| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO ATLANTA |
|
| 154 | 80 Final 77 |
|
|
| | |
|
Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 | | | | |
605 | CHICAGO | +155 | 606 | ATLANTA | -175 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (339-139 since 1997.) (70.9%, +90.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (264-100 since 1997.) (72.5%, +88.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (349-145 since 1997.) (70.6%, +88.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (269-105 since 1997.) (71.9%, +83.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (243-86 since 1997.) (73.9%, +82.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (250-102 since 1997.) (71%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (254-101 since 1997.) (71.5%, +79.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (288-109 since 1997.) (72.5%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (290-123 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (290-123 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (262-87 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (257-83 since 1997.) (75.6%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (260-106 since 1997.) (71%, +76.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (245-88 since 1997.) (73.6%, +76.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (196-69 since 1997.) (74%, +75.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (225-75 since 1997.) (75%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (225-75 since 1997.) (75%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (225-75 since 1997.) (75%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (182-57 since 1997.) (76.2%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (195-72 since 1997.) (73%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (163-107 since 1997.) (60.4%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (132-47 since 1997.) (73.7%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (112-38 since 1997.) (74.7%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (90-24 since 1997.) (78.9%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (132-91 since 1997.) (59.2%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (81-22 since 1997.) (78.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (81-22 since 1997.) (78.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (81-22 since 1997.) (78.6%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (93-36 since 1997.) (72.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (85-29 since 1997.) (74.6%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a home loss. (26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +20 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite. (25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game. (39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (260-241 since 1997.) (51.9%, +80.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (144-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (237-191 since 1997.) (55.4%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (133-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (64-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (63-21 since 1997.) (75%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (63-21 since 1997.) (75%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (63-21 since 1997.) (75%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +35.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (79-32 since 1997.) (71.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (82-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +42.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (182-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +76.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (43-24 since 1997.) (64.2%, +34.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (116-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.3%, +55.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 6*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (86-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (144-110 since 1997.) (56.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (80-49 since 1997.) (62%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less. (68-28 since 1997.) (70.8%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (70-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (88-56 since 1997.) (61.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (46-22 since 1997.) (67.6%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (38-22 since 1997.) (63.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (24-14 since 1997.) (63.2%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (57-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (57-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (57-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest. (28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (43-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (126-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (126-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (126-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 72 | | 27-65 | 41.7% | 4-11 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 81.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | ATLANTA | 79 | | 30-70 | 42.1% | 4-15 | 27.8% | 15-21 | 73.4% | 48 | 13 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 678 times, while CHICAGO won 300 times. Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 15-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 71.1 | ATLANTA is 33-32 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 14-17 against the money line (-23.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 77.8 | ATLANTA is 23-29 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 79.2 | ATLANTA is 8-9 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | ATLANTA is 47-57 against the money line (-31.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.8 | ATLANTA is 31-30 against the money line (-27.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 82.2 | ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1 |
|
CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.7 | CHICAGO is 37-53 against the money line (-27.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2 | CHICAGO is 21-35 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.1 | CHICAGO is 3-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 86.8 | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 72.1, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 22-27 against the money line (-16.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 | ATLANTA is 16-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in home games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.2, OPPONENT 73.2 | ATLANTA is 17-2 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 87.6, OPPONENT 77.9 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 18-6 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 24-10 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-12 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-5 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 31-31 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-20 against the money line (-16.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-31 against the money line (-20.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 12-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 31-32 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 21-26 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 28-29 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 21-19 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 20-24 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 97-138 against the money line (-49.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 41-47 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-69 against the money line (-32.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 71-123 against the money line (-51.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 38-88 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 14-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 40-36 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 33-22 against the money line (-21.2 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-11 against the money line (-15.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-27 against the money line (-23.5 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-17 against the money line (-24.2 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 12-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 60-77 against the money line (-43.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 16-21 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 29-35 against the money line (-23.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-30 against the money line (-22.5 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-26 against the money line (-21.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-13.9 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 69.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 69.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 47-74 against the money line (-42.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-61 against the money line (-40.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-28 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-17 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 67.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 15-19 | -4.6 | 15-18 | 14-20 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 43.4% | 41.9 | 78.2 | 39.3 | 42.0% | 44.1 | Road Games | 6-11 | -0.8 | 6-10 | 4-13 | 72.4 | 38.1 | 42.3% | 41.6 | 78.1 | 39.9 | 41.8% | 44.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.3 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 71.0 | 30.6 | 43.5% | 41.4 | 73.4 | 38.0 | 40.2% | 44.4 | Division Games | 14-8 | +8.2 | 14-7 | 7-15 | 76.3 | 38.5 | 43.2% | 42.5 | 74.9 | 37.7 | 40.0% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 3-11 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.8 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.4 | 38.1 | 27-64 | 42.3% | 3-11 | 32.2% | 15-18 | 79.9% | 42 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 39.3 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 31.5% | 15-20 | 76.3% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 14-19 | 76.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.1 | 39.9 | 29-70 | 41.8% | 4-15 | 28.6% | 15-20 | 76.6% | 44 | 12 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-15 | -12.6 | 17-16 | 18-16 | 80.6 | 40.5 | 43.3% | 45.9 | 78.5 | 39.1 | 42.8% | 43.1 | Home Games | 13-4 | -2 | 10-6 | 11-6 | 83.9 | 41.6 | 45.5% | 47.0 | 75.8 | 37.2 | 41.1% | 42.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 77.8 | 41.0 | 41.5% | 49.8 | 80.4 | 36.2 | 42.1% | 42.8 | Division Games | 11-11 | -15.8 | 8-13 | 11-11 | 78.6 | 40.0 | 42.3% | 46.5 | 76.9 | 38.7 | 42.5% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.6 | 40.5 | 31-71 | 43.3% | 4-15 | 30.3% | 15-20 | 73.3% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 10 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.9 | 41.6 | 32-70 | 45.5% | 4-13 | 28.5% | 17-23 | 73.1% | 47 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.5 | 39.1 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 35.5% | 15-20 | 76.0% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 76.1 | 37.5 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 4-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.8 | 37.2 | 28-68 | 41.1% | 4-13 | 31.6% | 16-21 | 75.4% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 22 | 10 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 69.7, ATLANTA 69.9 |
