|
|
MIDDLE TENN ST First Half Results UTSA |
|
| 29.5 | 21 Final 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
173 | MIDDLE TENN ST | -7 | 174 | UTSA | 29.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-5 | -0.3 | 7-4 | 4-7 | 33.5 | 19.9 | 464.7 | (5.9) | 2.3 | 26.7 | 18.4 | 399.3 | (5.3) | 1.9 | Road Games | 1-4 | -2 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 20.6 | 11.2 | 391.0 | (5.1) | 2.4 | 36.8 | 28.2 | 454.0 | (6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 0-3 | 30.7 | 18.3 | 509.0 | (6.3) | 2.3 | 16.0 | 9.3 | 378.7 | (4.9) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +2 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 35.9 | 22.3 | 502.3 | (6.5) | 2.3 | 28.4 | 20.7 | 394.9 | (5.2) | 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.5 | 19.9 | 23.4 | 30:04 | 40-151 | (3.8) | 26-39 | 65.7% | 314 | (8) | 79-465 | (5.9) | (13.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.2 | 15.7 | 21.6 | 30:30 | 41-171 | (4.2) | 20-33 | 59.3% | 236 | (7.1) | 74-407 | (5.5) | (13.5) | Offense Road Games | 20.6 | 11.2 | 19.8 | 28:49 | 33-92 | (2.7) | 27-43 | 61.8% | 299 | (6.9) | 77-391 | (5.1) | (19) | Defense (All Games) | 26.7 | 18.4 | 20.5 | 29:56 | 36-143 | (3.9) | 23-39 | 58.2% | 256 | (6.5) | 76-399 | (5.3) | (14.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.6 | 15.2 | 19.8 | 29:29 | 36-146 | (4) | 21-35 | 58.2% | 236 | (6.7) | 72-382 | (5.3) | (14.9) | Defense Road Games | 36.8 | 28.2 | 22.6 | 31:11 | 37-154 | (4.1) | 23-38 | 61.4% | 300 | (7.9) | 75-454 | (6) | (12.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-8 | -7.4 | 5-5 | 7-4 | 24.0 | 10.2 | 368.5 | (5) | 1.8 | 33.0 | 14.7 | 442.5 | (5.9) | 1.8 | Home Games | 1-4 | -5.4 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 26.0 | 14.4 | 363.2 | (5.8) | 0.8 | 31.4 | 16.0 | 473.6 | (6.1) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -1.4 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 31.7 | 14.0 | 402.0 | (5.6) | 1.3 | 29.0 | 13.3 | 481.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | Dome Games | 1-4 | -5.4 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 26.0 | 14.4 | 363.2 | (5.8) | 0.8 | 31.4 | 16.0 | 473.6 | (6.1) | 1.2 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -5.4 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 26.3 | 9.3 | 360.1 | (4.9) | 1.4 | 27.0 | 12.4 | 441.6 | (5.8) | 2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.0 | 10.2 | 20.5 | 28:41 | 43-170 | (4) | 18-31 | 58.3% | 199 | (6.5) | 73-368 | (5) | (15.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.4 | 17.4 | 21.4 | 30:51 | 39-181 | (4.6) | 20-32 | 60.4% | 250 | (7.8) | 72-431 | (6) | (13.3) | Offense Home Games | 26.0 | 14.4 | 17.8 | 24:30 | 36-154 | (4.3) | 17-27 | 63.9% | 209 | (7.8) | 63-363 | (5.8) | (14) | Defense (All Games) | 33.0 | 14.7 | 23.2 | 31:19 | 40-166 | (4.1) | 20-35 | 58.2% | 277 | (8) | 75-443 | (5.9) | (13.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.2 | 14.9 | 21.6 | 30:16 | 39-171 | (4.4) | 19-34 | 57.0% | 243 | (7.2) | 73-414 | (5.7) | (14.2) | Defense Home Games | 31.4 | 16.0 | 25.8 | 35:30 | 41-154 | (3.8) | 22-37 | 58.1% | 320 | (8.6) | 78-474 | (6.1) | (15.