| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA CHICAGO |
|
| 166.5 | 95 Final 83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | INDIANA | +200 | 654 | CHICAGO | -250 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (207-76 since 1997.) (73.1%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (178-64 since 1997.) (73.6%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (158-55 since 1997.) (74.2%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (188-63 since 1997.) (74.9%, +51.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog. (94-65 since 1997.) (59.1%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (139-94 since 1997.) (59.7%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (120-40 since 1997.) (75%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (73-17 since 1997.) (81.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (79-28 since 1997.) (73.8%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (153-116 since 1997.) (56.9%, +33 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road loss against a division rival, on Wednesday nights. (101-72 since 1997.) (58.4%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win. (57-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (37-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (40-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +9.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having lost 4 of their last 5 games. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%). (24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (53-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games against opponent after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games. (24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (34-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (296-292 since 1997.) (50.3%, +74.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (279-260 since 1997.) (51.8%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (99-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.9%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog. (22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (74-53 since 1997.) (58.3%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (153-116 since 1997.) (56.9%, +33 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +9.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%). (24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (65-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (27-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (45-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (35-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in May, June, or July games. (50-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 77 | | 28-67 | 42.5% | 5-16 | 30.2% | 16-19 | 83.6% | 38 | 10 | 12 | CHICAGO | 87 | | 34-70 | 48.7% | 4-12 | 38.4% | 14-17 | 84.1% | 45 | 12 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 744 times, while INDIANA won 227 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 17-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.4, OPPONENT 76.1 | CHICAGO is 89-131 against the money line (-69.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 47-69 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.8 | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 86.1 | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 84.8 |
|
INDIANA is 113-132 against the money line (-61.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 76.4 | INDIANA is 6-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 84.6 | INDIANA is 47-60 against the money line (-32.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 72.8 | INDIANA is 9-18 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 86.0 | INDIANA is 5-20 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.3, OPPONENT 89.7 | INDIANA is 58-100 against the money line (-53.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.2, OPPONENT 74.2 | INDIANA is 55-80 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.2, OPPONENT 73.1 | INDIANA is 99-107 against the money line (-45.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 13-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 93.5, OPPONENT 83.6 | CHICAGO is 36-18 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | CHICAGO is 20-5 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 92.9, OPPONENT 82.9 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 22-15 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 28-18 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 115-90 against the money line (+28.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 72-75 against the money line (-40.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-32 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 70-68 against the money line (-37.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 66-111 against the money line (-55.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-10.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 124-161 against the money line (-53.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-25 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-44 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 60-74 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 94-141 against the money line (-51.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-99 against the money line (-38.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-41 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 35-58 against the money line (-35.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 76-100 against the money line (-38.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 10-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 17-13 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-9 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-5 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 23-14 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 37-27 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-2 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 8-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 14-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 18-13 against the money line (+12.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 11-3 against the money line (+11.5 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 30-22 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 63-45 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 40-24 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 14-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 57-39 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-11 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 23-12 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 13-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 18-8 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 49-27 against the money line (+26.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 20-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 83-43 against the money line (+37.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.4, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 157-201 against the money line (-60.3 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 92-87 against the money line (-39.4 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in June games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 99-126 against the money line (-49.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 77-125 against the money line (-63.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 56-94 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-32 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-79 against the money line (-37.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-48 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 48-68 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-44 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 72-93 against the money line (-38.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-67 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-49 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-33 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-14 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-20 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-19 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-24 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-22 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-19 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-27 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 34-42 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-17 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-24 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 69.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 14-41 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in road games off a road win since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 68.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 12-37 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-9 | -2.4 | 7-7 | 7-8 | 78.5 | 40.0 | 42.0% | 39.5 | 82.4 | 40.8 | 46.5% | 42.0 | Road Games | 3-5 | 0 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 74.4 | 37.0 | 41.9% | 39.9 | 81.5 | 41.2 | 46.1% | 42.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 40.4 | 41.2% | 38.8 | 80.6 | 39.4 | 43.8% | 42.8 | Division Games | 2-5 | -3 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 74.0 | 38.7 | 40.0% | 39.7 | 80.7 | 38.4 | 45.6% | 46.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.5 | 40.0 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 4-16 | 27.3% | 18-22 | 83.4% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 41.4 | 30-69 | 43.8% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 18-23 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.4 | 37.0 | 28-67 | 41.9% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 14-17 | 85.2% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.4 | 40.8 | 29-63 | 46.5% | 5-15 | 35.4% | 18-24 | 77.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 83.1 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 18-23 | 78.8% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.5 | 41.2 | 30-64 | 46.1% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 17-23 | 74.