| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
CHICAGO |
|
|
82.5
| 38
Final
38 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | CONNECTICUT | 82.5 | | 608 | CHICAGO | -3.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(259-187 since 1997.) (58.1%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - off a road win by 3 points or less.
(46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(160-94 since 1997.) (63%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(127-75 since 1997.) (62.9%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(162-101 since 1997.) (61.6%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(126-68 since 1997.) (64.9%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(98-53 since 1997.) (64.9%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(170-111 since 1997.) (60.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(82-41 since 1997.) (66.7%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(83-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(78-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win as an underdog.
(106-61 since 1997.) (63.5%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(88-48 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(116-65 since 1997.) (64.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(64-31 since 1997.) (67.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(147-85 since 1997.) (63.4%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(114-64 since 1997.) (64%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(111-61 since 1997.) (64.5%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(190-126 since 1997.) (60.1%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(140-84 since 1997.) (62.5%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(124-80 since 1997.) (60.8%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win by 3 points or less.
(32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog.
(195-132 since 1997.) (59.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win by 10 points or more.
(142-91 since 1997.) (60.9%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win.
(332-226 since 1997.) (59.5%, +83.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(434-319 since 1997.) (57.6%, +83.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(838-630 since 1997.) (57.1%, +145 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(874-660 since 1997.) (57%, +148 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(264-178 since 1997.) (59.7%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(549-419 since 1997.) (56.7%, +88.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(312-228 since 1997.) (57.8%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as an underdog.
(146-90 since 1997.) (61.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(172-103 since 1997.) (62.5%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a non-conference game.
(676-527 since 1997.) (56.2%, +96.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(517-374 since 1997.) (58%, +105.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(390-266 since 1997.) (59.5%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(448-332 since 1997.) (57.4%, +82.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in July games.
(83-48 since 1997.) (63.4%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in May, June, or July games.
(245-169 since 1997.) (59.2%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(440-324 since 1997.) (57.6%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(263-180 since 1997.) (59.4%, +65 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, playing with 2 days rest.
(251-160 since 1997.) (61.1%, +75 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(517-374 since 1997.) (58%, +105.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(390-266 since 1997.) (59.5%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(501-371 since 1997.) (57.5%, +92.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 40 | | 30-71 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 30.3% | 13-18 | 72.6% | 41 | 11 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 89 | | 45 | | 34-73 | 47.2% | 5-11 | 40.0% | 16-19 | 82.3% | 49 | 13 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 566 times, while CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 434 times.
Edge against first half line=CHICAGO | In 1000 simulated games, 563 games went over first half total, while 437 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 37.5 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 38.5 | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.0, OPPONENT 38.7 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 38.1 | CHICAGO is 75-104 against the 1rst half line (-39.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 42.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 63-126 against the 1rst half line (-75.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 41.9 | CONNECTICUT is 43-80 against the 1rst half line (-45.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.1, OPPONENT 43.4 | CHICAGO is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.8, OPPONENT 41.2 | CHICAGO is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.5, OPPONENT 41.4 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 36.2 | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 36.6 | CHICAGO is 55-36 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 36.3 | CHICAGO is 59-34 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 35.6 |
|
| | | | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in home games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-39 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 48-33 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-32 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.3, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-28 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 45-28 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-17 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-2 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.8, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-30 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 77-50 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-4 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-0 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 47-69 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-74 against the 1rst half line (-30.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 79-112 against the 1rst half line (-44.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 54-81 against the 1rst half line (-35.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 64-90 against the 1rst half line (-35.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.1, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-25 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 63-39 OVER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-16 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 31-18 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 31-18 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 45-23 OVER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 39-23 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-24 OVER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-18 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 42-24 OVER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-16 OVER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-15 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-22 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-17 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-14 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-22 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 32-19 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 55-33 OVER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-22 OVER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-14 OVER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 53-32 OVER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 27.