Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Friday 8/22/2014Line$ LineOU LineScore
CHICAGO
 
ATLANTA
+3.5  

-3.5  
+145

-165

154
 
80
Final
77

CHICAGO (15 - 19) at ATLANTA (19 - 15)
No Previous GameView Next Game
Friday, 8/22/2014 7:30 PM
Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1
Board Money Line
605CHICAGO+155
606ATLANTA-175
BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)

(0%)

OVER

(0%)
(Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™
StatFox Super Situations favoring ATLANTA against the money line
There are 41 situations with a total rating of 88 stars.
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(339-139 since 1997.) (70.9%, +90.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(264-100 since 1997.) (72.5%, +88.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(349-145 since 1997.) (70.6%, +88.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(269-105 since 1997.) (71.9%, +83.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(243-86 since 1997.) (73.9%, +82.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(254-101 since 1997.) (71.5%, +79.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(288-109 since 1997.) (72.5%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(290-123 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(290-123 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(262-87 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(257-83 since 1997.) (75.6%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(260-106 since 1997.) (71%, +76.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(245-88 since 1997.) (73.6%, +76.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(196-69 since 1997.) (74%, +75.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(225-75 since 1997.) (75%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(225-75 since 1997.) (75%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(225-75 since 1997.) (75%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(182-57 since 1997.) (76.2%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(195-72 since 1997.) (73%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(163-107 since 1997.) (60.4%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(132-47 since 1997.) (73.7%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(112-38 since 1997.) (74.7%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games.
(90-24 since 1997.) (78.9%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(132-91 since 1997.) (59.2%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(81-22 since 1997.) (78.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(81-22 since 1997.) (78.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(81-22 since 1997.) (78.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games.
(93-36 since 1997.) (72.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(85-29 since 1997.) (74.6%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +20 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +17 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game.
(39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line
There are 42 situations with a total rating of 125 stars.
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(260-241 since 1997.) (51.9%, +80.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(144-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(237-191 since 1997.) (55.4%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(133-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(64-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(63-21 since 1997.) (75%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(63-21 since 1997.) (75%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(63-21 since 1997.) (75%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +35.4 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(79-32 since 1997.) (71.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(82-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +42.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(182-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +76.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(43-24 since 1997.) (64.2%, +34.9 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(116-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.3%, +55.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 6*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 6*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 6*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(86-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(144-110 since 1997.) (56.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(80-49 since 1997.) (62%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(68-28 since 1997.) (70.8%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(70-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +32 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(88-56 since 1997.) (61.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(46-22 since 1997.) (67.6%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(38-22 since 1997.) (63.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(24-14 since 1997.) (63.2%, +21 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(57-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(57-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(57-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(43-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(126-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(126-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(126-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
CHICAGO72 27-6541.7%4-1134.3%14-1781.5%41816
ATLANTA79 30-7042.1%4-1527.8%15-2173.4%481314

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 678 times, while CHICAGO won 300 times.
Edge against the money line=ATLANTA

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
CHICAGO is 15-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 75.2
CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 71.1
ATLANTA is 33-32 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.2
ATLANTA is 14-17 against the money line (-23.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 77.8
ATLANTA is 23-29 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 79.2
ATLANTA is 8-9 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 78.6
ATLANTA is 47-57 against the money line (-31.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.8
ATLANTA is 31-30 against the money line (-27.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 82.2
ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line
CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.7
CHICAGO is 37-53 against the money line (-27.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2
CHICAGO is 21-35 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9
CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.1
CHICAGO is 3-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 86.8
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.1, OPPONENT 78.6
CHICAGO is 22-27 against the money line (-16.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2
CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2
ATLANTA is 16-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in home games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.2, OPPONENT 73.2
ATLANTA is 17-2 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.6, OPPONENT 77.9