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-8 | -7.4 | 6-8 | 8-6 | 84.5 | 44.2 | 46.6% | 44.6 | 83.4 | 40.4 | 41.6% | 41.0 | Home Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 86.4 | 43.0 | 46.9% | 45.2 | 81.4 | 38.4 | 42.2% | 39.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.1 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 84.4 | 42.8 | 44.8% | 41.8 | 88.0 | 43.8 | 44.9% | 43.6 | Division Games | 4-3 | -1.1 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 86.7 | 46.7 | 45.8% | 47.6 | 78.9 | 39.0 | 39.4% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 44.2 | 33-71 | 46.6% | 3-10 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 84.2% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 32.5% | 17-22 | 78.7% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.4 | 43.0 | 34-72 | 46.9% | 2-8 | 22.5% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.4 | 40.4 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 20-25 | 80.3% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 32.5% | 18-23 | 78.1% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.4 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 19-25 | 77.6% | 40 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 70.9, CHICAGO 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2016 | ATLANTA | 94-85 | W | -300 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 46 | 21 | 5/27/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-74 | L | +550 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 14 | 5/29/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 76-85 | L | +175 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 47 | 15 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 10 | 6/1/2016 | SEATTLE | 85-75 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 27 | 20 | 6/3/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 59-91 | L | +175 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 32 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 51 | 12 | 6/5/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 88-77 | W | -250 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 6/10/2016 | CHICAGO | 64-73 | L | +100 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 14 | 6/12/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-90 | L | -250 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 14 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 34 | 16 | 6/14/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-87 | L | | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 6/17/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-75 | W | -210 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 39 | 16 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 31 | 16 | 6/19/2016 | NEW YORK | 75-78 | L | +135 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 36 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 56 | 21 | 6/22/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 62-76 | L | +170 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 18 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 37 | 13 | 6/25/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | W | +200 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | 6/29/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | L | +135 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | L | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | W | -120 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-78 | W | -175 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 35 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 13 | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | 98-72 | W | -600 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 45 | 11 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 14 | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | 73-64 | W | -120 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 14 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 9 | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 80-86 | L | +120 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 13 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 46 | 11 | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-98 | L | +280 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 97-101 | L | -210 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | 6/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 81-75 | W | | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 45 | 16 | 6/24/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-80 | L | +170 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 46 | 10 | 6/29/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 35-16 (+13.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 10-6 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 15-10 (+9.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 6-2 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/10/2016 | CHICAGO | 73 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 4-4 | 100.0% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | INDIANA | 64 | 172 | Under | 33 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 4-24 | 16.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 41 | 12 | 9 | 9/21/2015 | INDIANA | 100 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 28 | 6 | 6 | | CHICAGO | 89 | -4.5 | Over | 47 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 30 | 6 | 8 | 9/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 82 | 157.5 | Over | 42 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 37 | 11 | 13 | | INDIANA | 89 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 48 | 18 | 12 | 9/17/2015 | INDIANA | 72 | 159.5 | | 35 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 44 | 10 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | SU Under | 36 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 51 | 13 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | 82 | 161.5 | Over | 40 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 42 | 12 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 106 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 57 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 42 | 7 | 14 | 6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 83 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 43 | 11 | 9 | | INDIANA | 77 | 164.5 | Under | 52 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 43 | 6 | 18 | 6/14/2015 | CHICAGO | 98 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 53 | 7 | 15 | | INDIANA | 72 | 155.5 | Over | 21 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 5-25 | 20.0% | 21-32 | 65.6% | 40 | 10 | 10 | 6/5/2015 | INDIANA | 72 | 151.5 | Over | 38 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 40 | 11 | 20 | | CHICAGO | 95 | -7 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 56 | 15 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
White is 10-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 14-5 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 23-14 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-3 against the money line (+11.5 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 8-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 23-12 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 13-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 18-8 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 20-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 22-15 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 28-18 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 97-98 against the money line (-29.6 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 23-27 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-56 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 60-69 against the money line (-36.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-19 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 5-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 48-59 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-46 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 51-60 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-37 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-23 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-45 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 12-22 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 32-37 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-56 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-52 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-27 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-44 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 28-32 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 43-49 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-29 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 19-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-19 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 6-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 46-39 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-19 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 45-52 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 74-80 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-40 against the money line (-19.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-61 against the money line (-41.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 4-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-27 against the money line (-23.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 76-82 against the money line (-31.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-16 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 22-28 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 69-71 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-38 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-68 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 31-54 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-34 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 31-47 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 64 times, while the road underdog won straight up 32 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/01/2016 - Maggie Lucas out for season ( Knee ) | |
[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 8:31:26 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|