Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Friday 7/22/2016Line$ LineOU LineScore
CONNECTICUT
 
CHICAGO
+5  

-5  
+175

-210

167
 		94
Final
89

Go to Top
CONNECTICUT (7 - 16) at CHICAGO (11 - 12)
View Previous GameNo Next Game
Friday, 7/22/2016 8:30 PM
Go to Top
Board Money Line
607CONNECTICUT+210
608CHICAGO-270
BETTING TRENDSGo to Top

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)

 (0%)

OVER

 (0%)
(Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™Go to Top
StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line
There are 38 situations with a total rating of 78 stars.
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(97-28 since 1997.) (77.6%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(120-62 since 1997.) (65.9%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(42-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +23.8 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(84-35 since 1997.) (70.6%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(76-35 since 1997.) (68.5%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(68-31 since 1997.) (68.7%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(215-150 since 1997.) (58.9%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(78-33 since 1997.) (70.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(129-93 since 1997.) (58.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(55-24 since 1997.) (69.6%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(45-19 since 1997.) (70.3%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(50-27 since 1997.) (64.9%, +23 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(53-31 since 1997.) (63.1%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(55-32 since 1997.) (63.2%, +21.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(59-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +20.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(47-28 since 1997.) (62.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +20 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(30-9 since 1997.) (76.9%, +19 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +18 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(22-10 since 1997.) (68.8%, +16.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(25-4 since 1997.) (86.2%, +16.4 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(26-12 since 1997.) (68.4%, +16 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +19 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(46-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +15.7 units. Rating = 0*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(102-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT against the money line
There are 39 situations with a total rating of 91 stars.
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(309-305 since 1997.) (50.3%, +74.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(123-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(93-51 since 1997.) (64.6%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(178-167 since 1997.) (51.6%, +43.1 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(112-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(86-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +29 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(76-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset win as an underdog.
(102-71 since 1997.) (59%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(42-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +23.8 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less.
(68-41 since 1997.) (62.4%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(61-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(70-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(29-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.2%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win by 3 points or less.
(31-16 since 1997.) (66%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(62-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(46-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(24-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +25 units. Rating = 5*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(40-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.3%, +34.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(57-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(69-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +32.2 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(29-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +23 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(33-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +35.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(53-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(42-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(76-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(78-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(49-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(49-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +20 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™Go to Top
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
CONNECTICUT78 30-7142.0%6-1930.3%13-1872.6%411112
CHICAGO89 34-7347.2%5-1140.0%16-1982.3%491312

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 765 times, while CONNECTICUT won 213 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO
Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
CONNECTICUT is 83-63 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 75.4
CONNECTICUT is 9-7 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 78.9
CONNECTICUT is 9-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 73.2
CONNECTICUT is 146-110 against the money line (+31.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 73.5
CONNECTICUT is 113-96 against the money line (+29.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 73.9
CONNECTICUT is 53-27 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 77.0
CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.0
CHICAGO is 94-134 against the money line (-66.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 79.3
CHICAGO is 45-71 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.0
CHICAGO is 49-72 against the money line (-31.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.2
CHICAGO is 25-45 against the money line (-30.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.4
CHICAGO is 34-48 against the money line (-31.7 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.3
CHICAGO is 20-48 against the money line (-32.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.3
CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 88.9

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
CONNECTICUT is 29-55 against the money line (-51.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 80.1
CONNECTICUT is 1-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 84.3
CONNECTICUT is 48-136 against the money line (-123.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 86.7
CONNECTICUT is 4-29 against the money line (-20.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 91.1
CHICAGO is 55-36 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6
CHICAGO is 39-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 83.0
CHICAGO is 24-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 92.0, OPPONENT 83.9

