% | 48 | 13 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.7 | 36.1 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 6-22 | 29.1% | 12-16 | 76.9% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.4 | 39.7 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 8-24 | 33.8% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.0 | 40.3 | 27-67 | 40.0% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 13-16 | 83.0% | 38 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 4-6 | -2.6 | 5-5 | 4-6 | 78.9 | 40.4 | 41.1% | 45.5 | 79.7 | 40.4 | 42.8% | 44.7 | | Home Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 77.6 | 44.6 | 41.3% | 40.0 | 82.6 | 42.2 | 44.4% | 43.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 77.4 | 40.8 | 40.1% | 46.8 | 78.4 | 42.0 | 42.2% | 43.8 | | Division Games | 2-4 | -3.2 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 79.3 | 40.8 | 41.3% | 44.0 | 81.0 | 42.2 | 43.8% | 44.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.9 | 40.4 | 29-72 | 41.1% | 4-15 | 28.9% | 16-21 | 76.3% | 45 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.7 | 39.9 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 8-23 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 78.1% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.6 | 44.6 | 28-68 | 41.3% | 5-13 | 36.4% | 17-20 | 84.0% | 40 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.7 | 40.4 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 6-20 | 30.8% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.6 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 7-22 | 32.1% | 15-18 | 80.0% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.6 | 42.2 | 30-67 | 44.4% | 6-20 | 30.7% | 17-21 | 83.5% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 68.8, CHICAGO 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | INDIANA | 92-71 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | | 5/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 84-77 | W | -360 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | 74-72 | W | -400 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 69-50 | W | -140 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | 76-59 | W | -1050 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-82 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | 89-72 | W | -550 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/18/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/21/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 79-87 | L | +250 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 54 | 12 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 15 | | 5/18/2024 | @ DALLAS | 83-74 | W | +155 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | | 5/23/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 90-81 | W | | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 5/25/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 82-86 | L | +170 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | | 5/28/2024 | SEATTLE | 68-77 | L | +100 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 41 | 21 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 18 | | 5/30/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 83-73 | W | -200 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 46 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 45 | 18 | | 6/1/2024 | @ INDIANA | 70-71 | L | -115 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 54 | 15 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | | 6/4/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-88 | L | +300 | 24-74 | 32.4% | 49 | 10 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 50 | 10 | | 6/6/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-71 | W | -155 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | | 6/8/2024 | ATLANTA | 80-89 | L | -105 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 13 | | 6/12/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/16/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/20/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 37-38 (+6.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 7-7 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 21-18 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-3 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
09/10/2023 | CHICAGO | 102 | 159 | SU ATS | 41 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 12-23 | 52.2% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 43 | 6 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -9.5 | Over | 43 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 10 | 10 | 08/20/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | -6 | SU | 45 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 42 | 5 | 11 | | | CHICAGO | 73 | 160.5 | Under | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 37 | 7 | 10 | 07/12/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 40 | 8 | 10 | | | CHICAGO | 72 | 160.5 | Under | 38 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 7 | 16 | 06/25/2023 | CHICAGO | 72 | 157.5 | Over | 42 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 37 | 8 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -6 | SU ATS | 54 | 40-80 | 50.0% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 47 | 11 | 14 | 05/25/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -4.5 | SU Over | 42 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 47 | 16 | 17 | | | CHICAGO | 82 | 160.5 | ATS | 50 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 28 | 9 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
White is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 13-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 13-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 21-14 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 26-17 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 10-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 13-3 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 11-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 16-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 13-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 9-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 12-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 15-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 12-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 22-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 8-2 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 34-22 against the money line (+20.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 30-19 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 28-18 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 34-20 against the money line (+20.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 18-12 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 31-15 against the money line (+20.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 27-13 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 30-20 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
White is 6-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 7-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-11 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-8 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 4-6 against the money line (-11.8 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 38-37 against the money line (-28.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 58 times, while the home underdog won straight up 8 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 10/22/2024 8:22:33 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|