| | | |
CLEVELAND CHARLOTTE |
|
| 196.5 | 106 Final 104 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
803 | CLEVELAND | +100 | 804 | CHARLOTTE | -120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 7-26 | -12 | 14-19 | 17-16 | 93.9 | 48.0 | 41.5% | 52.5 | 99.3 | 49.3 | 47.2% | 50.0 | Road Games | 4-15 | -3.4 | 11-8 | 11-8 | 94.3 | 49.0 | 41.8% | 51.0 | 99.4 | 51.3 | 48.0% | 49.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 93.8 | 50.2 | 41.6% | 51.0 | 93.6 | 49.6 | 44.7% | 51.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 93.9 | 48.0 | 35-85 | 41.5% | 8-22 | 35.3% | 16-22 | 73.6% | 52 | 13 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.4 | 48.4 | 36-82 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 75.9% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.3 | 49.0 | 35-84 | 41.8% | 8-22 | 35.0% | 16-22 | 74.1% | 51 | 13 | 18 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 99.3 | 49.3 | 37-78 | 47.2% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 19-25 | 75.3% | 50 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents averaging | 96.2 | 48.5 | 36-82 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 16-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 99.4 | 51.3 | 37-77 | 48.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 19-25 | 76.1% | 49 | 10 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-23 | -5.8 | 11-19 | 16-14 | 95.4 | 46.6 | 42.2% | 52.5 | 103.8 | 53.3 | 45.8% | 54.2 | Home Games | 5-12 | -4.8 | 6-10 | 9-7 | 97.4 | 47.4 | 42.9% | 52.5 | 102.2 | 51.8 | 45.3% | 53.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +2 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 89.4 | 45.2 | 43.2% | 55.0 | 98.2 | 51.4 | 43.8% | 53.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 95.4 | 46.6 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 19-26 | 74.0% | 53 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 97 | 48.8 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 97.4 | 47.4 | 36-83 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 20-26 | 77.4% | 52 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 103.8 | 53.3 | 39-85 | 45.8% | 9-24 | 38.9% | 16-22 | 73.4% | 54 | 13 | 26 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 8 | vs opponents averaging | 97.2 | 49 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 16-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 102.2 | 51.8 | 38-85 | 45.3% | 9-24 | 37.4% | 16-22 | 73.9% | 53 | 12 | 25 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 8 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CLEVELAND 96.1, CHARLOTTE 96.6 |
| | |
|
|
11/26/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 78-84 | L | 12 | W | 193 | U | 31-76 | 40.8% | 49 | 16 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 41 | 14 | 11/27/2012 | PHOENIX | 78-91 | L | 3 | L | 200 | U | 30-84 | 35.7% | 61 | 18 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 48 | 15 | 11/30/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 113-111 | W | 8.5 | W | 189.5 | O | 41-85 | 48.2% | 56 | 18 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 38 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | PORTLAND | 117-118 | L | -1.5 | L | 192.5 | O | 43-99 | 43.4% | 63 | 16 | 46-94 | 48.9% | 49 | 14 | 12/3/2012 | @ DETROIT | 79-89 | L | 5 | L | 191.5 | U | 32-95 | 33.7% | 64 | 11 | 36-84 | 42.9% | 58 | 11 | 12/5/2012 | CHICAGO | 85-95 | L | 3 | L | 183 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 12/7/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 73-91 | L | 8.5 | L | 191 | U | 30-87 | 34.5% | 49 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 59 | 21 | 12/8/2012 | DETROIT | 97-104 | L | 1 | L | 187 | O | 39-91 | 42.9% | 58 | 14 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 46 | 9 | 12/11/2012 | LA LAKERS | 100-94 | W | 6.5 | W | 206.