| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
First Half Results
ATLANTA |
|
|
75.5
| 36
Final
37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 605 | CHICAGO | 75.5 | | 606 | ATLANTA | -2 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(64-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(47-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.4%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(75-31 since 1997.) (70.8%, +40.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(111-59 since 1997.) (65.3%, +46.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(60-28 since 1997.) (68.2%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(55-27 since 1997.) (67.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(57-30 since 1997.) (65.5%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(49-19 since 1997.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(71-37 since 1997.) (65.7%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(31-7 since 1997.) (81.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home loss.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(76-35 since 1997.) (68.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(91-48 since 1997.) (65.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(91-50 since 1997.) (64.5%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents.
(939-714 since 1997.) (56.8%, +153.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(617-464 since 1997.) (57.1%, +106.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a division game.
(955-739 since 1997.) (56.4%, +142.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(372-260 since 1997.) (58.9%, +86 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(136-82 since 1997.) (62.4%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(119-66 since 1997.) (64.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(119-66 since 1997.) (64.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(119-66 since 1997.) (64.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(453-307 since 1997.) (59.6%, +115.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(343-220 since 1997.) (60.9%, +101 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(512-378 since 1997.) (57.5%, +96.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(72-35 since 1997.) (67.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(762-541 since 1997.) (58.5%, +166.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(89-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season.
(283-202 since 1997.) (58.4%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(564-415 since 1997.) (57.6%, +107.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(75-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(406-282 since 1997.) (59%, +95.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(52-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(552-387 since 1997.) (58.8%, +126.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(415-272 since 1997.) (60.4%, +115.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(51-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(603-421 since 1997.) (58.9%, +139.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(158-93 since 1997.) (62.9%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(234-158 since 1997.) (59.7%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(338-234 since 1997.) (59.1%, +80.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after playing a road game, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(190-122 since 1997.) (60.9%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents.
(939-714 since 1997.) (56.8%, +153.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(280-182 since 1997.) (60.6%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a non-conference game.
(607-434 since 1997.) (58.3%, +129.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(136-82 since 1997.) (62.4%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(119-66 since 1997.) (64.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(119-66 since 1997.) (64.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(119-66 since 1997.) (64.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(453-307 since 1997.) (59.6%, +115.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(343-220 since 1997.) (60.9%, +101 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.).
(133-79 since 1997.) (62.7%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(227-157 since 1997.) (59.1%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record.
(100-61 since 1997.) (62.1%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(36-13 since 1997.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 72 | | 36 | | 27-65 | 41.7% | 4-11 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 81.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 79 | | 40 | | 30-70 | 42.1% | 4-15 | 27.8% | 15-21 | 73.4% | 48 | 13 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA covered the first half line 556 times, while CHICAGO covered the first half line 405 times.
Edge against first half line=ATLANTA | In 1000 simulated games, 506 games went over first half total, while 494 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 18-33 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 42.1 | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.4, OPPONENT 41.3 | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.3 | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in home games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 46.2, OPPONENT 34.6 | ATLANTA is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.1, OPPONENT 37.9 |
|
CHICAGO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.0 | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 38.5 | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 37.6 | CHICAGO is 17-4 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 | CHICAGO is 14-2 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 43.8 | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.1 | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 41.9 | CHICAGO is 14-1 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.6 | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 72 to 77 points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 41.1 | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 41.7 | ATLANTA is 39-25 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.8 | ATLANTA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.2, OPPONENT 37.2 | ATLANTA is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.6 | ATLANTA is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.1, OPPONENT 38.1 | ATLANTA is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.5, OPPONENT 39.5 | ATLANTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.8, OPPONENT 38.2 |
|
| | | | |
|
CHICAGO is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.1, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-16 against the 1rst half line (-9.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.5, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 32-50 against the 1rst half line (-23.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-28 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-35 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-35 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-22 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 37-21 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-19 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.6, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 36-25 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.7, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 37-26 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 42-61 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-19 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.1, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-11 against the 1rst half line (-11.1 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.5, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 23-10 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 23-8 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.4, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.7, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 30-14 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-6 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 43-31 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 46.0, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.9, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 47-27 OVER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 49-29 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.5, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 22-6 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 15-19 | -4.6 | 15-18 | 14-20 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 43.4% | 41.9 | 78.2 | 39.3 | 42.0% | 44.1 | | Road Games | 6-11 | -0.8 | 6-10 | 4-13 | 72.4 | 38.1 | 42.3% | 41.6 | 78.1 | 39.9 | 41.8% | 44.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.3 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 71.0 | 30.6 | 43.5% | 41.4 | 73.4 | 38.0 | 40.2% | 44.4 | | Division Games | 14-8 | +8.2 | 14-7 | 7-15 | 76.3 | 38.5 | 43.2% | 42.5 | 74.9 | 37.7 | 40.0% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 3-11 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.8 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.4 | 38.1 | 27-64 | 42.3% | 3-11 | 32.2% | 15-18 | 79.9% | 42 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 39.3 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 31.5% | 15-20 | 76.3% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 14-19 | 76.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.1 | 39.9 | 29-70 | 41.8% | 4-15 | 28.6% | 15-20 | 76.6% | 44 | 12 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 19-15 | -12.6 | 17-16 | 18-16 | 80.6 | 40.5 | 43.3% | 45.9 | 78.5 | 39.1 | 42.8% | 43.1 | | Home Games | 13-4 | -2 | 10-6 | 11-6 | 83.9 | 41.6 | 45.5% | 47.0 | 75.8 | 37.2 | 41.1% | 42.