| | | |
SAN ANTONIO First Half Results MILWAUKEE |
|
| 103 | 69 Final 52 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
713 | SAN ANTONIO | -2.5 | 714 | MILWAUKEE | 102.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 25-8 | +9.8 | 20-12 | 17-16 | 105.5 | 51.3 | 48.7% | 49.7 | 96.5 | 48.0 | 43.8% | 49.8 | Road Games | 12-6 | +3.1 | 11-7 | 11-7 | 105.2 | 49.4 | 48.1% | 50.4 | 99.8 | 48.8 | 44.1% | 50.9 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 113.2 | 57.8 | 54.1% | 45.0 | 89.2 | 49.2 | 43.7% | 46.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 105.5 | 51.3 | 40-82 | 48.7% | 9-22 | 39.3% | 17-21 | 79.3% | 50 | 9 | 25 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 98.1 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 17-23 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 105.2 | 49.4 | 40-83 | 48.1% | 9-23 | 38.6% | 17-21 | 78.4% | 50 | 8 | 25 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.5 | 48.0 | 37-85 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 16-21 | 76.1% | 50 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 98.3 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 18-23 | 76.0% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 99.8 | 48.8 | 39-88 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 16-13 | +2.9 | 15-13 | 12-17 | 95.8 | 49.0 | 43.1% | 51.7 | 96.0 | 47.1 | 43.9% | 53.3 | Home Games | 9-6 | +0.3 | 6-8 | 7-8 | 96.7 | 49.5 | 42.6% | 52.1 | 96.1 | 47.2 | 44.2% | 54.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.3 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 97.4 | 47.2 | 43.5% | 52.4 | 92.4 | 46.6 | 42.1% | 54.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 95.8 | 49.0 | 37-86 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-21 | 74.6% | 52 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.3 | 48.3 | 36-81 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 96.7 | 49.5 | 37-87 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 17-22 | 74.9% | 52 | 13 | 23 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.0 | 47.1 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 18-23 | 78.8% | 53 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 95.5 | 47.9 | 36-81 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 96.1 | 47.2 | 36-81 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 32.1% | 19-25 | 76.7% | 54 | 13 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 96.3, MILWAUKEE 94.9 |
| | |
|
|
11/23/2012 | @ INDIANA | 104-97 | W | -4.5 | W | 190.5 | O | 41-83 | 49.4% | 47 | 10 | 38-92 | 41.3% | 58 | 13 | 11/25/2012 | @ TORONTO | 111-106 | W | -6 | L | 195.5 | O | 44-103 | 42.7% | 63 | 11 | 40-110 | 36.4% | 74 | 12 | 11/26/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 118-92 | W | -7 | W | 195.5 | O | 45-80 | 56.2% | 51 | 15 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 45 | 10 | 11/28/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 110-89 | W | -7.5 | W | 196.5 | O | 44-84 | 52.4% | 48 | 16 | 41-95 | 43.2% | 53 | 16 | 11/29/2012 | @ MIAMI | 100-105 | L | 13 | W | 201.5 | O | 36-80 | 45.0% | 55 | 19 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 42 | 10 | 12/1/2012 | MEMPHIS | 99-95 | W | -6 | L | 196.5 | U | 37-89 | 41.6% | 58 | 16 | 36-99 | 36.4% | 66 | 19 | 12/5/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 110-99 | W | -9 | W | 202.5 | O | 40-85 | 47.1% | 58 | 17 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 12/7/2012 | HOUSTON | 114-92 | W | -8.5 | W | 212.5 | U | 48-87 | 55.2% | 55 | 17 | 37-95 | 38.9% | 44 | 18 | 12/8/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 132-102 | W | -9.5 | W | 199.5 | O | 50-90 | 55.6% | 51 | 11 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 42 | 11 | 12/10/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 134-126 | W | -7 | W | 212 | O | 48-92 | 52.2% | 58 | 19 | 41-97 | 42.3% | 52 | 14 | 12/12/2012 | @ UTAH | 96-99 | L | -4 | L | 210 | U | 37-87 | 42.5% | 53 | 12 | 41-84 | 48.8% | 50 | 14 | 12/13/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 90-98 | L | -7 | L | 200.5 | U | 33-72 | 45.8% | 48 | 19 | 40-88 | 45.5% | 47 | 14 | 12/15/2012 | BOSTON | 103-88 | W | -8.5 | W | 199 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 