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MIDDLE TENN ST 27.5, UTSA 27.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/3/2015 | VANDERBILT | 13-17 | L | -2 | L | 49.5 | U | 23-34 | 32-51-286 | 2 | 41-237 | 18-31-177 | 3 | 10/10/2015 | @ W KENTUCKY | 28-58 | L | 7 | L | 70 | O | 30-123 | 28-43-296 | 2 | 40-165 | 29-37-428 | 2 | 10/17/2015 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 42-34 | W | -12.5 | L | 53 | O | 43-200 | 17-26-261 | 2 | 30-86 | 29-51-260 | 1 | 10/24/2015 | @ LOUISIANA TECH | 16-45 | L | 7 | L | 63.5 | U | 24-33 | 36-56-381 | 3 | 35-169 | 19-33-301 | 0 | 11/7/2015 | MARSHALL | 27-24 | W | -2 | W | 56 | U | 51-201 | 21-35-353 | 3 | 45-139 | 35-59-376 | 1 | 11/14/2015 | @ FLA ATLANTIC | 24-17 | W | -5.5 | W | 57.5 | U | 45-178 | 18-32-301 | 2 | 34-75 | 13-27-222 | 1 | 11/21/2015 | NORTH TEXAS | 41-7 | W | -22 | W | 63 | U | 39-165 | 30-41-329 | 2 | 39-191 | 17-28-133 | 3 | 11/28/2015 | @ UTSA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/3/2015 | @ UTEP | 25-6 | W | -3.5 | W | 58 | U | 48-137 | 19-32-198 | 1 | 22-59 | 23-50-216 | 5 | 10/10/2015 | LOUISIANA TECH | 31-34 | L | 13 | W | 54 | O | 39-73 | 18-27-227 | 2 | 31-93 | 28-44-351 | 2 | 10/17/2015 | @ SOUTHERN MISS | 10-32 | L | 7.5 | L | 57 | U | 41-139 | 6-22-66 | 2 | 44-213 | 23-31-343 | 4 | 10/31/2015 | @ NORTH TEXAS | 23-30 | L | -7 | L | 54.5 | U | 50-230 | 27-41-245 | 1 | 38-267 | 11-22-104 | 1 | 11/7/2015 | OLD DOMINION | 31-36 | L | -8 | L | 53 | O | 38-141 | 26-38-283 | 1 | 37-170 | 29-48-378 | 1 | 11/14/2015 | @ CHARLOTTE | 30-27 | W | -3 | T | 54.5 | O | 47-218 | 18-33-133 | 3 | 54-134 | 15-29-243 | 2 | 11/21/2015 | RICE | 34-24 | W | -3 | W | 56 | O | 45-242 | 9-13-189 | 0 | 46-161 | 23-41-359 | 3 | 11/28/2015 | MIDDLE TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MIDDLE TENN ST: Middle Tennessee's roster is a notch below C-USA East favorites Marshall and Western Kentucky, and it could have the hardest schedule of the three. The Blue Raiders have to face both of their allotted West division opponents on the road, which includes a visit to division champion Louisiana Tech. The non-conference schedule is also a bear, with one guaranteed loss at Alabama, and two other games versus teams that could be double-digit favorites (at Illinois, vs. Vanderbilt). | | UTSA: It's curious why a school like UTSA breaking in 19 new starters would schedule such a challenging non-conference slate: at Arizona, versus Kansas State, at Oklahoma State and versus Colorado State. The Roadrunners were the second-worst team in the nation on third downs (28%), and the combination of untested quarterbacks and a thin receiving corps is a recipe for another losing season. There's a real possibility they lose all four conference home games (Louisiana Tech, Old Dominion, Rice and Middle Tennessee). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/11/2024 5:28:53 AM EST. |
|
|