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 26 trends with a total rating of 42 stars.
CHICAGO is 18-6 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 24-10 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 11-12 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*)
ATLANTA is 2-5 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*)
ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 31-31 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 14-20 against the money line (-16.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 21-31 against the money line (-20.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*)
ATLANTA is 12-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*)
ATLANTA is 8-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 31-32 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 21-26 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*)
ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 28-29 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 21-19 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*)
ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 20-24 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line
There are 7 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.
CHICAGO is 97-138 against the money line (-49.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 41-47 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 50-69 against the money line (-32.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 71-123 against the money line (-51.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 38-88 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 22 trends with a total rating of 44 stars.
CHICAGO is 14-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 40-36 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 33-22 against the money line (-21.2 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*)
ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 11-11 against the money line (-15.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 18-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*)
ATLANTA is 24-27 against the money line (-23.5 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 8-17 against the money line (-24.2 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 5*)
ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 10-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*)
ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 5*)
ATLANTA is 12-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*)
ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*)
ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*)
ATLANTA is 60-77 against the money line (-43.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*)
ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 5*)
ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 7-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 16-21 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 6-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line
There are 20 trends with a total rating of 28 stars.
CHICAGO is 29-35 against the money line (-23.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 14-30 against the money line (-22.5 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 10-26 against the money line (-21.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-13.9 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*)
CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 69.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 69.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*)
CHICAGO is 47-74 against the money line (-42.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 33-61 against the money line (-40.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 20-28 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 10-17 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 67.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*)
ATLANTA is 19-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS
CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games15-19-4.615-1814-2076.238.243.4%41.978.239.342.0%44.1
Road Games6-11-0.86-104-1372.438.142.3%41.678.139.941.8%44.4
Last 5 Games2-3-3.31-31-471.030.643.5%41.473.438.040.2%44.4
Division Games14-8+8.214-77-1576.338.543.2%42.574.937.740.0%44.8
CHICAGO Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)76.238.229-6643.4%3-1133.2%15-1981.0%42916197146
vs opponents surrendering76.837.729-6643.6%5-1433.0%15-1977.7%41917188144
Team Stats (Road Games)72.438.127-6442.3%3-1132.2%15-1879.9%42814197154
Stats Against (All Games)78.239.329-6942.0%5-1531.5%15-2076.3%441118188135
vs opponents averaging76.737.829-6743.3%5-1432.5%14-1976.9%421017198144
Stats Against (Road Games)78.139.929-7041.8%4-1528.6%15-2076.6%441218189124

ATLANTA - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games19-15-12.617-1618-1680.640.543.3%45.978.539.142.8%43.1
Home Games13-4-210-611-683.941.645.5%47.075.837.241.1%42.3
Last 5 Games2-3-1.63-22-377.841.041.5%49.880.436.242.1%42.8
Division Games11-11-15.88-1311-1178.640.042.3%46.576.938.742.5%43.4
ATLANTA Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)80.640.531-7143.3%4-1530.3%15-2073.3%4612191910164
vs opponents surrendering76.737.729-6643.5%4-1432.4%15-1977.8%42917188134
Team Stats (Home Games)83.941.632-7045.5%4-1328.5%17-2373.1%471221199154
Stats Against (All Games)78.539.129-6842.8%5-1535.5%15-2076.0%431019209163
vs opponents averaging76.137.529-6643.3%4-1433.0%15-1978.1%41916197134
Stats Against (Home Games)75.837.228-6841.1%4-1331.6%16-2175.4%4210192210163
Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 69.7,  ATLANTA 69.9
SCHEDULE AND RESULTS
CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
7/13/2014@ ATLANTA79-81L+22028-7437.8%552129-8235.4%6018
7/17/2014@ INDIANA64-82L+17521-5836.2%442135-7447.3%398
7/22/2014INDIANA60-57W+14521-5935.6%381121-5736.8%4818
7/25/2014@ ATLANTA79-75W+32528-5253.8%342429-6743.3%3320
7/27/2014@ TULSA69-79L+10528-7238.9%421224-6338.1%5012
7/29/2014@ SAN ANTONIO74-92L+15526-6241.9%361438-7550.7%4111
7/31/2014NEW YORK87-74W-16531-6647.0%42829-6942.0%4512
8/3/2014WASHINGTON76-65W-20030-7241.7%43827-7038.6%4519
8/5/2014@ CONNECTICUT82-66W-17526-5646.4%461425-7632.9%408
8/7/2014@ MINNESOTA64-74L+30028-6940.6%451128-7139.4%526
8/10/2014ATLANTA80-69W-27027-6342.9%421125-6936.2%4615
8/13/2014@ WASHINGTON72-69W-15528-6145.9%481424-6934.8%376
8/16/2014@ INDIANA67-71L+14525-6041.7%381228-6841.2%4411
8/17/2014SAN ANTONIO72-84L-33029-6246.8%341536-7448.6%4311
8/22/2014@ ATLANTA           