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 54 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 63 | 18 | 12/12/2012 | @ INDIANA | 81-96 | L | 7.5 | L | 189 | U | 27-81 | 33.3% | 52 | 12 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 63 | 13 | 12/14/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 86-90 | L | 3 | L | 196 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 12/15/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 102-103 | L | 10 | W | 193.5 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 52 | 12 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 12/18/2012 | TORONTO | 99-113 | L | -5 | L | 189 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 42 | 15 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | @ BOSTON | 91-103 | L | 9 | L | 191 | O | 36-88 | 40.9% | 48 | 9 | 37-62 | 59.7% | 43 | 14 | 12/21/2012 | INDIANA | 89-99 | L | 4.5 | L | 187 | O | 32-80 | 40.0% | 47 | 16 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 57 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 94-82 | W | 8 | W | 197 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 12/26/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 87-84 | W | 1 | W | 188.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 47 | 10 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 57 | 20 | 12/28/2012 | ATLANTA | 94-102 | L | 5.5 | L | 189.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 43 | 11 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 50 | 14 | 12/29/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 100-103 | L | 8.5 | W | 190 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 12 | 1/2/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 94-97 | L | -3.5 | L | 200 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 60 | 13 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 51 | 10 | 1/4/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/26/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 69-114 | L | 11.5 | L | 201.5 | U | 23-79 | 29.1% | 41 | 11 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 60 | 14 | 11/28/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 91-94 | L | 9.5 | W | 193 | U | 30-76 | 39.5% | 57 | 16 | 36-90 | 40.0% | 52 | 9 | 11/30/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 98-104 | L | 3.5 | L | 187 | O | 39-83 | 47.0% | 51 | 10 | 44-86 | 51.2% | 43 | 10 | 12/3/2012 | PORTLAND | 112-118 | L | -1.5 | L | 191.5 | O | 41-88 | 46.6% | 49 | 15 | 43-92 | 46.7% | 58 | 13 | 12/5/2012 | NEW YORK | 98-100 | L | 7.5 | W | 198 | P | 39-83 | 47.0% | 55 | 12 | 39-92 | 42.4% | 48 | 8 | 12/7/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 93-108 | L | 7.5 | L | 197.5 | O | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | 38-94 | 40.4% | 66 | 10 | 12/8/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 102-132 | L | 9.5 | L | 199.5 | O | 37-79 | 46.8% | 42 | 11 | 50-90 | 55.6% | 51 | 11 | 12/10/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 96-104 | L | 4.5 | L | 202 | U | 31-83 | 37.3% | 55 | 15 | 38-84 | 45.2% | 53 | 16 | 12/12/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 94-100 | L | 8 | W | 199.5 | U | 35-82 | 42.7% | 54 | 12 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 54 | 11 | 12/13/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 90-113 | L | 10 | L | 190.5 | O | 34-79 | 43.0% | 37 | 14 | 43-75 | 57.3% | 54 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | ORLANDO | 98-107 | L | -1.5 | L | 193 | O | 36-78 | 46.2% | 41 | 11 | 43-79 | 54.4% | 47 | 14 | 12/18/2012 | @ LA LAKERS | 100-101 | L | 12.5 | W | 206.5 | U | 38-95 | 40.0% | 67 | 10 | 35-88 | 39.8% | 57 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 104-121 | L | 9 | L | 198.5 | O | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 15 | 47-85 | 55.3% | 36 | 11 | 12/21/2012 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 100-115 | L | 10.5 | L | 205 | O | 33-90 | 36.7% | 56 | 7 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 54 | 11 | 12/22/2012 | @ DENVER | 88-110 | L | 16 | L | 210 | U | 33-87 | 37.9% | 60 | 11 | 47-92 | 51.1% | 55 | 12 | 12/26/2012 | MIAMI | 92-105 | L | 9 | L | 200.5 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 53 | 16 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 50 | 13 | 12/28/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 81-97 | L | 9.5 | L | 196 | U | 28-73 | 38.4% | 49 | 12 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 54 | 12 | 12/29/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 95-98 | L | 3 | T | 190 | O | 39-79 | 49.4% | 50 | 15 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 50 | 15 | 12/31/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 91-81 | W | 11.5 | W | 188.5 | U | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 