49 | 12 | 38-81 | 46.9% | 44 | 17 | 12/17/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 93-107 | L | 5.5 | L | 208.5 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 48 | 16 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 51 | 12 | 12/18/2012 | @ DENVER | 106-112 | L | 2.5 | L | 209 | O | 38-95 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 71 | 15 | 12/21/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 99-94 | W | -13.5 | L | 195.5 | U | 39-76 | 51.3% | 44 | 11 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 48 | 12 | 12/23/2012 | DALLAS | 129-91 | W | -10.5 | W | 207.5 | O | 47-84 | 56.0% | 44 | 16 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 48 | 20 | 12/26/2012 | TORONTO | 100-80 | W | -14 | W | 200.5 | U | 34-71 | 47.9% | 50 | 17 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 42 | 15 | 12/28/2012 | HOUSTON | 122-116 | W | -8.5 | L | 213.5 | O | 44-77 | 57.1% | 38 | 19 | 45-86 | 52.3% | 49 | 24 | 12/30/2012 | @ DALLAS | 111-86 | W | -6 | W | 207 | U | 41-81 | 50.6% | 49 | 11 | 38-95 | 40.0% | 52 | 11 | 12/31/2012 | BROOKLYN | 104-73 | W | -8.5 | W | 199 | U | 43-73 | 58.9% | 44 | 13 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 40 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/24/2012 | CHICAGO | 86-93 | L | -2.5 | L | 192 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 47 | 9 | 32-82 | 39.0% | 57 | 16 | 11/26/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 93-92 | W | 4 | W | 192 | U | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 12 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 49 | 15 | 11/28/2012 | NEW YORK | 88-102 | L | 2.5 | L | 202.5 | U | 33-72 | 45.8% | 42 | 17 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 43 | 14 | 11/30/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-95 | L | 1.5 | L | 194.5 | U | 34-93 | 36.6% | 57 | 11 | 34-87 | 39.1% | 67 | 15 | 12/1/2012 | BOSTON | 91-88 | W | -3 | T | 196 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 49 | 14 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 50 | 16 | 12/3/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 81-102 | L | -4 | L | 188.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 16 | 43-82 | 52.4% | 46 | 8 | 12/5/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 99-110 | L | 9 | L | 202.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 58 | 17 | 12/7/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 108-93 | W | -7.5 | W | 197.5 | O | 38-94 | 40.4% | 66 | 10 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | 12/9/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 97-88 | W | 6 | W | 194 | U | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 18 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 57 | 20 | 12/12/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 98-85 | W | -7.5 | W | 198 | U | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | 12/14/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 90-86 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 85-111 | L | 5 | L | 195 | O | 30-83 | 36.1% | 50 | 13 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 54 | 11 | 12/18/2012 | INDIANA | 98-93 | W | -2.5 | W | 185 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 52 | 15 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 60 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 80-90 | L | 9 | L | 187.5 | U | 30-85 | 35.3% | 55 | 16 | 36-88 | 40.9% | 60 | 16 | 12/21/2012 | @ BOSTON | 99-94 | W | 5 | W | 191 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 72 | 21 | 36-94 | 38.3% | 50 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | CLEVELAND | 82-94 | L | -8 | L | 197 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 12/26/2012 | BROOKLYN | 108-93 | W | -5 | W | 187 | O | 40-84 | 47.6% | 52 | 18 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 50 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | MIAMI | 104-85 | W | 4 | W | 199.5 | U | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | 12/30/2012 | @ DETROIT | 94-96 | L | 2.5 | W | 191 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 37 | 12 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 55 