| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA ATLANTA |
|
| 152.5 | 85 Final 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | TULSA | +180 | 652 | ATLANTA | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (302-121 since 1997.) (71.4%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (172-60 since 1997.) (74.1%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (51-20 since 1997.) (71.8%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (38-5 since 1997.) (88.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (53-29 since 1997.) (64.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (276-291 since 1997.) (48.7%, +89.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (158-135 since 1997.) (53.9%, +62.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (106-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (66-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.6%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (80-49 since 1997.) (62%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more. (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (203-160 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (189-141 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more. (42-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG). (67-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA | 80 | | 28-70 | 40.3% | 8-19 | 39.6% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 46 | 12 | 15 | ATLANTA | 73 | | 28-67 | 41.0% | 4-14 | 26.9% | 14-19 | 75.9% | 46 | 11 | 17 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 678 times, while ATLANTA won 301 times. Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was TULSA 91.5, OPPONENT 83.5 | ATLANTA is 4-6 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 77.7 | ATLANTA is 29-57 against the money line (-58.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 | ATLANTA is 25-31 against the money line (-24.3 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 78.7 | ATLANTA is 2-4 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 81.5 | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.6 | ATLANTA is 8-17 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 84.7 | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 81.8 | ATLANTA is 26-24 against the money line (-19.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 76.3 |
|
TULSA is 18-38 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 80.1, OPPONENT 83.6 | TULSA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.0 | TULSA is 8-20 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 81.0 | TULSA is 20-58 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 84.7 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 17-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 30-29 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-37 against the money line (-29.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 23-30 against the money line (-32.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 19-24 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 21-33 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-16 against the money line (-12.0 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-17 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-28 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 17-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 82.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 25-23 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-5 against the money line (-14.7 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 13-9 against the money line (-18.5 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 80-59 against the money line (-42.8 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 80-59 against the money line (-42.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 70-54 against the money line (-43.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-15 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-17 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 21-23 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 91-92 against the money line (-42.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 9-30 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 32-76 against the money line (-34.5 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 9-31 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-43 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997. The average score was TULSA 74.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 20-58 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after a close loss by 3 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 7-24 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was TULSA 73.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-49 against the money line (-38.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997. The average score was TULSA 75.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 6-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 13-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games off a home win over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in home games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-4 | +6.1 | 8-3 | 5-7 | 80.0 | 42.0 | 40.0% | 44.6 | 76.1 | 36.7 | 44.2% | 39.6 | Road Games | 3-4 | +1.1 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 77.0 | 38.1 | 38.0% | 44.1 | 80.4 | 38.7 | 47.1% | 41.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.4 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 76.6 | 40.2 | 37.4% | 40.6 | 81.8 | 40.8 | 49.8% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 42.0 | 28-71 | 40.0% | 7-20 | 38.3% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 45 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.0 | 38.1 | 28-74 | 38.0% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 14-18 | 76.8% | 44 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 36.7 | 28-64 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 30.6% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 73.5 | 35.8 | 27-64 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 31.4% | 14-17 | 81.6% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 38.7 | 30-64 | 47.1% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -10.6 | 5-6 | 4-7 | 72.7 | 34.0 | 39.3% | 46.6 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 42.8% | 39.5 | Home Games | 4-3 | -7.8 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 71.9 | 34.4 | 39.0% | 49.3 | 73.3 | 36.3 | 41.1% | 39.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 75.6 | 33.2 | 39.7% | 48.0 | 75.8 | 35.8 | 40.6% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.7 | 34.0 | 27-70 | 39.3% | 4-15 | 27.6% | 14-18 | 75.7% | 47 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 10 | 18 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 34.4 | 27-69 | 39.0% | 3-13 | 23.7% | 15-20 | 74.1% | 49 | 13 | 16 | 23 | 10 | 17 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.2 | 27-62 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 17-21 | 81.8% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 10 | 17 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.3 | 36.3 | 25-62 | 41.1% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 17-22 | 78.8% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 21 | 10 | 17 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 70.6, ATLANTA 69.1 |
| | |
|
|
6/5/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-83 | L | +400 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 38 | 6 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 53 | 16 | 6/6/2015 | CHICAGO | 101-93 | W | -125 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 33 | 15 | 6/9/2015 | SEATTLE | 68-45 | W | -250 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 13 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 42 | 18 | 6/14/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 73-62 | W | +155 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 64 | 12 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 41 | 10 | 6/16/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-61 | W | -250 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 50 | 12 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 36 | 11 | 6/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-82 | W | +145 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 37 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 38 | 12 | 6/21/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-78 | W | +250 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | W | -450 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | W | -850 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | L | -140 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | L | +250 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | L | +180 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/5/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 73-82 | L | -270 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 19 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 15 | 6/7/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 70-75 | L | -850 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 60 | 25 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 34 | 11 | 6/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-69 | W | -250 | 28-76 | 36.8% | 55 | 15 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 39 | 17 | 6/12/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-61 | W | +210 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 42 | 15 | 6/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-82 | L | -125 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 24 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 31 | 23 | 6/16/2015 | INDIANA | 79-90 | L | -210 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 17 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 45 | 18 | 6/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 74-73 | W | +145 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 51 | 17 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 18 | 6/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 64-73 | L | -210 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 45 | 18 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 44 | 21 | 6/24/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 96-100 | L | +300 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 6/26/2015 | WASHINGTON | 72-69 | W | +145 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 7/5/2015 | SEATTLE | 72-64 | W | -270 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | 7/7/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
TULSA is 7-10 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 3-1 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 4-5 (+4.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/15/2014 | TULSA | 76 | 164 | Over | 25 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 45 | 10 | 18 | | ATLANTA | 92 | -6 | SU ATS | 47 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 54 | 13 | 16 | 7/31/2014 | ATLANTA | 85 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 39 | 7 | 23 | | TULSA | 75 | 165 | Under | 39 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 40 | 17 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 17-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 25-23 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 19-17 against the money line (-28.1 Units) as a favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 13-9 against the money line (-18.5 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 10-10 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in home games after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 9-9 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 17-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 17-17 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 18-42 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 10-28 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 9-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-24 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 13-23 against the money line (-17.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.2, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.0, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.8, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 5-20 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 6-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 10-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 21-38 against the money line (-29.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 68.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 14-36 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 14-24 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 27-41 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 100-39 against the money line (+43.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 152-69 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.7, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 94-60 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 42-24 against the money line (+19.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 7-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 80.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 41-26 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 178 times, while the road underdog won straight up 74 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 3:19:24 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|