1/4/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2013 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | CLEVELAND: GUARDS: KYRIE IRVING is the real deal, a heady playmaker and near-elite shooter. He should emerge as the NBA's next great point guard this season . . . Rookie DION WAITERS has a chance to step right into the starting lineup. He can get to the rim and generally makes good choices withthe ball. The only thing holding him back is defense after playing college ball in Syracuse's lazy zone . . . C.J. MILES will reportedly start at either the two or three spot, but he really needs to find the range on his shot again for him to stick in the starting lineup . . . Gunning combo guard DANIEL GIBSON is looking like he'll be their sixth man . . . The Cavs are still trying to figure out their second unit. JEREMY PARGO figures to be Irving's backup, but DONALD SLOAN is a better defender and could eventually pass him for this role, which doesn't mean many minutes unless Irving gets injured again. FORWARDS: TRISTAN THOMPSON is trying to add a perimeter shot to his repertoire. Don't count on him becoming David West, but he should improve offensively to go along with his rebounding and shot-blocking . . . ALONZO GEE returns as the starting small forward, excelling on the defensive end, but without a polished enough offensive game to earn 35 minutes per night . . . OMRI CASSPI was in and out of the rotation late in the year as he battled knee issues. It's getting close to make-or-break time for him . . . JON LEUER is a solid stretch four who has a real chance at a rotation spot . . . SAMARDO SAMUELS reportedly dropped some weight in his effort to find some minutes . . . LUKE WALTON is an unofficial member of the coaching staff . . . Undrafted rookie KEVIN JONES could make some noise with his work on the offensive boards . . . LUKE HARANGODY is more of a D-League talent. CENTERS: ANDERSON VAREJAO's wrist should be 100 percent, and Sideshow Anderson should be the same relentless, double-double threat he's always been . . . Rookie TYLER ZELLER is a 7-footer with some nice offensive skills -- he can knock down a jump shot in the half court, and run the floor. He'll struggle to defend in space, but made a living drawing charges at UNC, and should be able to play 20+ minutes as a rookie. | | CHARLOTTE: GUARDS: RAMON SESSIONS will have to adjust to a major downgrade in teammates, but he has the kind of versatile offensive skill set to be the focal point of this offense . . . The athletic GERALD HENDERSON has made strides the past two seasons. Realistically, his offensive skills are those of a No. 4 or 5 option . . . Coach Mike Dunlap is high on KEMBA WALKER, who was sometimes overwhelmed as a rookie. With a few new sets built in for him, he could thrive as a sixth man getting starter's minutes . . . BEN GORDON won't overtake Henderson, but should see big minutes as the Cats' only shooter . . . REGGIE WILLIAMS is a D-League talent . . . MATT CARROLL, in the final year of his $27 million deal, symbolizes everything that's gone wrong under Michael Jordan. FORWARDS: Drafting MICHAEL KIDD-GILCHRIST was as much about changing the losing culture as it was adding a piece they needed. MKG's statistical output is a question mark, but he'll see big minutes as a defensive stopper and intangibles guy . . . This team is seriously lacking in the post, where they may have no choice but to play TYRUS THOMAS for significant minutes. The talented but uber-underachieving big man claims to have added 20 pounds of muscle in the offseason. If nothing else, they might showcase him in a desperate attempt to get some trade value . . . Rookie JEFFERY TAYLOR figures to make the team and has the versatility and athleticism to be a respectable second-unit guy. CENTERS: Charlotte sees BISMACK BIYOMBO as a franchise cornerstone. He can certainly rebound and block shots, but his offense is atrocious . . . BRENDAN HAYWOOD brings a veteran presence. At his age he can't go more than 15 or so minutes per night . . . BYRON MULLENS never saw a shot he didn't like. He'll get one more chance to prove he's an NBA rotation player, able to play the four or five . . . DeSAGANA DIOP is doing those things that DeSagana Diop does. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:53:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|