| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
INDIANA
First Half Results
CHICAGO |
|
|
82.5
| 44
Final
38 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | INDIANA | 82.5 | | 654 | CHICAGO | -3 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (INDIANA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(252-179 since 1997.) (58.5%, +55.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(66-30 since 1997.) (68.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(121-74 since 1997.) (62.1%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(59-24 since 1997.) (71.1%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in June games.
(40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(62-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in June games.
(46-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(402-299 since 1997.) (57.3%, +73.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(135-79 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(111-64 since 1997.) (63.4%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - off an upset win as a road underdog.
(193-129 since 1997.) (59.9%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - off a road win.
(327-221 since 1997.) (59.7%, +83.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(807-626 since 1997.) (56.3%, +118.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(503-373 since 1997.) (57.4%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(184-117 since 1997.) (61.1%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(85-45 since 1997.) (65.4%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(822-616 since 1997.) (57.2%, +144.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(864-645 since 1997.) (57.3%, +154.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(539-404 since 1997.) (57.2%, +94.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(307-222 since 1997.) (58%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as an underdog.
(144-89 since 1997.) (61.8%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(168-103 since 1997.) (62%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after a non-conference game.
(660-507 since 1997.) (56.6%, +102.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (INDIANA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road loss against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(102-56 since 1997.) (64.6%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (INDIANA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| INDIANA | 77 | | 39 | | 28-67 | 42.5% | 5-16 | 30.2% | 16-19 | 83.6% | 38 | 10 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 87 | | 44 | | 34-70 | 48.7% | 4-12 | 38.4% | 14-17 | 84.1% | 45 | 12 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 566 times, while INDIANA covered the first half line 389 times.
Edge against first half line=CHICAGO | In 1000 simulated games, 518 games went over first half total, while 482 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 35-21 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.3, OPPONENT 37.9 | INDIANA is 122-88 against the 1rst half line (+25.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.7, OPPONENT 34.8 | INDIANA is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 42.4, OPPONENT 41.2 |
|
INDIANA is 48-78 against the 1rst half line (-37.8 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 39.3 | INDIANA is 75-104 against the 1rst half line (-39.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 40.7 | CHICAGO is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.3, OPPONENT 40.8 | CHICAGO is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 40.6 | CHICAGO is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 48.1, OPPONENT 40.9 |
|
INDIANA is 51-30 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.8, OPPONENT 35.2 | INDIANA is 35-15 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.6, OPPONENT 34.2 | INDIANA is 66-43 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.0, OPPONENT 36.1 | INDIANA is 51-32 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.6 | INDIANA is 195-149 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 | INDIANA is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.2, OPPONENT 39.5 | INDIANA is 84-50 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 34.5 | CHICAGO is 54-35 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 36.1 |
|
| | | | |
|
INDIANA is 189-124 against the 1rst half line (+52.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 91-58 against the 1rst half line (+27.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 145-99 against the 1rst half line (+36.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 59-36 against the 1rst half line (+19.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 39.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 270-216 against the 1rst half line (+32.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 114-72 against the 1rst half line (+34.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 38.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-34 against the 1rst half line (-18.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-30 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-24 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-24 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 150-104 UNDER (+35.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 180-136 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 79-49 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 203-152 UNDER (+35.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 274-212 UNDER (+40.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 332-276 against the 1rst half line (+28.4 Units) versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 211-169 against the 1rst half line (+25.1 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 220-172 against the 1rst half line (+30.8 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 91-61 against the 1rst half line (+23.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 164-119 against the 1rst half line (+33.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 39-24 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 108-80 against the 1rst half line (+20.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 33-19 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 85-54 against the 1rst half line (+25.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-12 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 127-97 against the 1rst half line (+20.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 165-125 against the 1rst half line (+27.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 75-50 against the 1rst half line (+20.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games off a road loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 7-20 against the 1rst half line (-15.0 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 58-35 OVER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 35-19 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-15 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-15 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in June games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.0, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-19 OVER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 37-22 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-13 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-20 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-14 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-20 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-12 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 33-19 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 71-49 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 54-32 OVER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-20 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-19 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.6, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 31-17 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-29 OVER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-18 OVER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 32-10 OVER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 342-268 UNDER (+47.