|
|
BUFFALO
KENT ST |
|
|
40.5
| 27
Final
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 133 | BUFFALO | -5 | -7.5 | | 134 | KENT ST | 44 | 41 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 2-2 | 0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 22.7 | 17.7 | 379.5 | (5.8) | 0.7 | 19.7 | 10.2 | 345.5 | (4.9) | 0.5 | | Road Games | 0-2 | -1 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 287.0 | (5.6) | 1.5 | 19.0 | 10.5 | 373.5 | (4.8) | 0.5 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 28.0 | 21.3 | 418.7 | (6.4) | 0.7 | 20.7 | 9.0 | 324.7 | (4.8) | 0.3 | | Turf Games | 2-2 | 0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 22.7 | 17.7 | 379.5 | (5.8) | 0.7 | 19.7 | 10.2 | 345.5 | (4.9) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 22.7 | 17.7 | 19.5 | 30:38 | 40-169 | (4.2) | 14-25 | 57.4% | 210 | (8.3) | 65-379 | (5.8) | (16.7) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.1 | 16.8 | 19.9 | 30:45 | 40-199 | (4.9) | 15-26 | 58.2% | 183 | (7) | 67-383 | (5.7) | (17.4) | | Offense Road Games | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 24:23 | 22-85 | (3.8) | 15-29 | 53.4% | 202 | (7) | 51-287 | (5.6) | (23.9) | | Defense (All Games) | 19.7 | 10.2 | 20.0 | 29:22 | 48-230 | (4.8) | 11-23 | 47.8% | 115 | (5) | 71-345 | (4.9) | (17.5) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.4 | 12.8 | 19.4 | 30:15 | 47-240 | (5.1) | 9-19 | 46.9% | 107 | (5.6) | 66-347 | (5.2) | (14.2) | | Defense Road Games | 19.0 | 10.5 | 20.0 | 35:37 | 58-245 | (4.2) | 10-20 | 52.5% | 128 | (6.4) | 78-373 | (4.8) | (19.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-3 | -1 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 11.0 | 6.7 | 232.0 | (3.9) | 1.5 | 37.5 | 19.2 | 509.2 | (7.2) | 2.0 | | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 399.0 | (5.8) | 2.0 | 31.0 | 14.0 | 452.0 | (6.4) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 13.7 | 8.0 | 269.3 | (4.3) | 2.0 | 31.3 | 16.3 | 457.3 | (6.7) | 2.3 | | Turf Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 13.7 | 8.0 | 269.3 | (4.3) | 2.0 | 31.3 | 16.3 | 457.3 | (6.7) | 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 11.0 | 6.7 | 11.7 | 33:26 | 49-173 | (3.6) | 4-11 | 41.9% | 58 | (5.4) | 59-232 | (3.9) | (21.1) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.4 | 12.1 | 18.7 | 31:42 | 41-169 | (4.2) | 16-27 | 57.7% | 200 | (7.3) | 68-369 | (5.4) | (15.1) | | Offense Home Games | 38.0 | 21.0 | 17.0 | 33:44 | 53-294 | (5.5) | 8-16 | 50.0% | 105 | (6.6) | 69-399 | (5.8) | (10.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 37.5 | 19.2 | 24.7 | 26:34 | 38-225 | (6) | 20-33 | 61.8% | 284 | (8.7) | 70-509 | (7.2) | (13.6) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33.8 | 16.2 | 22.8 | 29:18 | 40-208 | (5.2) | 20-33 | 61.0% | 262 | (7.8) | 74-470 | (6.4) | (13.9) | | Defense Home Games | 31.0 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 26:16 | 48-226 | (4.7) | 10-23 | 43.5% | 226 | (9.8) | 71-452 | (6.4) | (14.6) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: BUFFALO 24, KENT ST 32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/31/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 7-17 | L | 21.5 | W | 52.5 | U | 22-51 | 22-42-211 | 1 | 51-169 | 19-32-239 | 1 | | 9/9/2017 | @ ARMY | 17-21 | L | 16 | W | 53.5 | U | 23-119 | 9-16-193 | 2 | 66-322 | 2-8-17 | 0 | | 9/16/2017 | COLGATE | 33-10 | W | -23.5 | L | 40 | O | 58-302 | 9-16-184 | 0 | 38-167 | 6-23-56 | 0 | | 9/23/2017 | FLA ATLANTIC | 34-31 | W | -1.5 | W | 59 | O | 57-204 | 18-27-254 | 0 | 37-262 | 17-29-150 | 1 | | 9/30/2017 | @ KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | @ AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/2/2017 | @ CLEMSON | 3-56 | L | 37 | L | 52 | O | 44-119 | 1-5-1 | 0 | 43-353 | 25-35-312 | 1 | | 9/9/2017 | HOWARD | 38-31 | W | -24.5 | L | 54.5 | O | 53-294 | 8-16-105 | 2 | 48-226 | 10-23-226 | 2 | | 9/16/2017 | @ MARSHALL | 0-21 | L | 14 | L | 49.5 | U | 44-142 | 7-17-117 | 1 | 33-158 | 23-43-223 | 1 | | 9/23/2017 | @ LOUISVILLE | 3-42 | L | 42 | W | 58.5 | U | 54-139 | 2-5-11 | 3 | 27-165 | 23-30-374 | 4 | | 9/30/2017 | BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | BUFFALO: The Bulls have a very good offensive line, and it'll be up to RB Johnathan Hawkins to make use of it. The junior rushed for only 338 yards last season, but he'll bein for a much bigger role this season. Defensively, Buffalo needs to do a better job of stopping the run. | | KENT ST: Kent State has some weapons in the backfield, but the team lacks the passing game to keep defenses honest. Nick Holley is the man under center this year and he completed under 50% of his passes last year. If that doesn't improve then this will be a very long season. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/5/2024 5:25:21 PM EST. |
|
|