|
|
OHIO U MASSACHUSETTS |
|
| 53 | 58 Final 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
131 | OHIO U | -8.5 | -4 | 132 | MASSACHUSETTS | 50 | 53 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | +1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 37.2 | 15.5 | 409.7 | (5.8) | 1.5 | 23.5 | 13.5 | 366.7 | (5.3) | 1.0 | Road Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 24.0 | 8.5 | 384.5 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 32.0 | 20.0 | 454.0 | (6.3) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 30.0 | 14.0 | 406.3 | (5.8) | 1.7 | 31.3 | 18.0 | 453.0 | (6.1) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 42.7 | 18.3 | 414.3 | (5.8) | 1.3 | 16.7 | 6.7 | 303.0 | (4.3) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 37.2 | 15.5 | 21.2 | 31:51 | 45-195 | (4.3) | 16-25 | 63.7% | 215 | (8.4) | 70-410 | (5.8) | (11) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34 | 14 | 20.4 | 31:28 | 41-177 | (4.3) | 18-30 | 59.9% | 227 | (7.5) | 71-404 | (5.7) | (11.9) | Offense Road Games | 24.0 | 8.5 | 20.5 | 29:32 | 42-168 | (4) | 18-30 | 59.0% | 216 | (7.1) | 73-384 | (5.3) | (16) | Defense (All Games) | 23.5 | 13.5 | 17.5 | 28:09 | 33-121 | (3.6) | 20-36 | 55.9% | 246 | (6.9) | 69-367 | (5.3) | (15.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20.4 | 11.5 | 17.3 | 29:32 | 34-118 | (3.5) | 19-36 | 53.2% | 220 | (6.1) | 70-338 | (4.9) | (16.6) | Defense Road Games | 32.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 30:28 | 35-154 | (4.3) | 22-36 | 61.1% | 300 | (8.3) | 71-454 | (6.3) | (14.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-5 | -5.1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 20.8 | 8.2 | 385.0 | (5.5) | 1.0 | 27.8 | 15.0 | 395.2 | (5.5) | 0.4 | Home Games | 0-2 | -2.6 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 372.5 | (5) | 1.0 | 27.5 | 12.0 | 434.5 | (5.8) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -2 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 13.7 | 4.3 | 357.0 | (5.2) | 0.3 | 21.0 | 13.3 | 357.3 | (4.9) | 0.3 | Turf Games | 0-3 | -4.1 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 23.3 | 9.3 | 395.3 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 31.0 | 15.0 | 423.3 | (5.9) | 0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.8 | 8.2 | 20.4 | 27:57 | 35-100 | (2.9) | 21-35 | 60.5% | 285 | (8.1) | 70-385 | (5.5) | (18.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.6 | 13.7 | 21.4 | 30:48 | 42-189 | (4.5) | 17-28 | 60.3% | 231 | (8.2) | 70-420 | (6) | (13.7) | Offense Home Games | 21.0 | 7.0 | 20.0 | 27:50 | 38-97 | (2.5) | 22-35 | 62.0% | 275 | (7.8) | 74-372 | (5) | (17.7) | Defense (All Games) | 27.8 | 15.0 | 19.0 | 32:03 | 41-177 | (4.4) | 18-31 | 58.3% | 218 | (7) | 72-395 | (5.5) | (14.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.9 | 11.5 | 18.4 | 30:12 | 37-159 | (4.3) | 16-31 | 54.1% | 196 | (6.4) | 67-355 | (5.3) | (14.9) | Defense Home Games | 27.5 | 12.0 | 18.5 | 32:09 | 41-154 | (3.7) | 19-33 | 56.7% | 280 | (8.4) | 75-434 | (5.8) | (15.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OHIO U 17.5, MASSACHUSETTS 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | HAMPTON | 59-0 | W | -36.5 | W | 47.5 | O | 53-248 | 13-19-172 | 1 | 31-68 | 6-24-40 | 2 | 9/8/2017 | @ PURDUE | 21-44 | L | 3 | L | 54 | O | 38-160 | 17-29-236 | 2 | 44-263 | 15-23-295 | 0 | 9/16/2017 | KANSAS | 42-30 | W | -7 | W | 59 | O | 42-196 | 16-22-254 | 1 | 32-108 | 30-47-343 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | @ E MICHIGAN | 27-20 | W | 1.5 | W | 54.5 | U | 47-176 | 19-32-197 | 2 | 27-45 | 29-49-305 | 1 | 9/30/2017 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/26/2017 | HAWAII | 35-38 | L | -3 | L | 60 | O | 41-115 | 22-34-298 | 2 | 35-112 | 25-38-391 | 1 | 9/2/2017 | @ COASTAL CAROLINA | 28-38 | L | -3 | L | 57 | O | 26-79 | 27-45-362 | 2 | 47-321 | 10-18-80 | 0 | 9/9/2017 | OLD DOMINION | 7-17 | L | 3.5 | L | 60.5 | U | 36-79 | 22-37-253 | 0 | 48-197 | 13-29-169 | 0 | 9/15/2017 | @ TEMPLE | 21-29 | L | 14.5 | W | 51.5 | U | 33-81 | 23-39-377 | 1 | 34-119 | 24-39-268 | 0 | 9/23/2017 | @ TENNESSEE | 13-17 | L | 28 | W | 59 | U | 37-144 | 13-22-137 | 0 | 39-135 | 19-32-184 | 1 | 9/30/2017 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | GA SOUTHERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | APPALACHIAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OHIO U: Ohio was nearly impossible to run on last year, allowing just 105.8 YPG on the ground (6th in CFB). But what was a strength last year is now a
major question mark. The team needs to replace almost its entire frontseven. Offensively, the Bobcats will lean heavily on the running game. | | MASSACHUSETTS: Mark Whipple has done some good things at UMass, but he absolutely needs to be better this season. The Minutemen have won three or fewer games in three straight years, and that is unacceptable. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 11:30:37 PM EST. |
|
|