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 168-111 UNDER (+45.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 146-93 UNDER (+43.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 117-61 UNDER (+49.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 71-41 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 184-122 UNDER (+49.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 121-89 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 58-34 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in June games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 224-157 UNDER (+51.3 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 114-82 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 124-87 UNDER (+28.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 49-26 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 165-119 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 100-70 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 169-117 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 48-29 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 107-76 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 71-49 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 52-26 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.5, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 27-13 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 36-18 UNDER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a road win since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 63-41 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 63-40 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 154-114 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 132-93 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 165-127 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 33-16 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 173-127 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 180-139 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 6-9 | -2.4 | 7-7 | 7-8 | 78.5 | 40.0 | 42.0% | 39.5 | 82.4 | 40.8 | 46.5% | 42.0 | | Road Games | 3-5 | 0 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 74.4 | 37.0 | 41.9% | 39.9 | 81.5 | 41.2 | 46.1% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 40.4 | 41.2% | 38.8 | 80.6 | 39.4 | 43.8% | 42.8 | | Division Games | 2-5 | -3 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 74.0 | 38.7 | 40.0% | 39.7 | 80.7 | 38.4 | 45.6% | 46.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.5 | 40.0 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 4-16 | 27.3% | 18-22 | 83.4% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 41.4 | 30-69 | 43.8% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 18-23 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.4 | 37.0 | 28-67 | 41.9% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 14-17 | 85.2% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.4 | 40.8 | 29-63 | 46.5% | 5-15 | 35.4% | 18-24 | 77.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.1 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 18-23 | 78.8% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.5 | 41.2 | 30-64 | 46.1% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 17-23 | 74.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-8 | -7.4 | 6-8 | 8-6 | 84.5 | 44.2 | 46.6% | 44.6 | 83.4 | 40.4 | 41.6% | 41.0 | | Home Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 86.4 | 43.0 | 46.9% | 45.2 | 81.4 | 38.4 | 42.2% | 39.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.1 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 84.4 | 42.8 | 44.8% | 41.8 | 88.0 | 43.8 | 44.9% | 43.6 | | Division Games | 4-3 | -1.1 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 86.7 | 46.7 | 45.8% | 47.6 | 78.9 | 39.0 | 39.4% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 44.2 | 33-71 | 46.6% | 3-10 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 84.2% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 32.5% | 17-22 | 78.7% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.4 | 43.0 | 34-72 | 46.9% | 2-8 | 22.5% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.4 | 40.4 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 20-25 | 80.3% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 32.5% | 18-23 | 78.1% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.4 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 19-25 | 77.6% | 40 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 70.9, CHICAGO 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/20/2016 | ATLANTA | 94-85 | 52-37 | -3.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 46 | 21 | | 5/27/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-74 | 27-50 | 7 | L | 82 | U | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 14 | | 5/29/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 76-85 | 33-43 | 2.5 | L | 83.5 | U | 30-73 | 41.1% | 47 | 15 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 10 | | 6/1/2016 | SEATTLE | 85-75 | 51-38 | -3.5 | W | 80.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 27 | 20 | | 6/3/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 59-91 | 29-42 | 2.5 | L | 77 | U | 20-61 | 32.8% | 32 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 51 | 12 | | 6/5/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 88-77 | 47-35 | -3 | W | 81.5 | O | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | | 6/10/2016 | CHICAGO | 64-73 | 33-41 | 1 | L | 85 | U | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 14 | | 6/12/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-90 | 36-42 | -3 | L | 80.5 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 14 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 34 | 16 | | 6/14/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-87 | 31-49 | 8 | L | 81 | U | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | | 6/17/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-75 | 42-29 | -2.5 | W | 74 | U | 32-64 | 50.0% | 39 | 16 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 31 | 16 | | 6/19/2016 | NEW YORK | 75-78 | 42-37 | 1.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 23-66 | 34.8% | 36 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 56 | 21 | | 6/22/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 62-76 | 35-34 | 2.5 | W | 78.5 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 18 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 37 | 13 | | 6/25/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | 52-48 | 3 | W | 84.5 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | | 6/29/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | 41-37 | -2.5 | W | 84.5 | U | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | 35-53 | 1.5 | L | 82 | O | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | 42-33 | -4 | W | 76 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | 56-47 | -1 | W | 85 | O | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-78 | 45-37 | -2 | W | 80.5 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 35 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 13 | | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | 98-72 | 60-36 | -6 | W | 80 | O | 39-71 | 54.9% | 45 | 11 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 14 | | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | 73-64 | 41-33 | -1 | W | 85 | U | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 14 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 9 | | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 