|
|
E MICHIGAN First Half Results W MICHIGAN |
|
| 31.5 | 17 Final 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
351 | E MICHIGAN | 31.5 | 352 | W MICHIGAN | -8 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-9 | -6.4 | 3-7 | 7-2 | 22.0 | 11.9 | 340.8 | (5.5) | 2.0 | 37.9 | 16.2 | 488.9 | (6.8) | 1.4 | Road Games | 0-5 | -3 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 13.2 | 9.2 | 269.0 | (4.3) | 1.8 | 36.6 | 17.4 | 503.0 | (6.7) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 16.0 | 10.3 | 299.0 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 34.3 | 16.0 | 439.3 | (6.8) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 1-7 | -6.4 | 2-6 | 6-1 | 24.6 | 12.9 | 364.0 | (5.8) | 2.0 | 37.7 | 15.7 | 485.6 | (6.7) | 1.4 | Conference Games | 0-6 | -6 | 1-5 | 5-1 | 22.5 | 10.2 | 347.8 | (5.7) | 1.7 | 38.8 | 16.5 | 506.0 | (6.9) | 1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 22.0 | 11.9 | 16.5 | 27:42 | 36-166 | (4.6) | 13-26 | 50.8% | 175 | (6.7) | 62-341 | (5.5) | (15.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.6 | 13.9 | 19.7 | 28:58 | 36-162 | (4.5) | 19-32 | 58.1% | 224 | (7) | 68-386 | (5.7) | (15.1) | Offense Road Games | 13.2 | 9.2 | 14.2 | 27:43 | 36-125 | (3.5) | 12-27 | 46.3% | 144 | (5.4) | 63-269 | (4.3) | (20.4) | Defense (All Games) | 37.9 | 16.2 | 22.9 | 32:09 | 45-284 | (6.3) | 16-27 | 59.3% | 205 | (7.5) | 72-489 | (6.8) | (12.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.1 | 14 | 22 | 32:51 | 43-205 | (4.8) | 18-30 | 59.5% | 206 | (6.8) | 73-411 | (5.6) | (14.1) | Defense Road Games | 36.6 | 17.4 | 24.2 | 32:17 | 45-304 | (6.8) | 18-30 | 60.0% | 199 | (6.6) | 75-503 | (6.7) | (13.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-7 | -4.7 | 4-7 | 5-5 | 29.9 | 16.7 | 438.9 | (5.7) | 2.6 | 29.7 | 14.5 | 398.4 | (5.6) | 1.5 | Home Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 37.0 | 23.0 | 481.2 | (6) | 2.0 | 28.8 | 13.0 | 392.2 | (5.7) | 1.4 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.6 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33.3 | 16.3 | 459.3 | (6.2) | 2.3 | 36.0 | 15.7 | 470.7 | (6.5) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 4-7 | -4.7 | 4-7 | 5-5 | 29.9 | 16.7 | 438.9 | (5.7) | 2.6 | 29.7 | 14.5 | 398.4 | (5.6) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -3.7 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 31.0 | 16.4 | 462.0 | (6.1) | 2.9 | 32.9 | 14.4 | 424.0 | (5.9) | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.9 | 16.7 | 23.6 | 29:45 | 35-153 | (4.4) | 25-42 | 59.7% | 286 | (6.8) | 77-439 | (5.7) | (14.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.5 | 16.5 | 22 | 31:38 | 40-180 | (4.5) | 20-33 | 61.1% | 247 | (7.5) | 73-427 | (5.9) | (14) | Offense Home Games | 37.0 | 23.0 | 26.6 | 31:58 | 38-181 | (4.7) | 27-42 | 64.0% | 301 | (7.1) | 80-481 | (6) | (13) | Defense (All Games) | 29.7 | 14.5 | 20.9 | 30:15 | 38-152 | (4) | 20-33 | 60.3% | 247 | (7.4) | 71-398 | (5.6) | (13.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.7 | 13.5 | 20.2 | 29:29 | 39-164 | (4.2) | 18-32 | 58.0% | 219 | (6.9) | 70-383 | (5.4) | (14.9) | Defense Home Games | 28.8 | 13.0 | 20.2 | 28:02 | 35-146 | (4.1) | 20-34 | 60.0% | 246 | (7.2) | 69-392 | (5.7) | (13.6) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: E MICHIGAN 27.6, W MICHIGAN 25.