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-23 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 75-52 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-31 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-16 | +0.1 | 14-8 | 11-12 | 81.0 | 39.0 | 43.0% | 43.4 | 85.2 | 40.5 | 45.8% | 43.1 | | Road Games | 4-8 | +2.2 | 9-3 | 5-7 | 80.5 | 39.3 | 43.1% | 42.8 | 84.8 | 40.1 | 46.0% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 81.2 | 43.2 | 43.5% | 43.2 | 78.0 | 38.2 | 41.3% | 43.2 | | Division Games | 1-9 | -7.7 | 4-5 | 5-5 | 79.0 | 36.8 | 41.7% | 44.1 | 84.4 | 41.2 | 44.6% | 45.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.0 | 39.0 | 31-72 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 29.8% | 14-19 | 72.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 16-21 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.5 | 39.3 | 30-71 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 72.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.2 | 40.5 | 30-66 | 45.8% | 5-15 | 35.2% | 19-23 | 81.3% | 43 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.3 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-16 | 34.2% | 17-21 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.8 | 40.1 | 30-66 | 46.0% | 5-14 | 34.3% | 20-24 | 83.2% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-12 | -7.4 | 10-13 | 14-9 | 84.3 | 44.2 | 45.8% | 44.0 | 84.1 | 41.4 | 43.1% | 41.1 | | Home Games | 6-5 | -1.7 | 3-8 | 7-4 | 85.2 | 42.1 | 46.1% | 43.8 | 83.9 | 42.2 | 43.5% | 40.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.7 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 84.2 | 44.8 | 45.3% | 44.8 | 82.8 | 38.0 | 46.8% | 37.6 | | Division Games | 5-5 | -3.8 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 86.1 | 44.9 | 45.6% | 45.6 | 81.9 | 41.7 | 40.5% | 43.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.3 | 44.2 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 4-11 | 38.6% | 14-17 | 82.3% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.2 | 42.1 | 33-72 | 46.1% | 4-11 | 34.2% | 15-18 | 81.1% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.1 | 41.4 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 19-23 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 40.4 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-16 | 34.2% | 17-22 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.9 | 42.2 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 7-18 | 36.0% | 19-23 | 81.7% | 41 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.1, CHICAGO 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/12/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 87-93 | 41-46 | 4.5 | L | 83 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 106-109 | 42-44 | 1.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 72-80 | 36-41 | 4 | L | 80 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-90 | 45-45 | -2.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 32 | 13 | | 6/24/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-98 | 37-56 | 4.5 | L | 82 | O | 32-85 | 37.6% | 46 | 12 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 38 | 15 | | 6/26/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-80 | 38-36 | 9 | W | 81.5 | U | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 11 | | 6/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 75-86 | 37-41 | 7 | W | 86.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 42 | 13 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 14 | | 7/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | 86-83 | 41-38 | 5 | W | 86 | U | 35-70 | 50.0% | 41 | 15 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 12 | | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | 93-89 | 34-33 | 6.5 | W | 81 | U | 34-77 | 44.2% | 45 | 14 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 54 | 12 | | 7/10/2016 | ATLANTA | 63-67 | 30-43 | 1.5 | L | 82.5 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 36 | 12 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 51 | 16 | | 7/13/2016 | @ INDIANA | 86-64 | 44-35 | 4.5 | W | 81 | U | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 8 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 34 | 10 | | 7/15/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 92-98 | 55-44 | 5 | W | 78 | O | 38-83 | 45.8% | 43 | 13 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 47 | 14 | | 7/17/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 76-83 | 39-36 | 4.5 | W | 77 | U | 24-71 | 33.8% | 40 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 46 | 16 | | 7/20/2016 | @ DALLAS | 89-78 | 48-33 | 3.5 | W | 84 | U | 34-69 | 49.3% | 46 | 12 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 9 | | 7/22/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 80-86 | 47-36 | 1.5 | W | 86.5 | U | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 13 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 46 | 11 | | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-98 | 37-46 | 4.5 | L | 83.5 | U | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 97-101 | 55-55 | -2.5 | L | 87.5 | O | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | | 6/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 81-75 | 35-32 | -8 | L | 79.5 | U | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 45 | 16 | | 6/24/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-80 | 40-50 | 2.5 | L | 80 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 46 | 10 | | 6/29/2016 | INDIANA | 83-95 | 38-44 | -3 | L | 82.5 | U | 29-60 | 48.3% | 32 | 14 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 41 | 13 | | 7/1/2016 | WASHINGTON | 86-84 | 40-50 | -2 | L | 82.5 | O | 35-81 | 43.2% | 51 | 8 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 46 | 12 | | 7/5/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-87 | 51-52 | 6.5 | W | 82.5 | O | 27-69 | 39.1% | 39 | 13 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 43 | 14 | | 7/8/2016 | NEW YORK | 85-88 | 44-50 | -1 | L | 81.5 | O | 33-74 | 44.6% | 40 | 12 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 54 | 15 | | 7/10/2016 | PHOENIX | 100-95 | 53-49 | -3 | W | 85.5 | O | 38-74 | 51.4% | 52 | 14 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 26 | 11 | | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 67-77 | 35-44 | 2.5 | L | 83.5 | U | 29-74 | 39.2% | 32 | 5 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 44 | 12 | | 7/15/2016 | DALLAS | 84-77 | 38-35 | -3 | T | 85 | U | 34-73 | 46.6% | 49 | 9 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 10 | | 7/17/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 91-88 | 56-32 | -1 | W | 81 | O | 36-75 | 48.0% | 48 | 13 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | | 7/19/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 79-77 | 42-30 | 2.5 | W | 86.5 | U | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 8 