| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK CHICAGO |
|
| 152 | 89 Final 81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | NEW YORK | +220 | 654 | CHICAGO | -300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (247-92 since 1997.) (72.9%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (241-85 since 1997.) (73.9%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (218-84 since 1997.) (72.2%, +67.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (187-67 since 1997.) (73.6%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (121-27 since 1997.) (81.8%, +56.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in June games. (90-68 since 1997.) (57%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (78-47 since 1997.) (62.4%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (270-252 since 1997.) (51.7%, +90.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (108-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season. (246-229 since 1997.) (51.8%, +65.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (53-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights. (96-75 since 1997.) (56.1%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (56-22 since 1997.) (71.8%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK | 73 | | 28-65 | 43.0% | 3-12 | 29.0% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 47 | 9 | 17 | CHICAGO | 76 | | 27-68 | 39.6% | 4-12 | 33.5% | 18-21 | 85.3% | 40 | 8 | 10 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 571 times, while NEW YORK won 392 times. Edge against the money line=NEW YORK |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 112-87 against the money line (+20.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 70.9 | NEW YORK is 71-53 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 70.4 | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.8, OPPONENT 71.0 | NEW YORK is 91-86 against the money line (+25.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.0 | NEW YORK is 84-39 against the money line (+55.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.5 | CHICAGO is 70-113 against the money line (-59.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.9 | CHICAGO is 41-55 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.5 | CHICAGO is 20-25 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 76.6 | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.9 | CHICAGO is 40-42 against the money line (-26.7 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 82.3 | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 75.4 |
|
CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 78.1 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 149-130 against the money line (+24.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 42-42 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 105-148 against the money line (-52.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 27-12 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 52-31 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 94-87 against the money line (+27.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 78-80 against the money line (-39.1 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 75-76 against the money line (-38.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-35 against the money line (-19.1 Units) on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-49 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-16 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 70.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-26 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-86 against the money line (-47.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-27 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-43 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-32 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 70.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 38-58 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-37 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-22 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-54 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-39 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-24 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-19 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-18 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 62-91 against the money line (-34.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-48 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 6-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 68.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 41-78 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 67.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-22 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-25 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-21 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-13 against the money line (+10.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-4 | +1.2 | 6-2 | 3-6 | 70.4 | 36.8 | 41.3% | 44.2 | 70.6 | 36.4 | 36.0% | 41.1 | Road Games | 1-2 | -0.2 | 2-0 | 0-3 | 65.7 | 38.0 | 40.1% | 44.3 | 67.3 | 35.0 | 33.5% | 41.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.9 | 2-2 | 1-4 | 67.2 | 36.8 | 39.7% | 43.4 | 71.8 | 38.8 | 37.1% | 40.6 | Division Games | 3-3 | +0.2 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 70.8 | 37.3 | 40.3% | 43.2 | 72.8 | 37.0 | 37.4% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.4 | 36.8 | 25-62 | 41.3% | 3-11 | 28.0% | 16-21 | 78.3% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 17 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 76 | 36.8 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 16-19 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.7 | 38.0 | 23-57 | 40.1% | 2-8 | 29.2% | 17-22 | 78.8% | 44 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 6 | 21 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.6 | 36.4 | 23-64 | 36.0% | 7-20 | 36.3% | 17-20 | 83.0% | 41 | 7 | 15 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 37.4 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 6-17 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.3 | 35.0 | 22-66 | 33.5% | 6-21 | 30.2% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-4 | -0.7 | 4-5 | 6-3 | 85.9 | 42.4 | 45.9% | 43.6 | 81.3 | 40.7 | 41.9% | 44.8 | Home Games | 2-0 | +2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 97.5 | 45.5 | 44.0% | 52.5 | 84.0 | 36.0 | 41.6% | 45.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.3 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 84.4 | 39.4 | 44.6% | 41.0 | 84.0 | 41.2 | 43.7% | 46.6 | Division Games | 4-3 | -0.7 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 83.6 | 42.1 | 43.7% | 45.4 | 77.7 | 37.7 | 41.3% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.9 | 42.4 | 32-70 | 45.9% | 3-12 | 29.5% | 18-21 | 85.3% | 44 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.9 | 38.5 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 16-19 | 80.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 97.5 | 45.5 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 3-10 | 35.0% | 28-31 | 90.3% | 52 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 10 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.3 | 40.7 | 30-71 | 41.9% | 6-16 | 37.2% | 15-21 | 72.8% | 45 | 11 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.5 | 27-68 | 40.4% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.0 | 36.0 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-21 | 64.3% | 45 | 13 | 20 | 26 | 7 | 16 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 70.6, CHICAGO 69.3 |