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 7-23 | L | 31.5 | W | 47 | U | 29-46 | 13-26-137 | 1 | 44-269 | 16-29-159 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | KENT ST | 14-41 | L | 3 | L | 47 | O | 21-107 | 9-17-93 | 2 | 57-321 | 14-24-146 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | TOLEDO | 47-52 | L | 15 | W | 55 | O | 41-323 | 18-29-301 | 1 | 37-254 | 21-32-401 | 2 | 10/20/2012 | ARMY | 48-38 | W | 2.5 | W | 62 | O | 47-208 | 19-31-369 | 1 | 52-413 | 3-11-65 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 3-24 | L | 14.5 | L | 52 | U | 27-64 | 11-24-114 | 3 | 41-225 | 10-21-131 | 0 | 11/1/2012 | @ OHIO U | 14-45 | L | 16 | L | 58 | O | 52-167 | 9-21-138 | 1 | 42-304 | 19-28-255 | 2 | 11/10/2012 | C MICHIGAN | 31-34 | L | 2.5 | L | 62 | O | 42-294 | 14-26-120 | 2 | 28-119 | 20-34-284 | 1 | 11/17/2012 | @ W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2012 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/22/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 30-24 | W | -2 | W | 44 | O | 30-77 | 21-40-253 | 0 | 34-92 | 28-44-333 | 2 | 9/29/2012 | TOLEDO | 17-37 | L | -1 | L | 57 | U | 30-173 | 26-46-232 | 4 | 37-278 | 22-33-243 | 0 | 10/6/2012 | MASSACHUSETTS | 52-14 | W | -17 | W | 56 | O | 46-268 | 23-28-283 | 1 | 33-83 | 17-29-135 | 3 | 10/13/2012 | @ BALL ST | 24-30 | L | 2.5 | L | 65.5 | U | 38-222 | 16-31-202 | 2 | 45-168 | 27-43-265 | 3 | 10/20/2012 | @ KENT ST | 24-41 | L | 3.5 | L | 53.5 | O | 36-143 | 30-57-333 | 6 | 31-181 | 18-33-203 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | N ILLINOIS | 34-48 | L | 7.5 | L | 58.5 | O | 38-156 | 32-51-333 | 1 | 40-179 | 18-28-274 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | @ C MICHIGAN | 42-31 | W | -1.5 | W | 60.5 | O | 30-151 | 23-33-362 | 1 | 27-123 | 26-41-383 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | @ BUFFALO | 24-29 | L | -3 | L | 54.5 | U | 32-101 | 19-38-275 | 5 | 49-168 | 21-33-285 | 1 | 11/17/2012 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| E MICHIGAN: The Eagles could be heading in the right direction, as they will be returning most of their starters on a team that showed a lot of promise in 2011. Dual-threat QB Alex Gillett (1,504 pass yds, 14 TD; 736 rush yds, 3 TD) is going to need to be every bit as versatile as he was last season while continuing to improve his accuracy after cutting down his interceptions from 13 in 2010 to just seven in 2011. Javanti Greene must improve, as it's crucial for a team's top running back to do his job and rush for more yards than the quarterback. The Eagles were one of the best teams in the nation at stopping teams on third down, something all teams wish they could do. The secondary was an issue for them last year, but all of their starters are back and that bodes well for a team that needed experience last season. This defense lost three important players, but has players returning that are more than ready to step in their absence. | | W MICHIGAN: Western Michigan has made slight improvements over the last two years, but now it's time for head coach Bill Cubit to lead them to a MAC Championship. They return a solid number of players on both sides of the ball including star QB Alex Carder (3,873 pass yds, 31 TD). Carder could be the best player in his conference and thrives under pressure, having better road statistics than he did at home. He's losing a lot of his weapons on offense, but WR Josh Schaffer (241 rec yds, 2 TD) is looking to emerge as a playmaker this coming season. The Broncos defense has caused Cubit to take a lot of heat, so they must improve on that side of the ball. They're getting back two of their biggest playmakers in S Johnnie Simon (114 tackles) and DE Freddie Bishop (5.5 sacks). Outside of these two, the play has been very inconsistent for this Western Michigan team. If this team wants to be part of the MAC's elite, they must be able to stop the pass; something they struggled doing in 2011. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:03:24 PM EST. |
|
|