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 77.8 | 41.0 | 41.5% | 49.8 | 80.4 | 36.2 | 42.1% | 42.8 | | Division Games | 11-11 | -15.8 | 8-13 | 11-11 | 78.6 | 40.0 | 42.3% | 46.5 | 76.9 | 38.7 | 42.5% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.6 | 40.5 | 31-71 | 43.3% | 4-15 | 30.3% | 15-20 | 73.3% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 10 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.9 | 41.6 | 32-70 | 45.5% | 4-13 | 28.5% | 17-23 | 73.1% | 47 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.5 | 39.1 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 35.5% | 15-20 | 76.0% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.1 | 37.5 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 4-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.8 | 37.2 | 28-68 | 41.1% | 4-13 | 31.6% | 16-21 | 75.4% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 22 | 10 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 69.7, ATLANTA 69.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/13/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 79-81 | 46-42 | 3.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | | 7/17/2014 | @ INDIANA | 64-82 | 31-45 | 2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | | 7/22/2014 | INDIANA | 60-57 | 29-20 | 2 | W | 74 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | | 7/25/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 79-75 | 43-29 | 5 | W | 79 | U | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | | 7/27/2014 | @ TULSA | 69-79 | 41-33 | 1 | W | 80.5 | U | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 12 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | | 7/29/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-92 | 37-48 | 2 | L | 75 | O | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 14 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 41 | 11 | | 7/31/2014 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | 39-36 | -2 | W | 73.5 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 12 | | 8/3/2014 | WASHINGTON | 76-65 | 43-31 | -2.5 | W | 75 | U | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | | 8/5/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-66 | 36-41 | -2 | L | 76 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 46 | 14 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 40 | 8 | | 8/7/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-74 | 24-30 | 5 | L | 78.5 | U | 28-69 | 40.6% | 45 | 11 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 52 | 6 | | 8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 80-69 | 32-36 | -3.5 | L | 76.5 | U | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | | 8/13/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-69 | 31-29 | -1.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | | 8/16/2014 | @ INDIANA | 67-71 | 31-44 | 2 | L | 72 | O | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | | 8/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-84 | 35-51 | -4 | L | 75 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 15 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 43 | 11 | | 8/22/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | 42-46 | -3.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | 40-45 | -3 | L | 76 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 108-112 | 48-52 | 2.5 | L | 81 | O | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 75-79 | 29-43 | -5 | L | 79 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-77 | 38-39 | -1.5 | L | 77.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-80 | 44-41 | -5 | L | 77 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 49 | 14 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 43 | 12 | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | 85-75 | 43-39 | -1.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 39 | 23 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 40 | 17 | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-83 | 35-34 | -4.5 | L | 77.5 | U | 29-62 | 46.8% | 32 | 15 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 44 | 17 | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 67-75 | 29-41 | 6 | L | 82 | U | 27-79 | 34.2% | 54 | 11 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 16 | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 68-88 | 30-53 | -3 | L | 74.5 | O | 23-66 | 34.8% | 37 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 44 | 11 | | 8/8/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-80 | 31-37 | 2 | L | 78.5 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 51 | 19 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 47 | 17 | | 8/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 69-80 | 36-32 | 3.5 | W | 76.5 | U | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | | 8/13/2014 | PHOENIX | 96-82 | 55-41 | 1 | W | 76.5 | O | 33-68 | 48.5% | 49 | 11 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 38 | 9 | | 8/15/2014 | TULSA | 92-76 | 47-25 | -3 | W | 81 | U | 37-75 | 49.3% | 54 | 16 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | | 8/17/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 55-84 | 36-46 | -2 | L | 77.5 | O | 21-63 | 33.3% | 49 | 26 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 42 | 12 | | 8/22/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 15-15 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 16 of 29 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 10-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 9 of 14 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 10-6 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997 | | 9 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 4-3 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 69 | 156 | Under | 36 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 80 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 42 | 6 | 11 | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 160 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 34 | 7 | 24 | | | ATLANTA | 75 | -9 | Under | 29 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 33 | 10 | 20 | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 159 | ATS | 46 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 55 | 13 | 21 | | | ATLANTA | 81 | -7 | SU Over | 42 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 20-30 | 66.7% | 60 | 21 | 18 | 6/7/2014 | CHICAGO | 59 | 160 | Under | 31 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 40 | 10 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 97 | -6 | SU ATS | 56 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 59 | 20 | 13 | 5/24/2014 | ATLANTA | 73 | 152.5 | Over | 39 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 10 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 87 | -2 | SU ATS | 41 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 9/13/2013 | ATLANTA | 82 | 154 | ATS | 44 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 12 | 7 | | | CHICAGO | 87 | -7 | SU Over | 45 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 43 | 9 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | ATLANTA | 68 | 155 | Under | 39 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | | | CHICAGO | 85 | -7 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 46 | 13 | 8 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 67 | 154 | SU ATS | 35 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 53 | 12 | 20 | | | ATLANTA | 56 | -4 | Under | 26 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 47 | 10 | 22 | 6/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 74 | 155 | Over | 47 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 49 | 15 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 88 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 40 | 8 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.1, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Pokey is 60-77 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-37 against the 1rst half line (-21.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 39-51 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 39-51 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 19-30 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 29-41 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 2-13 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 27-41 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 47-61 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 34-52 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 29-43 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 48-64 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 24-9 against the 1rst half line (+14.1 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 40.2, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in the first round of the playoffs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 36.6, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 38-22 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 38.7, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Pokey is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 42-27 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 42-27 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 26-13 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 51-38 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 37-26 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 24-10 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 24-13 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 35-21 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 43-31 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 49-37 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 63-49 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.6, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Michael is 55-34 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 91-63 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 60-40 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 37.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 61 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 56 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 14 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 11 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 12 games went over the first half total, while 7 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 12 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 6 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times. | | Since 1997, 9 games went under the first half total, while 8 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 6 games went under the first half total, while 4 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 3:13:35 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|