| | |
|
|
6/5/2015 | ATLANTA | 82-73 | W | +210 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 19 | 6/6/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 62-67 | L | +220 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 45 | 17 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 9 | 6/9/2015 | INDIANA | 86-79 | W | -155 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 41 | 15 | 6/11/2015 | PHOENIX | 68-57 | W | -105 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 56 | 17 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 38 | 9 | 6/14/2015 | WASHINGTON | 59-74 | L | -200 | 22-71 | 31.0% | 50 | 19 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 12 | 6/19/2015 | INDIANA | 63-80 | L | -165 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 40 | 16 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 9 | 6/21/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 73-64 | W | +175 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 44 | 21 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 45 | 18 | 6/26/2015 | @ TULSA | 62-71 | L | +325 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 6/28/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 79-70 | W | -165 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 6/30/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/5/2015 | INDIANA | 95-72 | W | -300 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 56 | 11 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 40 | 20 | 6/6/2015 | @ TULSA | 93-101 | L | +105 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 33 | 15 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 6/11/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 65-67 | L | -200 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 45 | 11 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 10 | 6/14/2015 | @ INDIANA | 98-72 | W | -155 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 53 | 15 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 40 | 10 | 6/19/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 73-74 | L | -165 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 18 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 51 | 17 | 6/20/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 95-87 | W | -210 | 42-76 | 55.3% | 41 | 12 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 49 | 14 | 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -400 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | 6/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 83-77 | W | -155 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 6/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 71-86 | L | -105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 19-17 (-2.6 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 9-0 (+9.8 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 7-11 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 5-0 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/31/2014 | NEW YORK | 74 | 149.5 | Over | 36 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 45 | 11 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 87 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 42 | 8 | 8 | 6/27/2014 | CHICAGO | 73 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 26 | 5 | 15 | | NEW YORK | 69 | 155.5 | Under | 37 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 6/18/2014 | NEW YORK | 100 | 148.5 | Over | 38 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 45 | 10 | 17 | | CHICAGO | 105 | -2 | SU ATS | 35 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 30-33 | 90.9% | 44 | 6 | 10 | 5/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 145 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 48 | 7 | 13 | | NEW YORK | 65 | -5.5 | Under | 35 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 8 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 64-42 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 73.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 91-76 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 38-23 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 73.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 13-10 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 75-79 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 12-22 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 33-39 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 16-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 33-48 against the money line (-30.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 21-38 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 37-47 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 20-29 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 25-33 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-19 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 12-19 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 11-18 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 26-37 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 35-41 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 34-41 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 24-51 against the money line (-45.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 46-50 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 57-69 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 25-27 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Bill is 6-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 7-22 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 67.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 10-25 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 67.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 8-21 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 67.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 7-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 9-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 162 times, while the road underdog won straight up 59 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 06/15/2015 - Rebecca Allen out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Epiphanny Prince is expected to return 7/9 vs. Washington Mystics ( Personal ) | |
[G] 06/30/2015 - Allie Quigley out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | [F] 06/15/2015 - Tamera Young out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | [C] 06/04/2015 - Sylvia Fowles out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 12:59:55 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|