| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
TULSA
First Half Results
ATLANTA |
|
|
75
| 48
Final
41 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | | |
|
 - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(100-59 since 1997.) (62.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(45-18 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(73-35 since 1997.) (67.6%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses.
(73-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (67%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(47-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses.
(82-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (TULSA) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival.
(35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in July games.
(452-322 since 1997.) (58.4%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(243-165 since 1997.) (59.6%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(125-73 since 1997.) (63.1%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games.
(131-77 since 1997.) (63%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - poor ball handling team - committing >=17 turnovers/game, in July games.
(102-53 since 1997.) (65.8%, +43.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(401-282 since 1997.) (58.7%, +90.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(256-174 since 1997.) (59.5%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(452-322 since 1997.) (58.4%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season.
(695-508 since 1997.) (57.8%, +136.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(221-122 since 1997.) (64.4%, +86.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(389-259 since 1997.) (60%, +104.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(110-64 since 1997.) (63.2%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(767-572 since 1997.) (57.3%, +137.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(289-173 since 1997.) (62.6%, +98.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(480-339 since 1997.) (58.6%, +107.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(154-82 since 1997.) (65.3%, +63.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(270-187 since 1997.) (59.1%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(762-549 since 1997.) (58.1%, +158.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(385-250 since 1997.) (60.6%, +110 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(158-99 since 1997.) (61.5%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(181-115 since 1997.) (61.1%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(297-208 since 1997.) (58.8%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | 80 | | 40 |  | 28-70 | 40.3% | 8-19 | 39.6% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 46 | 12 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 73 | | 37 | | 28-67 | 41.0% | 4-14 | 26.9% | 14-19 | 75.9% | 46 | 11 | 17 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 707 times, while ATLANTA covered the first half line 258 times.
Edge against first half line=TULSA | In 1000 simulated games, 541 games went over first half total, while 411 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.9, OPPONENT 38.5 | TULSA is 18-5 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.2, OPPONENT 40.4 | TULSA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 39.0 | ATLANTA is 59-105 against the 1rst half line (-56.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.7, OPPONENT 42.5 |
|
TULSA is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 42.9 | TULSA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.4, OPPONENT 42.4 | ATLANTA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.3, OPPONENT 39.9 | ATLANTA is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.0, OPPONENT 42.0 | ATLANTA is 35-15 OVER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.5, OPPONENT 40.5 |
|
TULSA is 21-7 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 33.8, OPPONENT 36.7 | ATLANTA is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.0, OPPONENT 35.0 |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | -0.5 | | | ATLANTA | | |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 33.6, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 35.1, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 20-7 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.5, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 27-12 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 20-40 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 20-40 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 33-53 against the 1rst half line (-25.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.7, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-16 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.1, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 44.0, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 45.2, OPPONENT 46.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 51-30 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 31.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 32.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-4 | +6.1 | 8-3 | 5-7 | 80.0 | 42.0 | 40.0% | 44.6 | 76.1 | 36.7 | 44.2% | 39.6 | | Road Games | 3-4 | +1.1 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 77.0 | 38.1 | 38.0% | 44.1 | 80.4 | 38.7 | 47.1% | 41.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.4 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 76.6 | 40.2 | 37.4% | 40.6 | 81.8 | 40.8 | 49.8% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 42.0 | 28-71 | 40.0% | 7-20 | 38.3% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 45 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.0 | 38.1 | 28-74 | 38.0% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 14-18 | 76.8% | 44 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 36.7 | 28-64 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 30.6% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 73.5 | 35.8 | 27-64 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 31.4% | 14-17 | 81.6% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 38.7 | 30-64 | 47.1% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-6 | -10.6 | 5-6 | 4-7 | 72.7 | 34.0 | 39.3% | 46.6 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 42.8% | 39.5 | | Home Games | 4-3 | -7.8 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 71.9 | 34.4 | 39.0% | 49.3 | 73.3 | 36.3 | 41.1% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 75.6 | 33.2 | 39.7% | 48.0 | 75.8 | 35.8 | 40.6% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.7 | 34.0 | 27-70 | 39.3% | 4-15 | 27.6% | 14-18 | 75.7% | 47 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 10 | 18 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 34.4 | 27-69 | 39.0% | 3-13 | 23.7% | 15-20 | 74.1% | 49 | 13 | 16 | 23 | 10 | 17 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.2 | 27-62 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 17-21 | 81.8% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 10 | 17 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.3 | 36.3 | 25-62 | 41.1% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 17-22 | 78.8% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 21 | 10 | 17 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 70.6, ATLANTA 69.