ATLANTA - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
7/13/2014CHICAGO81-79W-30029-8235.4%601828-7437.8%5521
7/16/2014@ NEW YORK75-77L-22028-6940.6%371431-7640.8%5318
7/22/2014@ MINNESOTA108-112L+17542-9345.2%451442-8648.8%5821
7/25/2014CHICAGO75-79L-45029-6743.3%332028-5253.8%3424
7/27/2014@ WASHINGTON67-77L-15528-7537.3%421527-5945.8%4415
7/29/2014CONNECTICUT89-80W-45034-7048.6%491432-7841.0%4312
7/31/2014@ TULSA85-75W-15533-6055.0%392327-7337.0%4017
8/3/2014NEW YORK76-83L-36029-6246.8%321529-6246.8%4417
8/5/2014@ PHOENIX67-75L+37527-7934.2%541130-6446.9%4016
8/7/2014@ SEATTLE68-88L-22023-6634.8%371233-6451.6%4411
8/8/2014@ LOS ANGELES77-80L+14531-7939.2%511932-7343.8%4717
8/10/2014@ CHICAGO69-80L+21025-6936.2%461527-6342.9%4211
8/13/2014PHOENIX96-82W+10033-6848.5%491131-7342.5%389
8/15/2014TULSA92-76W-25037-7549.3%541624-7233.3%4518
8/17/2014@ CONNECTICUT55-84L-16521-6333.3%492635-7347.9%4212
8/22/2014CHICAGO           
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY
All games in this series since 1997
CHICAGO is 18-12 (+12.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CHICAGO is 8-6 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons

All games played at ATLANTA since 1997
CHICAGO is 9-7 (+10.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997
Games played at ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons.
CHICAGO is 3-4 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
8/10/2014ATLANTA69156 Under3625-6936.2%8-1942.1%11-1573.3%461015
 CHICAGO80-6.5SU ATS3227-6342.9%8-1457.1%18-2281.8%42611
7/25/2014CHICAGO79160SU ATS4328-5253.8%1-425.0%22-2588.0%34724
 ATLANTA75-9 Under2929-6743.3%2-1118.2%15-1788.2%331020
7/13/2014CHICAGO79159 ATS4628-7437.8%1-425.0%22-2878.6%551321
 ATLANTA81-7SU Over4229-8235.4%3-1520.0%20-3066.7%602118
6/7/2014CHICAGO59160 Under3122-6533.8%2-922.2%13-1872.2%401018
 ATLANTA97-6SU ATS5635-7844.9%8-1844.4%19-2770.4%592013
5/24/2014ATLANTA73152.5 Over3928-6642.4%5-1729.4%12-1580.0%371015
 CHICAGO87-2SU ATS4130-6446.9%8-1457.1%19-2286.4%411016
9/13/2013ATLANTA82154 ATS4430-7440.5%6-1250.0%16-2080.0%43127
 CHICAGO87-7SU Over4528-6145.9%6-1250.0%25-3083.3%43912
8/31/2013ATLANTA68155 Under3929-6842.6%3-1520.0%7-1070.0%40717
 CHICAGO85-7SU ATS4031-7044.3%1-714.3%22-2781.5%46138
8/24/2013CHICAGO67154SU ATS3523-6435.9%2-728.6%19-2673.1%531220
 ATLANTA56-4 Under2620-7028.6%3-1127.3%13-1586.7%471022
6/16/2013CHICAGO74155 Over4727-7138.0%2-922.2%18-1994.7%491517
 ATLANTA88-5.5SU ATS5132-6946.4%7-1353.8%17-2470.8%4088
COACHING TRENDS
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 25 trends with a total rating of 35 stars.
Pokey is 22-17 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 8-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 14-8 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 11-11 against the money line (-15.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 20-34 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 73.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 8-9 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in home games after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*)
Michael is 8-8 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 10-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Michael is 6-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Michael is 4-10 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*)
Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Michael is 5-9 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 7-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 11-12 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Michael is 6-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Michael is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Michael is 5-8 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 8-11 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Michael is 55-53 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 17-16 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 80.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line
There are 37 trends with a total rating of 39 stars.
Pokey is 66-70 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 19-27 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 39-51 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Pokey is 28-33 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 22-28 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 10-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Pokey is 26-43 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*)
Pokey is 31-41 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 20-29 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 7-17 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Pokey is 11-17 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 68.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 26-39 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Pokey is 28-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Pokey is 29-38 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 11-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 14-27 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 30-39 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 48-60 against the money line (-30.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 42-44 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 50-62 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 49-55 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Pokey is 23-33 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Pokey is 32-50 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 18-43 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Pokey is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Pokey is 12-19 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 183-61 against the money line (+36.2 Units) as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 149-67 against the money line (+47.3 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 98-38 against the money line (+42.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Michael is 80-41 against the money line (+27.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 56-28 against the money line (+19.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 53-27 against the money line (+16.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Michael is 53-23 against the money line (+21.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 29-8 against the money line (+22.8 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 81.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 4*)
Michael is 48-25 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Michael is 167-71 against the money line (+36.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-140 (Road=+120), Closing Money Line: Home=-175 (Road=+155)
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 75 times, while the road underdog won straight up 45 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 13 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIES
CHICAGO
No significant injuries.
ATLANTA
No significant injuries.

Last Updated: 5/3/2024 7:10:22 PM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.