View Expanded Details
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 27 trends with a total rating of 31 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 62-48 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 5-2 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-13 against the money line (+13.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+16.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 155-113 against the money line (+28.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-9 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 78-67 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 76-76 against the money line (-38.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 42-46 against the money line (-27.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 39-57 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 49-80 against the money line (-41.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 73-71 against the money line (-39.0 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 51-46 against the money line (-29.5 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 126-165 against the money line (-57.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 22-26 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 41-45 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 54-62 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 10-17 against the money line (-15.1 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 19-28 against the money line (-25.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 33-35 against the money line (-31.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 99-145 against the money line (-51.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 56-103 against the money line (-38.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 28-44 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 40-61 against the money line (-34.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 4 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.
CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+5.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+5.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 14-6 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 47 trends with a total rating of 50 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 73-80 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 5-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 45-31 against the money line (+24.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 37-26 against the money line (+13.5 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-25 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 60-61 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-17 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 32-28 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 6*)
CHICAGO is 162-205 against the money line (-60.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 95-90 against the money line (-41.1 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 92-86 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 54-79 against the money line (-33.8 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 18-32 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 82-129 against the money line (-63.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 61-98 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 30-36 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 55-83 against the money line (-37.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 37-52 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 51-72 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 29-48 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 16-18 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 20-24 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 17-24 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 10-17 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 17-36 against the money line (-29.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 18-23 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 12-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 16-28 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 4*)
CHICAGO is 12-21 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 22-29 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 45-48 against the money line (-27.9 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 12-20 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 14-21 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 18-30 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 9-26 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 4 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 21-58 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 5-16 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 1*)

View Expanded Details
ADVANCED TEAM STATSGo to Top
CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games7-16+0.114-811-1281.039.043.0%43.485.240.545.8%43.1
Road Games4-8+2.29-35-780.539.343.1%42.884.840.146.0%42.0
Last 5 Games2-3+24-12-381.243.243.5%43.278.038.241.3%43.2
Division Games1-9-7.74-55-579.036.841.7%44.184.441.244.6%45.2
CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)81.039.031-7243.0%6-1929.8%14-1972.4%431016228144
vs opponents surrendering81.640.530-6844.1%5-1633.6%16-2179.5%42918208134
Team Stats (Road Games)80.539.330-7143.1%6-1832.9%13-1972.2%431016228134
Stats Against (All Games)85.240.530-6645.8%5-1535.2%19-2381.3%43818188144
vs opponents averaging81.840.330-6744.2%6-1634.2%17-2180.2%42918197134
Stats Against (Road Games)84.840.130-6646.0%5-1434.3%20-2483.2%42817188134
CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games11-12-7.410-1314-984.344.245.8%44.084.141.443.1%41.1
Home Games6-5-1.73-87-485.242.146.1%43.883.942.243.5%40.9
Last 5 Games4-1+3.73-22-384.244.845.3%44.882.838.046.8%37.6
Division Games5-5-3.85-56-486.144.945.6%45.681.941.740.5%43.9
CHICAGO Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)84.344.233-7245.8%4-1138.6%14-1782.3%441018196125
vs opponents surrendering81.640.530-6844.1%5-1633.7%17-2179.8%42917208134
Team Stats (Home Games)85.242.133-7246.1%4-1134.2%15-1881.1%441019187125
Stats Against (All Games)84.141.429-6843.1%7-1935.1%19-2381.0%41819187114
vs opponents averaging82.140.430-6744.1%6-1634.2%17-2280.2%42918208134
Stats Against (Home Games)83.942.229-6743.5%7-1836.0%19-2381.7%41821197124
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.1,  CHICAGO 71.7
View Expanded Details
SCHEDULE AND RESULTSGo to Top
CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
6/12/2016@ ATLANTA87-93L+28034-7147.9%431137-7251.4%4613
6/14/2016WASHINGTON106-109L+13539-8645.3%551934-7744.2%4218
6/16/2016NEW YORK72-80L+25028-6046.7%301629-6147.5%4517
6/19/2016SAN ANTONIO93-90W-21036-7349.3%431032-6251.6%3213
6/24/2016@ SEATTLE81-98L+28032-8537.6%461235-5761.4%3815
6/26/2016@ LOS ANGELES73-80L 31-6845.6%421530-6943.5%4211
6/29/2016@ PHOENIX75-86L+55029-7638.2%421330-5950.8%4314
7/2/2016@ DALLAS86-83W+32535-7050.0%411529-6643.9%3912
7/7/2016MINNESOTA93-89W+50034-7744.2%451432-7940.5%5412
7/10/2016ATLANTA63-67L+13527-6640.9%361223-6535.4%5116
7/13/2016@ INDIANA86-64W+28031-6547.7%51825-6936.2%3410
7/15/2016LOS ANGELES92-98L+32538-8345.8%431337-7549.3%4714
7/17/2016@ NEW YORK76-83L+28024-7133.8%401129-6246.8%4616
7/20/2016@ DALLAS89-78W+22034-6949.3%461228-7338.4%389
7/22/2016@ CHICAGO           