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-83 | 44-45 | 6 | W | 80.5 | O | 28-79 | 35.4% | 38 | 6 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 53 | 16 | | 6/6/2015 | CHICAGO | 101-93 | 62-43 | -1 | W | 82.5 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 33 | 15 | | 6/9/2015 | SEATTLE | 68-45 | 40-15 | -3 | W | 79.5 | U | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 13 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 42 | 18 | | 6/14/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 73-62 | 34-31 | 2 | W | 78 | U | 30-84 | 35.7% | 64 | 12 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 41 | 10 | | 6/16/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-61 | 45-29 | -3 | W | 74.5 | U | 36-71 | 50.7% | 50 | 12 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 36 | 11 | | 6/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-82 | 40-36 | 2 | W | 72 | O | 31-75 | 41.3% | 37 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 38 | 12 | | 6/21/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-78 | 38-38 | 4 | W | 78 | U | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | | 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | 45-41 | -5 | L | 74.5 | O | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | 45-42 | -7 | L | 74 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | 40-32 | -1.5 | W | 74 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | 29-47 | 4 | L | 73.5 | O | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | 42-42 | 3 | W | 73.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 73-82 | 38-51 | -3.5 | L | 74 | O | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 19 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 15 | | 6/7/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 70-75 | 42-37 | -7 | L | 74.5 | O | 25-68 | 36.8% | 60 | 25 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 34 | 11 | | 6/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-69 | 32-29 | -3 | T | 74.5 | U | 28-76 | 36.8% | 55 | 15 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 39 | 17 | | 6/12/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-61 | 25-36 | 3.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 42 | 15 | | 6/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-82 | 36-39 | -1 | L | 72 | O | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 24 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 31 | 23 | | 6/16/2015 | INDIANA | 79-90 | 35-49 | -2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 17 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 45 | 18 | | 6/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 74-73 | 37-36 | 2 | W | 78 | U | 30-71 | 42.3% | 51 | 17 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 18 | | 6/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 64-73 | 28-40 | -2.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 19-64 | 29.7% | 45 | 18 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 44 | 21 | | 6/24/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 96-100 | 34-40 | 5 | L | 79 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | | 6/26/2015 | WASHINGTON | 72-69 | 31-36 | 2 | L | 72 | U | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | | 7/5/2015 | SEATTLE | 72-64 | 36-27 | -3.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | | 7/7/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 12-6 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 13 of 18 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| TULSA is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997 | | 6 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/15/2014 | TULSA | 76 | 164 | Over | 25 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 45 | 10 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 92 | -6 | SU ATS | 47 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 54 | 13 | 16 | 7/31/2014 | ATLANTA | 85 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 39 | 7 | 23 | | | TULSA | 75 | 165 | Under | 39 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 40 | 17 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 18-29 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fred is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in July games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in road games after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 36.7, OPPONENT 46.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-16 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Fred is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 27-11 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 38.7, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 48-28 against the 1rst half line (+17.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 38.4, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.1, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 44.0, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 45.2, OPPONENT 46.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a close loss by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.4, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 20-5 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.8, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 37.8, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 122 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 122 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 13 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 23 games went over the first half total, while 20 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 6 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 10 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 9 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times. | | Since 1997, 12 games went under the first half total, while 7 games went over the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 11:24:25 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|