80-86 | 47-36 | 1.5 | W | 86.5 | U | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 13 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 46 | 11 | | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-98 | 37-46 | 4.5 | L | 83.5 | U | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 97-101 | 55-55 | -2.5 | L | 87.5 | O | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | | 6/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 81-75 | 35-32 | -8 | L | 79.5 | U | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 45 | 16 | | 6/24/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-80 | 40-50 | 2.5 | L | 80 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 46 | 10 | | 6/29/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| INDIANA is 33-16 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 29 of 51 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| INDIANA is 9-6 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 10 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| INDIANA is 16-8 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 13 of 25 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| INDIANA is 5-3 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/10/2016 | CHICAGO | 73 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 4-4 | 100.0% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 64 | 172 | Under | 33 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 4-24 | 16.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 41 | 12 | 9 | 9/21/2015 | INDIANA | 100 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 28 | 6 | 6 | | | CHICAGO | 89 | -4.5 | Over | 47 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 30 | 6 | 8 | 9/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 82 | 157.5 | Over | 42 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 37 | 11 | 13 | | | INDIANA | 89 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 48 | 18 | 12 | 9/17/2015 | INDIANA | 72 | 159.5 | | 35 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 44 | 10 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | SU Under | 36 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 51 | 13 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | 82 | 161.5 | Over | 40 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 42 | 12 | 13 | | | CHICAGO | 106 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 57 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 42 | 7 | 14 | 6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 83 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 43 | 11 | 9 | | | INDIANA | 77 | 164.5 | Under | 52 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 43 | 6 | 18 | 6/14/2015 | CHICAGO | 98 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 53 | 7 | 15 | | | INDIANA | 72 | 155.5 | Over | 21 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 5-25 | 20.0% | 21-32 | 65.6% | 40 | 10 | 10 | 6/5/2015 | INDIANA | 72 | 151.5 | Over | 38 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 40 | 11 | 20 | | | CHICAGO | 95 | -7 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 56 | 15 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
White is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 22-12 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 41.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 88-107 against the 1rst half line (-29.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-51 against the 1rst half line (-28.1 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 14-29 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 34-60 against the 1rst half line (-32.0 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 33-60 against the 1rst half line (-33.0 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-33 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-71 against the 1rst half line (-22.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-70 against the 1rst half line (-26.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-41 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-41 against the 1rst half line (-23.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-31 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-48 against the 1rst half line (-22.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 9-23 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-62 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 47-67 against the 1rst half line (-26.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-44 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-59 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 30-49 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-36 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 47-62 against the 1rst half line (-21.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-54 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 31-46 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-39 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-61 against the 1rst half line (-32.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 38-52 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 17-31 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-35 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-28 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 38-57 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 68-85 against the 1rst half line (-25.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-30 against the 1rst half line (-17.0 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-60 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 69-88 against the 1rst half line (-27.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-29 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 23-42 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-26 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-32 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 109-87 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-50 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 32-20 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total in June games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 63-50 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 70-56 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 73-56 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-45 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 20-7 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 61-46 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 49-28 OVER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 37-23 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-14 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 39-26 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-11 OVER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 63-42 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 50-30 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-22 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-49 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 41-26 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 58-38 OVER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 52-39 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 34-23 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 84-70 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 89-70 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 70-53 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 48 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 48 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 5 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 10 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 2 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 06/01/2016 - Maggie Lucas out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:21:36 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|