|
|
HOUSTON UTSA |
|
| 62.5 | 59 Final 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
167 | HOUSTON | -2.5 | -2 | 168 | UTSA | 62.5 | 64 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 38.3 | 17.7 | 548.3 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 17.3 | 10.7 | 378.3 | (5) | 3.0 | Road Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 26.5 | 13.0 | 509.0 | (6) | 1.5 | 19.5 | 13.0 | 381.5 | (4.8) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 38.3 | 17.7 | 548.3 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 17.3 | 10.7 | 378.3 | (5) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 38.3 | 17.7 | 29.3 | 28:22 | 45-252 | (5.6) | 24-41 | 59.8% | 296 | (7.3) | 86-548 | (6.4) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 40.3 | 19.6 | 26.8 | 29:48 | 43-243 | (5.6) | 22-35 | 62.8% | 281 | (8) | 78-524 | (6.7) | (13) | Offense Road Games | 26.5 | 13.0 | 26.5 | 27:43 | 42-192 | (4.5) | 23-42 | 56.0% | 317 | (7.5) | 84-509 | (6) | (19.2) | Defense (All Games) | 17.3 | 10.7 | 20.3 | 31:38 | 38-126 | (3.3) | 23-37 | 61.6% | 252 | (6.8) | 75-378 | (5) | (21.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 18.6 | 10.1 | 21.6 | 31:12 | 38-163 | (4.2) | 22-37 | 59.4% | 227 | (6.2) | 75-389 | (5.2) | (21) | Defense Road Games | 19.5 | 13.0 | 22.0 | 32:16 | 42-137 | (3.3) | 21-38 | 55.3% | 244 | (6.4) | 80-381 | (4.8) | (19.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | +2.6 | 3-0 | 1-3 | 25.2 | 11.2 | 415.5 | (5.9) | 1.2 | 30.0 | 20.5 | 380.5 | (5.8) | 0.2 | Home Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 35.0 | 7.0 | 504.0 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 56.0 | 35.0 | 605.0 | (8.1) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 26.7 | 12.7 | 422.7 | (5.8) | 1.3 | 35.7 | 23.0 | 415.0 | (6.1) | 0.3 | Dome Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 35.0 | 7.0 | 504.0 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 56.0 | 35.0 | 605.0 | (8.1) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.2 | 11.2 | 23.7 | 33:24 | 32-144 | (4.5) | 25-39 | 63.9% | 272 | (7) | 71-415 | (5.9) | (16.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.2 | 12.3 | 19.6 | 32:59 | 36-176 | (4.9) | 18-30 | 58.4% | 207 | (6.8) | 66-383 | (5.8) | (17.2) | Offense Home Games | 35.0 | 7.0 | 31.0 | 34:19 | 32-135 | (4.2) | 30-50 | 60.0% | 369 | (7.4) | 82-504 | (6.1) | (14.4) | Defense (All Games) | 30.0 | 20.5 | 21.0 | 26:35 | 38-161 | (4.3) | 18-28 | 64.3% | 220 | (7.8) | 66-380 | (5.8) | (12.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 36.6 | 20.7 | 21.9 | 30:17 | 45-247 | (5.5) | 15-24 | 62.4% | 165 | (6.9) | 69-412 | (6) | (11.3) | Defense Home Games | 56.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 25:41 | 32-87 | (2.7) | 35-43 | 81.4% | 518 | (12) | 75-605 | (8.1) | (10.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: HOUSTON 19, UTSA 34 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2013 | SOUTHERN | 62-13 | W | -40 | W | 60.5 | O | 50-372 | 26-38-255 | 0 | 30-104 | 27-36-268 | 4 | 9/7/2013 | @ TEMPLE | 22-13 | W | -2.5 | W | 67.5 | U | 48-219 | 29-48-305 | 2 | 39-100 | 20-39-200 | 3 | 9/21/2013 | *RICE | 31-26 | W | -3.5 | W | 63 | U | 37-165 | 18-36-329 | 1 | 45-174 | 22-37-289 | 2 | 9/28/2013 | @ UTSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2013 | BYU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2013 | @ NEW MEXICO | 21-13 | W | 3.5 | W | 54 | U | 33-157 | 21-34-237 | 1 | 42-193 | 6-17-84 | 0 | 9/7/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | 35-56 | L | 28 | W | 59 | O | 32-135 | 30-50-369 | 2 | 32-87 | 35-43-518 | 0 | 9/14/2013 | @ ARIZONA | 13-38 | L | 25 | T | 62.5 | U | 29-102 | 30-47-277 | 2 | 48-264 | 14-21-158 | 1 | 9/21/2013 | @ UTEP | 32-13 | W | -2.5 | W | 58.5 | U | 35-181 | 18-24-204 | 0 | 29-99 | 17-31-119 | 0 | 9/28/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/5/2013 | @ MARSHALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2013 | RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | UAB | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| HOUSTON: Junior QB David Piland (16 TD, 12 INT) returns to operate the nation's 15th-best offense (480 YPG) with all of his top targets plus JUCO star WR Markeith Ambles. Top RB Charles Sims transferred in May, leaving RB Kenneth Farrow (466 rush yds) as the top back. The nation's 7th-worst defense (483 YPG) will still be lousy, but LB Derrick Mathews (126 tackles, 17 TFL) is a beast and the secondary is strong with S Trevon Stewart (126 tackles, 7 PD) in charge. | | UTSA: UTSA was 8-4, but just two of those wins came versus full FBS members (NMSU, Idaho). Although Larry Coker's group cannot go bowling this year, they can keep improving with so many returnees. Heady QB Eric Soza (2,085 pass yds, 20 TD, 3 INT) can also run the football (364 yds, 6 TD), but RBs David Glasco II (537 rush yds, 5 TD) and Evans Okotcha (450 rush yds, 8 TD; 349 rec. yds) are the preferred ball carriers. WR Kam Jones (323 rec. yds) and TE Cole Hubble (308 rec. yds, 20.5 YPC, 4 TD) are both sure-handed targets. The defense allowed 50.3 PPG in its three WAC losses, but forced 29 turnovers for the year. The 4-2-5 set is anchored by All-WAC S Triston Wade (4 INT, 4 FF) and LBs Steven Kurfehs (71 tackles) and Blake Terry (64 tackles). |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 9/28/2024 9:14:19 PM EST. |
|
|