|
|
LOUISIANA TECH UTSA |
|
| 47 | 31 Final 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
163 | LOUISIANA TECH | -525 | 164 | UTSA | +360 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -0.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 28.2 | 18.2 | 417.4 | (5.7) | 1.8 | 27.2 | 14.6 | 359.0 | (5.2) | 1.8 | Road Games | 2-1 | +2.5 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 26.7 | 17.7 | 405.3 | (5.4) | 1.7 | 30.3 | 17.3 | 381.3 | (5.3) | 2.3 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.5 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 19.0 | 13.3 | 344.7 | (4.9) | 1.7 | 31.0 | 17.3 | 400.3 | (5.6) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 1-1 | -0.5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 18.0 | 16.5 | 308.5 | (4.6) | 1.5 | 27.5 | 14.0 | 396.0 | (5.7) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.2 | 18.2 | 21.8 | 30:37 | 36-157 | (4.4) | 20-37 | 55.7% | 261 | (7.1) | 73-417 | (5.7) | (14.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.5 | 16.9 | 21.8 | 29:13 | 38-170 | (4.5) | 17-31 | 54.4% | 234 | (7.5) | 69-404 | (5.8) | (13.3) | Offense Road Games | 26.7 | 17.7 | 20.7 | 31:52 | 35-149 | (4.2) | 22-39 | 55.9% | 256 | (6.5) | 75-405 | (5.4) | (15.2) | Defense (All Games) | 27.2 | 14.6 | 19.2 | 29:23 | 42-173 | (4.1) | 15-27 | 55.6% | 186 | (6.9) | 69-359 | (5.2) | (13.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28 | 17.5 | 19.9 | 31:46 | 40-156 | (3.9) | 17-29 | 58.9% | 218 | (7.5) | 69-374 | (5.4) | (13.4) | Defense Road Games | 30.3 | 17.3 | 21.0 | 28:08 | 43-189 | (4.4) | 16-29 | 57.0% | 193 | (6.7) | 71-381 | (5.3) | (12.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | 0 | 1-5 | 4-2 | 19.8 | 12.3 | 250.5 | (3.7) | 1.2 | 28.7 | 14.8 | 368.8 | (5.9) | 2.0 | Home Games | 2-1 | +1 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 25.0 | 18.0 | 268.3 | (4.1) | 1.0 | 26.3 | 11.3 | 346.3 | (5.5) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 25.0 | 18.0 | 242.7 | (3.7) | 0.7 | 15.0 | 4.7 | 255.7 | (4.2) | 3.0 | Dome Games | 2-1 | +1 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 25.0 | 18.0 | 268.3 | (4.1) | 1.0 | 26.3 | 11.3 | 346.3 | (5.5) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 25.0 | 18.5 | 228.0 | (3.8) | 0.5 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 259.5 | (4) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 19.8 | 12.3 | 15.7 | 29:58 | 34-102 | (3) | 17-34 | 51.0% | 148 | (4.4) | 67-250 | (3.7) | (12.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.1 | 16.9 | 20.4 | 29:47 | 37-180 | (4.9) | 18-30 | 60.6% | 223 | (7.4) | 67-402 | (6) | (13.4) | Offense Home Games | 25.0 | 18.0 | 16.0 | 28:38 | 30-111 | (3.7) | 19-34 | 55.3% | 157 | (4.6) | 65-268 | (4.1) | (10.7) | Defense (All Games) | 28.7 | 14.8 | 18.0 | 30:02 | 36-125 | (3.4) | 17-27 | 62.7% | 244 | (9.1) | 63-369 | (5.9) | (12.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.9 | 11.7 | 20.1 | 32:34 | 38-165 | (4.3) | 18-31 | 57.8% | 213 | (6.9) | 69-378 | (5.5) | (15.2) | Defense Home Games | 26.3 | 11.3 | 18.7 | 31:22 | 33-90 | (2.7) | 18-29 | 62.5% | 256 | (8.7) | 63-346 | (5.5) | (13.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: LOUISIANA TECH 25, UTSA 24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ S ALABAMA | 30-26 | W | -11 | L | 52.5 | O | 48-231 | 19-29-209 | 3 | 43-217 | 11-23-91 | 4 | 9/8/2018 | SOUTHERN | 54-17 | W | -35 | W | 64.5 | O | 33-186 | 27-42-427 | 1 | 40-70 | 18-25-216 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | @ LSU | 21-38 | L | 18.5 | W | 51 | O | 26-87 | 27-50-330 | 2 | 48-218 | 16-28-191 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | @ NORTH TEXAS | 29-27 | W | 7.5 | W | 62 | U | 32-129 | 20-39-230 | 0 | 37-131 | 22-35-296 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | UAB | 7-28 | L | -7 | L | 57 | U | 41-151 | 9-23-107 | 3 | 44-229 | 8-24-136 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | @ UTSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | UTEP | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2018 | @ FLA ATLANTIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ FLA ATLANTIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ ARIZONA ST | 7-49 | L | 17.5 | L | 52 | O | 34-2 | 19-43-218 | 3 | 36-266 | 16-24-237 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | BAYLOR | 20-37 | L | 16.5 | L | 54.5 | O | 26-98 | 18-33-157 | 1 | 31-91 | 27-41-403 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | @ KANSAS ST | 17-41 | L | 20 | L | 46.5 | O | 39-143 | 19-34-157 | 1 | 44-164 | 14-19-285 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | TEXAS ST | 25-21 | W | -7.5 | L | 48.5 | U | 41-145 | 19-35-127 | 1 | 25-26 | 17-28-222 | 3 | 9/29/2018 | UTEP | 30-21 | W | -10.5 | L | 47 | O | 24-91 | 20-35-187 | 1 | 44-154 | 11-19-143 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | @ RICE | 20-3 | W | 1.5 | W | 49.5 | U | 38-135 | 8-22-43 | 0 | 37-47 | 16-30-175 | 4 | 10/13/2018 | LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ SOUTHERN MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | @ UAB | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| LOUISIANA TECH: Cornerback Amik Robertson leads a defense that should be the best in the division. He's one of many talented players in this secondary, and the defensive line is stacked as well. On offense, Skip Holtz's spread attack is a perfect fit for quarterback J'Mar Smith. In his first year seeing significant playing time, Smith threw for 2,974 yards with 16 touchdowns and only five picks'and added 378 yards and six scores on the ground. With stud wideouts Teddy Veal and Rhashid Bonnette back in the fold, Smith could put up huge numbers this year. The West definitely has more parity than the East, but Tech is the only team with a shot to win the conference. | | UTSA: UTSA's offense is its biggest question mark heading into this season. The Roadrunners aren't very good on the line, and quarterback Bryce Rivers is unproven. That will make life on running back Jalen Rhodes really tough. But UTSA just might have the best defense in the conference, led by edge rusher Eric Banks. Defensive end Marcus Davenport might be gone, but this lethal Roadrunners pass rush isn't going anywhere. If the offense can play significantly better than expected, then UTSA will compete for its division, but it's hard to see that happening. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/5/2024 10:36:00 PM EST. |
|
|