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
6/12/2016@ PHOENIX80-86L+12031-6647.0%411324-6835.3%4611
6/14/2016@ LOS ANGELES85-98L+28033-7047.1%36939-6758.2%316
6/17/2016@ ATLANTA97-101L-21037-8245.1%511134-7545.3%509
6/21/2016SAN ANTONIO81-75W 30-7341.1%451327-6342.9%4516
6/24/2016@ NEW YORK79-80L+17030-6844.1%36831-7243.1%4610
6/29/2016INDIANA83-95L-25029-6048.3%321432-6747.8%4113
7/1/2016WASHINGTON86-84W-17535-8143.2%51830-7241.7%4612
7/5/2016@ MINNESOTA82-87L+45027-6939.1%391331-6647.0%4314
7/8/2016NEW YORK85-88L-12033-7444.6%401231-7839.7%5415
7/10/2016PHOENIX100-95W-22038-7451.4%521431-6647.0%2611
7/13/2016LOS ANGELES67-77L+17529-7439.2%32533-6055.0%4412
7/15/2016DALLAS84-77W-25034-7346.6%49926-6937.7%4110
7/17/2016@ SEATTLE91-88W-12036-7548.0%481334-7048.6%3512
7/19/2016@ PHOENIX79-77W+17028-6841.2%43831-6647.0%4212
7/22/2016CONNECTICUT           
View Expanded Details
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORYGo to Top
All games in this series since 1997
CHICAGO is 19-21 (-2.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CONNECTICUT is 4-6 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CHICAGO since 1997
CONNECTICUT is 10-12 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997
Games played at CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons.
CHICAGO is 4-1 (-0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
5/14/2016CONNECTICUT70165 Under2524-7133.8%9-2733.3%13-2065.0%431017
 CHICAGO93-10SU ATS4531-6944.9%0-60.0%31-3783.8%551516
9/13/2015CHICAGO75-4 Over4726-6440.6%6-1735.3%17-2277.3%461314
 CONNECTICUT86157SU ATS4231-7441.9%6-1735.3%18-2378.3%45107
8/30/2015CONNECTICUT72156.5SU ATS3326-6142.6%4-1625.0%16-2466.7%46915
 CHICAGO68-9 Under3427-7237.5%1-812.5%13-1872.2%4779
7/12/2015CONNECTICUT76157 Over4128-6245.2%6-2030.0%14-2070.0%3049
 CHICAGO96-8SU ATS4938-6756.7%9-1850.0%11-1384.6%41910
7/2/2015CHICAGO77-4SU Under3829-6246.8%5-1435.7%14-1593.3%36815
 CONNECTICUT74154 ATS4230-7440.5%5-1926.3%9-1090.0%431014
6/11/2015CHICAGO65-4.5 Under3825-6936.2%0-60.0%15-1883.3%451011
 CONNECTICUT67156SU ATS3926-6738.8%3-1127.3%12-1866.7%49910
View Expanded Details
COACHING TRENDSGo to Top
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 40 trends with a total rating of 43 stars.
Chatman is 102-102 against the money line (-29.6 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 60-60 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 32-41 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 26-33 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 53-63 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 37-50 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 56-64 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 35-41 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 21-27 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 36-41 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 58-60 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 14-26 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 46-56 against the money line (-29.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 22-31 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 33-46 against the money line (-34.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 28-34 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 11-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 32-33 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 24-28 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 17-23 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 7-13 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 50-40 against the money line (-23.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 16-17 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 20-24 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 32-42 against the money line (-34.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*)
Chatman is 28-37 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 41-53 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 79-84 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 61-60 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 51-59 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 78-86 against the money line (-34.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 14-17 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 26-29 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 11-13 against the money line (-14.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 74-75 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Chatman is 38-40 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 60-72 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 36-58 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 25-37 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Chatman is 36-50 against the money line (-29.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
Miller is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Chatman is 31-21 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX LINE TRACKER™Go to Top
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-270 (Road=+210), Closing Money Line: Home=-270 (Road=+210)
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 219 times, while the road underdog won straight up 82 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIESGo to Top
CONNECTICUT
[G] 07/09/2016 - Rachel Banham out for season ( Knee )
CHICAGO
[C] 07/19/2016 - Clarissa Dos Santos out indefinitely ( Personal )
[F] 07/19/2016 - Erika de Souza out indefinitely ( Personal )
[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee )

Last Updated: 5/5/2024 5:11:04 AM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.