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | SAN ANTONIO: GUARDS: TONY PARKER played at an MVP level last year. His eye injury is obviously not an issue, and he was constantly getting on coach Gregg Popovich to let him finish meaningless games last year. There's no reason he can't repeat last year's performance . . . MANU GINOBILI dealt with a series of nagging injuries last year, and it's clear the team will have to monitor his regular-season workload . . . GARY NEAL provides solid minutes in this rotation, mostly at the point, and is able to consistently knock down threes . . . DANNY GREEN's rotation spot is in a bit of peril. He was too much of an offensive liability in last year's Western Conference Finals . . . NANDO de COLO is a combo guard who can provide instant offense off the bench. He can shoot it and does a nice job getting to the line . . . PATTY MILLS steps in as another viable option in this loaded backcourt . . . CORY JOSEPH's roster spot is in jeopardy after a middling D-League season. FORWARDS: TIM DUNCAN will continue to save it up for the playoffs. He still has plenty left in the tank, but he'll get tons of rest in March and April and more and more often defers to Tony Parker on offense when he does play . . . There's plenty to like about KAWHI LEONARD, who proved to be useful on both ends of the court last season. He'll be asked to be a little more aggressive offensively this year and should even have a couple of sets designed for him . . . STEPHEN JACKSON was a bit of a disaster in Milwaukee before landing with the Spurs last year. He's another veteran who will be paced during the regular season. And while he's been a facilitator in the past, he's really just a catch-and-shoot guy in San Antonio . . . MATT BONNER will continue to come off the bench and hoist some threes. CENTERS: BORIS DIAW's pick-and-pop ability makes him Popovich's top choice in the center rotation . . . TIAGO SPLITTER looks to be a career second-unit guy. He works hard and can defend, but he's just too clunky on the offensive end . . . DeJUAN BLAIR can pick up some cheap baskets, but his lack of offensive skills and defensive size makes him a fringe rotation player. | | MILWAUKEE: GUARDS: BRANDON JENNINGS benefitted from the arrival of Monta Ellis last year. He has the offense and system to thrive, and now needs to prove he can be efficient enough to be a star . . . MONTA ELLIS played second fiddle to Jennings last year, and really struggled to shoot the ball. The Bucks now play the kind of tempo he likes, but he'll have to adjust to playing off the ball more often . . . BENO UDRIH won't see a ton of action off the bench considering Jennings and Ellis play so many minutes. If a starter gets hurt, he could step in and hit a lot of threes . . . Second-rounder DORON LAMB has some upside as a future sixth man, but figures to ride the bench this year once his torn elbow ligament heals. FORWARDS: ERSAN ILYASOVA should finally get some respect from Skiles after starring down the stretch last year . . . MIKE DUNLEAVY re-emerged as a legitimate three-point threat, though he doesn't do much else . . . DREW GOODEN's role should shrink with Ilyasova stepping up and Sam Dalembert coming in . . . LUC RICHARD MBAH a MOUTE is coming off knee surgery, but he's improving as a rebounder and can play both forward spots off the bench . . . Rookie JOHN HENSON is a defensive stud and does enough as a screener to get decent minutes early . . . TOBIAS HARRIS was a Summer League star, but he's too much of a 'tweener to thrive in the NBA . . . EKPE UDOH provides defense and rebounding off the bench . . . LARRY SANDERS has potential, but this frontcourt is too crowded for him to make an impact. CENTERS: SAM DALEMBERT fell in and out of favor in Houston, but he's exactly what the Bucksneed as a defensive presence in the paint. Milwaukee has numerous players who can man the five in spots (Ekpe Udoh, Drew Gooden), but Dalembert is by far their best defensive option and should see big minutes . . . JOEL PRZYBILLA signed on in August to provide back-end depth on the pine. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 9/20/2024 10:22:22 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|