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 12 | | 7/22/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 24-17 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 24 of 41 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 6-4 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 10 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 15-7 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 12 of 22 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 165 | Under | 25 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | | | CHICAGO | 93 | -10 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 0-6 | 0.0% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 55 | 15 | 16 | 9/13/2015 | CHICAGO | 75 | -4 | Over | 47 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 46 | 13 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 157 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 45 | 10 | 7 | 8/30/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 46 | 9 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 68 | -9 | Under | 34 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 47 | 7 | 9 | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 157 | Over | 41 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 30 | 4 | 9 | | | CHICAGO | 96 | -8 | SU ATS | 49 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 41 | 9 | 10 | 7/2/2015 | CHICAGO | 77 | -4 | SU Under | 38 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 36 | 8 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 74 | 154 | ATS | 42 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 6/11/2015 | CHICAGO | 65 | -4.5 | Under | 38 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 0-6 | 0.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 45 | 10 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 67 | 156 | SU ATS | 39 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 49 | 9 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 92-111 against the 1rst half line (-30.1 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-54 against the 1rst half line (-30.4 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 35-64 against the 1rst half line (-35.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-64 against the 1rst half line (-36.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-43 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) in home games on Friday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 56-74 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-35 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 15-32 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-31 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 22-36 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-66 against the 1rst half line (-23.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 51-71 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-48 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-19 against the 1rst half line (-15.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-63 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 32-53 against the 1rst half line (-26.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 51-66 against the 1rst half line (-21.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 5-16 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 18-29 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 31-48 against the 1rst half line (-21.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-41 against the 1rst half line (-23.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 36-63 against the 1rst half line (-33.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-54 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-29 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-39 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-32 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-26 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-40 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-28 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 4-15 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-61 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 72-89 against the 1rst half line (-25.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-49 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 51-70 against the 1rst half line (-26.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-64 against the 1rst half line (-26.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 71-92 against the 1rst half line (-30.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 6-20 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 13-33 against the 1rst half line (-23.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 24-46 against the 1rst half line (-26.6 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 4-17 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 11-25 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-30 against the 1rst half line (-22.0 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 24-35 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 114-91 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 67-52 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 68-54 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 72-57 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 43-30 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 36-24 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-50 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-32 OVER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 42-27 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-18 OVER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 43-29 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-13 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 67-45 OVER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-32 OVER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 68-52 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-29 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-17 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-41 OVER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 54-41 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 61-40 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 39-27 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-14 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-27 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 89-74 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 69-53 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 93-72 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-35 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 75-57 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 154 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 144 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 11 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 10 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 9 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times.
Edge against the first half line=CONNECTICUT | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | Since 1997, 5 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/09/2016 - Rachel Banham out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [C] 07/19/2016 - Clarissa Dos Santos out indefinitely ( Personal ) | | [F] 07/19/2016 - Erika de Souza out indefinitely ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 1:41:27 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|