| | |
|
|
7/13/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 79-81 | L | +220 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 7/17/2014 | @ INDIANA | 64-82 | L | +175 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | 7/22/2014 | INDIANA | 60-57 | W | +145 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | 7/25/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 79-75 | W | +325 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 7/27/2014 | @ TULSA | 69-79 | L | +105 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 12 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | 7/29/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-92 | L | +155 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 14 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 41 | 11 | 7/31/2014 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -165 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 12 | 8/3/2014 | WASHINGTON | 76-65 | W | -200 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | 8/5/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-66 | W | -175 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 46 | 14 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 40 | 8 | 8/7/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-74 | L | +300 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 45 | 11 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 52 | 6 | 8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 80-69 | W | -270 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | 8/13/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-69 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | 8/16/2014 | @ INDIANA | 67-71 | L | +145 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | 8/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-84 | L | -330 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 15 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 43 | 11 | 8/22/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | W | -300 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | L | -220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 108-112 | L | +175 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 75-79 | L | -450 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-77 | L | -155 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-80 | W | -450 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 49 | 14 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 43 | 12 | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | 85-75 | W | -155 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 39 | 23 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 40 | 17 | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-83 | L | -360 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 32 | 15 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 44 | 17 | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 67-75 | L | +375 | 27-79 | 34.2% | 54 | 11 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 16 | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 68-88 | L | -220 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 37 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 44 | 11 | 8/8/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-80 | L | +145 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 51 | 19 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 47 | 17 | 8/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 69-80 | L | +210 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | 8/13/2014 | PHOENIX | 96-82 | W | +100 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 49 | 11 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 38 | 9 | 8/15/2014 | TULSA | 92-76 | W | -250 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 54 | 16 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | 8/17/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 55-84 | L | -165 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 49 | 26 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 42 | 12 | 8/22/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 18-12 (+12.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 8-6 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 9-7 (+10.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 3-4 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 69 | 156 | Under | 36 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 80 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 42 | 6 | 11 | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 160 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 34 | 7 | 24 | | ATLANTA | 75 | -9 | Under | 29 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 33 | 10 | 20 | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 159 | ATS | 46 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 55 | 13 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 81 | -7 | SU Over | 42 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 20-30 | 66.7% | 60 | 21 | 18 | 6/7/2014 | CHICAGO | 59 | 160 | Under | 31 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 40 | 10 | 18 | | ATLANTA | 97 | -6 | SU ATS | 56 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 59 | 20 | 13 | 5/24/2014 | ATLANTA | 73 | 152.5 | Over | 39 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 10 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 87 | -2 | SU ATS | 41 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 9/13/2013 | ATLANTA | 82 | 154 | ATS | 44 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 12 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 87 | -7 | SU Over | 45 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 43 | 9 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | ATLANTA | 68 | 155 | Under | 39 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | | CHICAGO | 85 | -7 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 46 | 13 | 8 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 67 | 154 | SU ATS | 35 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 53 | 12 | 20 | | ATLANTA | 56 | -4 | Under | 26 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 47 | 10 | 22 | 6/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 74 | 155 | Over | 47 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 49 | 15 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 88 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 40 | 8 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Pokey is 22-17 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 14-8 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 11-11 against the money line (-15.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 20-34 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 8-9 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in home games after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 8-8 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 10-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 6-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 4-10 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 5-9 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-12 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 6-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 5-8 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-11 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 55-53 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 17-16 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 80.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Pokey is 66-70 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 19-27 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 39-51 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 28-33 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 22-28 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 26-43 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 31-41 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 20-29 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 7-17 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 11-17 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 68.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 26-39 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 28-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 29-38 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 11-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 14-27 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 30-39 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 48-60 against the money line (-30.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 42-44 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 50-62 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 49-55 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 23-33 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 32-50 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 18-43 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 12-19 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 183-61 against the money line (+36.2 Units) as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 149-67 against the money line (+47.3 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 98-38 against the money line (+42.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 80-41 against the money line (+27.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 56-28 against the money line (+19.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 78.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 53-27 against the money line (+16.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 53-23 against the money line (+21.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 29-8 against the money line (+22.8 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 81.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 48-25 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 78.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 167-71 against the money line (+36.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 75 times, while the road underdog won straight up 45 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 13 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 7:10:22 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|